From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 05 12:14:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:14:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WB1NO-0004RJ-KS; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:14:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WB1NN-0004RE-Dy for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:14:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:31668] by server-16.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 69/E4-29917-43B22F25; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:14:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391602473!13517334!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTMzMTkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13490 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2014 12:14:35 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 Feb 2014 12:14:35 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,786,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="98169076" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2014 12:14:32 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:14:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> From: Dario Faggioli To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:14:30 +0100 Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , Stefano Stabellini Subject: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8076068765114852341==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8076068765114852341== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KT2jUiMfmEJhc+0e0c3c" --=-KT2jUiMfmEJhc+0e0c3c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anyone up for it? I think it would be something cool to have, given how nice FOSDEM went! :-) If it'd be from someone who also gave a presentation, it of course can include some details about the talk itself. I'll send a proper update late, but the pipeline looks like this: * Goerge * Julien * Stefano I know that Goerge has something next to ready, but that's not about FOSDEM, so I'd be inclined to postpone. OTOH, Julien and Stefano both gave talks... Any chance you guys are up for writing something? :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-KT2jUiMfmEJhc+0e0c3c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlLyKyYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ7UQCgolWaVHANZqsjIGpvlLe6GK3T XxoAn0AOwf3xyE0/ZA0/KbGLpgDdZqoH =TYR8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KT2jUiMfmEJhc+0e0c3c-- --===============8076068765114852341== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8076068765114852341==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 05 12:14:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:14:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WB1NO-0004RJ-KS; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:14:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WB1NN-0004RE-Dy for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:14:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:31668] by server-16.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 69/E4-29917-43B22F25; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:14:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391602473!13517334!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTMzMTkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13490 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2014 12:14:35 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 Feb 2014 12:14:35 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,786,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="98169076" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2014 12:14:32 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:14:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> From: Dario Faggioli To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:14:30 +0100 Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , Stefano Stabellini Subject: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8076068765114852341==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8076068765114852341== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KT2jUiMfmEJhc+0e0c3c" --=-KT2jUiMfmEJhc+0e0c3c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anyone up for it? I think it would be something cool to have, given how nice FOSDEM went! :-) If it'd be from someone who also gave a presentation, it of course can include some details about the talk itself. I'll send a proper update late, but the pipeline looks like this: * Goerge * Julien * Stefano I know that Goerge has something next to ready, but that's not about FOSDEM, so I'd be inclined to postpone. OTOH, Julien and Stefano both gave talks... Any chance you guys are up for writing something? :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-KT2jUiMfmEJhc+0e0c3c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlLyKyYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ7UQCgolWaVHANZqsjIGpvlLe6GK3T XxoAn0AOwf3xyE0/ZA0/KbGLpgDdZqoH =TYR8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KT2jUiMfmEJhc+0e0c3c-- --===============8076068765114852341== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8076068765114852341==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 13:46:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:46:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPHr-0004PR-5U; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:46:39 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPHq-0004PM-BX for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:46:38 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:57841] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 60/5E-10891-D3293F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:46:37 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391694387!3630181!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjgyNzIgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 30067 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 13:46:28 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 13:46:28 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,793,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="98579051" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2014 13:46:26 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net (10.69.46.34) by FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:46:26 -0500 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.176]) by AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net ([10.69.46.34]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:46:24 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: Dario Faggioli , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Thread-Topic: FOSDEM event report blog post? Thread-Index: AQHPImvgyRmy66wc10mqRiBErIqLe5qoPruQ Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:46:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> In-Reply-To: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.160] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org I can't : please someone step up Lars -----Original Message----- From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@citrix.com] Sent: 05 February 2014 12:15 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Julien Grall; Lars Kurth; George Dunlap Subject: FOSDEM event report blog post? Anyone up for it? I think it would be something cool to have, given how nice FOSDEM went! :-) If it'd be from someone who also gave a presentation, it of course can include some details about the talk itself. I'll send a proper update late, but the pipeline looks like this: * Goerge * Julien * Stefano I know that Goerge has something next to ready, but that's not about FOSDEM, so I'd be inclined to postpone. OTOH, Julien and Stefano both gave talks... Any chance you guys are up for writing something? :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 13:46:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:46:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPHr-0004PR-5U; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:46:39 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPHq-0004PM-BX for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:46:38 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:57841] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 60/5E-10891-D3293F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:46:37 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391694387!3630181!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjgyNzIgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 30067 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 13:46:28 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 13:46:28 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,793,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="98579051" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2014 13:46:26 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net (10.69.46.34) by FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:46:26 -0500 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.176]) by AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net ([10.69.46.34]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:46:24 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: Dario Faggioli , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Thread-Topic: FOSDEM event report blog post? Thread-Index: AQHPImvgyRmy66wc10mqRiBErIqLe5qoPruQ Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:46:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> In-Reply-To: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.160] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org I can't : please someone step up Lars -----Original Message----- From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@citrix.com] Sent: 05 February 2014 12:15 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Julien Grall; Lars Kurth; George Dunlap Subject: FOSDEM event report blog post? Anyone up for it? I think it would be something cool to have, given how nice FOSDEM went! :-) If it'd be from someone who also gave a presentation, it of course can include some details about the talk itself. I'll send a proper update late, but the pipeline looks like this: * Goerge * Julien * Stefano I know that Goerge has something next to ready, but that's not about FOSDEM, so I'd be inclined to postpone. OTOH, Julien and Stefano both gave talks... Any chance you guys are up for writing something? :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 13:54:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:54:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPPF-0004pH-TY; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:54:17 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPPE-0004ov-DX for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:54:16 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:53484] by server-12.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id C4/C4-17220-70493F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:54:15 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391694844!2492996!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDYxMjQgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1984 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 13:54:05 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 13:54:05 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,793,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100459790" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2014 13:54:03 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:54:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1391694841.9917.12.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Lars Kurth Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:54:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5242707852393365051==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============5242707852393365051== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xxYLVzsVazVKJwiHv48T" --=-xxYLVzsVazVKJwiHv48T Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-06 at 14:46 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > I can't : please someone step up > Indeed. Just as an example, something like this one from last year would be great: http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/02/05/fosdem13-personal-impressions/ BTW, Lars, do you have at least a picture of the booth and/or devroom? If you do, even if you can't write the post, can you share them somehow, so we can use them? Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-xxYLVzsVazVKJwiHv48T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEUEABECAAYFAlLzk/kACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRt8ACXS6mjKa7bhnVjyv2iQGi4bhDs kgCeIizY0C+wxWSxYjkiL1kEemSVcBo= =nVhO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xxYLVzsVazVKJwiHv48T-- --===============5242707852393365051== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============5242707852393365051==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 13:54:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:54:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPPF-0004pH-TY; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:54:17 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPPE-0004ov-DX for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:54:16 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:53484] by server-12.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id C4/C4-17220-70493F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:54:15 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391694844!2492996!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDYxMjQgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1984 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 13:54:05 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 13:54:05 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,793,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100459790" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2014 13:54:03 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:54:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1391694841.9917.12.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Lars Kurth Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:54:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5242707852393365051==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============5242707852393365051== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xxYLVzsVazVKJwiHv48T" --=-xxYLVzsVazVKJwiHv48T Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-06 at 14:46 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > I can't : please someone step up > Indeed. Just as an example, something like this one from last year would be great: http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/02/05/fosdem13-personal-impressions/ BTW, Lars, do you have at least a picture of the booth and/or devroom? If you do, even if you can't write the post, can you share them somehow, so we can use them? Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-xxYLVzsVazVKJwiHv48T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEUEABECAAYFAlLzk/kACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRt8ACXS6mjKa7bhnVjyv2iQGi4bhDs kgCeIizY0C+wxWSxYjkiL1kEemSVcBo= =nVhO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xxYLVzsVazVKJwiHv48T-- --===============5242707852393365051== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============5242707852393365051==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 14:06:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPaw-0005wn-Li; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPav-0005wZ-Ek for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:21 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:37331] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id D7/B0-10839-CD693F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:20 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391695579!2506822!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.173] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9473 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 14:06:19 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 14:06:19 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hn9so1634580wib.12 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:06:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=xpMWgmvSNChpYUFDZ3c1KpOpzMADBR8sqURZ6dNSe8c=; b=gORUchETr+mARVt7nJIUQeTP96LkscJ6vr9oKbx2fyQzgzY+J7lyirnWma2zraNboe 2IYfSoaq9L4CAGqFWc7Y3IY3218TmYAepaX62XwWJQZ1xyjXGG7En8FeWgmsL2wC1DcY TXW5PjLg1mgkw6HazO9gC6quNxnRjqJPKsaKkVjfTdfhhRdEON+GqBJSh/gLZHfUyDiB q/OFfCLWFQWHFR24B3FXmGxw25DZtPVrC6sAhZcaFKkSme3h7JAhRp38JlcZyIyMHmiV F3gWa/goYE7VxEwmCzGG8lPuo6YUWdESz0BwC/DWSeJIXJtjj4Scb3AlDHvjSocADsvM s+2w== X-Received: by 10.180.11.233 with SMTP id t9mr24455602wib.1.1391695579367; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:06:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cm5sm5993588wid.5.2014.02.06.06.06.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:06:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F396D9.3040100@xen.org> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:17 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391694841.9917.12.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1391694841.9917.12.camel@Solace> Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8632926499065781598==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============8632926499065781598== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050901080800060405050101" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050901080800060405050101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I uploaded them to https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B404FrB3gtj2UmpoN1dQNVJCT0k&usp=sharing (you should be able to access without logging in). Some are a bit blurred Lars On 06/02/2014 13:54, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On gio, 2014-02-06 at 14:46 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >> I can't : please someone step up >> > Indeed. > > Just as an example, something like this one from last year would be > great: > http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/02/05/fosdem13-personal-impressions/ > > BTW, Lars, do you have at least a picture of the booth and/or devroom? > > If you do, even if you can't write the post, can you share them somehow, > so we can use them? > > Regards, > Dario > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------050901080800060405050101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I uploaded them to https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B404FrB3gtj2UmpoN1dQNVJCT0k&usp=sharing (you should be able to access without logging in). Some are a bit blurred

Lars

On 06/02/2014 13:54, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On gio, 2014-02-06 at 14:46 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:

I can't : please someone step up


Indeed.

Just as an example, something like this one from last year would be
great:
 http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/02/05/fosdem13-personal-impressions/

BTW, Lars, do you have at least a picture of the booth and/or devroom?

If you do, even if you can't write the post, can you share them somehow,
so we can use them?

Regards,
Dario




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------050901080800060405050101-- --===============8632926499065781598== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8632926499065781598==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 14:06:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPaw-0005wn-Li; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBPav-0005wZ-Ek for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:21 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:37331] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id D7/B0-10839-CD693F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:20 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391695579!2506822!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.173] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9473 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 14:06:19 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 14:06:19 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hn9so1634580wib.12 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:06:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=xpMWgmvSNChpYUFDZ3c1KpOpzMADBR8sqURZ6dNSe8c=; b=gORUchETr+mARVt7nJIUQeTP96LkscJ6vr9oKbx2fyQzgzY+J7lyirnWma2zraNboe 2IYfSoaq9L4CAGqFWc7Y3IY3218TmYAepaX62XwWJQZ1xyjXGG7En8FeWgmsL2wC1DcY TXW5PjLg1mgkw6HazO9gC6quNxnRjqJPKsaKkVjfTdfhhRdEON+GqBJSh/gLZHfUyDiB q/OFfCLWFQWHFR24B3FXmGxw25DZtPVrC6sAhZcaFKkSme3h7JAhRp38JlcZyIyMHmiV F3gWa/goYE7VxEwmCzGG8lPuo6YUWdESz0BwC/DWSeJIXJtjj4Scb3AlDHvjSocADsvM s+2w== X-Received: by 10.180.11.233 with SMTP id t9mr24455602wib.1.1391695579367; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:06:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cm5sm5993588wid.5.2014.02.06.06.06.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:06:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F396D9.3040100@xen.org> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:17 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391694841.9917.12.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1391694841.9917.12.camel@Solace> Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8632926499065781598==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============8632926499065781598== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050901080800060405050101" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050901080800060405050101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I uploaded them to https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B404FrB3gtj2UmpoN1dQNVJCT0k&usp=sharing (you should be able to access without logging in). Some are a bit blurred Lars On 06/02/2014 13:54, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On gio, 2014-02-06 at 14:46 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >> I can't : please someone step up >> > Indeed. > > Just as an example, something like this one from last year would be > great: > http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/02/05/fosdem13-personal-impressions/ > > BTW, Lars, do you have at least a picture of the booth and/or devroom? > > If you do, even if you can't write the post, can you share them somehow, > so we can use them? > > Regards, > Dario > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------050901080800060405050101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I uploaded them to https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B404FrB3gtj2UmpoN1dQNVJCT0k&usp=sharing (you should be able to access without logging in). Some are a bit blurred

Lars

On 06/02/2014 13:54, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On gio, 2014-02-06 at 14:46 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:

I can't : please someone step up


Indeed.

Just as an example, something like this one from last year would be
great:
 http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/02/05/fosdem13-personal-impressions/

BTW, Lars, do you have at least a picture of the booth and/or devroom?

If you do, even if you can't write the post, can you share them somehow,
so we can use them?

