[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FuSa meeting Dec 8 2021 notes
- To: <fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:46:08 -0800
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 149.199.62.198) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=yAiZv/MrtsO9DS0m35a/8RIk0TgPzDDfwCIPW32X0ds=; b=HPiftQOVd/fdnLRsYz1n7cm6OWPqQ+xzwAuDlJaD+8nKoH9wyXiLoxoELW3Z/BEYkLOPX8fXEuvlnXnJ0Sw9CShWjTWnyIg0x6FOvQQToOM84soOp2lbDenpzCTVcBxY9+RKPn/qwk7s+AkM+ewVQ4AIpGj44VQEQ501vW7Ob88jOcblOy2KhJmf0feV77fyAgZM/FLPkBJgfcaT2YgSC6LFPggs78pnuxPLSRdCHH1fqfSDc0xKcK3ObxG4fMrtOAQeMYhLg1L4qizy2b8ZlW7G69XUI8JBRs2USuGwRK1rvz4ESYbz0W/o54MQc7xLMSyQiKrHqcSKzhbVuSmuZg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=DQwG0HZmH0rVpshvwC2FP+nvj8ahfWCdb6amqox8oDXuoTPCCLH5IB1b3335cR/3BQDcjTZFVdWo9DwtTYqO9SXVFIKr2K2pJ6OJ5wBGO33ArzBgHIUjpXCf4jpEVGdvchlpy04ImdtjhHx3PqgtdrSsVgmCyj+kua/OEimb725ZZqhdUKEicNxOPLBB1TAIckSTNhxvLJ1+Uax+Ys2qi+HhvqCreCBgKb4xyUrISWdn4EuQO8b+DVhtlr625d06hHyB7UifnoLMIru8Iw6d/opshwJfE+uxeAf22vFmxzTWcWXDppyaz8XzahnEPd8PiNJGNDgEWnoDHru5O0HFLw==
- Cc: <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 20:46:21 +0000
- List-id: This is a discussion list for members of the Xen Project FuSa SIG <fusa-sig.lists.xenproject.org>
Hi all,
These are some of the notes I took during today's FuSa meeting.
Cheers,
Stefano
Plans for the next cycle: upstream the "make cppcheck" patch and start
fixing cppcheck-detected issues, starting from the ones that obviously
make sense, e.g. adding "const" where possible.
We need to find a way for cppcheck to ignore certain things, like ASSERT
and BUG_ON. Is there a way to ask cppcheck to ignore a function? If so,
does it work on macros?
Make progress on the publishing of our MISRA-C tailoring.
For the Doxygen series, only headers with `incontents need to be fixed
for now. The script consuming `incontents and generating docs is
"docs/xen-headers".
Take the opportunity to cleanup Xen linker scripts.
|
