Hi all,
can you please propose agenda items for tomorrow?
- I have an interesting question which we do need to resolve before the docs efforts can complete:
- Ultimately, we ought to decide what license documentation artefacts and generated safety docs should have. I was originally assuming something like CC-BY-4 would be ideal, but CC-BY-4
is not compatible with GPL2 and my understanding is that safety docs would be tightly coupled with code, which may be an issue (or it may be a non-issue)
- Then there is a question about business needs: how strong of a copyleft for docs would be acceptable for use in safety contexts
- I think the example Antonio was preparing may be of help in making that decision
Regards
Lars
Open actions
ACTION: Artem will send part 2 of ISO2626 customization example to the group
ACTION: Francesco to publish sanitized version of ISO2626 sheets
ACTION: Artem, Francesco, Lars and Artem to discuss what skills we need in a sub-group to drive progress on ISO2626 customization and see how we can make this happen
ACTION: Francesco’s team to double check MISRA results and later share with group
ACTION: Antonio to provide a sanitized example of safety docs (including requirements) for system software that we can use as an example
_______________________________________________
Fusa-sig mailing list
Fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fusa-sig