[FuSa SIG] Proposed Agenda Items for Tomorrow's Xen FuSa SIG meeting

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Apologies,

I had sent this to the wrong email address

Lars

 

From: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, 20 May 2019 at 11:41
To: Fusa-sig <fusa-sig-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Proposed Agenda Items for Tomorrow's Xen FuSa SIG meeting

 

Dear SIG members,

 

for tomorrow’s meeting agenda items are primarily for stream leads and prospective stream leads.

 

Specifically:

- safety management system (Artem or Francesco)

- documentation (Stefano)

- verification tests (Artem or Francesco)

- open source community interactions and processes (Lars)

- process automation tools (Kate)

However, everyone is welcome

 

In terms of concrete agenda items, we have

 

1. Action Review (Lars) – red items open or status unknown

1. Update SIG charter according to agreed work streams and selected leaders (Artem) – done
2. Create Wiki page to store links to all materials (Lars) – done
3. Create mailing (Lars) – done
4. Check Google Docs access (Lars) – use google docs for now
5. Create boards for streams and provide full access to Trello boards to all members (Artem) – open?
6. New meeting invite and administrative items (Lars) – done
7. Missing from previous call: 

·         Create project timeline draft. Since it is not clear what shall be “implementation milestones” can fill in only the “scoping” activities 

·         Review and agree on critical organizational topics related to scoping efforts and SIG operation

 

2. Major topics: work streams and their leaders (Lars)

1. Finalize stream owners according to updated charter
2. Set goals
3. Define what each stream needs in terms of input, resources, etc. – aka identify ideal team composition and review against volunteers
4. Start populating trello boards
5. Agree on how to track progress for each stream's group and how to coordinate within group, etc.

 

3. Contribution Model (Artem) - best effort, depending on group's progress, I don't think we'll manage to fit

·         Contribution model for Assessors - this has to be certainly funded. We need to understand how to get funding in the group (maybe as Kate suggested?)

·         Contribution model for Implementers - how to ensure participants are actively working? How to be fair?

 

Feel free to add additional items

 

Best Regards

Lars

_______________________________________________
Fusa-sig mailing list
Fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fusa-sig