Regards,
Dario




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------050901080800060405050101-- --===============8632926499065781598== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8632926499065781598==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 18:25:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:25:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBTdC-0004fI-Sm; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:24:58 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBTdB-0004fD-TZ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:24:58 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:14736] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id FF/27-26923-973D3F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:24:57 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391711087!146850!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTI4NTkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4683 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 18:24:47 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 18:24:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 14575 invoked by uid 634); 6 Feb 2014 18:24:47 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:24:46 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:24:42 +0000 Message-Id: <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org CCing Amir, who is working on a fosdem post on some of the mirage-related activities. -a On 5 Feb 2014, at 12:14, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Anyone up for it? > > I think it would be something cool to have, given how nice FOSDEM > went! :-) > > If it'd be from someone who also gave a presentation, it of course can > include some details about the talk itself. > > I'll send a proper update late, but the pipeline looks like this: > * Goerge > * Julien > * Stefano > > I know that Goerge has something next to ready, but that's not about > FOSDEM, so I'd be inclined to postpone. OTOH, Julien and Stefano both > gave talks... Any chance you guys are up for writing something? :-) > > Thanks and Regards, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 18:25:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:25:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBTdC-0004fI-Sm; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:24:58 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBTdB-0004fD-TZ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:24:58 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:14736] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id FF/27-26923-973D3F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:24:57 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391711087!146850!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTI4NTkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4683 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 18:24:47 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 18:24:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 14575 invoked by uid 634); 6 Feb 2014 18:24:47 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:24:46 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:24:42 +0000 Message-Id: <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org CCing Amir, who is working on a fosdem post on some of the mirage-related activities. -a On 5 Feb 2014, at 12:14, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Anyone up for it? > > I think it would be something cool to have, given how nice FOSDEM > went! :-) > > If it'd be from someone who also gave a presentation, it of course can > include some details about the talk itself. > > I'll send a proper update late, but the pipeline looks like this: > * Goerge > * Julien > * Stefano > > I know that Goerge has something next to ready, but that's not about > FOSDEM, so I'd be inclined to postpone. OTOH, Julien and Stefano both > gave talks... Any chance you guys are up for writing something? :-) > > Thanks and Regards, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 18:27:50 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBTfy-0004gL-5e; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:50 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBTfx-0004gG-4f for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:49 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:60040] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 08/42-10891-424D3F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:48 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amc79@cam.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391711258!3700362!1 X-Originating-IP: [131.111.8.152] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTMxLjExMS44LjE1MiA9PiA4MDU1Mw==\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDcyMjMgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1797 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 18:27:38 -0000 Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.152) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 18:27:38 -0000 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from dhcp-172-17-154-45.eduroam.lapwing.private.cam.ac.uk ([172.17.154.45]:56798) by ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1WBTfl-000236-Ft (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:37 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:27:37 +0000 Message-Id: <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> To: Anil Madhavapeddy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org I'm planning a FOSDEM writeup for the Nymote site (nymote.org), which I'll be working on tomorrow. It'll cover some of the mirage stuff as well as other things I saw at the event (specifically the Mail dev room and the Internet of Things devroom). ac On 6 Feb 2014, at 18:24, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > CCing Amir, who is working on a fosdem post on some of the mirage-related activities. > > -a > > On 5 Feb 2014, at 12:14, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >> Anyone up for it? >> >> I think it would be something cool to have, given how nice FOSDEM >> went! :-) >> >> If it'd be from someone who also gave a presentation, it of course can >> include some details about the talk itself. >> >> I'll send a proper update late, but the pipeline looks like this: >> * Goerge >> * Julien >> * Stefano >> >> I know that Goerge has something next to ready, but that's not about >> FOSDEM, so I'd be inclined to postpone. OTOH, Julien and Stefano both >> gave talks... Any chance you guys are up for writing something? :-) >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Dario >> >> -- >> <> (Raistlin Majere) >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli >> Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 06 18:27:50 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBTfy-0004gL-5e; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:50 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBTfx-0004gG-4f for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:49 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:60040] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 08/42-10891-424D3F25; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:48 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amc79@cam.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391711258!3700362!1 X-Originating-IP: [131.111.8.152] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTMxLjExMS44LjE1MiA9PiA4MDU1Mw==\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDcyMjMgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1797 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2014 18:27:38 -0000 Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.152) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Feb 2014 18:27:38 -0000 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from dhcp-172-17-154-45.eduroam.lapwing.private.cam.ac.uk ([172.17.154.45]:56798) by ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1WBTfl-000236-Ft (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:27:37 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:27:37 +0000 Message-Id: <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> To: Anil Madhavapeddy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org I'm planning a FOSDEM writeup for the Nymote site (nymote.org), which I'll be working on tomorrow. It'll cover some of the mirage stuff as well as other things I saw at the event (specifically the Mail dev room and the Internet of Things devroom). ac On 6 Feb 2014, at 18:24, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > CCing Amir, who is working on a fosdem post on some of the mirage-related activities. > > -a > > On 5 Feb 2014, at 12:14, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >> Anyone up for it? >> >> I think it would be something cool to have, given how nice FOSDEM >> went! :-) >> >> If it'd be from someone who also gave a presentation, it of course can >> include some details about the talk itself. >> >> I'll send a proper update late, but the pipeline looks like this: >> * Goerge >> * Julien >> * Stefano >> >> I know that Goerge has something next to ready, but that's not about >> FOSDEM, so I'd be inclined to postpone. OTOH, Julien and Stefano both >> gave talks... Any chance you guys are up for writing something? :-) >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Dario >> >> -- >> <> (Raistlin Majere) >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli >> Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 11:57:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:57:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBk3m-0007PQ-Qs; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:57:30 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBk3k-0007PJ-VJ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:57:29 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:49541] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id DA/94-11539-82AC4F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:57:28 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391774237!3917603!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjM3MDQgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 8490 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 11:57:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 11:57:19 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,800,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100797800" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 11:57:17 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 06:57:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1391774227.25331.1.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:57:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52F396D9.3040100@xen.org> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391694841.9917.12.camel@Solace> <52F396D9.3040100@xen.org> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4650966774913945690==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4650966774913945690== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l/K3B0lhHrFWKkE/sAY2" --=-l/K3B0lhHrFWKkE/sAY2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-06 at 14:06 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > I uploaded them to > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=3D0B404FrB3gtj2UmpoN1dQNVJCT0k&usp= =3Dsharing (you should be able to access without logging in).=20 > Ok, thanks. Seems like no one is up for that... I guess I can put something together after lunch and publish it in the afternoon. > Some are a bit blurred >=20 Ok, I'll try to use the best quality one. Thanks, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-l/K3B0lhHrFWKkE/sAY2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL0yhMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTU+gCffiDVQLR0o43bDizu6GqEH2W4 PlAAnAkWVDjcgJePv7SHfE87RhZmTXbw =yzL8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l/K3B0lhHrFWKkE/sAY2-- --===============4650966774913945690== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4650966774913945690==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 11:57:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:57:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBk3m-0007PQ-Qs; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:57:30 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBk3k-0007PJ-VJ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:57:29 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:49541] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id DA/94-11539-82AC4F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:57:28 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391774237!3917603!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjM3MDQgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 8490 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 11:57:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 11:57:19 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,800,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100797800" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 11:57:17 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 06:57:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1391774227.25331.1.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:57:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52F396D9.3040100@xen.org> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391694841.9917.12.camel@Solace> <52F396D9.3040100@xen.org> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4650966774913945690==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4650966774913945690== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l/K3B0lhHrFWKkE/sAY2" --=-l/K3B0lhHrFWKkE/sAY2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-06 at 14:06 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > I uploaded them to > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=3D0B404FrB3gtj2UmpoN1dQNVJCT0k&usp= =3Dsharing (you should be able to access without logging in).=20 > Ok, thanks. Seems like no one is up for that... I guess I can put something together after lunch and publish it in the afternoon. > Some are a bit blurred >=20 Ok, I'll try to use the best quality one. Thanks, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-l/K3B0lhHrFWKkE/sAY2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL0yhMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTU+gCffiDVQLR0o43bDizu6GqEH2W4 PlAAnAkWVDjcgJePv7SHfE87RhZmTXbw =yzL8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l/K3B0lhHrFWKkE/sAY2-- --===============4650966774913945690== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4650966774913945690==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 12:01:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:01:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBk7f-0007ht-6M; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:01:31 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBk7d-0007hm-7X for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:01:29 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:36178] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 34/45-10891-81BC4F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:01:28 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391774478!3894364!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjY3MjIgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4476 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 12:01:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 12:01:19 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,800,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100798547" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 12:01:17 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 07:01:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Amir Chaudhry Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:01:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0520279263256453846==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0520279263256453846== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-GYGatUQzi/urtUXxYuFV" --=-GYGatUQzi/urtUXxYuFV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-06 at 18:27 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: > I'm planning a FOSDEM writeup for the Nymote site (nymote.org), which I'l= l be working on tomorrow. It'll cover some of the mirage stuff as well as = other things I saw at the event (specifically the Mail dev room and the Int= ernet of Things devroom). >=20 Right... Very cool, actually! :-) Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g., the MirageOS demo at the booth. I'll work out something myself ASAP and let the list know when it's ready. If time matches (which I'm not sure, though), feel free to place a link to it in our piece. OTOH, if yours is published before mine, send me the link and I'll do the same. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-GYGatUQzi/urtUXxYuFV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL0ywsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTaMQCeKLAHEakxOcUgFGBSBhxAVK+M DrkAoITEUs8P+vamj86tv9hqjRbcbib7 =aQeC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-GYGatUQzi/urtUXxYuFV-- --===============0520279263256453846== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0520279263256453846==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 12:01:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:01:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBk7f-0007ht-6M; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:01:31 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBk7d-0007hm-7X for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:01:29 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:36178] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 34/45-10891-81BC4F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:01:28 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391774478!3894364!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjY3MjIgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4476 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 12:01:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 12:01:19 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,800,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100798547" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 12:01:17 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 07:01:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Amir Chaudhry Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:01:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0520279263256453846==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0520279263256453846== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-GYGatUQzi/urtUXxYuFV" --=-GYGatUQzi/urtUXxYuFV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-06 at 18:27 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: > I'm planning a FOSDEM writeup for the Nymote site (nymote.org), which I'l= l be working on tomorrow. It'll cover some of the mirage stuff as well as = other things I saw at the event (specifically the Mail dev room and the Int= ernet of Things devroom). >=20 Right... Very cool, actually! :-) Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g., the MirageOS demo at the booth. I'll work out something myself ASAP and let the list know when it's ready. If time matches (which I'm not sure, though), feel free to place a link to it in our piece. OTOH, if yours is published before mine, send me the link and I'll do the same. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-GYGatUQzi/urtUXxYuFV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL0ywsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTaMQCeKLAHEakxOcUgFGBSBhxAVK+M DrkAoITEUs8P+vamj86tv9hqjRbcbib7 =aQeC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-GYGatUQzi/urtUXxYuFV-- --===============0520279263256453846== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0520279263256453846==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 12:32:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBkc3-0001TG-2J; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:55 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBkc2-0001TA-4T for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:54 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:11501] by server-7.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 48/D2-14867-572D4F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:53 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amc79@cam.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391776372!2359990!1 X-Originating-IP: [131.111.8.133] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7348 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 12:32:52 -0000 Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.133) by server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 12:32:52 -0000 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from dhcp-172-17-157-160.eduroam.lapwing.private.cam.ac.uk ([172.17.157.160]:63661) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1WBkbz-0006hl-iK (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:51 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:32:51 +0000 Message-Id: <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 7 Feb 2014, at 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On gio, 2014-02-06 at 18:27 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: >> I'm planning a FOSDEM writeup for the Nymote site (nymote.org), which I'll be working on tomorrow. It'll cover some of the mirage stuff as well as other things I saw at the event (specifically the Mail dev room and the Internet of Things devroom). >> > Right... Very cool, actually! :-) > > Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g., > the MirageOS demo at the booth. I will do. I was very interested in the Xen/ARM talk in the Automotive devroom but didn't manage to make it. If anyone has comments on how it went and the types of questions people asked, that would be very useful. Lars, d'you have that pic of Mort explaining Mirage to the kid? I'd like to include that in my post if that's ok. > I'll work out something myself ASAP and let the list know when it's > ready. If time matches (which I'm not sure, though), feel free to place > a link to it in our piece. OTOH, if yours is published before mine, send > me the link and I'll do the same. I'm running late with admin things today so it's unlikely I'll get anything live. I'll send you a link when I get the post up and I'll definitely link back to the Xen post. Thanks, Amir _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 12:32:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBkc3-0001TG-2J; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:55 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBkc2-0001TA-4T for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:54 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:11501] by server-7.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 48/D2-14867-572D4F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:53 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amc79@cam.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391776372!2359990!1 X-Originating-IP: [131.111.8.133] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7348 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 12:32:52 -0000 Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.133) by server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 12:32:52 -0000 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from dhcp-172-17-157-160.eduroam.lapwing.private.cam.ac.uk ([172.17.157.160]:63661) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1WBkbz-0006hl-iK (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:32:51 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:32:51 +0000 Message-Id: <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 7 Feb 2014, at 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On gio, 2014-02-06 at 18:27 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: >> I'm planning a FOSDEM writeup for the Nymote site (nymote.org), which I'll be working on tomorrow. It'll cover some of the mirage stuff as well as other things I saw at the event (specifically the Mail dev room and the Internet of Things devroom). >> > Right... Very cool, actually! :-) > > Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g., > the MirageOS demo at the booth. I will do. I was very interested in the Xen/ARM talk in the Automotive devroom but didn't manage to make it. If anyone has comments on how it went and the types of questions people asked, that would be very useful. Lars, d'you have that pic of Mort explaining Mirage to the kid? I'd like to include that in my post if that's ok. > I'll work out something myself ASAP and let the list know when it's > ready. If time matches (which I'm not sure, though), feel free to place > a link to it in our piece. OTOH, if yours is published before mine, send > me the link and I'll do the same. I'm running late with admin things today so it's unlikely I'll get anything live. I'll send you a link when I get the post up and I'll definitely link back to the Xen post. Thanks, Amir _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 13:50:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:50:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBlop-0006ZM-9k; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:50:11 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBloo-0006ZH-4U for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:50:10 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:18581] by server-8.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id DC/3D-05298-194E4F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:50:09 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391780996!2357267!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTI5ODIgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 16778 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 13:49:57 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 13:49:57 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,800,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="98968103" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 13:49:55 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:49:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Amir Chaudhry Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:49:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1565554770863970996==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1565554770863970996== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8VhsA/0FdrHf9JGHYWNe" --=-8VhsA/0FdrHf9JGHYWNe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 12:32 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: > On 7 Feb 2014, at 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote= : > > > Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g.= , > > the MirageOS demo at the booth. >=20 > I will do. I was very interested in the Xen/ARM talk in the Automotive d= evroom but didn't manage to make it. If anyone has comments on how it went= and the types of questions people asked, that would be very useful. >=20 What I know for sure is that it went pretty well. Lots of people, lots of questions, a lot of interest! :-) Stefano is the one who gave it, so he's probably able to give more details or answer more specific questions. > I'm running late with admin things today so it's unlikely I'll get anythi= ng live.=20 > I'll send you a link when I get the post up and I'll definitely link back= to the Xen post. >=20 Ok, let's see how far I do get then. Even if late, send the link here=20 anyway, so that we can make the proper fuss about your article, when it goes live. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-8VhsA/0FdrHf9JGHYWNe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL05IEACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTBNgCeJv80FETQXqQUjtWKWWiNwVB9 kAQAn2dkZ3dBJz8SMyiveqChrFVEjJTF =yBbI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8VhsA/0FdrHf9JGHYWNe-- --===============1565554770863970996== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1565554770863970996==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 13:50:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:50:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBlop-0006ZM-9k; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:50:11 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBloo-0006ZH-4U for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:50:10 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:18581] by server-8.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id DC/3D-05298-194E4F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:50:09 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391780996!2357267!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTI5ODIgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 16778 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 13:49:57 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 13:49:57 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,800,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="98968103" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 13:49:55 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:49:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Amir Chaudhry Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:49:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1565554770863970996==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1565554770863970996== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8VhsA/0FdrHf9JGHYWNe" --=-8VhsA/0FdrHf9JGHYWNe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 12:32 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: > On 7 Feb 2014, at 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote= : > > > Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g.= , > > the MirageOS demo at the booth. >=20 > I will do. I was very interested in the Xen/ARM talk in the Automotive d= evroom but didn't manage to make it. If anyone has comments on how it went= and the types of questions people asked, that would be very useful. >=20 What I know for sure is that it went pretty well. Lots of people, lots of questions, a lot of interest! :-) Stefano is the one who gave it, so he's probably able to give more details or answer more specific questions. > I'm running late with admin things today so it's unlikely I'll get anythi= ng live.=20 > I'll send you a link when I get the post up and I'll definitely link back= to the Xen post. >=20 Ok, let's see how far I do get then. Even if late, send the link here=20 anyway, so that we can make the proper fuss about your article, when it goes live. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-8VhsA/0FdrHf9JGHYWNe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL05IEACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTBNgCeJv80FETQXqQUjtWKWWiNwVB9 kAQAn2dkZ3dBJz8SMyiveqChrFVEjJTF =yBbI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8VhsA/0FdrHf9JGHYWNe-- --===============1565554770863970996== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1565554770863970996==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 16:14:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:14:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBo48-0000Mz-IC; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:14:08 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBo47-0000Mm-6M for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:14:07 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:43133] by server-6.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 4A/1E-03396-E4605F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:14:06 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391789635!2822184!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDgxMzUgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 20521 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 16:13:56 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 16:13:56 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="99014718" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 16:13:55 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:13:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:13:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9025627022609108942==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9025627022609108942== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9wVkCR9XZR1mfFcq/IBG" --=-9wVkCR9XZR1mfFcq/IBG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:14 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Anyone up for it? >=20 There is a draft here: http://blog.xen.org/?p=3D8731&preview=3Dtrue I know it's late, but couldn't do better, sorry. I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, but someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it very very soon (like in 1hr?). Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-9wVkCR9XZR1mfFcq/IBG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1BkAACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTx1ACfZg3BtCvVd+33pdyf5eqWOSmh pREAn0CVn9VaiKVsLD9EutjMpnYaDQg8 =QlFo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9wVkCR9XZR1mfFcq/IBG-- --===============9025627022609108942== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9025627022609108942==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 16:14:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:14:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBo48-0000Mz-IC; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:14:08 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBo47-0000Mm-6M for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:14:07 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:43133] by server-6.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 4A/1E-03396-E4605F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:14:06 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391789635!2822184!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDgxMzUgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 20521 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 16:13:56 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 16:13:56 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="99014718" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 16:13:55 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:13:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:13:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9025627022609108942==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9025627022609108942== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9wVkCR9XZR1mfFcq/IBG" --=-9wVkCR9XZR1mfFcq/IBG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:14 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Anyone up for it? >=20 There is a draft here: http://blog.xen.org/?p=3D8731&preview=3Dtrue I know it's late, but couldn't do better, sorry. I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, but someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it very very soon (like in 1hr?). Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-9wVkCR9XZR1mfFcq/IBG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1BkAACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTx1ACfZg3BtCvVd+33pdyf5eqWOSmh pREAn0CVn9VaiKVsLD9EutjMpnYaDQg8 =QlFo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9wVkCR9XZR1mfFcq/IBG-- --===============9025627022609108942== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9025627022609108942==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 16:22:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBoBx-0001Ia-CG; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBoBw-0001II-2p for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:12 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:51735] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id DC/06-31661-33805F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391790130!3966253!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.181] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.7 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 18589 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 16:22:10 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f181.google.com) (74.125.82.181) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 16:22:10 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w61so2429641wes.40 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:22:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iRSKcTxKTCPj+7Chq3plGIMSaVZ0KLJHjvgatrQgg98=; b=ywXjRP2s3jTd/V13dcFryPWxEZucDNniTz0I6T2Uq1C4RL1eiW0ccTVhoHiTzHlT9w oexE4HKNn55v/4PyPlweWUXQ+aH7B+DjilDSqOV8KUM6ea/pfoCZbMBO5sS0TCpde1Ct B/8kkGQbgq4yIR61xePXFvm4nEdWwS2DGeOvb7XGcT8OKoZmaEc8RtfbKzIMibmxpLr6 7Nmlmz+brgh3EIBWPX8bc4mijLNhlebjobFFb3YJR7+E6dq0a4NrWUDMXduy5CmKdAwR cYuAevBixaDmp1UIKperQIp6t+FdCGb6S3//fSzz8YxE2hop4cI0GPKtLYR9lgFQT+aA 9IiQ== X-Received: by 10.194.85.168 with SMTP id i8mr549944wjz.81.1391790130450; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hy8sm11851888wjb.2.2014.02.07.08.22.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:22:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F50830.3020708@xen.org> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:08 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> Cc: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 07/02/2014 16:13, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:14 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> Anyone up for it? >> > There is a draft here: > http://blog.xen.org/?p=8731&preview=true > > I know it's late, but couldn't do better, sorry. > > I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, but > someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it > very very soon (like in 1hr?). Dario. I have a meeting now. Do you mind if I go in and make some edits later and then publish? It's just grammar and style stuff which needs fixing : I was thinking of reposting at Open @ Citrix too (pointing to your post) Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 16:22:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBoBx-0001Ia-CG; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBoBw-0001II-2p for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:12 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:51735] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id DC/06-31661-33805F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1391790130!3966253!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.181] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.7 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 18589 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 16:22:10 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f181.google.com) (74.125.82.181) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 16:22:10 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w61so2429641wes.40 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:22:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iRSKcTxKTCPj+7Chq3plGIMSaVZ0KLJHjvgatrQgg98=; b=ywXjRP2s3jTd/V13dcFryPWxEZucDNniTz0I6T2Uq1C4RL1eiW0ccTVhoHiTzHlT9w oexE4HKNn55v/4PyPlweWUXQ+aH7B+DjilDSqOV8KUM6ea/pfoCZbMBO5sS0TCpde1Ct B/8kkGQbgq4yIR61xePXFvm4nEdWwS2DGeOvb7XGcT8OKoZmaEc8RtfbKzIMibmxpLr6 7Nmlmz+brgh3EIBWPX8bc4mijLNhlebjobFFb3YJR7+E6dq0a4NrWUDMXduy5CmKdAwR cYuAevBixaDmp1UIKperQIp6t+FdCGb6S3//fSzz8YxE2hop4cI0GPKtLYR9lgFQT+aA 9IiQ== X-Received: by 10.194.85.168 with SMTP id i8mr549944wjz.81.1391790130450; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hy8sm11851888wjb.2.2014.02.07.08.22.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:22:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F50830.3020708@xen.org> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:08 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> Cc: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 07/02/2014 16:13, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:14 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> Anyone up for it? >> > There is a draft here: > http://blog.xen.org/?p=8731&preview=true > > I know it's late, but couldn't do better, sorry. > > I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, but > someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it > very very soon (like in 1hr?). Dario. I have a meeting now. Do you mind if I go in and make some edits later and then publish? It's just grammar and style stuff which needs fixing : I was thinking of reposting at Open @ Citrix too (pointing to your post) Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 16:28:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:28:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBoHq-0001a3-3Y; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:28:18 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBoHo-0001Zv-QR for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:28:17 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:50961] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 85/FF-10839-0A905F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:28:16 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391790494!2790667!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13072 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 16:28:15 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 16:28:15 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100873510" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 16:28:13 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:28:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1391790491.25331.19.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:28:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52F50830.3020708@xen.org> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <52F50830.3020708@xen.org> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2676864142342690005==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============2676864142342690005== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-n3WjLAs9KMI+zZs86DBk" --=-n3WjLAs9KMI+zZs86DBk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 16:22 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > On 07/02/2014 16:13, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:14 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, but > > someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it > > very very soon (like in 1hr?). > Dario. I have a meeting now. Do you mind if I go in and make some edits= =20 > later and then publish? > It's just grammar and style stuff which needs fixing : I was thinking of= =20 > reposting at Open @ Citrix too (pointing to your post) >=20 That's perfectly fine. Last touches from me coming right now. I'll be done in 5 mins, and it will be in your hands from then... go ahead changing and publishing at your ease and convenience! Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-n3WjLAs9KMI+zZs86DBk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1CZsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTMdQCeIDQRIEYOgEEqN6GTTmqYdhNg 1l0AnR6+0HIjE4FiJJgQNr54POHwo+v0 =kbHQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-n3WjLAs9KMI+zZs86DBk-- --===============2676864142342690005== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============2676864142342690005==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 16:28:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:28:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBoHq-0001a3-3Y; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:28:18 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBoHo-0001Zv-QR for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:28:17 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:50961] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 85/FF-10839-0A905F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:28:16 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391790494!2790667!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13072 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 16:28:15 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 16:28:15 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100873510" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 16:28:13 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:28:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1391790491.25331.19.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:28:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52F50830.3020708@xen.org> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <52F50830.3020708@xen.org> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2676864142342690005==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============2676864142342690005== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-n3WjLAs9KMI+zZs86DBk" --=-n3WjLAs9KMI+zZs86DBk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 16:22 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > On 07/02/2014 16:13, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:14 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, but > > someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it > > very very soon (like in 1hr?). > Dario. I have a meeting now. Do you mind if I go in and make some edits= =20 > later and then publish? > It's just grammar and style stuff which needs fixing : I was thinking of= =20 > reposting at Open @ Citrix too (pointing to your post) >=20 That's perfectly fine. Last touches from me coming right now. I'll be done in 5 mins, and it will be in your hands from then... go ahead changing and publishing at your ease and convenience! Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-n3WjLAs9KMI+zZs86DBk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1CZsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTMdQCeIDQRIEYOgEEqN6GTTmqYdhNg 1l0AnR6+0HIjE4FiJJgQNr54POHwo+v0 =kbHQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-n3WjLAs9KMI+zZs86DBk-- --===============2676864142342690005== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============2676864142342690005==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 16:57:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:57:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBojd-00032N-4m; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:57:01 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBojb-00032D-78 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:56:59 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:45400] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 22/DE-26923-A5015F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:56:58 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391792217!384914!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.179] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8,RCVD_BY_IP,spamassassin: ,surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRvbmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdna W9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6565 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 16:56:57 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f179.google.com) (74.125.82.179) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 16:56:57 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q58so2468026wes.38 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:56:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vOajSvqYyLuhu0YlGiugcv4WB5L8zBnpmGlBZI77lNY=; b=cAAVcL78NiDRzZUjohcpg+paNhGLvnB1QQP0/d+FJKG2s6GP+uG7fGZClU8NPJpcbH qy/u3dn1IZz5CBWu2d7sh2p029AOeVnxZxAAi9lXJ9WAQYE265RkPe60cdRMCSlVquIe qDL8ZyR903C3g8+XM+sNB7mzL72ZkaWZ0fn6g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vOajSvqYyLuhu0YlGiugcv4WB5L8zBnpmGlBZI77lNY=; b=i/2zelRDhdqKvMjmBpBdXfewkV5b8gkMMUiJRxpk19/ZJMxRAz09X4EL724RI53Ydz MykgcbHJWa8yVR5PJvkt6v8pHvObiZk0kNwrbbDEI+t7ixgktUyiJ5TYj3C9Aea6emhk TgkjZIDMcVp9lM+C46j0aIJhx8M1fn+GQTvlbPsmCyko8JaA3OZK+950UNvfCU1edgqj hxpaUZXTNKRl6k5zDAxtcKlj7eO9mdLEf7e9hOjNNK7KwYtdKbuGcm+JIISzFrLIVnvm +RemcCYQF7uJ6XevZg3Fg3yJiK1li+rznJW3nC8A/1XV8h4SQUu6ykzQYaCNfwmiYzN3 SP7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnAOTAxuD/uMLbpqhnlo8WpU/g2cnLx2ZDDYalNwfcg16LhtPMyYBqfhoKlZnlTroesfucB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.75.202 with SMTP id e10mr663463wiw.50.1391792216771; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:56:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:56:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Dario Faggioli Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4491861945972459181==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4491861945972459181== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04389569aeace304f1d3e0f8 --f46d04389569aeace304f1d3e0f8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dario. I made some edits, mostly grammar changes, online. Are you able to add specifics about the people you talked with who are using Xen? Might be a way to increase the blog's exposure on social channels too. Thanks, On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:14 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Anyone up for it? > > > There is a draft here: > http://blog.xen.org/?p=8731&preview=true > > I know it's late, but couldn't do better, sorry. > > I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, but > someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it > very very soon (like in 1hr?). > > Thanks and Regards, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --f46d04389569aeace304f1d3e0f8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dario.

I made some edits, mostly gra= mmar changes, online. Are you able to add specifics about the people you ta= lked with who are using Xen? Might be a way to increase the blog's expo= sure on social channels too.

Thanks,


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:1= 4 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Anyone up for it?
>
There is a draft here:
http://blog.xen.org/?p=3D8731&preview=3Dtrue

I know it's late, but couldn't do better, sorry.

I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, = but
someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it=
very very soon (like in 1hr?).

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majer= e)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)




--
=
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The L= inux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--f46d04389569aeace304f1d3e0f8-- --===============4491861945972459181== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4491861945972459181==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 16:57:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:57:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBojd-00032N-4m; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:57:01 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBojb-00032D-78 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:56:59 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:45400] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 22/DE-26923-A5015F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:56:58 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391792217!384914!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.179] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8,RCVD_BY_IP,spamassassin: ,surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRvbmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdna W9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6565 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 16:56:57 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f179.google.com) (74.125.82.179) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 16:56:57 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q58so2468026wes.38 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:56:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vOajSvqYyLuhu0YlGiugcv4WB5L8zBnpmGlBZI77lNY=; b=cAAVcL78NiDRzZUjohcpg+paNhGLvnB1QQP0/d+FJKG2s6GP+uG7fGZClU8NPJpcbH qy/u3dn1IZz5CBWu2d7sh2p029AOeVnxZxAAi9lXJ9WAQYE265RkPe60cdRMCSlVquIe qDL8ZyR903C3g8+XM+sNB7mzL72ZkaWZ0fn6g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vOajSvqYyLuhu0YlGiugcv4WB5L8zBnpmGlBZI77lNY=; b=i/2zelRDhdqKvMjmBpBdXfewkV5b8gkMMUiJRxpk19/ZJMxRAz09X4EL724RI53Ydz MykgcbHJWa8yVR5PJvkt6v8pHvObiZk0kNwrbbDEI+t7ixgktUyiJ5TYj3C9Aea6emhk TgkjZIDMcVp9lM+C46j0aIJhx8M1fn+GQTvlbPsmCyko8JaA3OZK+950UNvfCU1edgqj hxpaUZXTNKRl6k5zDAxtcKlj7eO9mdLEf7e9hOjNNK7KwYtdKbuGcm+JIISzFrLIVnvm +RemcCYQF7uJ6XevZg3Fg3yJiK1li+rznJW3nC8A/1XV8h4SQUu6ykzQYaCNfwmiYzN3 SP7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnAOTAxuD/uMLbpqhnlo8WpU/g2cnLx2ZDDYalNwfcg16LhtPMyYBqfhoKlZnlTroesfucB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.75.202 with SMTP id e10mr663463wiw.50.1391792216771; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:56:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:56:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Dario Faggioli Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4491861945972459181==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4491861945972459181== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04389569aeace304f1d3e0f8 --f46d04389569aeace304f1d3e0f8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dario. I made some edits, mostly grammar changes, online. Are you able to add specifics about the people you talked with who are using Xen? Might be a way to increase the blog's exposure on social channels too. Thanks, On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:14 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Anyone up for it? > > > There is a draft here: > http://blog.xen.org/?p=8731&preview=true > > I know it's late, but couldn't do better, sorry. > > I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, but > someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it > very very soon (like in 1hr?). > > Thanks and Regards, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --f46d04389569aeace304f1d3e0f8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dario.

I made some edits, mostly gra= mmar changes, online. Are you able to add specifics about the people you ta= lked with who are using Xen? Might be a way to increase the blog's expo= sure on social channels too.

Thanks,


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
On mer, 2014-02-05 at 13:1= 4 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Anyone up for it?
>
There is a draft here:
http://blog.xen.org/?p=3D8731&preview=3Dtrue

I know it's late, but couldn't do better, sorry.

I'm still reviewing it myself, and adding some of Lars's pictures, = but
someone could give me an opinion on the writeup, I'd like to publish it=
very very soon (like in 1hr?).

