[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FuSa SIG] Proposed agenda items for tomorrow's meeting


  • To: Rich Persaud <persaur@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:08:51 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Authentication-results: esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Cc: "fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:08:59 +0000
  • Ironport-sdr: STOK1BYo2gTZ0bVgvjgk00lGu9pUSmDjwKov/0HpAoUbL4hTB13itwjl089LK0WBJXSdp63Anw WP0kS/vGe2OqjjhRh/bS9gUYR9hyb6C7hsOFM1UPZgsVlNjlxrkEBvAlL9rWLUIyUzWXweRCmh WeJzZXkVCnA2Vc9Wna58a/xX1dbh2Gq0lTQ736SrtiSLXjfiMNmiXsEwJUwR3XEuoBbPoKp6BJ izLpVbDPh+9apXG+v3zq2Bsp4hUPp/Fot25YRoYK8zs6PV0jbKV2EIUNFBXtPo52NvFDAkGwDS vGQ=
  • List-id: This is a discussion list for members of the Xen Project FuSa SIG <fusa-sig.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Thread-index: AQHVfR5bgpUIEBq4uEaRI/h1qf61tKdPN0CA
  • Thread-topic: [FuSa SIG] Proposed agenda items for tomorrow's meeting

Thanks for pointing this out: seems I got led astray when I was looking at this earlier and confused CC BY 4 with CC BY SA 4

In any case, we do still need to make a decision on what type of license we want and work backwards from it.

I was assuming the ideal would be a weak or no copyleft license but that should be confirmed by business rep’s on the group

Lars

 

From: Rich Persaud <persaur@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, 7 October 2019 at 15:49
To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [FuSa SIG] Proposed agenda items for tomorrow's meeting

 

Re: CC-BY, http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#OtherLicenses

 

"This is a non-copyleft free license that is good for art and entertainment works, and educational works. It is compatible with all versions of the GNU GPL; however, like all CC licenses, it should not be used on software."

 

Rich

 

On Oct 7, 2019, at 10:01, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

 

can you please propose agenda items for tomorrow?

  • I have an interesting question which we do need to resolve before the docs efforts can complete:
    • Ultimately, we ought to decide what license documentation artefacts and generated safety docs should have. I was originally assuming something like CC-BY-4 would be ideal, but CC-BY-4 is not compatible with GPL2 and my understanding is that safety docs would be tightly coupled with code, which may be an issue (or it may be a non-issue)
    • Then there is a question about business needs: how strong of a copyleft for docs would be acceptable for use in safety contexts
    • I think the example Antonio was preparing may be of help in making that decision

 

Regards

Lars

 

Open actions

ACTION: Artem will send part 2 of ISO2626 customization example to the group
ACTION: Francesco to publish sanitized version of ISO2626 sheets
ACTION: Artem, Francesco, Lars and Artem to discuss what skills we need in a sub-group to drive progress on ISO2626 customization and see how we can make this happen

ACTION: Francesco’s team to double check MISRA results and later share with group

ACTION: Antonio to provide a sanitized example of safety docs (including requirements) for system software that we can use as an example

 

 

_______________________________________________
Fusa-sig mailing list
Fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fusa-sig

_______________________________________________
Fusa-sig mailing list
Fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fusa-sig

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.