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majer= e)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)




--
=
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The L= inux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--f46d04389569aeace304f1d3e0f8-- --===============4491861945972459181== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4491861945972459181==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 17:23:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:23:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBp99-0004QV-T1; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:23:23 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBp97-0004QQ-RM for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:23:22 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:8135] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 23/4B-04712-88615F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:23:20 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391793798!389984!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 8803 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 17:23:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 17:23:19 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100889765" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 17:23:17 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:23:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Sarah Conway Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:23:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6622371323575790989==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6622371323575790989== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uSVb2JLe6QQaRlsY9HLQ" --=-uSVb2JLe6QQaRlsY9HLQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 11:56 -0500, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi Dario. >=20 Hi, > I made some edits, mostly grammar changes, online.=20 > Thanks. > Are you able to add specifics about the people you talked with who are > using Xen? Might be a way to increase the blog's exposure on social > channels too. >=20 I'm not because, for the large part, it was people using Xen either at home, or at work in "small" companies (that they either own or work for), which names they often didn't even mention. OTOH, I had a nice chat about someone from Verizon, and with a couple of friends from Amazon, but then it is no big news that these two firms are interested in / are using Xen already, I guess. What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open Source advanced users and developers). Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't need you, there is , isn't it?". This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude showed up, which was very good! :-P I tried to have the post reflect this, but I know I'm not very good at it. :-/ Thanks and regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-uSVb2JLe6QQaRlsY9HLQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1FoMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQSVQCgmm2UjXGUkzmzqZXLj2cH8c/o XJUAoJ7bB8Q+2sYWfoJVolUx5JD9M3Wl =iWdc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uSVb2JLe6QQaRlsY9HLQ-- --===============6622371323575790989== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6622371323575790989==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 17:23:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:23:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBp99-0004QV-T1; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:23:23 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBp97-0004QQ-RM for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:23:22 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:8135] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 23/4B-04712-88615F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:23:20 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391793798!389984!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 8803 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 17:23:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 17:23:19 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100889765" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 17:23:17 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:23:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Sarah Conway Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:23:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6622371323575790989==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6622371323575790989== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uSVb2JLe6QQaRlsY9HLQ" --=-uSVb2JLe6QQaRlsY9HLQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 11:56 -0500, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi Dario. >=20 Hi, > I made some edits, mostly grammar changes, online.=20 > Thanks. > Are you able to add specifics about the people you talked with who are > using Xen? Might be a way to increase the blog's exposure on social > channels too. >=20 I'm not because, for the large part, it was people using Xen either at home, or at work in "small" companies (that they either own or work for), which names they often didn't even mention. OTOH, I had a nice chat about someone from Verizon, and with a couple of friends from Amazon, but then it is no big news that these two firms are interested in / are using Xen already, I guess. What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open Source advanced users and developers). Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't need you, there is , isn't it?". This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude showed up, which was very good! :-P I tried to have the post reflect this, but I know I'm not very good at it. :-/ Thanks and regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-uSVb2JLe6QQaRlsY9HLQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1FoMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQSVQCgmm2UjXGUkzmzqZXLj2cH8c/o XJUAoJ7bB8Q+2sYWfoJVolUx5JD9M3Wl =iWdc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uSVb2JLe6QQaRlsY9HLQ-- --===============6622371323575790989== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6622371323575790989==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 17:26:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:26:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpBg-0004RN-4N; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:26:00 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpBf-0004RI-7U for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:25:59 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:46734] by server-4.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 55/57-08092-62715F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:25:58 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391793955!2436322!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9915 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 17:25:57 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 17:25:57 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100890496" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 17:25:55 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:25:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1391793953.25331.33.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:25:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1391790491.25331.19.camel@Solace> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391790491.25331.19.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6818521401813607110==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6818521401813607110== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OnfQws9xPQYZKO50uMXR" --=-OnfQws9xPQYZKO50uMXR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:28 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 16:22 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > Dario. I have a meeting now. Do you mind if I go in and make some edits= =20 > > later and then publish? > >=20 > That's perfectly fine. Last touches from me coming right now. I'll be > done in 5 mins, and it will be in your hands from then... go ahead > changing and publishing at your ease and convenience! >=20 One thing. I'm done, even putting pictures there. The two big ones, I like. The two smaller 'vertical' one, don't seem like they align properly with the text... I tried, but couldn't do any better than how it looks now, sorry. :-( Perhaps have a look at this (of course, feel free to change everything you like, I was just pointing out what I'd do :-D). Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-OnfQws9xPQYZKO50uMXR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1FyEACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTSQQCeN/x454+u5EnvUYFfEqJpa7VF IUsAn14Bx/swPU8ZlwMQvVxoz5qvG5rT =UKvA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-OnfQws9xPQYZKO50uMXR-- --===============6818521401813607110== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6818521401813607110==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 17:26:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:26:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpBg-0004RN-4N; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:26:00 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpBf-0004RI-7U for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:25:59 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:46734] by server-4.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 55/57-08092-62715F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:25:58 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391793955!2436322!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9915 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 17:25:57 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 17:25:57 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100890496" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 17:25:55 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:25:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1391793953.25331.33.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:25:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1391790491.25331.19.camel@Solace> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391790491.25331.19.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6818521401813607110==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6818521401813607110== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OnfQws9xPQYZKO50uMXR" --=-OnfQws9xPQYZKO50uMXR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:28 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 16:22 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > Dario. I have a meeting now. Do you mind if I go in and make some edits= =20 > > later and then publish? > >=20 > That's perfectly fine. Last touches from me coming right now. I'll be > done in 5 mins, and it will be in your hands from then... go ahead > changing and publishing at your ease and convenience! >=20 One thing. I'm done, even putting pictures there. The two big ones, I like. The two smaller 'vertical' one, don't seem like they align properly with the text... I tried, but couldn't do any better than how it looks now, sorry. :-( Perhaps have a look at this (of course, feel free to change everything you like, I was just pointing out what I'd do :-D). Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-OnfQws9xPQYZKO50uMXR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1FyEACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTSQQCeN/x454+u5EnvUYFfEqJpa7VF IUsAn14Bx/swPU8ZlwMQvVxoz5qvG5rT =UKvA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-OnfQws9xPQYZKO50uMXR-- --===============6818521401813607110== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6818521401813607110==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 17:38:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:38:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpNQ-0004pE-2z; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:38:08 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpNP-0004p9-5T for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:38:07 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:59385] by server-2.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id AD/4D-23037-EF915F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:38:06 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391794683!2407620!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7468 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 17:38:05 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 17:38:05 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,802,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="99041038" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 17:37:44 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:37:44 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpN1-0008Kb-Td for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:37:43 +0000 Message-ID: <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:37:41 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA1 Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is > perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open > Source advanced users and developers). > Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're > here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't > need you, there is , isn't > it?". > > This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude > showed up, which was very good! :-P On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts (i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's quite a big change. As an aside, I think we need to have a better answer when people ask that. I was thinking something like, "The XenProject is actually funded by a board of about a dozen corporations, so we have plenty of money. But what we can't really buy is people testing new Xen releases, giving good bug reports, and talking about Xen. Those are all great ways to support the project." Thoughts? -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 17:38:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:38:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpNQ-0004pE-2z; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:38:08 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpNP-0004p9-5T for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:38:07 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:59385] by server-2.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id AD/4D-23037-EF915F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:38:06 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391794683!2407620!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7468 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 17:38:05 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 17:38:05 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,802,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="99041038" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 17:37:44 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:37:44 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBpN1-0008Kb-Td for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:37:43 +0000 Message-ID: <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:37:41 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA1 Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is > perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open > Source advanced users and developers). > Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're > here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't > need you, there is , isn't > it?". > > This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude > showed up, which was very good! :-P On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts (i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's quite a big change. As an aside, I think we need to have a better answer when people ask that. I was thinking something like, "The XenProject is actually funded by a board of about a dozen corporations, so we have plenty of money. But what we can't really buy is people testing new Xen releases, giving good bug reports, and talking about Xen. Those are all great ways to support the project." Thoughts? -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 18:23:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:23:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBq56-0008VR-Fc; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:23:16 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBq54-0008VM-JC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:23:14 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:10437] by server-6.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id EC/39-09180-19425F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:23:13 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391797391!397603!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 20083 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 18:23:12 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 18:23:12 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,802,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100907429" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 18:23:10 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:23:10 -0500 Message-ID: <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:23:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6061581202691100102==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6061581202691100102== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MNR+Xr9NUf6mqe8cqpA2" --=-MNR+Xr9NUf6mqe8cqpA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:37 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is > > perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open > > Source advanced users and developers). > > Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're > > here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don'= t > > need you, there is , isn't > > it?". > > > > This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitud= e > > showed up, which was very good! :-P >=20 > On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts=20 > (i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At= =20 > least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's= =20 > quite a big change. > Yeah, that too... I had a couple which were literally trying to put a 10 euros note in one of my pocket... I mean, physically! :-P >=20 > As an aside, I think we need to have a better answer when people ask=20 > that. I was thinking something like,=20 > Indeed. > "The XenProject is actually funded=20 > by a board of about a dozen corporations, so we have plenty of money. = =20 > EhEh, nice one! > But what we can't really buy is people testing new Xen releases, giving= =20 > good bug reports, and talking about Xen. Those are all great ways to=20 > support the project." >=20 =3D=3D A T-Shirt For a Bug Report =3D=3D I like it! I think we can think about something nice and fun enough for next round... Something like writing a 'fake' contract where the person agrees on testing and sending a report, in return of having got the t-shirt for free! Of course, we could put any kind of info about Xen on the "contract" (including, of course, how to test it!). The only thing I don't like is that it looks a bit of a waste to print so much sheets... Perhaps we can use recycled paper. Or, if the event is one of the ones with badges (like OSCON and LinuxCon), we can just scan them and send the thing by e-mail!! Ok... Better go downstairs cooking dinner, I guess :-P Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-MNR+Xr9NUf6mqe8cqpA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1JI0ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQCIQCfT3Y5FcGxzX5ep38OIGg/CAeN mmEAn0HVTSuUM8zuXxDrUfvEIsSW8YRo =dbIS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MNR+Xr9NUf6mqe8cqpA2-- --===============6061581202691100102== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6061581202691100102==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 18:23:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:23:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBq56-0008VR-Fc; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:23:16 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBq54-0008VM-JC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:23:14 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:10437] by server-6.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id EC/39-09180-19425F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:23:13 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1391797391!397603!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 20083 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 18:23:12 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 18:23:12 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,802,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100907429" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 18:23:10 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:23:10 -0500 Message-ID: <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:23:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6061581202691100102==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6061581202691100102== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MNR+Xr9NUf6mqe8cqpA2" --=-MNR+Xr9NUf6mqe8cqpA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:37 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is > > perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open > > Source advanced users and developers). > > Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're > > here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don'= t > > need you, there is , isn't > > it?". > > > > This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitud= e > > showed up, which was very good! :-P >=20 > On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts=20 > (i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At= =20 > least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's= =20 > quite a big change. > Yeah, that too... I had a couple which were literally trying to put a 10 euros note in one of my pocket... I mean, physically! :-P >=20 > As an aside, I think we need to have a better answer when people ask=20 > that. I was thinking something like,=20 > Indeed. > "The XenProject is actually funded=20 > by a board of about a dozen corporations, so we have plenty of money. = =20 > EhEh, nice one! > But what we can't really buy is people testing new Xen releases, giving= =20 > good bug reports, and talking about Xen. Those are all great ways to=20 > support the project." >=20 =3D=3D A T-Shirt For a Bug Report =3D=3D I like it! I think we can think about something nice and fun enough for next round... Something like writing a 'fake' contract where the person agrees on testing and sending a report, in return of having got the t-shirt for free! Of course, we could put any kind of info about Xen on the "contract" (including, of course, how to test it!). The only thing I don't like is that it looks a bit of a waste to print so much sheets... Perhaps we can use recycled paper. Or, if the event is one of the ones with badges (like OSCON and LinuxCon), we can just scan them and send the thing by e-mail!! Ok... Better go downstairs cooking dinner, I guess :-P Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-MNR+Xr9NUf6mqe8cqpA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL1JI0ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQCIQCfT3Y5FcGxzX5ep38OIGg/CAeN mmEAn0HVTSuUM8zuXxDrUfvEIsSW8YRo =dbIS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MNR+Xr9NUf6mqe8cqpA2-- --===============6061581202691100102== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6061581202691100102==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 19:01:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:01:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBqff-00030r-KQ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:01:03 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBqfd-00030U-7O for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:01:01 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:33410] by server-13.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 35/10-18801-C6D25F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:01:00 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391799659!2464343!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.179] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24974 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 19:00:59 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f179.google.com) (209.85.212.179) by server-6.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 19:00:59 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hn9so1145197wib.0 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:00:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=K/8uNSXJAKOB/cxxSml0e7+4IyI6BeG1/cDNI5Fzstg=; b=pw2TdwHpN/RpCF86fM71Z1DjPxVo8nPrc1qawUvJrkeBW36b5dV63i7ohE+Lc71ke+ g6KfXwrFrCDb+el45yBIB1ufAyWoZ8KQ2C7bjNT16qKeu64nrfCZvEvlU0qKAusPdNqd 92dwPe14O94wJQzEeZNlq2tDZgNjDucKx7OEYHn0u+6rO6NOxOQM++V4w9o+HAInx8qF ymGlTVd8yP9klA5VrpQEqd0MUtydIoNSHbPEl0GLeOfEgr63TwnA3DopKQ4h19FWuvgx oPiFY6BCa98BKMgN5e9vUD2HOmM6b5OuFj8h8GTxm5/7UrKNiGHbewFLOPU0lndtsBmk Vflg== X-Received: by 10.194.190.8 with SMTP id gm8mr1587510wjc.36.1391799658847; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:00:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gt6sm10551977wib.8.2014.02.07.11.00.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:00:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F52D69.2080708@xen.org> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:00:57 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6980891529432074959==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============6980891529432074959== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090605070700080003040105" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090605070700080003040105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dario, went over it and changed most issues. Mainly I shortened sentences and fixed small errors. It's published now. Feel free to go in and make changes Lars On 07/02/2014 18:23, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:37 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is >>> perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open >>> Source advanced users and developers). >>> Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're >>> here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't >>> need you, there is , isn't >>> it?". >>> >>> This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude >>> showed up, which was very good! :-P >> On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts >> (i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At >> least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's >> quite a big change. >> > Yeah, that too... I had a couple which were literally trying to put a 10 > euros note in one of my pocket... I mean, physically! :-P >> As an aside, I think we need to have a better answer when people ask >> that. I was thinking something like, >> > Indeed. > >> "The XenProject is actually funded >> by a board of about a dozen corporations, so we have plenty of money. >> > EhEh, nice one! > >> But what we can't really buy is people testing new Xen releases, giving >> good bug reports, and talking about Xen. Those are all great ways to >> support the project." >> > == > A T-Shirt For a Bug Report > == > > I like it! I think we can think about something nice and fun enough for > next round... Something like writing a 'fake' contract where the person > agrees on testing and sending a report, in return of having got the > t-shirt for free! Of course, we could put any kind of info about Xen on > the "contract" (including, of course, how to test it!). > > The only thing I don't like is that it looks a bit of a waste to print > so much sheets... Perhaps we can use recycled paper. Or, if the event is > one of the ones with badges (like OSCON and LinuxCon), we can just scan > them and send the thing by e-mail!! > > Ok... Better go downstairs cooking dinner, I guess :-P > > Dario > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------090605070700080003040105 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dario,
went over it and changed most issues. Mainly I shortened sentences and fixed small errors. It's published now. Feel free to go in and make changes
Lars

On 07/02/2014 18:23, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:37 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:

On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:

What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is
perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open
Source advanced users and developers).
Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're
here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't
need you, there is <another_open_source_virtualization_solution>, isn't
it?".

This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude
showed up, which was very good! :-P

On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts 
(i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At 
least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's 
quite a big change.


Yeah, that too... I had a couple which were literally trying to put a 10
euros note in one of my pocket... I mean, physically! :-P

As an aside, I think we need to have a better answer when people ask 
that.  I was thinking something like, 


Indeed.


"The XenProject is actually funded 
by a board of about a dozen corporations, so we have plenty of money.  


EhEh, nice one!


But what we can't really buy is people testing new Xen releases, giving 
good bug reports, and talking about Xen.  Those are all great ways to 
support the project."


==
A T-Shirt For a Bug Report
==

I like it! I think we can think about something nice and fun enough for
next round... Something like writing a 'fake' contract where the person
agrees on testing and sending a report, in return of having got the
t-shirt for free! Of course, we could put any kind of info about Xen on
the "contract" (including, of course, how to test it!).

The only thing I don't like is that it looks a bit of a waste to print
so much sheets... Perhaps we can use recycled paper. Or, if the event is
one of the ones with badges (like OSCON and LinuxCon), we can just scan
them and send the thing by e-mail!!

Ok... Better go downstairs cooking dinner, I guess :-P

Dario




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------090605070700080003040105-- --===============6980891529432074959== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6980891529432074959==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 19:01:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:01:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBqff-00030r-KQ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:01:03 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBqfd-00030U-7O for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:01:01 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:33410] by server-13.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 35/10-18801-C6D25F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:01:00 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1391799659!2464343!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.179] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24974 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 19:00:59 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f179.google.com) (209.85.212.179) by server-6.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 19:00:59 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hn9so1145197wib.0 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:00:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=K/8uNSXJAKOB/cxxSml0e7+4IyI6BeG1/cDNI5Fzstg=; b=pw2TdwHpN/RpCF86fM71Z1DjPxVo8nPrc1qawUvJrkeBW36b5dV63i7ohE+Lc71ke+ g6KfXwrFrCDb+el45yBIB1ufAyWoZ8KQ2C7bjNT16qKeu64nrfCZvEvlU0qKAusPdNqd 92dwPe14O94wJQzEeZNlq2tDZgNjDucKx7OEYHn0u+6rO6NOxOQM++V4w9o+HAInx8qF ymGlTVd8yP9klA5VrpQEqd0MUtydIoNSHbPEl0GLeOfEgr63TwnA3DopKQ4h19FWuvgx oPiFY6BCa98BKMgN5e9vUD2HOmM6b5OuFj8h8GTxm5/7UrKNiGHbewFLOPU0lndtsBmk Vflg== X-Received: by 10.194.190.8 with SMTP id gm8mr1587510wjc.36.1391799658847; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:00:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gt6sm10551977wib.8.2014.02.07.11.00.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:00:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F52D69.2080708@xen.org> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:00:57 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6980891529432074959==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============6980891529432074959== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090605070700080003040105" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090605070700080003040105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dario, went over it and changed most issues. Mainly I shortened sentences and fixed small errors. It's published now. Feel free to go in and make changes Lars On 07/02/2014 18:23, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:37 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is >>> perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open >>> Source advanced users and developers). >>> Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're >>> here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't >>> need you, there is , isn't >>> it?". >>> >>> This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude >>> showed up, which was very good! :-P >> On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts >> (i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At >> least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's >> quite a big change. >> > Yeah, that too... I had a couple which were literally trying to put a 10 > euros note in one of my pocket... I mean, physically! :-P >> As an aside, I think we need to have a better answer when people ask >> that. I was thinking something like, >> > Indeed. > >> "The XenProject is actually funded >> by a board of about a dozen corporations, so we have plenty of money. >> > EhEh, nice one! > >> But what we can't really buy is people testing new Xen releases, giving >> good bug reports, and talking about Xen. Those are all great ways to >> support the project." >> > == > A T-Shirt For a Bug Report > == > > I like it! I think we can think about something nice and fun enough for > next round... Something like writing a 'fake' contract where the person > agrees on testing and sending a report, in return of having got the > t-shirt for free! Of course, we could put any kind of info about Xen on > the "contract" (including, of course, how to test it!). > > The only thing I don't like is that it looks a bit of a waste to print > so much sheets... Perhaps we can use recycled paper. Or, if the event is > one of the ones with badges (like OSCON and LinuxCon), we can just scan > them and send the thing by e-mail!! > > Ok... Better go downstairs cooking dinner, I guess :-P > > Dario > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------090605070700080003040105 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dario,
went over it and changed most issues. Mainly I shortened sentences and fixed small errors. It's published now. Feel free to go in and make changes
Lars

On 07/02/2014 18:23, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:37 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:

On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:

What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is
perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open
Source advanced users and developers).
Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're
here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't
need you, there is <another_open_source_virtualization_solution>, isn't
it?".

This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude
showed up, which was very good! :-P

On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts 
(i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At 
least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's 
quite a big change.


Yeah, that too... I had a couple which were literally trying to put a 10
euros note in one of my pocket... I mean, physically! :-P

As an aside, I think we need to have a better answer when people ask 
that.  I was thinking something like, 


Indeed.


"The XenProject is actually funded 
by a board of about a dozen corporations, so we have plenty of money.  


EhEh, nice one!


But what we can't really buy is people testing new Xen releases, giving 
good bug reports, and talking about Xen.  Those are all great ways to 
support the project."


==
A T-Shirt For a Bug Report
==

I like it! I think we can think about something nice and fun enough for
next round... Something like writing a 'fake' contract where the person
agrees on testing and sending a report, in return of having got the
t-shirt for free! Of course, we could put any kind of info about Xen on
the "contract" (including, of course, how to test it!).

The only thing I don't like is that it looks a bit of a waste to print
so much sheets... Perhaps we can use recycled paper. Or, if the event is
one of the ones with badges (like OSCON and LinuxCon), we can just scan
them and send the thing by e-mail!!

Ok... Better go downstairs cooking dinner, I guess :-P

Dario




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------090605070700080003040105-- --===============6980891529432074959== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6980891529432074959==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 19:23:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:23:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBr1J-0004S2-Ct; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:23:25 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBr1H-0004Ro-Sy for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:23:24 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:47342] by server-9.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id AA/89-24895-BA235F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:23:23 +0000 X-Env-Sender: konrad.wilk@oracle.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391801001!2846106!1 X-Originating-IP: [156.151.31.81] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTU2LjE1MS4zMS44MSA9PiAyODgzMzk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 26915 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 19:23:22 -0000 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (HELO userp1040.oracle.com) (156.151.31.81) by server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 19:23:22 -0000 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s17JNHBK028871 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:23:17 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s17JNGjD013324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:23:17 GMT Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s17JNFQh029305; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:23:16 GMT Received: from phenom.dumpdata.com (/50.195.21.189) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:23:15 -0800 Received: by phenom.dumpdata.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E9FA51C0972; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:23:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:23:14 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Dario Faggioli Message-ID: <20140207192314.GA11699@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:23:09PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:37 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is > > > perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open > > > Source advanced users and developers). > > > Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're > > > here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't > > > need you, there is , isn't > > > it?". > > > > > > This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude > > > showed up, which was very good! :-P > > > > On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts > > (i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At > > least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's > > quite a big change. > > > Yeah, that too... I had a couple which were literally trying to put a 10 > euros note in one of my pocket... I mean, physically! :-P Beer money! I should sooo have been there _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 19:23:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:23:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBr1J-0004S2-Ct; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:23:25 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBr1H-0004Ro-Sy for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:23:24 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:47342] by server-9.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id AA/89-24895-BA235F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:23:23 +0000 X-Env-Sender: konrad.wilk@oracle.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391801001!2846106!1 X-Originating-IP: [156.151.31.81] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTU2LjE1MS4zMS44MSA9PiAyODgzMzk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 26915 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 19:23:22 -0000 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (HELO userp1040.oracle.com) (156.151.31.81) by server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 19:23:22 -0000 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s17JNHBK028871 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:23:17 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s17JNGjD013324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:23:17 GMT Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s17JNFQh029305; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:23:16 GMT Received: from phenom.dumpdata.com (/50.195.21.189) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:23:15 -0800 Received: by phenom.dumpdata.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E9FA51C0972; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:23:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:23:14 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Dario Faggioli Message-ID: <20140207192314.GA11699@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <1391789632.25331.17.camel@Solace> <1391793795.25331.30.camel@Solace> <52F519E5.3080305@eu.citrix.com> <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1391797389.25331.63.camel@Solace> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:23:09PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 17:37 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > On 02/07/2014 05:23 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > What changed, IMHO, as compared to last year, was how the project is > > > perceived outside, by a crowd like the one attending FOSDEM (so Open > > > Source advanced users and developers). > > > Last year I got a couple of those annoying question like "why you're > > > here, xen is not open source?" or "isn't xen dead already?" or "we don't > > > need you, there is , isn't > > > it?". > > > > > > This year, _not_a_single_occurrence_ of the above questions and attitude > > > showed up, which was very good! :-P > > > > On the contrary, a large number of people wanted to *buy* t-shirts > > (i.e., asked how much they were and were surprised they were free). At > > least a handful of people actually tried to donate money to us! That's > > quite a big change. > > > Yeah, that too... I had a couple which were literally trying to put a 10 > euros note in one of my pocket... I mean, physically! :-P Beer money! I should sooo have been there _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 20:30:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBs48-0008La-2C; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:24 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBs46-0008LV-JJ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:22 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:9410] by server-14.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id D1/96-29228-D5245F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:21 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391805019!2860709!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.54] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1941 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 20:30:19 -0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f54.google.com) (74.125.82.54) by server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 20:30:19 -0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id x13so2590466wgg.21 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:30:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=qlj9NAyED13Pox+2D3QLhRcNcUFSrRHuEIIb+uDvOzE=; b=DDrWfpeUgiRVzIlkY3BLlxMWrIBQBmE/IPGbG1koCj/M0SCm0I5B7SdGBHnhhYR09R W6WzCKfmI2EWzJsgNOAYjMR7aTHL7GusOqXey1XSjXuT3cumx/bpcZBNBK13P6N0Z2UW KjSSOXKh5wG57MMpKYVaUZCQ3tS9bT/MenwZfuvXUFDAQekIMyrXipPvf5JvmTsIs4UG GH+l1IjjtaeuJbNFhl+uxaC81Z4FshVK2WWFtTXrQ0uQpYJdh4Ub/EJFCa4+RG6/htL+ 5cVf18wUV/ZI1vwy4hLFl3iT1ButhNgQFdlXxVWkL0RIaARKdKo0GHX6RN42fxIJ+L/3 Qb2g== X-Received: by 10.194.77.7 with SMTP id o7mr12128760wjw.35.1391805018894; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:30:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.26.11] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 12sm13324478wjm.10.2014.02.07.12.30.17 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:30:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F54258.7000204@xen.org> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:16 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" References: In-Reply-To: X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Subject: [Publicity] Fwd: New major release (Xen Orchestra) X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0542212406604475785==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0542212406604475785== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000603000503030303090002" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000603000503030303090002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New major release Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:42:19 +0100 From: Olivier Lambert To: Lars Kurth Hi Lars, Here we are: https://xen-orchestra.com/new-major-release-for-xen-orchestra/ :) Olivier --------------000603000503030303090002 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: New major release
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:42:19 +0100
From: Olivier Lambert <lambert.olivier@gmail.com>
To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> 


Hi Lars,

Here we are:
https://xen-orchestra.com/new-major-release-for-xen-orchestra/


:)



Olivier


--------------000603000503030303090002-- --===============0542212406604475785== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0542212406604475785==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 07 20:30:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBs48-0008La-2C; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:24 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBs46-0008LV-JJ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:22 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:9410] by server-14.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id D1/96-29228-D5245F25; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:21 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1391805019!2860709!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.54] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1941 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2014 20:30:19 -0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f54.google.com) (74.125.82.54) by server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2014 20:30:19 -0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id x13so2590466wgg.21 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:30:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=qlj9NAyED13Pox+2D3QLhRcNcUFSrRHuEIIb+uDvOzE=; b=DDrWfpeUgiRVzIlkY3BLlxMWrIBQBmE/IPGbG1koCj/M0SCm0I5B7SdGBHnhhYR09R W6WzCKfmI2EWzJsgNOAYjMR7aTHL7GusOqXey1XSjXuT3cumx/bpcZBNBK13P6N0Z2UW KjSSOXKh5wG57MMpKYVaUZCQ3tS9bT/MenwZfuvXUFDAQekIMyrXipPvf5JvmTsIs4UG GH+l1IjjtaeuJbNFhl+uxaC81Z4FshVK2WWFtTXrQ0uQpYJdh4Ub/EJFCa4+RG6/htL+ 5cVf18wUV/ZI1vwy4hLFl3iT1ButhNgQFdlXxVWkL0RIaARKdKo0GHX6RN42fxIJ+L/3 Qb2g== X-Received: by 10.194.77.7 with SMTP id o7mr12128760wjw.35.1391805018894; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:30:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.26.11] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 12sm13324478wjm.10.2014.02.07.12.30.17 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:30:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F54258.7000204@xen.org> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:30:16 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" References: In-Reply-To: X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Subject: [Publicity] Fwd: New major release (Xen Orchestra) X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0542212406604475785==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0542212406604475785== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000603000503030303090002" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000603000503030303090002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New major release Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:42:19 +0100 From: Olivier Lambert To: Lars Kurth Hi Lars, Here we are: https://xen-orchestra.com/new-major-release-for-xen-orchestra/ :) Olivier --------------000603000503030303090002 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: New major release
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:42:19 +0100
From: Olivier Lambert <lambert.olivier@gmail.com>
To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> 


Hi Lars,

Here we are:
https://xen-orchestra.com/new-major-release-for-xen-orchestra/


:)



Olivier


--------------000603000503030303090002-- --===============0542212406604475785== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0542212406604475785==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 01:35:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:35:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WD2Fz-00089G-N1; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:35:27 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WD2Fy-00089B-9i for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:35:26 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:23704] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 56/5F-01226-D5E79F25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:35:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392082524!3392343!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.169] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TINY_FONT,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1078 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 01:35:24 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 01:35:24 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t61so4967170wes.0 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:35:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yh3R6fJ5NDwQ0WuWxe/Ht2GlzRODOVwczf0HnpoAXrg=; b=ItQkdOsu0lZUJbdStONGkhzySblSI3MdrDiq1kz7DJGiwdqiRTDjVqRm4hxWXde/x+ y5gogdSBhhzrmfG5yg8lDwNa+2fYNqx3UkNW519iY49iMoEn2EWL8aNQBWoWbmBApzMx W6MBsXap+FkY4QfMG6woftcIpFdsunTy9Y8Dc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yh3R6fJ5NDwQ0WuWxe/Ht2GlzRODOVwczf0HnpoAXrg=; b=I9XKWVDstcntn1qFcVBIBBwocxNi+2G5MtHYolHmOdDtfwBT4O1jB9Dp345Ug/FBYF pHyF/jp4UUktCXHSqAp+etBnSNe1I4dfsIcuRCDBL8PddXyMdznAlfcFxhjMHzPFgr2M 6A6y67Wj2XzmznATN4BX9nDaEGOZk6YaxZVQbpBDJ3kEip3W3Jjx6xbr1FZVbY/oIl/X gzNJnqk2EImVWYJWk29SsljgJI2gKA2b/8ZILDQdSOaZGxgRMt/wzFeyfbId4urSV5iR n57hrnAOLtnUzgZuqUSD8kOSDfR7kEP95eTEJ6HhIoBCQXfD8UnMxUvSwcvVDY6e5bPS 6PXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcsvOD4qaC70yewlajlEfmL7TsS/UJ8/ABSe3Kc2kOSKZB79I6cOit++3pJykvgENPBwh3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.143.40 with SMTP id sb8mr24380627wjb.15.1392082523816; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:35:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:35:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: [Publicity] InformationWeek on commoditization of hypervisors X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4688319685373814680==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4688319685373814680== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115e78c549b5704f217786d --089e0115e78c549b5704f217786d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Interesting article on commoditization of hypervisor technology. Charles Babcock's take is that it is not upsetting VMWare's position in the market- yet. Microsoft and Red Hat get a mention. http://www.informationweek.com/cloud/infrastructure-as-a-service/vmware-navigates-high-wire-act/d/d-id/1113759 Would be great to follow up with Babcock regarding how much more Xen is in use at the end of 2013 vs. 2012. He's also very interested in end users, so if we could share some new names wit him that would likely pique his interest. It would be useful to include these stats. when approaching him with the upcoming 4.4 release too. Thanks, Some interesting quotes from the article: There was doubtless more Microsoft Hyper-V and Red Hat KVM in use at the end of 2013 than there was at the end of 2012, so some commoditization is happening. But there remains a huge market for virtualization. Gartner says 68% of the x86 part of the datacenter was virtualized at the end of 2013, up from just 21% in 2008. By 2016, that figure is expected to hit 84%, Gartner predicts. That means more license fees flowing out of VMware's core business as long as customers rely on it to continue the conversion of their data centers. One VMware customer, Covance in Princeton, N.J., found that vCloud Automation Center, "reduced the service cycle time from a month to a day," Sayar said. ...VMware's fourth quarter shows that it has the revenue to finance more development of management products and that there is a growing market for them. Commoditization is going on at the hypervisor level. VMware keeps elevating its product line above that. -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e0115e78c549b5704f217786d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Interesting article on commoditization of hypervisor = technology. Charles Babcock's take is that it is not upsetting VMWare&#= 39;s position in the market- yet. Microsoft and Red Hat get a mention.


Would be great to follow up with Babcock regardin= g how much more Xen is in use at the end of 2013 vs. 2012. He's also ve= ry interested in end users, so if we could share some new names wit him tha= t would likely pique his interest. It would be useful to include these stat= s. when approaching him with the upcoming 4.4 release too.

Thanks,

Some interesting quotes = from the article:

= There was doubtless more Microsoft Hyper-V and Red Hat KVM in use at the en= d of 2013 than there was at the end of 2012, so some commoditization is hap= pening.

But there remains a huge market for virtualiza= tion. Gartner says 68% of the x86 part of the datacenter was virtualized at= the end of 2013, up from just 21% in 2008. By 2016, that figure is expecte= d to hit 84%, Gartner predicts. That means more license fees flowing out of= VMware's core business as long as customers rely on it to continue the= conversion of their=A0data centers.

One VMware customer,=A0Covance=A0in Princeton, N.J., found that vCloud Automatio= n Center, "reduced the service cycle time from a month to a day,"= Sayar said.

...VMware's fourth quarter shows that it has the revenue t= o finance more development of management products and that there is a growi= ng market for them. Commoditization is going on at the hypervisor level. VM= ware keeps elevating its product line above that.


--
Sarah Conway
PR M= anager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(9= 78) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--089e0115e78c549b5704f217786d-- --===============4688319685373814680== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4688319685373814680==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 01:35:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:35:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WD2Fz-00089G-N1; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:35:27 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WD2Fy-00089B-9i for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:35:26 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:23704] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 56/5F-01226-D5E79F25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:35:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392082524!3392343!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.169] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TINY_FONT,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1078 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 01:35:24 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 01:35:24 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t61so4967170wes.0 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:35:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yh3R6fJ5NDwQ0WuWxe/Ht2GlzRODOVwczf0HnpoAXrg=; b=ItQkdOsu0lZUJbdStONGkhzySblSI3MdrDiq1kz7DJGiwdqiRTDjVqRm4hxWXde/x+ y5gogdSBhhzrmfG5yg8lDwNa+2fYNqx3UkNW519iY49iMoEn2EWL8aNQBWoWbmBApzMx W6MBsXap+FkY4QfMG6woftcIpFdsunTy9Y8Dc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yh3R6fJ5NDwQ0WuWxe/Ht2GlzRODOVwczf0HnpoAXrg=; b=I9XKWVDstcntn1qFcVBIBBwocxNi+2G5MtHYolHmOdDtfwBT4O1jB9Dp345Ug/FBYF pHyF/jp4UUktCXHSqAp+etBnSNe1I4dfsIcuRCDBL8PddXyMdznAlfcFxhjMHzPFgr2M 6A6y67Wj2XzmznATN4BX9nDaEGOZk6YaxZVQbpBDJ3kEip3W3Jjx6xbr1FZVbY/oIl/X gzNJnqk2EImVWYJWk29SsljgJI2gKA2b/8ZILDQdSOaZGxgRMt/wzFeyfbId4urSV5iR n57hrnAOLtnUzgZuqUSD8kOSDfR7kEP95eTEJ6HhIoBCQXfD8UnMxUvSwcvVDY6e5bPS 6PXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcsvOD4qaC70yewlajlEfmL7TsS/UJ8/ABSe3Kc2kOSKZB79I6cOit++3pJykvgENPBwh3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.143.40 with SMTP id sb8mr24380627wjb.15.1392082523816; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:35:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:35:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: [Publicity] InformationWeek on commoditization of hypervisors X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4688319685373814680==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4688319685373814680== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115e78c549b5704f217786d --089e0115e78c549b5704f217786d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Interesting article on commoditization of hypervisor technology. Charles Babcock's take is that it is not upsetting VMWare's position in the market- yet. Microsoft and Red Hat get a mention. http://www.informationweek.com/cloud/infrastructure-as-a-service/vmware-navigates-high-wire-act/d/d-id/1113759 Would be great to follow up with Babcock regarding how much more Xen is in use at the end of 2013 vs. 2012. He's also very interested in end users, so if we could share some new names wit him that would likely pique his interest. It would be useful to include these stats. when approaching him with the upcoming 4.4 release too. Thanks, Some interesting quotes from the article: There was doubtless more Microsoft Hyper-V and Red Hat KVM in use at the end of 2013 than there was at the end of 2012, so some commoditization is happening. But there remains a huge market for virtualization. Gartner says 68% of the x86 part of the datacenter was virtualized at the end of 2013, up from just 21% in 2008. By 2016, that figure is expected to hit 84%, Gartner predicts. That means more license fees flowing out of VMware's core business as long as customers rely on it to continue the conversion of their data centers. One VMware customer, Covance in Princeton, N.J., found that vCloud Automation Center, "reduced the service cycle time from a month to a day," Sayar said. ...VMware's fourth quarter shows that it has the revenue to finance more development of management products and that there is a growing market for them. Commoditization is going on at the hypervisor level. VMware keeps elevating its product line above that. -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e0115e78c549b5704f217786d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Interesting article on commoditization of hypervisor = technology. Charles Babcock's take is that it is not upsetting VMWare&#= 39;s position in the market- yet. Microsoft and Red Hat get a mention.


Would be great to follow up with Babcock regardin= g how much more Xen is in use at the end of 2013 vs. 2012. He's also ve= ry interested in end users, so if we could share some new names wit him tha= t would likely pique his interest. It would be useful to include these stat= s. when approaching him with the upcoming 4.4 release too.

Thanks,

Some interesting quotes = from the article:

= There was doubtless more Microsoft Hyper-V and Red Hat KVM in use at the en= d of 2013 than there was at the end of 2012, so some commoditization is hap= pening.

But there remains a huge market for virtualiza= tion. Gartner says 68% of the x86 part of the datacenter was virtualized at= the end of 2013, up from just 21% in 2008. By 2016, that figure is expecte= d to hit 84%, Gartner predicts. That means more license fees flowing out of= VMware's core business as long as customers rely on it to continue the= conversion of their=A0data centers.

One VMware customer,=A0Covance=A0in Princeton, N.J., found that vCloud Automatio= n Center, "reduced the service cycle time from a month to a day,"= Sayar said.

...VMware's fourth quarter shows that it has the revenue t= o finance more development of management products and that there is a growi= ng market for them. Commoditization is going on at the hypervisor level. VM= ware keeps elevating its product line above that.


--
Sarah Conway
PR M= anager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(9= 78) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--089e0115e78c549b5704f217786d-- --===============4688319685373814680== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4688319685373814680==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 02:53:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:53:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WD3T4-0003fx-Nm; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:53:02 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WD3T3-0003fs-CY for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:53:01 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:60915] by server-9.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id F9/41-24895-C8099F25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:53:00 +0000 X-Env-Sender: jennifer@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392087177!3409045!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.217.173] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TINY_FONT,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 27438 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 02:52:58 -0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f173.google.com) (209.85.217.173) by server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 02:52:58 -0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id s7so3877113lbd.4 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:52:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jZLtk/UdDGHaNQk3pypQSKGDrgBtBCrESP8Yg9myNLI=; b=Qf75QyMa+X0jkGwQwIsrdSa7UODIRwx5NKagUxLuO12vtWINYNW2i0/UJ5bH5dZaqt 1yBQGnuVnP/yu8oYTFgUms3s2zRkxEKX0BnP/jiCXU265eOm+ByTnXEbI4dKC96HKWQ8 fnM80/exl2bRmWmS6TVMaYjA6f96BivKhsodM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jZLtk/UdDGHaNQk3pypQSKGDrgBtBCrESP8Yg9myNLI=; b=bZUfQHA65XGNg7Eg4FSgbC/bD3jwmRdqhivHrKT8dxkvhhIS3Mox0kzjAstemjnSaz 2yQuYeLhfbi22HMnciXJ7XKZs78x+PksqeOJl0WI0pmMCdPNSzpc4W1Rtm94G5DH4hZx iQ6rsPO6Xsr6IFBuTUS5kYCL5xuyTmCPvsg1Gh2+0z3FOYqZs8xDaz0OBB7k10U5VkR0 kEQ4tNGuAbW73pCPtnkPX9wB2GlMQ3/LcybHYNgcZZ30FImxSbTMrhVVWdUxdtRjma/d GRilu745iXoMgatMtBWHwDGrhL+YgmDBSsOXqMOT9NozE+XORY7mirJWsHYS8/+c/8dX iOfA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCgyO8aiLjlXhMz7t5WikO8TVnB2snGJBvL1slGudt85An32x6V9hSWHktofDTML1EKMx5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.27.193 with SMTP id v1mr24668938lag.4.1392087177232; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.166.36 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:52:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:52:57 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jennifer Cloer To: Sarah Conway Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] InformationWeek on commoditization of hypervisors X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9115639383545025877==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9115639383545025877== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158c486b2103004f2188d2c --089e0158c486b2103004f2188d2c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for sharing, Sarah. Agree re: collecting stats and customers. Team: how do suggest we can we get these stats and customer references? On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Interesting article on commoditization of hypervisor technology. Charles > Babcock's take is that it is not upsetting VMWare's position in the market- > yet. Microsoft and Red Hat get a mention. > > > http://www.informationweek.com/cloud/infrastructure-as-a-service/vmware-navigates-high-wire-act/d/d-id/1113759 > > Would be great to follow up with Babcock regarding how much more Xen is in > use at the end of 2013 vs. 2012. He's also very interested in end users, so > if we could share some new names wit him that would likely pique his > interest. It would be useful to include these stats. when approaching him > with the upcoming 4.4 release too. > > Thanks, > > Some interesting quotes from the article: > > There was doubtless more Microsoft Hyper-V and Red Hat KVM in use at the > end of 2013 than there was at the end of 2012, so some commoditization is > happening. > > But there remains a huge market for virtualization. Gartner says 68% of > the x86 part of the datacenter was virtualized at the end of 2013, up from > just 21% in 2008. By 2016, that figure is expected to hit 84%, Gartner > predicts. That means more license fees flowing out of VMware's core > business as long as customers rely on it to continue the conversion of > their data centers. > > One VMware customer, Covance in > Princeton, N.J., found that vCloud Automation Center, "reduced the service > cycle time from a month to a day," Sayar said. > > ...VMware's fourth quarter shows that it has the revenue to finance more > development of management products and that there is a growing market for > them. Commoditization is going on at the hypervisor level. VMware keeps > elevating its product line above that. > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > -- Jennifer Cloer The Linux Foundation Director of Communications 503-867-2304 jennifer@linuxfoundation.org Skype: jencloer Twitter: jennifercloer --089e0158c486b2103004f2188d2c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for sharing, Sarah. Agree re: collecting stats and = customers.=A0

Team: how do suggest we can we get these s= tats and customer references?=A0

=
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoun= dation.org> wrote:
Interesting article on commoditization of hypervisor = technology. Charles Babcock's take is that it is not upsetting VMWare&#= 39;s position in the market- yet. Microsoft and Red Hat get a mention.


Would be great to follow up with Babcock regardin= g how much more Xen is in use at the end of 2013 vs. 2012. He's also ve= ry interested in end users, so if we could share some new names wit him tha= t would likely pique his interest. It would be useful to include these stat= s. when approaching him with the upcoming 4.4 release too.

Thanks,

Some interesting quotes = from the article:

= There was doubtless more Microsoft Hyper-V and Red Hat KVM in use at the en= d of 2013 than there was at the end of 2012, so some commoditization is hap= pening.

But there remains a huge market for virtualiza= tion. Gartner says 68% of the x86 part of the datacenter was virtualized at= the end of 2013, up from just 21% in 2008. By 2016, that figure is expecte= d to hit 84%, Gartner predicts. That means more license fees flowing out of= VMware's core business as long as customers rely on it to continue the= conversion of their=A0data centers.

One VMware customer,=A0Covance=A0in Princeton, N.J., found that vCloud Automatio= n Center, "reduced the service cycle time from a month to a day,"= Sayar said.

...VMware's fourth quarter shows that it has the revenue t= o finance more development of management products and that there is a growi= ng market for them. Commoditization is going on at the hypervisor level. VM= ware keeps elevating its product line above that.


--
Sarah Conway
PR M= anager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity




--
Jennifer= Cloer
The Linux Foundation
Director of Communications
503-867-230= 4
jenn= ifer@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: jencloer
Twitter: jennifercloer
--089e0158c486b2103004f2188d2c-- --===============9115639383545025877== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9115639383545025877==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 02:53:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:53:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WD3T4-0003fx-Nm; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:53:02 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WD3T3-0003fs-CY for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:53:01 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:60915] by server-9.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id F9/41-24895-C8099F25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 02:53:00 +0000 X-Env-Sender: jennifer@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392087177!3409045!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.217.173] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TINY_FONT,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 27438 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 02:52:58 -0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f173.google.com) (209.85.217.173) by server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 02:52:58 -0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id s7so3877113lbd.4 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:52:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jZLtk/UdDGHaNQk3pypQSKGDrgBtBCrESP8Yg9myNLI=; b=Qf75QyMa+X0jkGwQwIsrdSa7UODIRwx5NKagUxLuO12vtWINYNW2i0/UJ5bH5dZaqt 1yBQGnuVnP/yu8oYTFgUms3s2zRkxEKX0BnP/jiCXU265eOm+ByTnXEbI4dKC96HKWQ8 fnM80/exl2bRmWmS6TVMaYjA6f96BivKhsodM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jZLtk/UdDGHaNQk3pypQSKGDrgBtBCrESP8Yg9myNLI=; b=bZUfQHA65XGNg7Eg4FSgbC/bD3jwmRdqhivHrKT8dxkvhhIS3Mox0kzjAstemjnSaz 2yQuYeLhfbi22HMnciXJ7XKZs78x+PksqeOJl0WI0pmMCdPNSzpc4W1Rtm94G5DH4hZx iQ6rsPO6Xsr6IFBuTUS5kYCL5xuyTmCPvsg1Gh2+0z3FOYqZs8xDaz0OBB7k10U5VkR0 kEQ4tNGuAbW73pCPtnkPX9wB2GlMQ3/LcybHYNgcZZ30FImxSbTMrhVVWdUxdtRjma/d GRilu745iXoMgatMtBWHwDGrhL+YgmDBSsOXqMOT9NozE+XORY7mirJWsHYS8/+c/8dX iOfA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCgyO8aiLjlXhMz7t5WikO8TVnB2snGJBvL1slGudt85An32x6V9hSWHktofDTML1EKMx5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.27.193 with SMTP id v1mr24668938lag.4.1392087177232; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.166.36 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:52:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:52:57 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jennifer Cloer To: Sarah Conway Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] InformationWeek on commoditization of hypervisors X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9115639383545025877==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9115639383545025877== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158c486b2103004f2188d2c --089e0158c486b2103004f2188d2c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for sharing, Sarah. Agree re: collecting stats and customers. Team: how do suggest we can we get these stats and customer references? On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Interesting article on commoditization of hypervisor technology. Charles > Babcock's take is that it is not upsetting VMWare's position in the market- > yet. Microsoft and Red Hat get a mention. > > > http://www.informationweek.com/cloud/infrastructure-as-a-service/vmware-navigates-high-wire-act/d/d-id/1113759 > > Would be great to follow up with Babcock regarding how much more Xen is in > use at the end of 2013 vs. 2012. He's also very interested in end users, so > if we could share some new names wit him that would likely pique his > interest. It would be useful to include these stats. when approaching him > with the upcoming 4.4 release too. > > Thanks, > > Some interesting quotes from the article: > > There was doubtless more Microsoft Hyper-V and Red Hat KVM in use at the > end of 2013 than there was at the end of 2012, so some commoditization is > happening. > > But there remains a huge market for virtualization. Gartner says 68% of > the x86 part of the datacenter was virtualized at the end of 2013, up from > just 21% in 2008. By 2016, that figure is expected to hit 84%, Gartner > predicts. That means more license fees flowing out of VMware's core > business as long as customers rely on it to continue the conversion of > their data centers. > > One VMware customer, Covance in > Princeton, N.J., found that vCloud Automation Center, "reduced the service > cycle time from a month to a day," Sayar said. > > ...VMware's fourth quarter shows that it has the revenue to finance more > development of management products and that there is a growing market for > them. Commoditization is going on at the hypervisor level. VMware keeps > elevating its product line above that. > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > -- Jennifer Cloer The Linux Foundation Director of Communications 503-867-2304 jennifer@linuxfoundation.org Skype: jencloer Twitter: jennifercloer --089e0158c486b2103004f2188d2c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for sharing, Sarah. Agree re: collecting stats and = customers.=A0

Team: how do suggest we can we get these s= tats and customer references?=A0

=
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoun= dation.org> wrote:
Interesting article on commoditization of hypervisor = technology. Charles Babcock's take is that it is not upsetting VMWare&#= 39;s position in the market- yet. Microsoft and Red Hat get a mention.


Would be great to follow up with Babcock regardin= g how much more Xen is in use at the end of 2013 vs. 2012. He's also ve= ry interested in end users, so if we could share some new names wit him tha= t would likely pique his interest. It would be useful to include these stat= s. when approaching him with the upcoming 4.4 release too.

Thanks,

Some interesting quotes = from the article:

= There was doubtless more Microsoft Hyper-V and Red Hat KVM in use at the en= d of 2013 than there was at the end of 2012, so some commoditization is hap= pening.

But there remains a huge market for virtualiza= tion. Gartner says 68% of the x86 part of the datacenter was virtualized at= the end of 2013, up from just 21% in 2008. By 2016, that figure is expecte= d to hit 84%, Gartner predicts. That means more license fees flowing out of= VMware's core business as long as customers rely on it to continue the= conversion of their=A0data centers.

One VMware customer,=A0Covance=A0in Princeton, N.J., found that vCloud Automatio= n Center, "reduced the service cycle time from a month to a day,"= Sayar said.

...VMware's fourth quarter shows that it has the revenue t= o finance more development of management products and that there is a growi= ng market for them. Commoditization is going on at the hypervisor level. VM= ware keeps elevating its product line above that.


--
Sarah Conway
PR M= anager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity




--
Jennifer= Cloer
The Linux Foundation
Director of Communications
503-867-230= 4
jenn= ifer@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: jencloer
Twitter: jennifercloer
--089e0158c486b2103004f2188d2c-- --===============9115639383545025877== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9115639383545025877==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 11:52:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDBsp-0007ec-M2; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:11 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDBso-0007eX-Ax for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:10 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:45894] by server-8.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 00/0A-05298-9EE0AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:09 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amc79@cam.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392119525!3147732!1 X-Originating-IP: [131.111.8.132] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1031 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 11:52:05 -0000 Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.132) by server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 11:52:05 -0000 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from host81-149-102-120.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.149.102.120]:1024 helo=[10.0.0.152]) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1WDBsj-0000Ho-0m (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:05 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:50:03 +0000 Message-Id: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario, I've put a draft of my FOSDEM summary up at: https://github.com/nymote/nymote.github.io/wiki/fosdem-summary I've linked to the Xen blog post and also the Xen/ARM project page. I'll be making it live later today at http://nymote.org/blog/ but if you spot any errors please do let me know (or feel free to edit the page - just log in with github). Thanks, Amir On 7 Feb 2014, at 13:49, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 12:32 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: >> On 7 Feb 2014, at 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> >>> Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g., >>> the MirageOS demo at the booth. >> >> I will do. I was very interested in the Xen/ARM talk in the Automotive devroom but didn't manage to make it. If anyone has comments on how it went and the types of questions people asked, that would be very useful. >> > What I know for sure is that it went pretty well. Lots of people, lots > of questions, a lot of interest! :-) > > Stefano is the one who gave it, so he's probably able to give more > details or answer more specific questions. > >> I'm running late with admin things today so it's unlikely I'll get anything live. >> I'll send you a link when I get the post up and I'll definitely link back to the Xen post. >> > Ok, let's see how far I do get then. Even if late, send the link here > anyway, so that we can make the proper fuss about your article, when it > goes live. > > Thanks and Regards, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 11:52:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDBsp-0007ec-M2; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:11 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDBso-0007eX-Ax for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:10 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:45894] by server-8.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 00/0A-05298-9EE0AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:09 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amc79@cam.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392119525!3147732!1 X-Originating-IP: [131.111.8.132] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1031 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 11:52:05 -0000 Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.132) by server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 11:52:05 -0000 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from host81-149-102-120.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.149.102.120]:1024 helo=[10.0.0.152]) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1WDBsj-0000Ho-0m (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:05 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:50:03 +0000 Message-Id: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario, I've put a draft of my FOSDEM summary up at: https://github.com/nymote/nymote.github.io/wiki/fosdem-summary I've linked to the Xen blog post and also the Xen/ARM project page. I'll be making it live later today at http://nymote.org/blog/ but if you spot any errors please do let me know (or feel free to edit the page - just log in with github). Thanks, Amir On 7 Feb 2014, at 13:49, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 12:32 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: >> On 7 Feb 2014, at 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> >>> Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g., >>> the MirageOS demo at the booth. >> >> I will do. I was very interested in the Xen/ARM talk in the Automotive devroom but didn't manage to make it. If anyone has comments on how it went and the types of questions people asked, that would be very useful. >> > What I know for sure is that it went pretty well. Lots of people, lots > of questions, a lot of interest! :-) > > Stefano is the one who gave it, so he's probably able to give more > details or answer more specific questions. > >> I'm running late with admin things today so it's unlikely I'll get anything live. >> I'll send you a link when I get the post up and I'll definitely link back to the Xen post. >> > Ok, let's see how far I do get then. Even if late, send the link here > anyway, so that we can make the proper fuss about your article, when it > goes live. > > Thanks and Regards, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 11:52:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDBt1-0007fH-Ni; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:23 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDBt0-0007fC-Oe for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:23 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:15016] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 68/75-13775-5FE0AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:21 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amirmc@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392119541!1091231!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.176] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_14, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8,spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 12833 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 11:52:21 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 11:52:21 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi5so4091938wib.3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:52:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=99DsoUE+ZgxAsJceVvUCZo7vr/IFQTXi0WfQYs1F5ak=; b=SeENOuPkxtXeRAKuAyMwx57Ss85NKH8eSaq00MDg03Jo2PO4tGiNRu20HCOCPv1c4C CFU0IMmN5zUlh33S1quCsZ5VGL9VFRUFMc/IkQgp+XszBpVmwRKNvg5Cx9BiHmP4QELJ wORQqAgRBVG4HY8SttF219NdXc7pDpQs3U1OILULxYgYKbJ4eEHgH7iCIHVde9S2tLYc BWGNOvWgVE/jGU1PWfG+A1G8IyCN8pXKZor6gpxbQ9s9oyXUg+xqNyH5tjngy6VJXgtx cSRxZrLkvIiYxZHw3AQf3RPjR+dB20/wW0/Dco+u/32OUOyugJ0UOU2OD+PPl9g4e3mB 7utA== X-Received: by 10.194.108.162 with SMTP id hl2mr1153928wjb.84.1392119540652; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:52:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.152] (host81-149-102-120.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.102.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ci4sm43543104wjc.21.2014.02.11.03.52.17 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:52:19 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:15 +0000 Message-Id: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario, I've put a draft of my FOSDEM summary up at: https://github.com/nymote/nymote.github.io/wiki/fosdem-summary I've linked to the Xen blog post and also the Xen/ARM project page. I'll be making it live later today at http://nymote.org/blog/ but if you spot any errors please do let me know (or feel free to edit the page - just log in with github). Thanks, Amir On 7 Feb 2014, at 13:49, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 12:32 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: >> On 7 Feb 2014, at 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> >>> Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g., >>> the MirageOS demo at the booth. >> >> I will do. I was very interested in the Xen/ARM talk in the Automotive devroom but didn't manage to make it. If anyone has comments on how it went and the types of questions people asked, that would be very useful. >> > What I know for sure is that it went pretty well. Lots of people, lots > of questions, a lot of interest! :-) > > Stefano is the one who gave it, so he's probably able to give more > details or answer more specific questions. > >> I'm running late with admin things today so it's unlikely I'll get anything live. >> I'll send you a link when I get the post up and I'll definitely link back to the Xen post. >> > Ok, let's see how far I do get then. Even if late, send the link here > anyway, so that we can make the proper fuss about your article, when it > goes live. > > Thanks and Regards, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 11:52:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDBt1-0007fH-Ni; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:23 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDBt0-0007fC-Oe for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:23 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:15016] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 68/75-13775-5FE0AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:21 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amirmc@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392119541!1091231!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.176] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_14, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8,spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 12833 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 11:52:21 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 11:52:21 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi5so4091938wib.3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:52:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=99DsoUE+ZgxAsJceVvUCZo7vr/IFQTXi0WfQYs1F5ak=; b=SeENOuPkxtXeRAKuAyMwx57Ss85NKH8eSaq00MDg03Jo2PO4tGiNRu20HCOCPv1c4C CFU0IMmN5zUlh33S1quCsZ5VGL9VFRUFMc/IkQgp+XszBpVmwRKNvg5Cx9BiHmP4QELJ wORQqAgRBVG4HY8SttF219NdXc7pDpQs3U1OILULxYgYKbJ4eEHgH7iCIHVde9S2tLYc BWGNOvWgVE/jGU1PWfG+A1G8IyCN8pXKZor6gpxbQ9s9oyXUg+xqNyH5tjngy6VJXgtx cSRxZrLkvIiYxZHw3AQf3RPjR+dB20/wW0/Dco+u/32OUOyugJ0UOU2OD+PPl9g4e3mB 7utA== X-Received: by 10.194.108.162 with SMTP id hl2mr1153928wjb.84.1392119540652; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:52:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.152] (host81-149-102-120.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.102.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ci4sm43543104wjc.21.2014.02.11.03.52.17 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:52:19 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:15 +0000 Message-Id: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario, I've put a draft of my FOSDEM summary up at: https://github.com/nymote/nymote.github.io/wiki/fosdem-summary I've linked to the Xen blog post and also the Xen/ARM project page. I'll be making it live later today at http://nymote.org/blog/ but if you spot any errors please do let me know (or feel free to edit the page - just log in with github). Thanks, Amir On 7 Feb 2014, at 13:49, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-07 at 12:32 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: >> On 7 Feb 2014, at 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> >>> Feel free to mention any of the Xen activities that went on there, e.g., >>> the MirageOS demo at the booth. >> >> I will do. I was very interested in the Xen/ARM talk in the Automotive devroom but didn't manage to make it. If anyone has comments on how it went and the types of questions people asked, that would be very useful. >> > What I know for sure is that it went pretty well. Lots of people, lots > of questions, a lot of interest! :-) > > Stefano is the one who gave it, so he's probably able to give more > details or answer more specific questions. > >> I'm running late with admin things today so it's unlikely I'll get anything live. >> I'll send you a link when I get the post up and I'll definitely link back to the Xen post. >> > Ok, let's see how far I do get then. Even if late, send the link here > anyway, so that we can make the proper fuss about your article, when it > goes live. > > Thanks and Regards, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 14:08:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDE15-0002QA-SP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:51 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDE14-0002ML-Bz for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:50 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:18725] by server-2.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id D7/EA-01236-1FE2AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:49 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392127718!3571543!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjU4ODEgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 12732 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 14:08:39 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 14:08:39 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,825,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="99787908" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 14:08:37 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:08:34 -0500 Message-ID: <1392127710.30734.18.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Amir Chaudhry Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:08:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8172151861860503656==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8172151861860503656== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-j9z5k2F+EoAP52eMs3u3" --=-j9z5k2F+EoAP52eMs3u3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-11 at 11:50 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: > Dario, I've put a draft of my FOSDEM summary up at: https://github.com/ny= mote/nymote.github.io/wiki/fosdem-summary >=20 Hey, thanks for doing and sharing this! > I've linked to the Xen blog post and also the Xen/ARM project page. I'll= be making it live later today at http://nymote.org/blog/ but if you spot a= ny errors please do let me know (or feel free to edit the page - just log i= n with github). > I had a look, and it does look great. Thanks again, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-j9z5k2F+EoAP52eMs3u3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL6Lt4ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTzKwCfSNYX2BbIHdoK/IgA6yxsACO/ LY0AoI8v22wMA4ru7cS6N9k0xNUrUV0R =EVfy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-j9z5k2F+EoAP52eMs3u3-- --===============8172151861860503656== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8172151861860503656==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 14:08:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDE15-0002QA-SP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:51 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDE14-0002ML-Bz for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:50 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:18725] by server-2.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id D7/EA-01236-1FE2AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:49 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392127718!3571543!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjU4ODEgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 12732 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 14:08:39 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 14:08:39 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,825,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="99787908" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 14:08:37 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:08:34 -0500 Message-ID: <1392127710.30734.18.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Amir Chaudhry Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:08:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1391602470.21667.6.camel@Abyss> <487CEF71-6740-4199-A148-81EFCF35193D@recoil.org> <1AFEDC43-B5A0-4832-9810-953B764B44A5@cam.ac.uk> <1391774475.25331.5.camel@Solace> <1FB236DA-F079-49B7-B07B-B559A3631481@cam.ac.uk> <1391780993.25331.10.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM event report blog post? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8172151861860503656==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8172151861860503656== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-j9z5k2F+EoAP52eMs3u3" --=-j9z5k2F+EoAP52eMs3u3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-11 at 11:50 +0000, Amir Chaudhry wrote: > Dario, I've put a draft of my FOSDEM summary up at: https://github.com/ny= mote/nymote.github.io/wiki/fosdem-summary >=20 Hey, thanks for doing and sharing this! > I've linked to the Xen blog post and also the Xen/ARM project page. I'll= be making it live later today at http://nymote.org/blog/ but if you spot a= ny errors please do let me know (or feel free to edit the page - just log i= n with github). > I had a look, and it does look great. Thanks again, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-j9z5k2F+EoAP52eMs3u3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL6Lt4ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTzKwCfSNYX2BbIHdoK/IgA6yxsACO/ LY0AoI8v22wMA4ru7cS6N9k0xNUrUV0R =EVfy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-j9z5k2F+EoAP52eMs3u3-- --===============8172151861860503656== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8172151861860503656==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 17:12:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGsn-0002Uw-UQ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:29 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGsm-0002Uc-Dc for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:28 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:46070] by server-9.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id BA/A0-10184-BF95AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:27 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392138745!1170909!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 21285 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 17:12:26 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 17:12:26 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,826,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="99860190" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 17:12:24 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:12:23 -0500 Message-ID: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:12:22 +0100 Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3449836423717710644==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3449836423717710644== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X0de0E36DJE8c7xy262l" --=-X0de0E36DJE8c7xy262l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, This is the blog status update for this week (Feb 10th to 14th). Last posts have been: - Me, about FOSDEM (February 7) - Konrad, about PVH and how to test it (January 31) I have the following people in the pipeline already: + George Dunlap=20 + Julien Grall + Stefano Stabellini George, do you think it would be possible to have one of the two posts you where preparing (PoD and the presentation to Huawei conf. blogified) by the en of this week? If not, Julien, any idea (and time to work on it)? Perhaps a blog version of your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-X0de0E36DJE8c7xy262l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL6WfYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSTNACfTEUPx8OZug+qKUwfkeeijjJZ xCcAn12v18hFbM7G/GFdirYDEtBJf65N =7AhX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X0de0E36DJE8c7xy262l-- --===============3449836423717710644== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3449836423717710644==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 17:12:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGsn-0002Uw-UQ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:29 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGsm-0002Uc-Dc for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:28 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:46070] by server-9.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id BA/A0-10184-BF95AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:27 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392138745!1170909!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 21285 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 17:12:26 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 17:12:26 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,826,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="99860190" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 17:12:24 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:12:23 -0500 Message-ID: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:12:22 +0100 Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3449836423717710644==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3449836423717710644== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X0de0E36DJE8c7xy262l" --=-X0de0E36DJE8c7xy262l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, This is the blog status update for this week (Feb 10th to 14th). Last posts have been: - Me, about FOSDEM (February 7) - Konrad, about PVH and how to test it (January 31) I have the following people in the pipeline already: + George Dunlap=20 + Julien Grall + Stefano Stabellini George, do you think it would be possible to have one of the two posts you where preparing (PoD and the presentation to Huawei conf. blogified) by the en of this week? If not, Julien, any idea (and time to work on it)? Perhaps a blog version of your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-X0de0E36DJE8c7xy262l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL6WfYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSTNACfTEUPx8OZug+qKUwfkeeijjJZ xCcAn12v18hFbM7G/GFdirYDEtBJf65N =7AhX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X0de0E36DJE8c7xy262l-- --===============3449836423717710644== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3449836423717710644==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 18:19:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:19:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDHvr-0007Rx-Nv; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:19:43 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDHvq-0007Rq-Pn for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:19:43 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:64634] by server-14.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id E1/A8-08196-EB96AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:19:42 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392142779!1187185!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31508 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 18:19:40 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 18:19:40 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,826,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="101691657" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 18:19:38 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:19:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Joanna Rutkowska Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:19:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> References: <1387302668.3880.16.camel@Solace> <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM booth demo: QubesOS X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9016366347661524056==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9016366347661524056== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+w3KsQG1wsmsYjR407+i" --=-+w3KsQG1wsmsYjR407+i Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2013-12-20 at 12:04 +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: > On 12/17/13 18:51, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > A bit of context, for Joanna's benefit: > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/publicity/2013-12/msg00044.ht= ml > >=20 > > Personally, I think QubesOS would make a great demo... Joanna, any > > interest? > >=20 > > In case you don't want or can't come (or send anyone) to Brussels, I di= d > > setup Qubes on my laptop a while back, and I can try to do that again, > > with a newer version and commit, if not to a full fledged demo, to have > > it open and available for people to look at and play with while I'll be > > at the booth. > >=20 > > Thoughts? > >=20 >=20 > Hi Dario, Lars, >=20 > Thanks for reaching out! Unfortunately none of us plan to attend FOSDEM. >=20 BTW... Sorry for reporting about this a bit late, but QubesOS demo happened at the Xen's FOSDEM booth, and, if you ask me, it went pretty well! :-) Ufortunatelly, despite all the effort you (Joanna) and Marek spent in trying to help me, Win7 seamless mode wasn't functional on the laptop. Still, I reported to the many intereste people the availability of that feature too, which only happen to be not working in that very moment (it's a Beta, after all!). Despite that, it was something very interesting to do on my side, and something very well received from the FOSDEM crowd... We definitely should do that again in future events! You can find something about how FOSDEM went for Xen here: http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/02/07/xen-fosdem14-an-even-report/ Feel free to use the link/the article/the content in any way you like. Thanks again and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-+w3KsQG1wsmsYjR407+i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL6abgACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRp5QCgkskyj0G1dGtIOgoHNLkWyC6I pxoAnjuBuL1gf6zcU3VJYp8aEZ+g9Y81 =PdXI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+w3KsQG1wsmsYjR407+i-- --===============9016366347661524056== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9016366347661524056==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 18:19:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:19:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDHvr-0007Rx-Nv; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:19:43 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDHvq-0007Rq-Pn for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:19:43 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:64634] by server-14.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id E1/A8-08196-EB96AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:19:42 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392142779!1187185!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31508 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 18:19:40 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 18:19:40 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,826,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="101691657" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 18:19:38 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:19:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Joanna Rutkowska Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:19:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> References: <1387302668.3880.16.camel@Solace> <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM booth demo: QubesOS X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9016366347661524056==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9016366347661524056== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+w3KsQG1wsmsYjR407+i" --=-+w3KsQG1wsmsYjR407+i Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2013-12-20 at 12:04 +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: > On 12/17/13 18:51, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > A bit of context, for Joanna's benefit: > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/publicity/2013-12/msg00044.ht= ml > >=20 > > Personally, I think QubesOS would make a great demo... Joanna, any > > interest? > >=20 > > In case you don't want or can't come (or send anyone) to Brussels, I di= d > > setup Qubes on my laptop a while back, and I can try to do that again, > > with a newer version and commit, if not to a full fledged demo, to have > > it open and available for people to look at and play with while I'll be > > at the booth. > >=20 > > Thoughts? > >=20 >=20 > Hi Dario, Lars, >=20 > Thanks for reaching out! Unfortunately none of us plan to attend FOSDEM. >=20 BTW... Sorry for reporting about this a bit late, but QubesOS demo happened at the Xen's FOSDEM booth, and, if you ask me, it went pretty well! :-) Ufortunatelly, despite all the effort you (Joanna) and Marek spent in trying to help me, Win7 seamless mode wasn't functional on the laptop. Still, I reported to the many intereste people the availability of that feature too, which only happen to be not working in that very moment (it's a Beta, after all!). Despite that, it was something very interesting to do on my side, and something very well received from the FOSDEM crowd... We definitely should do that again in future events! You can find something about how FOSDEM went for Xen here: http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/02/07/xen-fosdem14-an-even-report/ Feel free to use the link/the article/the content in any way you like. Thanks again and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-+w3KsQG1wsmsYjR407+i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL6abgACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRp5QCgkskyj0G1dGtIOgoHNLkWyC6I pxoAnjuBuL1gf6zcU3VJYp8aEZ+g9Y81 =PdXI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+w3KsQG1wsmsYjR407+i-- --===============9016366347661524056== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9016366347661524056==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 18:57:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:57:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIWo-00011W-V4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:57:54 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIWm-00011H-SX; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:57:53 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:31072] by server-11.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 65/F9-23886-0B27AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:57:52 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392145069!3206221!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 16115 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 18:57:51 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 18:57:51 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,826,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="99894236" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 18:57:43 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:57:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Anil Madhavapeddy Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:57:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <99DF25E9-B4D5-48BE-B7D1-0DD06C4EDE8B@gmail.com> <1386839335.14726.50.camel@Abyss> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , Amir Chaudhry , "mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] [MirageOS-devel] Scheduling some posts for openmirage.org X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8818097709149912071==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8818097709149912071== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Bet7cdrAAPvlHjkU4qz3" --=-Bet7cdrAAPvlHjkU4qz3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2013-12-12 at 11:55 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > On 12 Dec 2013, at 09:08, Dario Faggioli wrot= e: > > > Just for clarity, these are intended for the Mirage blog, right? Or is > > it the Xen-Project blog that you're targeting (also)? >=20 > These are for the Mirage blog, but I would very much like to distill > them into summary documentation suitable for the Xen blog. The audiences > for both are fairly different -- the Mirage readers would want more of > the mechanics of the toolchain, whereas the Xen crowd probably care more > about the details of the protocols. >=20 > >=20 > > If the former, well, personally, I think it would be great to have most > > (if not all) of them in Xen's blog too. As Lars said, we often publish > > stuff sort of multiple time to amplify the effect. However, if we're > > worried that would mean too much information duplication, perhaps > > someone could write a summary, for instance, of the various posts in th= e > > 'Homepage' category for the Xen's blog? >=20 > Agreed -- I suggest we push these out to the Mirage blog over December > (the GitHub issue now has target dates on it for those who 'volunteered'= =20 > on the Mirage call), and then summarise for the Xen blog. >=20 Hey! I just found this old thread and realized that not much of what we were discussing has happened, at least when it comes to "distill them into summary documentation suitable for the Xen blog". =46rom the github issue cited earlier on the thread (https://github.com/mirage/mirage/issues/128) I can't tell exactly what went online on the Mirage blog, where should I check that? Do we have the material already for a post on the Xen Project's blog? Let us know, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-Bet7cdrAAPvlHjkU4qz3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL6cqUACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSaEwCfUb2ODzNYI74tOzKBfU1jlkQD LtkAn3h6U9FNJAZBRR/u88fiM/aAsA7s =URRG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Bet7cdrAAPvlHjkU4qz3-- --===============8818097709149912071== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8818097709149912071==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 18:57:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:57:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIWo-00011W-V4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:57:54 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIWm-00011H-SX; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:57:53 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:31072] by server-11.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 65/F9-23886-0B27AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:57:52 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392145069!3206221!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 16115 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 18:57:51 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 18:57:51 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,826,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="99894236" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 18:57:43 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:57:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Anil Madhavapeddy Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:57:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <99DF25E9-B4D5-48BE-B7D1-0DD06C4EDE8B@gmail.com> <1386839335.14726.50.camel@Abyss> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , Amir Chaudhry , "mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] [MirageOS-devel] Scheduling some posts for openmirage.org X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8818097709149912071==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8818097709149912071== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Bet7cdrAAPvlHjkU4qz3" --=-Bet7cdrAAPvlHjkU4qz3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2013-12-12 at 11:55 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > On 12 Dec 2013, at 09:08, Dario Faggioli wrot= e: > > > Just for clarity, these are intended for the Mirage blog, right? Or is > > it the Xen-Project blog that you're targeting (also)? >=20 > These are for the Mirage blog, but I would very much like to distill > them into summary documentation suitable for the Xen blog. The audiences > for both are fairly different -- the Mirage readers would want more of > the mechanics of the toolchain, whereas the Xen crowd probably care more > about the details of the protocols. >=20 > >=20 > > If the former, well, personally, I think it would be great to have most > > (if not all) of them in Xen's blog too. As Lars said, we often publish > > stuff sort of multiple time to amplify the effect. However, if we're > > worried that would mean too much information duplication, perhaps > > someone could write a summary, for instance, of the various posts in th= e > > 'Homepage' category for the Xen's blog? >=20 > Agreed -- I suggest we push these out to the Mirage blog over December > (the GitHub issue now has target dates on it for those who 'volunteered'= =20 > on the Mirage call), and then summarise for the Xen blog. >=20 Hey! I just found this old thread and realized that not much of what we were discussing has happened, at least when it comes to "distill them into summary documentation suitable for the Xen blog". =46rom the github issue cited earlier on the thread (https://github.com/mirage/mirage/issues/128) I can't tell exactly what went online on the Mirage blog, where should I check that? Do we have the material already for a post on the Xen Project's blog? Let us know, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-Bet7cdrAAPvlHjkU4qz3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL6cqUACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSaEwCfUb2ODzNYI74tOzKBfU1jlkQD LtkAn3h6U9FNJAZBRR/u88fiM/aAsA7s =URRG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Bet7cdrAAPvlHjkU4qz3-- --===============8818097709149912071== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8818097709149912071==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:01:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIaV-0001Zm-G6; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:43 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIaU-0001Zc-L9 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:42 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:4674] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 32/57-10891-5937AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:41 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392145300!4917396!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11428 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:01:40 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:01:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 567 invoked by uid 634); 11 Feb 2014 19:01:40 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:39 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:37 +0000 Message-Id: <484CB6F6-CB8B-45C7-AB06-60AA725B72DE@recoil.org> References: <99DF25E9-B4D5-48BE-B7D1-0DD06C4EDE8B@gmail.com> <1386839335.14726.50.camel@Abyss> <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Lars Kurth , Amir Chaudhry , Publicity list , "mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [MirageOS-devel] Scheduling some posts for openmirage.org X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 11 Feb 2014, at 18:57, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On gio, 2013-12-12 at 11:55 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> On 12 Dec 2013, at 09:08, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> >>> Just for clarity, these are intended for the Mirage blog, right? Or is >>> it the Xen-Project blog that you're targeting (also)? >> >> These are for the Mirage blog, but I would very much like to distill >> them into summary documentation suitable for the Xen blog. The audiences >> for both are fairly different -- the Mirage readers would want more of >> the mechanics of the toolchain, whereas the Xen crowd probably care more >> about the details of the protocols. >> >>> >>> If the former, well, personally, I think it would be great to have most >>> (if not all) of them in Xen's blog too. As Lars said, we often publish >>> stuff sort of multiple time to amplify the effect. However, if we're >>> worried that would mean too much information duplication, perhaps >>> someone could write a summary, for instance, of the various posts in the >>> 'Homepage' category for the Xen's blog? >> >> Agreed -- I suggest we push these out to the Mirage blog over December >> (the GitHub issue now has target dates on it for those who 'volunteered' >> on the Mirage call), and then summarise for the Xen blog. >> > Hey! > > I just found this old thread and realized that not much of what we were > discussing has happened, at least when it comes to "distill them into > summary documentation suitable for the Xen blog". > > From the github issue cited earlier on the thread > (https://github.com/mirage/mirage/issues/128) I can't tell exactly what > went online on the Mirage blog, where should I check that? Do we have > the material already for a post on the Xen Project's blog? A timely question! We have quite a few articles that have gone up now; the front page has a summary of recent updates; http://www.openmirage.org/ Some specific articles that may be of interest from the docs page: http://www.openmirage.org/docs/ - How Xen events work: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-events - How Xen suspend/resume works: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-suspend - Building custom disk backends: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-synthesize-virtual-disk - A walkthrough building a Hello World Xen kernel: http://openmirage.org/wiki/hello-world As for distilling these down to a Xen blog post, I'll defer to someone with a little more time than I have right now. I like the thinking though :-) -anil _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:01:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIaV-0001Zm-G6; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:43 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIaU-0001Zc-L9 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:42 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:4674] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 32/57-10891-5937AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:41 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392145300!4917396!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11428 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:01:40 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:01:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 567 invoked by uid 634); 11 Feb 2014 19:01:40 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:39 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:01:37 +0000 Message-Id: <484CB6F6-CB8B-45C7-AB06-60AA725B72DE@recoil.org> References: <99DF25E9-B4D5-48BE-B7D1-0DD06C4EDE8B@gmail.com> <1386839335.14726.50.camel@Abyss> <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Lars Kurth , Amir Chaudhry , Publicity list , "mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [MirageOS-devel] Scheduling some posts for openmirage.org X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 11 Feb 2014, at 18:57, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On gio, 2013-12-12 at 11:55 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> On 12 Dec 2013, at 09:08, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> >>> Just for clarity, these are intended for the Mirage blog, right? Or is >>> it the Xen-Project blog that you're targeting (also)? >> >> These are for the Mirage blog, but I would very much like to distill >> them into summary documentation suitable for the Xen blog. The audiences >> for both are fairly different -- the Mirage readers would want more of >> the mechanics of the toolchain, whereas the Xen crowd probably care more >> about the details of the protocols. >> >>> >>> If the former, well, personally, I think it would be great to have most >>> (if not all) of them in Xen's blog too. As Lars said, we often publish >>> stuff sort of multiple time to amplify the effect. However, if we're >>> worried that would mean too much information duplication, perhaps >>> someone could write a summary, for instance, of the various posts in the >>> 'Homepage' category for the Xen's blog? >> >> Agreed -- I suggest we push these out to the Mirage blog over December >> (the GitHub issue now has target dates on it for those who 'volunteered' >> on the Mirage call), and then summarise for the Xen blog. >> > Hey! > > I just found this old thread and realized that not much of what we were > discussing has happened, at least when it comes to "distill them into > summary documentation suitable for the Xen blog". > > From the github issue cited earlier on the thread > (https://github.com/mirage/mirage/issues/128) I can't tell exactly what > went online on the Mirage blog, where should I check that? Do we have > the material already for a post on the Xen Project's blog? A timely question! We have quite a few articles that have gone up now; the front page has a summary of recent updates; http://www.openmirage.org/ Some specific articles that may be of interest from the docs page: http://www.openmirage.org/docs/ - How Xen events work: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-events - How Xen suspend/resume works: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-suspend - Building custom disk backends: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-synthesize-virtual-disk - A walkthrough building a Hello World Xen kernel: http://openmirage.org/wiki/hello-world As for distilling these down to a Xen blog post, I'll defer to someone with a little more time than I have right now. I like the thinking though :-) -anil _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:08:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:08:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIhP-00021t-1N; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:08:51 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIhN-00021l-Tj for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:08:50 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:20659] by server-5.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 03/BC-32749-1457AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:08:49 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392145727!3242470!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.170] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5431 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:08:47 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f170.google.com) (209.85.212.170) by server-16.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:08:47 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hi5so49561wib.5 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:08:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rIBDtJkNhCOazOn4R11VGsNuSFV2Kx1DbsWQYCUp9j0=; b=fVkm1/AupDOFBXxFYv/R8q70v6ha+Ib/rrLrlaZrykFE74opZEc/WVwAg3kbER1Rfb tcdgwbpWqIGbmswZvJuW1Joz/TtWZF48M8zA53ONSzRZkwAZRE9zrbsNZoouAKIWsMVU 3JQ5l6ak4CpUoDXtRmRZX5HatVmOKRtJNMeYE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rIBDtJkNhCOazOn4R11VGsNuSFV2Kx1DbsWQYCUp9j0=; b=AlW1C3e8TPqavZKP4+eHFDpAjef/HYsQn8ih+Gd/ierfDsDXA78mWbM7kQ86gZJpPB 64d/qr4TDtAELU/k8Iuuw1KmZNwS2oo+EexZPZSYFGCDXISmfsQsBytmYPwDq1RgHDLV A2K7IfI22XdZ8EPC4aHV5KU+bYDDqnGk/d6AueH9rLk4TS+ZyzoMHP/plnXvAqigJMiH 5C5PZtmE9+gGTZLz5SOUO2uabYXwcMmTSTmbtJ4Xjsm9v+zBkE57wCAEfngI9yhKcc/E HHQGJ1Y3uXs3lR5JhaUtTnMfiIJ0AssQZEkwz3zOPqRnAMFpmXgJsBVhD4aK5Cq1JYKd zySg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnsCEx1m7HBRYYslVxfF4RVOqi5Bu/ITzwhDvJ9Siz42aNHVkkpBJEmbTl7uMfi7BXu3BJt MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.12.14 with SMTP id u14mr163776wib.0.1392145727414; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:08:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:08:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0698831697390151713==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0698831697390151713== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c23ed28f391f04f2262f07 --001a11c23ed28f391f04f2262f07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 FYI, Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater portability, efficiency and security." http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 An article from Dec. 2013: http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors Some additional messaging from their web site: Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. virtualization, etc. Thanks, -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --001a11c23ed28f391f04f2262f07 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker = release. (1.0 version is expected in April.) With these new releases, suppo= sedly Docker can now "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS sol= utions." They are positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pi= geon-holing hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors= that power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an en= tire operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application contain= ers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By v= irtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater portability,= efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technolo= gies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Df= eedburner&utm_medium=3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The= +VAR+Guy%29

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/co= mmunity/blog/containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messagin= g from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly= : Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 Gi= thub stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 community dev= elopers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now available a= t the Docker public index, and third party projects and partnerships built = on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, hosting services, CI platfor= ms, and more. Over 50 user-created case studies are available from companie= s such as eBay, Cloudflare, Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Car= e, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technol= ogies like Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedb= ack from the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a que= stion that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any= Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, offer= ing reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. virtualization, etc.=

Thanks,



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager=
The Linux Foundation
= sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sara= h.k.conway
--001a11c23ed28f391f04f2262f07-- --===============0698831697390151713== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0698831697390151713==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:08:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:08:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIhP-00021t-1N; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:08:51 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIhN-00021l-Tj for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:08:50 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:20659] by server-5.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 03/BC-32749-1457AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:08:49 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392145727!3242470!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.170] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5431 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:08:47 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f170.google.com) (209.85.212.170) by server-16.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:08:47 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hi5so49561wib.5 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:08:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rIBDtJkNhCOazOn4R11VGsNuSFV2Kx1DbsWQYCUp9j0=; b=fVkm1/AupDOFBXxFYv/R8q70v6ha+Ib/rrLrlaZrykFE74opZEc/WVwAg3kbER1Rfb tcdgwbpWqIGbmswZvJuW1Joz/TtWZF48M8zA53ONSzRZkwAZRE9zrbsNZoouAKIWsMVU 3JQ5l6ak4CpUoDXtRmRZX5HatVmOKRtJNMeYE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rIBDtJkNhCOazOn4R11VGsNuSFV2Kx1DbsWQYCUp9j0=; b=AlW1C3e8TPqavZKP4+eHFDpAjef/HYsQn8ih+Gd/ierfDsDXA78mWbM7kQ86gZJpPB 64d/qr4TDtAELU/k8Iuuw1KmZNwS2oo+EexZPZSYFGCDXISmfsQsBytmYPwDq1RgHDLV A2K7IfI22XdZ8EPC4aHV5KU+bYDDqnGk/d6AueH9rLk4TS+ZyzoMHP/plnXvAqigJMiH 5C5PZtmE9+gGTZLz5SOUO2uabYXwcMmTSTmbtJ4Xjsm9v+zBkE57wCAEfngI9yhKcc/E HHQGJ1Y3uXs3lR5JhaUtTnMfiIJ0AssQZEkwz3zOPqRnAMFpmXgJsBVhD4aK5Cq1JYKd zySg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnsCEx1m7HBRYYslVxfF4RVOqi5Bu/ITzwhDvJ9Siz42aNHVkkpBJEmbTl7uMfi7BXu3BJt MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.12.14 with SMTP id u14mr163776wib.0.1392145727414; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:08:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:08:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0698831697390151713==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0698831697390151713== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c23ed28f391f04f2262f07 --001a11c23ed28f391f04f2262f07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 FYI, Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater portability, efficiency and security." http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 An article from Dec. 2013: http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors Some additional messaging from their web site: Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. virtualization, etc. Thanks, -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --001a11c23ed28f391f04f2262f07 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker = release. (1.0 version is expected in April.) With these new releases, suppo= sedly Docker can now "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS sol= utions." They are positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pi= geon-holing hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors= that power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an en= tire operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application contain= ers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By v= irtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater portability,= efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technolo= gies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Df= eedburner&utm_medium=3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The= +VAR+Guy%29

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/co= mmunity/blog/containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messagin= g from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly= : Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 Gi= thub stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 community dev= elopers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now available a= t the Docker public index, and third party projects and partnerships built = on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, hosting services, CI platfor= ms, and more. Over 50 user-created case studies are available from companie= s such as eBay, Cloudflare, Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Car= e, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technol= ogies like Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedb= ack from the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a que= stion that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any= Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, offer= ing reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. virtualization, etc.=

Thanks,



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager=
The Linux Foundation
= sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sara= h.k.conway
--001a11c23ed28f391f04f2262f07-- --===============0698831697390151713== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0698831697390151713==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:12:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:12:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIkV-0002Lz-TT; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:12:03 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIkV-0002Lp-4U for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:12:03 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:46598] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 4C/90-10891-1067AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:12:01 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392145920!4898355!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 20775 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:12:00 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:12:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 17138 invoked by uid 634); 11 Feb 2014 19:12:00 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:11:59 +0000 From: Anil Madhavapeddy Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:11:57 +0000 Message-Id: To: mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Publicity list Subject: [Publicity] Mirage 1.1.0 release: the eat-your-own-dogfood release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org I'm pleased to announce the release of Mirage OS 1.1.0. The latest packages have been uploaded to OPAM, so you can just run "opam update -u" to grab the sources. A summary of new features and fixes is available online at: http://openmirage.org/blog/mirage-1.1-released It can be summarised as follows, but please see the blog post for details. - functional combinators to express device drivers in configuration files -- a much more flexible and well-typed approach to assembling various combinations of an OS stack in a principled way. - a fully functorized TCP/IP stack that is modular enough to abstract the sockets API and the direct TCP/IP stack behind the same modular interface. This lets us swap between developing on a familiar Unix box and redeploying on Xen. - less magic in the build system to make upstream binary packaging easier. - over 30 libraries released into OPAM, ranging from protocol implementations to Xen libraries to database code. - a refreshed set of tutorials and hello world walkthroughs online at: http://openmirage.org/wiki/hello-world Our libraries have had contributions from a large number of people in this release; the Mirage website now installs *40* libraries from a clean build (see https://travis-ci.org/mirage/mirage-www/jobs/18672156 for a sample build log of the live website). I'd like to particularly thank David Sheets, Hugo Heuzard and Rudy Grinberg for their contributions to the network and web stacks, and Jon Ludlam for contributing to the Xen suspend/resume support. The focus of the development team is now to shift our personal homepages onto Mirage-hosted VMs, so expect a flurry of complaints and bugfixes as we are forced to use our own tools! As always, please report bugs to https://github.com/mirage/mirage/issues, or on the mailing list. -Anil, along with Thomas Gazagnaire, David Scott and Richard Mortier _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:12:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:12:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIkV-0002Lz-TT; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:12:03 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDIkV-0002Lp-4U for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:12:03 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:46598] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 4C/90-10891-1067AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:12:01 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392145920!4898355!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 20775 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:12:00 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:12:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 17138 invoked by uid 634); 11 Feb 2014 19:12:00 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:11:59 +0000 From: Anil Madhavapeddy Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:11:57 +0000 Message-Id: To: mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Publicity list Subject: [Publicity] Mirage 1.1.0 release: the eat-your-own-dogfood release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org I'm pleased to announce the release of Mirage OS 1.1.0. The latest packages have been uploaded to OPAM, so you can just run "opam update -u" to grab the sources. A summary of new features and fixes is available online at: http://openmirage.org/blog/mirage-1.1-released It can be summarised as follows, but please see the blog post for details. - functional combinators to express device drivers in configuration files -- a much more flexible and well-typed approach to assembling various combinations of an OS stack in a principled way. - a fully functorized TCP/IP stack that is modular enough to abstract the sockets API and the direct TCP/IP stack behind the same modular interface. This lets us swap between developing on a familiar Unix box and redeploying on Xen. - less magic in the build system to make upstream binary packaging easier. - over 30 libraries released into OPAM, ranging from protocol implementations to Xen libraries to database code. - a refreshed set of tutorials and hello world walkthroughs online at: http://openmirage.org/wiki/hello-world Our libraries have had contributions from a large number of people in this release; the Mirage website now installs *40* libraries from a clean build (see https://travis-ci.org/mirage/mirage-www/jobs/18672156 for a sample build log of the live website). I'd like to particularly thank David Sheets, Hugo Heuzard and Rudy Grinberg for their contributions to the network and web stacks, and Jon Ludlam for contributing to the Xen suspend/resume support. The focus of the development team is now to shift our personal homepages onto Mirage-hosted VMs, so expect a flurry of complaints and bugfixes as we are forced to use our own tools! As always, please report bugs to https://github.com/mirage/mirage/issues, or on the mailing list. -Anil, along with Thomas Gazagnaire, David Scott and Richard Mortier _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:36:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJ8W-0003rc-Kr; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:52 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJ8V-0003rX-JO for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:51 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:4795] by server-15.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 1F/22-19263-2DB7AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:50 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392147408!1197357!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11616 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:36:49 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:36:49 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,827,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="99907896" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:36:47 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:36:47 -0500 Received: from gateway-cbg.eng.citrite.net ([10.80.16.17] helo=[0.0.0.0]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJ8R-0008IU-0s for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:47 +0000 Message-ID: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:46 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA1 Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think we need to think about how to get a counter-message out. The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH mode on Xen). But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker control of all containers on the system. By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but I'm sure it's similar. So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking one server cannot easily attack other servers. The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical than performance. Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach. -George On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > FYI, > > Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is > expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now > "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are > positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing > hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. > > The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that > power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire > operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application > containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By > virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater > portability, efficiency and security." > > http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 > > An article from Dec. 2013: > > http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors > > Some additional messaging from their web site: > > Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: > Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 > Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 > community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now > available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and > partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, > hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case > studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, > Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. > > I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like > Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from > the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question > that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any > Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, > offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. > virtualization, etc. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:36:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJ8W-0003rc-Kr; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:52 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJ8V-0003rX-JO for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:51 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:4795] by server-15.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 1F/22-19263-2DB7AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:50 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392147408!1197357!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11616 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:36:49 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:36:49 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,827,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="99907896" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:36:47 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:36:47 -0500 Received: from gateway-cbg.eng.citrite.net ([10.80.16.17] helo=[0.0.0.0]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJ8R-0008IU-0s for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:47 +0000 Message-ID: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:36:46 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA1 Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think we need to think about how to get a counter-message out. The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH mode on Xen). But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker control of all containers on the system. By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but I'm sure it's similar. So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking one server cannot easily attack other servers. The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical than performance. Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach. -George On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > FYI, > > Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is > expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now > "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are > positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing > hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. > > The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that > power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire > operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application > containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By > virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater > portability, efficiency and security." > > http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 > > An article from Dec. 2013: > > http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors > > Some additional messaging from their web site: > > Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: > Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 > Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 > community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now > available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and > partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, > hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case > studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, > Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. > > I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like > Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from > the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question > that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any > Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, > offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. > virtualization, etc. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:42:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJE6-0004Jv-3r; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:38 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJE4-0004Jq-AI for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:36 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:30989] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id C2/77-31661-B2D7AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:35 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392147754!4912361!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.5 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6691 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:42:34 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-16.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:42:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 30397 invoked by uid 634); 11 Feb 2014 19:42:33 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:33 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:31 +0000 Message-Id: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> To: George Dunlap X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too much trust in containers in sharp relief. http://www.zdnet.com/low-level-exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-hunting-7000025872/ Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and containers. I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web. -anil On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap wrote: > There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think we need to think about how to get a counter-message out. > > The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH mode on Xen). > > But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker control of all containers on the system. > > By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but I'm sure it's similar. > > So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking one server cannot easily attack other servers. > > The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical than performance. > > Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach. > > -George > > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> FYI, >> >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is >> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >> >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >> portability, efficiency and security." >> >> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >> >> An article from Dec. 2013: >> >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >> >> Some additional messaging from their web site: >> >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >> >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >> virtualization, etc. > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 19:42:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJE6-0004Jv-3r; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:38 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJE4-0004Jq-AI for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:36 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:30989] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id C2/77-31661-B2D7AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:35 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392147754!4912361!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.5 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6691 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 19:42:34 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-16.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 19:42:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 30397 invoked by uid 634); 11 Feb 2014 19:42:33 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:33 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:42:31 +0000 Message-Id: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> To: George Dunlap X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too much trust in containers in sharp relief. http://www.zdnet.com/low-level-exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-hunting-7000025872/ Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and containers. I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web. -anil On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap wrote: > There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think we need to think about how to get a counter-message out. > > The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH mode on Xen). > > But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker control of all containers on the system. > > By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but I'm sure it's similar. > > So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking one server cannot easily attack other servers. > > The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical than performance. > > Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach. > > -George > > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> FYI, >> >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is >> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >> >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >> portability, efficiency and security." >> >> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >> >> An article from Dec. 2013: >> >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >> >> Some additional messaging from their web site: >> >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >> >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >> virtualization, etc. > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 20:02:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:02:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJWt-0004vb-9K; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:02:03 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJWr-0004vW-9H for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:02:01 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:38826] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id E5/C9-13775-8B18AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:02:00 +0000 X-Env-Sender: joanna@invisiblethingslab.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392148897!1202837!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.111.4.25] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTExLjQuMjUgPT4gNDQ5ODE=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9791 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 20:01:59 -0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 20:01:59 -0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B7C2123C for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:01:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:01:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= invisiblethingslab.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=A3 1JE/r1PnTThuCoKhvJUd8zdeo=; b=AomDDuj292Aetu8soMctdvKY4DW5Qj4Jfz +mhBhOTM6de+5SoemuU0XjiTDaHjkYzaaZtC/ty6w6uCLx0MYL3XVu7h/8Vxz4xj XWyquR7JANy7cH9kaV+DB2MJgKI9I9DdeRm4xnksd2LmZsWh7MEGRHZqaRH3jtVk EHcq79AmM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=A31J E/r1PnTThuCoKhvJUd8zdeo=; b=o9ovTDDmtyYh86qHFbbBTAgPUNnGlSgGI21d PVnfp6HUS17lTNTZSvWAQ2KuXGIPF4fYRjsQpLKRZjUQo7+Q2q0OHKyvrGjoDXgl oAM7R5ZrRp2Sk/2GqYvQ6cckmx5M7z9wHG7XV0++xjj5bajfv71Ps2yfLnnb6Dyl 2EJTKzA= X-Sasl-enc: JY3b19Ev84jj88Zc3S3BKdQe+CgjZAJxzNGgcbDAa6pP 1392148889 Received: from [10.137.1.33] (unknown [37.31.88.211]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 698BDC00005; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:01:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52FA8195.9060408@invisiblethingslab.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:01:25 +0100 From: Joanna Rutkowska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1387302668.3880.16.camel@Solace> <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM booth demo: QubesOS X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4848252473901513641==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============4848252473901513641== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NHV2I6bsoF9LmiERLhi1J1qQJvpQ0JsoO" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --NHV2I6bsoF9LmiERLhi1J1qQJvpQ0JsoO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/11/14 19:19, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2013-12-20 at 12:04 +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: >> On 12/17/13 18:51, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> A bit of context, for Joanna's benefit: >>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/publicity/2013-12/msg00044.= html >>> >>> Personally, I think QubesOS would make a great demo... Joanna, any >>> interest? >>> >>> In case you don't want or can't come (or send anyone) to Brussels, I = did >>> setup Qubes on my laptop a while back, and I can try to do that again= , >>> with a newer version and commit, if not to a full fledged demo, to ha= ve >>> it open and available for people to look at and play with while I'll = be >>> at the booth. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >> >> Hi Dario, Lars, >> >> Thanks for reaching out! Unfortunately none of us plan to attend FOSDE= M. >> > BTW... Sorry for reporting about this a bit late, but QubesOS demo > happened at the Xen's FOSDEM booth, and, if you ask me, it went pretty > well! :-) >=20 > Ufortunatelly, despite all the effort you (Joanna) and Marek spent in > trying to help me, Win7 seamless mode wasn't functional on the laptop. > Still, I reported to the many intereste people the availability of that= > feature too, which only happen to be not working in that very moment > (it's a Beta, after all!). >=20 > Despite that, it was something very interesting to do on my side, and > something very well received from the FOSDEM crowd... We definitely > should do that again in future events! >=20 > You can find something about how FOSDEM went for Xen here: > http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/02/07/xen-fosdem14-an-even-report/ >=20 > Feel free to use the link/the article/the content in any way you like. >=20 > Thanks again and Regards, > Dario >=20 Hi Dario, Thanks for the update and for undertaking all the efforts to show of Qubes OS :) I think that a non-working windows support on a FOSDEM conference might just not be that much of a problem anyway ;) (But of course, we're working to improve this support and hope to have it much better in the soon-to-be-released r2-rc1...) Thanks, joanna. --NHV2I6bsoF9LmiERLhi1J1qQJvpQ0JsoO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+oGVAAoJEJwtLfzExk0Lmu8H/1spwp/0y+gdbTFuHAk5JReD +Hl2vQPHtORRr+kFQVhnI750cZuo+LiS9e4lY7qvugfCZQXEMuNNq2kgrZ4NPM3R MfwfRUqDWlFN2idkFojKchY3H5Ck01jTMKRB9qbUXuJbcSURL2jk4RUpyBrCJfxy 4xXWpfJIEgiYs7b8t3BfW7l60CNxXbhLP6sXN2Zo9xfPrOPPA++TYmL6PPpXE7Om qTwDy2NqFaJsf2vykA28igSrl0mlYoDpyw2CbvubcdunfehvAld1FtHn7ugQdjKm WQc1ivk/12XWLCqTBFzb/BoLtzZ4aaejNiICG+elkhsQ6WHpmVpfRbm/eTKbpUA= =17FA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NHV2I6bsoF9LmiERLhi1J1qQJvpQ0JsoO-- --===============4848252473901513641== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4848252473901513641==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 20:02:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:02:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJWt-0004vb-9K; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:02:03 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDJWr-0004vW-9H for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:02:01 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:38826] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id E5/C9-13775-8B18AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:02:00 +0000 X-Env-Sender: joanna@invisiblethingslab.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392148897!1202837!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.111.4.25] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTExLjQuMjUgPT4gNDQ5ODE=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9791 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 20:01:59 -0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 20:01:59 -0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B7C2123C for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:01:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:01:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= invisiblethingslab.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=A3 1JE/r1PnTThuCoKhvJUd8zdeo=; b=AomDDuj292Aetu8soMctdvKY4DW5Qj4Jfz +mhBhOTM6de+5SoemuU0XjiTDaHjkYzaaZtC/ty6w6uCLx0MYL3XVu7h/8Vxz4xj XWyquR7JANy7cH9kaV+DB2MJgKI9I9DdeRm4xnksd2LmZsWh7MEGRHZqaRH3jtVk EHcq79AmM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=A31J E/r1PnTThuCoKhvJUd8zdeo=; b=o9ovTDDmtyYh86qHFbbBTAgPUNnGlSgGI21d PVnfp6HUS17lTNTZSvWAQ2KuXGIPF4fYRjsQpLKRZjUQo7+Q2q0OHKyvrGjoDXgl oAM7R5ZrRp2Sk/2GqYvQ6cckmx5M7z9wHG7XV0++xjj5bajfv71Ps2yfLnnb6Dyl 2EJTKzA= X-Sasl-enc: JY3b19Ev84jj88Zc3S3BKdQe+CgjZAJxzNGgcbDAa6pP 1392148889 Received: from [10.137.1.33] (unknown [37.31.88.211]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 698BDC00005; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:01:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52FA8195.9060408@invisiblethingslab.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:01:25 +0100 From: Joanna Rutkowska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1387302668.3880.16.camel@Solace> <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM booth demo: QubesOS X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4848252473901513641==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============4848252473901513641== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NHV2I6bsoF9LmiERLhi1J1qQJvpQ0JsoO" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --NHV2I6bsoF9LmiERLhi1J1qQJvpQ0JsoO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/11/14 19:19, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2013-12-20 at 12:04 +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: >> On 12/17/13 18:51, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> A bit of context, for Joanna's benefit: >>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/publicity/2013-12/msg00044.= html >>> >>> Personally, I think QubesOS would make a great demo... Joanna, any >>> interest? >>> >>> In case you don't want or can't come (or send anyone) to Brussels, I = did >>> setup Qubes on my laptop a while back, and I can try to do that again= , >>> with a newer version and commit, if not to a full fledged demo, to ha= ve >>> it open and available for people to look at and play with while I'll = be >>> at the booth. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >> >> Hi Dario, Lars, >> >> Thanks for reaching out! Unfortunately none of us plan to attend FOSDE= M. >> > BTW... Sorry for reporting about this a bit late, but QubesOS demo > happened at the Xen's FOSDEM booth, and, if you ask me, it went pretty > well! :-) >=20 > Ufortunatelly, despite all the effort you (Joanna) and Marek spent in > trying to help me, Win7 seamless mode wasn't functional on the laptop. > Still, I reported to the many intereste people the availability of that= > feature too, which only happen to be not working in that very moment > (it's a Beta, after all!). >=20 > Despite that, it was something very interesting to do on my side, and > something very well received from the FOSDEM crowd... We definitely > should do that again in future events! >=20 > You can find something about how FOSDEM went for Xen here: > http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/02/07/xen-fosdem14-an-even-report/ >=20 > Feel free to use the link/the article/the content in any way you like. >=20 > Thanks again and Regards, > Dario >=20 Hi Dario, Thanks for the update and for undertaking all the efforts to show of Qubes OS :) I think that a non-working windows support on a FOSDEM conference might just not be that much of a problem anyway ;) (But of course, we're working to improve this support and hope to have it much better in the soon-to-be-released r2-rc1...) Thanks, joanna. --NHV2I6bsoF9LmiERLhi1J1qQJvpQ0JsoO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+oGVAAoJEJwtLfzExk0Lmu8H/1spwp/0y+gdbTFuHAk5JReD +Hl2vQPHtORRr+kFQVhnI750cZuo+LiS9e4lY7qvugfCZQXEMuNNq2kgrZ4NPM3R MfwfRUqDWlFN2idkFojKchY3H5Ck01jTMKRB9qbUXuJbcSURL2jk4RUpyBrCJfxy 4xXWpfJIEgiYs7b8t3BfW7l60CNxXbhLP6sXN2Zo9xfPrOPPA++TYmL6PPpXE7Om qTwDy2NqFaJsf2vykA28igSrl0mlYoDpyw2CbvubcdunfehvAld1FtHn7ugQdjKm WQc1ivk/12XWLCqTBFzb/BoLtzZ4aaejNiICG+elkhsQ6WHpmVpfRbm/eTKbpUA= =17FA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NHV2I6bsoF9LmiERLhi1J1qQJvpQ0JsoO-- --===============4848252473901513641== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4848252473901513641==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 21:27:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDKrF-0001bC-BT; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:09 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDKrD-0001b4-DU for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:07 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:64264] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 14/D8-11539-AA59AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:06 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392154024!4902195!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.180] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 856 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 21:27:04 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f180.google.com) (209.85.212.180) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 21:27:04 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hm4so5403515wib.13 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:27:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FbfDxrw0TUxhUBoo/jhR45UQ6PYUfBtcto7DQXJwiSE=; b=Lbz0Ai9mSYDguqbS4UIW5EQlAYcYynbbi0h1LNn1gYFh3bqk5M53lIUeSpGkmoZY3m hFydogzDG6OtATVBYA2r+g16hJyjOwd7DVqrNUO7CSd5u8Nivtv1+W8gQENJwuhcN7RR pwHrL60zP3pOJEs5A79KqT1kxKYlaUDQUvPNo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FbfDxrw0TUxhUBoo/jhR45UQ6PYUfBtcto7DQXJwiSE=; b=LmQREXprZEuUEKHkvHloU5RxQ5ZGYrgR+BbmAdrt1t0zelA66Ipx71JlD31KlZUQUJ X5zGGlZDOOKyZxGuyKsqSIMAqMh19UuTqMHNavRPhwcm0N3z+yMtgVoyoly7vsjC4k80 tOicgxJkC03tufA/K6gad9jFdQJScPhwLUPL/tqn9H/5pT9cCoCx3NVEbjr7OOXeIrvh SBP0dCbpvCmxrMKq+g0JZJCna2lqAjUW0YDjBIwqXMgr4cfRqPBi1ZGHeqXJkMpH99Eo fME2KF42vlaPIsLj0qX73eRk42MeRgUsaR+3JQH12ELw06mF6q78Q7HcMA/jwPp1wFil 88gA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3l1To14WAueWT1AjpLPQYGp04LVgpdpMbpqri2x3ABkd6UWKqQl96sPbHfpyltnrdKoZU MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.75.198 with SMTP id e6mr27572361wjw.3.1392154023968; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:27:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:27:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Anil Madhavapeddy Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4946731614959489055==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4946731614959489055== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04adc12b0f704f2281e6b --047d7bb04adc12b0f704f2281e6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This is excellent fodder. Regarding this info.: There have been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker control of all containers on the system. Are are there any specific examples of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities you can share? Thanks, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too much > trust in containers in sharp relief. > > > http://www.zdnet.com/low-level-exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-hunting-7000025872/ > > Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE > vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and > containers. I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web. > > -anil > > On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap > wrote: > > > There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think > we need to think about how to get a counter-message out. > > > > The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in > terms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though > probably not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running > in PV or PVH mode on Xen). > > > > But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call > interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have > been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the > system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would > give an attacker control of all containers on the system. > > > > By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to > break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only > worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but > I'm sure it's similar. > > > > So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud > environment, where users who don't trust each other share the same > hardware. Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that > successfully attacking one server cannot easily attack other servers. > > > > The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, > particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the > public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical > than performance. > > > > Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate > with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing > anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; > particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their > approach. > > > > -George > > > > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > >> FYI, > >> > >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is > >> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now > >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are > >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing > >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. > >> > >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that > >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire > >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application > >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By > >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater > >> portability, efficiency and security." > >> > >> > http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 > >> > >> An article from Dec. 2013: > >> > >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors > >> > >> Some additional messaging from their web site: > >> > >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: > >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 > >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 > >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now > >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and > >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, > >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case > >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, > >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. > >> > >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like > >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from > >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question > >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any > >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, > >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. > >> virtualization, etc. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Publicity mailing list > > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7bb04adc12b0f704f2281e6b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is excellent fodder. Regarding this info.:=A0There have been dozens = of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layer= s over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker c= ontrol of all containers on the system.

Are are = there any specific examples of=A0Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities<= span style=3D"font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">=A0you can share?=

Tha= nks,


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org><= /span> wrote:
The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too much = trust in containers in sharp relief.

http://www.zdnet.com/low-lev= el-exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-hunting-7000025872/

Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE vulnerabilit= ies and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and containers. = =A0I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web.

-anil

On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

> There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think= we need to think about how to get a counter-message out.
>
> The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in te= rms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probabl= y not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or= PVH mode on Xen).
>
> But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. =A0The system ca= ll interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. =A0There ha= ve been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the sy= stem call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would giv= e an attacker control of all containers on the system.
>
> By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to= break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only wo= rked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. =A0I don't know what KVM's record = is, but I'm sure it's similar.
>
> So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environm= ent, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. = =A0Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully atta= cking one server cannot easily attack other servers.
>
> The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particu= larly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-faci= ng services are lower value, where security is less critical than performan= ce.
>
> Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinat= e with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? =A0Are RedHat or Canonical d= oing anything with containers? =A0I think the OSv guys should be on-side; p= articularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approa= ch.
>
> -George
>
> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
>> FYI,
>>
>> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 versio= n is
>> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can= now
>> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions."= ; They are
>> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.
>>
>> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hyperv= isors that
>> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an= entire
>> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
>> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operat= ing system. By
>> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >> portability, efficiency and security."
>>
>> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-ap= plications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualizat= ion-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium=3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DF= eed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29
>>
>> An article from Dec. 2013:
>>
>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blo= g/containers-new-hypervisors
>>
>> Some additional messaging from their web site:
>>
>> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding ra= pidly:
>> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7= ,500
>> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applicatio= ns are now
>> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and=
>> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,<= br> >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created cas= e
>> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
>> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >>
>> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies = like
>> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedbac= k from
>> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a que= stion
>> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back = any
>> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timefram= e,
>> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
>> virtualization, etc.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicity mailing list
> Publicity@lists.xenp= roject.org
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo= /publicity
>


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity



--
=
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The L= inux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7bb04adc12b0f704f2281e6b-- --===============4946731614959489055== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4946731614959489055==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 21:27:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDKrF-0001bC-BT; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:09 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDKrD-0001b4-DU for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:07 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:64264] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 14/D8-11539-AA59AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:27:06 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392154024!4902195!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.180] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 856 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 21:27:04 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f180.google.com) (209.85.212.180) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 21:27:04 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hm4so5403515wib.13 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:27:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FbfDxrw0TUxhUBoo/jhR45UQ6PYUfBtcto7DQXJwiSE=; b=Lbz0Ai9mSYDguqbS4UIW5EQlAYcYynbbi0h1LNn1gYFh3bqk5M53lIUeSpGkmoZY3m hFydogzDG6OtATVBYA2r+g16hJyjOwd7DVqrNUO7CSd5u8Nivtv1+W8gQENJwuhcN7RR pwHrL60zP3pOJEs5A79KqT1kxKYlaUDQUvPNo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FbfDxrw0TUxhUBoo/jhR45UQ6PYUfBtcto7DQXJwiSE=; b=LmQREXprZEuUEKHkvHloU5RxQ5ZGYrgR+BbmAdrt1t0zelA66Ipx71JlD31KlZUQUJ X5zGGlZDOOKyZxGuyKsqSIMAqMh19UuTqMHNavRPhwcm0N3z+yMtgVoyoly7vsjC4k80 tOicgxJkC03tufA/K6gad9jFdQJScPhwLUPL/tqn9H/5pT9cCoCx3NVEbjr7OOXeIrvh SBP0dCbpvCmxrMKq+g0JZJCna2lqAjUW0YDjBIwqXMgr4cfRqPBi1ZGHeqXJkMpH99Eo fME2KF42vlaPIsLj0qX73eRk42MeRgUsaR+3JQH12ELw06mF6q78Q7HcMA/jwPp1wFil 88gA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3l1To14WAueWT1AjpLPQYGp04LVgpdpMbpqri2x3ABkd6UWKqQl96sPbHfpyltnrdKoZU MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.75.198 with SMTP id e6mr27572361wjw.3.1392154023968; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:27:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:27:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Anil Madhavapeddy Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4946731614959489055==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4946731614959489055== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04adc12b0f704f2281e6b --047d7bb04adc12b0f704f2281e6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This is excellent fodder. Regarding this info.: There have been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker control of all containers on the system. Are are there any specific examples of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities you can share? Thanks, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too much > trust in containers in sharp relief. > > > http://www.zdnet.com/low-level-exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-hunting-7000025872/ > > Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE > vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and > containers. I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web. > > -anil > > On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap > wrote: > > > There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think > we need to think about how to get a counter-message out. > > > > The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in > terms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though > probably not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running > in PV or PVH mode on Xen). > > > > But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call > interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have > been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the > system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would > give an attacker control of all containers on the system. > > > > By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to > break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only > worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but > I'm sure it's similar. > > > > So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud > environment, where users who don't trust each other share the same > hardware. Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that > successfully attacking one server cannot easily attack other servers. > > > > The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, > particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the > public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical > than performance. > > > > Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate > with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing > anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; > particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their > approach. > > > > -George > > > > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > >> FYI, > >> > >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is > >> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now > >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are > >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing > >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. > >> > >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that > >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire > >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application > >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By > >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater > >> portability, efficiency and security." > >> > >> > http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 > >> > >> An article from Dec. 2013: > >> > >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors > >> > >> Some additional messaging from their web site: > >> > >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: > >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 > >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 > >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now > >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and > >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, > >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case > >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, > >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. > >> > >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like > >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from > >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question > >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any > >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, > >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. > >> virtualization, etc. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Publicity mailing list > > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7bb04adc12b0f704f2281e6b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is excellent fodder. Regarding this info.:=A0There have been dozens = of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layer= s over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker c= ontrol of all containers on the system.

Are are = there any specific examples of=A0Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities<= span style=3D"font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">=A0you can share?=

Tha= nks,


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org><= /span> wrote:
The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too much = trust in containers in sharp relief.

http://www.zdnet.com/low-lev= el-exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-hunting-7000025872/

Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE vulnerabilit= ies and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and containers. = =A0I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web.

-anil

On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

> There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think= we need to think about how to get a counter-message out.
>
> The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in te= rms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probabl= y not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or= PVH mode on Xen).
>
> But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. =A0The system ca= ll interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. =A0There ha= ve been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the sy= stem call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would giv= e an attacker control of all containers on the system.
>
> By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to= break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only wo= rked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. =A0I don't know what KVM's record = is, but I'm sure it's similar.
>
> So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environm= ent, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. = =A0Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully atta= cking one server cannot easily attack other servers.
>
> The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particu= larly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-faci= ng services are lower value, where security is less critical than performan= ce.
>
> Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinat= e with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? =A0Are RedHat or Canonical d= oing anything with containers? =A0I think the OSv guys should be on-side; p= articularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approa= ch.
>
> -George
>
> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
>> FYI,
>>
>> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 versio= n is
>> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can= now
>> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions."= ; They are
>> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.
>>
>> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hyperv= isors that
>> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an= entire
>> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
>> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operat= ing system. By
>> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >> portability, efficiency and security."
>>
>> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-ap= plications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualizat= ion-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium=3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DF= eed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29
>>
>> An article from Dec. 2013:
>>
>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blo= g/containers-new-hypervisors
>>
>> Some additional messaging from their web site:
>>
>> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding ra= pidly:
>> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7= ,500
>> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applicatio= ns are now
>> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and=
>> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,<= br> >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created cas= e
>> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
>> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >>
>> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies = like
>> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedbac= k from
>> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a que= stion
>> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back = any
>> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timefram= e,
>> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
>> virtualization, etc.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicity mailing list
> Publicity@lists.xenp= roject.org
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo= /publicity
>


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity



--
=
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The L= inux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7bb04adc12b0f704f2281e6b-- --===============4946731614959489055== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4946731614959489055==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 22:04:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDLRB-0003yN-B2; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:17 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDLR9-0003yI-DI for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:15 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:60820] by server-15.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 5E/84-24395-E5E9AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:14 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amc79@cam.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392156252!3285664!1 X-Originating-IP: [131.111.8.133] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.8 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 16328 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 22:04:12 -0000 Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.133) by server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 22:04:12 -0000 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc17-cmbg14-2-0-cust360.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([86.6.155.105]:63647 helo=[192.168.0.14]) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1WDLR4-0002b2-ih (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:11 +0000 References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <53A39C1D-A804-4EE3-9472-E4EBDD3DABFE@cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B554a) From: Amir Chaudhry Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:12 +0000 To: Sarah Conway Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0868078604519739876==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0868078604519739876== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-B7E56C92-DCC4-4EF0-BC34-B45B6F222EE7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Apple-Mail-B7E56C92-DCC4-4EF0-BC34-B45B6F222EE7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sarah, is the following the kind of info you're after? http://timetobleed.com/a-closer-look-at-a-recent-privilege-escalation-bug-in= -linux-cve-2013-2094/ Best wishes, Amir -- sent via mobile > On 11 Feb 2014, at 21:27, Sarah Conway wrote= : >=20 > This is excellent fodder. Regarding this info.: There have been dozens of L= inux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layers ove= r the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker control= of all containers on the system. >=20 > Are are there any specific examples of Linux privilege escalation vulnerab= ilities you can share? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrot= e: >> The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too muc= h trust in containers in sharp relief. >>=20 >> http://www.zdnet.com/low-level-exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-h= unting-7000025872/ >>=20 >> Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE vulnerabil= ities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and containers. = I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web. >>=20 >> -anil >>=20 >> On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap wro= te: >>=20 >> > There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think w= e need to think about how to get a counter-message out. >> > >> > The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in ter= ms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably n= ot for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH= mode on Xen). >> > >> > But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call i= nterface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have been= dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system cal= l layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an atta= cker control of all containers on the system. >> > >> > By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to b= reak into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worke= d in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but I'm su= re it's similar. >> > >> > So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environme= nt, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. Nor are= they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking one s= erver cannot easily attack other servers. >> > >> > The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particul= arly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing ser= vices are lower value, where security is less critical than performance. >> > >> > Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate= with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing= anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; particul= arly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach. >> > >> > -George >> > >> > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >> FYI, >> >> >> >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is= >> >> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now= >> >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >> >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >> >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >> >> >> >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors tha= t >> >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >> >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >> >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By= >> >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >> >> portability, efficiency and security." >> >> >> >> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/0210= 14/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&= utm_medium=3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >> >> >> >> An article from Dec. 2013: >> >> >> >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >> >> >> >> Some additional messaging from their web site: >> >> >> >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidl= y: >> >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500= >> >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >> >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >> >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >> >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >> >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >> >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >> >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >> >> >> >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like= >> >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback fr= om >> >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a questio= n >> >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >> >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >> >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >> >> virtualization, etc. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Publicity mailing list >> > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> > >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --Apple-Mail-B7E56C92-DCC4-4EF0-BC34-B45B6F222EE7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sarah, is the following the kind of in= fo you're after?

sent via mobile

On 11 Feb 2014, at 21:2= 7, Sarah Conway <sconway@l= inuxfoundation.org> wrote:

This is excellent fodder. Regarding this info.: There have been doze= ns of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call lay= ers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker c= ontrol of all containers on the system.

Are are th= ere any specific examples of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities you can share?=

=
Thank= s,


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org> wrote:
The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too much t= rust in containers in sharp relief.

http://www.zdnet.com/low-level= -exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-hunting-7000025872/

Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE vulnerabiliti= es and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and containers. &nb= sp;I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web.

-anil

On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

> There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think w= e need to think about how to get a counter-message out.
>
> The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in ter= ms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably n= ot for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH= mode on Xen).
>
> But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors.  The system c= all interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface.  There= have been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the s= ystem call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would giv= e an attacker control of all containers on the system.
>
> By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to b= reak into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worke= d in PV mode, on Intel boxes.  I don't know what KVM's record is, but I= 'm sure it's similar.
>
> So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environme= nt, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware.  No= r are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking o= ne server cannot easily attack other servers.
>
> The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particul= arly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing ser= vices are lower value, where security is less critical than performance.
= >
> Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate= with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this?  Are RedHat or Canonical d= oing anything with containers?  I think the OSv guys should be on-side;= particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their appro= ach.
>
> -George
>
> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
>> FYI,
>>
>> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version= is
>> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can n= ow
>> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are<= br> >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
= >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.
>>
>> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors t= hat
>> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an enti= re
>> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
>> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system.= By
>> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
= >> portability, efficiency and security."
>>
>> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applic= ations-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-r= ise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium=3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A= +TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29
>>
>> An article from Dec. 2013:
>>
>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/= containers-new-hypervisors
>>
>> Some additional messaging from their web site:
>>
>> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rap= idly:
>> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,= 500
>> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
= >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now<= br> >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and<= br> >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case=
>> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
>> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.
= >>
>> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies l= ike
>> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback= from
>> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a ques= tion
>> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back a= ny
>> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe= ,
>> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
>> virtualization, etc.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicity mailing list
> Publicity@lists.xenpr= oject.org
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p= ublicity
>


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject= .org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/public= ity



--
<= div dir=3D"ltr">
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Lin= ux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway
____________________= ___________________________
Publicity mailing listPublicity@lists.xen= project.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l= istinfo/publicity
= --Apple-Mail-B7E56C92-DCC4-4EF0-BC34-B45B6F222EE7-- --===============0868078604519739876== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0868078604519739876==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 11 22:04:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDLRB-0003yN-B2; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:17 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDLR9-0003yI-DI for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:15 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:60820] by server-15.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 5E/84-24395-E5E9AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:14 +0000 X-Env-Sender: amc79@cam.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392156252!3285664!1 X-Originating-IP: [131.111.8.133] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.8 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 16328 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2014 22:04:12 -0000 Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.133) by server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Feb 2014 22:04:12 -0000 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc17-cmbg14-2-0-cust360.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([86.6.155.105]:63647 helo=[192.168.0.14]) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1WDLR4-0002b2-ih (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:11 +0000 References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <53A39C1D-A804-4EE3-9472-E4EBDD3DABFE@cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B554a) From: Amir Chaudhry Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:04:12 +0000 To: Sarah Conway Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0868078604519739876==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0868078604519739876== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-B7E56C92-DCC4-4EF0-BC34-B45B6F222EE7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Apple-Mail-B7E56C92-DCC4-4EF0-BC34-B45B6F222EE7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sarah, is the following the kind of info you're after? http://timetobleed.com/a-closer-look-at-a-recent-privilege-escalation-bug-in= -linux-cve-2013-2094/ Best wishes, Amir -- sent via mobile > On 11 Feb 2014, at 21:27, Sarah Conway wrote= : >=20 > This is excellent fodder. Regarding this info.: There have been dozens of L= inux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call layers ove= r the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker control= of all containers on the system. >=20 > Are are there any specific examples of Linux privilege escalation vulnerab= ilities you can share? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrot= e: >> The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too muc= h trust in containers in sharp relief. >>=20 >> http://www.zdnet.com/low-level-exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-h= unting-7000025872/ >>=20 >> Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE vulnerabil= ities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and containers. = I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web. >>=20 >> -anil >>=20 >> On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap wro= te: >>=20 >> > There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think w= e need to think about how to get a counter-message out. >> > >> > The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in ter= ms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably n= ot for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH= mode on Xen). >> > >> > But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call i= nterface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have been= dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system cal= l layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an atta= cker control of all containers on the system. >> > >> > By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to b= reak into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worke= d in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but I'm su= re it's similar. >> > >> > So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environme= nt, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. Nor are= they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking one s= erver cannot easily attack other servers. >> > >> > The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particul= arly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing ser= vices are lower value, where security is less critical than performance. >> > >> > Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate= with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing= anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; particul= arly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach. >> > >> > -George >> > >> > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >> FYI, >> >> >> >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is= >> >> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now= >> >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >> >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >> >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >> >> >> >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors tha= t >> >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >> >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >> >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By= >> >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >> >> portability, efficiency and security." >> >> >> >> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/0210= 14/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&= utm_medium=3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >> >> >> >> An article from Dec. 2013: >> >> >> >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >> >> >> >> Some additional messaging from their web site: >> >> >> >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidl= y: >> >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500= >> >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >> >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >> >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >> >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >> >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >> >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >> >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >> >> >> >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like= >> >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback fr= om >> >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a questio= n >> >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >> >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >> >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >> >> virtualization, etc. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Publicity mailing list >> > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> > >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --Apple-Mail-B7E56C92-DCC4-4EF0-BC34-B45B6F222EE7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sarah, is the following the kind of in= fo you're after?

sent via mobile

On 11 Feb 2014, at 21:2= 7, Sarah Conway <sconway@l= inuxfoundation.org> wrote:

This is excellent fodder. Regarding this info.: There have been doze= ns of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system call lay= ers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an attacker c= ontrol of all containers on the system.

Are are th= ere any specific examples of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities you can share?=

=
Thank= s,


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org> wrote:
The recent x32 ABI exploit in Linux puts the dangers of depending too much t= rust in containers in sharp relief.

http://www.zdnet.com/low-level= -exploit-sends-ubuntu-opensuse-kernel-bug-hunting-7000025872/

Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE vulnerabiliti= es and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM and containers. &nb= sp;I've not seen such a list elsewhere on the web.

-anil

On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:36, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

> There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think w= e need to think about how to get a counter-message out.
>
> The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in ter= ms of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably n= ot for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH= mode on Xen).
>
> But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors.  The system c= all interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface.  There= have been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the s= ystem call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would giv= e an attacker control of all containers on the system.
>
> By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to b= reak into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worke= d in PV mode, on Intel boxes.  I don't know what KVM's record is, but I= 'm sure it's similar.
>
> So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environme= nt, where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware.  No= r are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking o= ne server cannot easily attack other servers.
>
> The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particul= arly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing ser= vices are lower value, where security is less critical than performance.
= >
> Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate= with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this?  Are RedHat or Canonical d= oing anything with containers?  I think the OSv guys should be on-side;= particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their appro= ach.
>
> -George
>
> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
>> FYI,
>>
>> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version= is
>> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can n= ow
>> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are<= br> >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
= >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.
>>
>> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors t= hat
>> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an enti= re
>> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
>> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system.= By
>> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
= >> portability, efficiency and security."
>>
>> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applic= ations-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-r= ise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium=3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A= +TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29
>>
>> An article from Dec. 2013:
>>
>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/= containers-new-hypervisors
>>
>> Some additional messaging from their web site:
>>
>> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rap= idly:
>> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,= 500
>> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
= >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now<= br> >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and<= br> >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case=
>> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
>> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.
= >>
>> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies l= ike
>> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback= from
>> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a ques= tion
>> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back a= ny
>> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe= ,
>> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
>> virtualization, etc.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicity mailing list
> Publicity@lists.xenpr= oject.org
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p= ublicity
>


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject= .org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/public= ity



--
<= div dir=3D"ltr">
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Lin= ux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway
____________________= ___________________________
Publicity mailing listPublicity@lists.xen= project.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l= istinfo/publicity
= --Apple-Mail-B7E56C92-DCC4-4EF0-BC34-B45B6F222EE7-- --===============0868078604519739876== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0868078604519739876==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 12 07:58:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:58:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDUiH-0001le-LW; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:58:33 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDUiG-0001if-40 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:58:32 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:46339] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 89/67-10891-7A92BF25; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:58:31 +0000 X-Env-Sender: tzach@cloudius-systems.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392191908!4999420!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.219.43] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.7 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 23586 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2014 07:58:29 -0000 Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f43.google.com) (209.85.219.43) by server-3.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Feb 2014 07:58:29 -0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id h16so10578435oag.16 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:58:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XyP/zSNSyEJPFiZ5LX24UKfx/7P9fHZ6UCGs9kSaomk=; b=KupViVfukkG+9O3aWoNPOH9nqeypHqLEyhlRq6bFVzaC3Vd4tbqMwVmiYdY8PJ+No6 hm/RH0+B8VKUskm5IprSMpUIMde4l2JyCeeRIw1io07uHjCqa/hhUVxCYODfIdalxN9L 4sMGPX3mzpQu651IvbQo5Zib/wz6Fu+//ohE5fHFNCY0a0VnwN9cTP7gOZ9yQsywJZcP lgyIwJmTDsR/Bxsgj8jFKThaXHjZXYjq6oKphQ0ZTlg46t0Y92BYNLlSUPHDQkmRw/6a SAI6wDo6Q6DN8xrPCrXI0CFfLssbA1EiH6gCvSGJlK4roobRt97+eUFfcAhU9oVhLhaU aljw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGxOe1/hGh1uU64qJx1stJutx57O3SMqOijp1xVmHlXF8yF6K0DmFncOdm7zBV3HKZVON0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.45.38 with SMTP id j6mr36259329oem.2.1392191907533; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:58:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.213.8 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:58:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:58:27 +0200 Message-ID: From: Tzach Livyatan To: George Dunlap Cc: Glauber Costa , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5448368815499420086==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============5448368815499420086== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e015367ec1bb36004f230f057 --089e015367ec1bb36004f230f057 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:36 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think we > need to think about how to get a counter-message out. > > The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms > of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably > not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or > PVH mode on Xen). > > But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call > interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have > been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the > system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would > give an attacker control of all containers on the system. > > By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to > break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only > worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but > I'm sure it's similar. > > So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, > where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. Nor are > they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking one > server cannot easily attack other servers. > > The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, > particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the > public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical > than performance. > > Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate > with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing > anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; > particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their > approach. > We are on-side! Our own Glauber Costa (cc) gave a talk at on the subject of HV vs Containers which can be found here https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/ Some points to use from this are: - OS is traditionally bad at truly isolating basic resources like CPU and memory usage between groups of tasks - Containers comes with a price paid in complexity. - HV take advantage of continues HW improvements (containers do not) Glauber, feel free to add relevant points. Tzach > -George > > > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > >> FYI, >> >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is >> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >> >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >> portability, efficiency and security." >> >> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/ >> docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_ >> source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ >> TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >> >> An article from Dec. 2013: >> >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >> >> Some additional messaging from their web site: >> >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >> >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >> virtualization, etc. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > --089e015367ec1bb36004f230f057 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:36 PM, George Dunlap &l= t;george.d= unlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
There does seem to be a really big push for containers, an= d I do think we need to think about how to get a counter-message out.

The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms o= f memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably not= for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH = mode on Xen).

But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. =A0The system call in= terface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. =A0There have be= en dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system = call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an = attacker control of all containers on the system.

By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to brea= k into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worked = in PV mode, on Intel boxes. =A0I don't know what KVM's record is, b= ut I'm sure it's similar.

So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, = where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. =A0Nor = are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking o= ne server cannot easily attack other servers.

The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particularly= if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing se= rvices are lower value, where security is less critical than performance.
Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate wit= h KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? =A0Are RedHat or Canonical doing = anything with containers? =A0I think the OSv guys should be on-side; partic= ularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach.

We are on-side!
Our own Glauber = Costa (cc) gave a talk at on the subject of HV vs Containers which can be f= ound here=A0https://lwn.net/Ar= ticles/524952/
Some points to use from this are:
- OS is traditionally = bad at truly isolating basic resources like CPU and memory usage between gr= oups of tasks
- Containers comes with a =A0price paid in comp= lexity.=A0
- HV take advantage of continues HW improvements (containers=A0do not)=

Glauber, feel free to add relevant points.
<= div>
Tzach=A0



=A0-George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They ar= e
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors tha= t
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating syste= m. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-appl= ications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container= -virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium= =3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%2= 9

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/= containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are no= w
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici= ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin= fo/publicity

--089e015367ec1bb36004f230f057-- --===============5448368815499420086== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============5448368815499420086==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 12 07:58:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:58:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDUiH-0001le-LW; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:58:33 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDUiG-0001if-40 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:58:32 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:46339] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 89/67-10891-7A92BF25; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:58:31 +0000 X-Env-Sender: tzach@cloudius-systems.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392191908!4999420!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.219.43] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.7 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 23586 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2014 07:58:29 -0000 Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f43.google.com) (209.85.219.43) by server-3.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Feb 2014 07:58:29 -0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id h16so10578435oag.16 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:58:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XyP/zSNSyEJPFiZ5LX24UKfx/7P9fHZ6UCGs9kSaomk=; b=KupViVfukkG+9O3aWoNPOH9nqeypHqLEyhlRq6bFVzaC3Vd4tbqMwVmiYdY8PJ+No6 hm/RH0+B8VKUskm5IprSMpUIMde4l2JyCeeRIw1io07uHjCqa/hhUVxCYODfIdalxN9L 4sMGPX3mzpQu651IvbQo5Zib/wz6Fu+//ohE5fHFNCY0a0VnwN9cTP7gOZ9yQsywJZcP lgyIwJmTDsR/Bxsgj8jFKThaXHjZXYjq6oKphQ0ZTlg46t0Y92BYNLlSUPHDQkmRw/6a SAI6wDo6Q6DN8xrPCrXI0CFfLssbA1EiH6gCvSGJlK4roobRt97+eUFfcAhU9oVhLhaU aljw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGxOe1/hGh1uU64qJx1stJutx57O3SMqOijp1xVmHlXF8yF6K0DmFncOdm7zBV3HKZVON0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.45.38 with SMTP id j6mr36259329oem.2.1392191907533; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:58:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.213.8 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:58:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:58:27 +0200 Message-ID: From: Tzach Livyatan To: George Dunlap Cc: Glauber Costa , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5448368815499420086==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============5448368815499420086== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e015367ec1bb36004f230f057 --089e015367ec1bb36004f230f057 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:36 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think we > need to think about how to get a counter-message out. > > The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms > of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably > not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or > PVH mode on Xen). > > But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call > interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have > been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the > system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would > give an attacker control of all containers on the system. > > By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to > break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only > worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but > I'm sure it's similar. > > So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, > where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. Nor are > they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking one > server cannot easily attack other servers. > > The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, > particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the > public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical > than performance. > > Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate > with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing > anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; > particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their > approach. > We are on-side! Our own Glauber Costa (cc) gave a talk at on the subject of HV vs Containers which can be found here https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/ Some points to use from this are: - OS is traditionally bad at truly isolating basic resources like CPU and memory usage between groups of tasks - Containers comes with a price paid in complexity. - HV take advantage of continues HW improvements (containers do not) Glauber, feel free to add relevant points. Tzach > -George > > > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > >> FYI, >> >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is >> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >> >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >> portability, efficiency and security." >> >> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/ >> docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_ >> source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ >> TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >> >> An article from Dec. 2013: >> >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >> >> Some additional messaging from their web site: >> >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >> >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >> virtualization, etc. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > --089e015367ec1bb36004f230f057 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:36 PM, George Dunlap &l= t;george.d= unlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
There does seem to be a really big push for containers, an= d I do think we need to think about how to get a counter-message out.

The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms o= f memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably not= for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH = mode on Xen).

But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. =A0The system call in= terface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. =A0There have be= en dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system = call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an = attacker control of all containers on the system.

By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to brea= k into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worked = in PV mode, on Intel boxes. =A0I don't know what KVM's record is, b= ut I'm sure it's similar.

So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, = where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. =A0Nor = are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking o= ne server cannot easily attack other servers.

The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particularly= if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing se= rvices are lower value, where security is less critical than performance.
Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate wit= h KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? =A0Are RedHat or Canonical doing = anything with containers? =A0I think the OSv guys should be on-side; partic= ularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach.

We are on-side!
Our own Glauber = Costa (cc) gave a talk at on the subject of HV vs Containers which can be f= ound here=A0https://lwn.net/Ar= ticles/524952/
Some points to use from this are:
- OS is traditionally = bad at truly isolating basic resources like CPU and memory usage between gr= oups of tasks
- Containers comes with a =A0price paid in comp= lexity.=A0
- HV take advantage of continues HW improvements (containers=A0do not)=

Glauber, feel free to add relevant points.
<= div>
Tzach=A0



=A0-George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They ar= e
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors tha= t
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating syste= m. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-appl= ications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container= -virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium= =3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%2= 9

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/= containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are no= w
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici= ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin= fo/publicity

--089e015367ec1bb36004f230f057-- --===============5448368815499420086== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============5448368815499420086==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 12 08:44:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVRA-0003IG-7T; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:56 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVR8-0003IB-Rv for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:55 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:6843] by server-14.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 7B/8E-27598-6843BF25; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:54 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392194692!3360777!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 22651 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2014 08:44:53 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Feb 2014 08:44:53 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,831,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="101847693" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2014 08:44:51 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:44:51 -0500 Received: from gateway-cbg.eng.citrite.net ([10.80.16.17] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVR5-00026k-2n; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:51 +0000 Message-ID: <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> From: Ian Campbell To: Anil Madhavapeddy Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> References: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-4+b1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:42 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE > vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM > and containers. One thing worth remembering is that while Xen has a well defined security response process[0] and is proactive and transparent about issuing advisories (and CVEs) for anything which we become aware of, even relatively minor issues, while I don't believe the same can be said of Linux and by extension containers. AFAIK security fixes to Linux are made, deliberately and explicitly, in a very low key way and appear as any other bugfix. They are not highlighted as security relevant and mention of a CVE or security aspect is routinely stripped from the commit log comments. CVEs are issued after the fact, if at all, when someone who is watching the commit stream spots it, realises the security impact, and requests it for themselves/their distro/etc or when the original author does so independently. So the risk is that Xen CVEs will be over represented in the set of CVEs. On the other hand maybe the sheer volume of CVEs means that even if they are under reported there are loads of them anyway... FWIW AIUI KVM is a bit split brained -- the kernel side is somewhat as above and the qemu side is more transparent (although I don't think to the same extent Xen is) and does issue advisories. My gut feeling is that it is probable that kernel side KVM issues tend to get a CVE, via the original author or the qemu security team requesting one, more often than the overall Linux norm. Not saying it isn't worth running the numbers, but something to keep in mind during the analysis. Ian. [0] http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 12 08:44:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVRA-0003IG-7T; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:56 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVR8-0003IB-Rv for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:55 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:6843] by server-14.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 7B/8E-27598-6843BF25; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:54 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392194692!3360777!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 22651 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2014 08:44:53 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Feb 2014 08:44:53 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,831,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="101847693" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2014 08:44:51 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:44:51 -0500 Received: from gateway-cbg.eng.citrite.net ([10.80.16.17] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVR5-00026k-2n; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:51 +0000 Message-ID: <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> From: Ian Campbell To: Anil Madhavapeddy Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:44:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> References: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-4+b1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:42 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE > vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM > and containers. One thing worth remembering is that while Xen has a well defined security response process[0] and is proactive and transparent about issuing advisories (and CVEs) for anything which we become aware of, even relatively minor issues, while I don't believe the same can be said of Linux and by extension containers. AFAIK security fixes to Linux are made, deliberately and explicitly, in a very low key way and appear as any other bugfix. They are not highlighted as security relevant and mention of a CVE or security aspect is routinely stripped from the commit log comments. CVEs are issued after the fact, if at all, when someone who is watching the commit stream spots it, realises the security impact, and requests it for themselves/their distro/etc or when the original author does so independently. So the risk is that Xen CVEs will be over represented in the set of CVEs. On the other hand maybe the sheer volume of CVEs means that even if they are under reported there are loads of them anyway... FWIW AIUI KVM is a bit split brained -- the kernel side is somewhat as above and the qemu side is more transparent (although I don't think to the same extent Xen is) and does issue advisories. My gut feeling is that it is probable that kernel side KVM issues tend to get a CVE, via the original author or the qemu security team requesting one, more often than the overall Linux norm. Not saying it isn't worth running the numbers, but something to keep in mind during the analysis. Ian. [0] http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 12 13:55:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaHp-00006M-MC; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:37 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaHp-00006H-33 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:37 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:21836] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 9F/4D-10891-85D7BF25; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:36 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392213335!5123924!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 21603 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2014 13:55:35 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2014 13:55:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 13491 invoked by uid 634); 12 Feb 2014 13:55:35 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:34 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:32 +0000 Message-Id: <04FD6B06-E037-40E1-9FFF-1C33DA7AABED@recoil.org> References: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> To: Ian Campbell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 12 Feb 2014, at 08:44, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:42 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE >> vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM >> and containers. > > One thing worth remembering is that while Xen has a well defined > security response process[0] and is proactive and transparent about > issuing advisories (and CVEs) for anything which we become aware of, > even relatively minor issues, while I don't believe the same can be said > of Linux and by extension containers. > > AFAIK security fixes to Linux are made, deliberately and explicitly, in > a very low key way and appear as any other bugfix. They are not > highlighted as security relevant and mention of a CVE or security aspect > is routinely stripped from the commit log comments. CVEs are issued > after the fact, if at all, when someone who is watching the commit > stream spots it, realises the security impact, and requests it for > themselves/their distro/etc or when the original author does so > independently. > > So the risk is that Xen CVEs will be over represented in the set of > CVEs. On the other hand maybe the sheer volume of CVEs means that even > if they are under reported there are loads of them anyway... I think that's an excellent point. The flipside is to look at exploit sets instead, which are basically independent of security processes. A quick look at Metasploit shows this collection: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/tree/master/modules ...which sadly (?) doesn't include Xen or KVM, or any other hypervisors, but I'm sure there must be a similar set elsewhere. -anil _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 12 13:55:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaHp-00006M-MC; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:37 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaHp-00006H-33 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:37 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:21836] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 9F/4D-10891-85D7BF25; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:36 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392213335!5123924!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 21603 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2014 13:55:35 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2014 13:55:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 13491 invoked by uid 634); 12 Feb 2014 13:55:35 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO flick.office) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:34 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:55:32 +0000 Message-Id: <04FD6B06-E037-40E1-9FFF-1C33DA7AABED@recoil.org> References: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> To: Ian Campbell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Publicity list Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 12 Feb 2014, at 08:44, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:42 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE >> vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM >> and containers. > > One thing worth remembering is that while Xen has a well defined > security response process[0] and is proactive and transparent about > issuing advisories (and CVEs) for anything which we become aware of, > even relatively minor issues, while I don't believe the same can be said > of Linux and by extension containers. > > AFAIK security fixes to Linux are made, deliberately and explicitly, in > a very low key way and appear as any other bugfix. They are not > highlighted as security relevant and mention of a CVE or security aspect > is routinely stripped from the commit log comments. CVEs are issued > after the fact, if at all, when someone who is watching the commit > stream spots it, realises the security impact, and requests it for > themselves/their distro/etc or when the original author does so > independently. > > So the risk is that Xen CVEs will be over represented in the set of > CVEs. On the other hand maybe the sheer volume of CVEs means that even > if they are under reported there are loads of them anyway... I think that's an excellent point. The flipside is to look at exploit sets instead, which are basically independent of security processes. A quick look at Metasploit shows this collection: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/tree/master/modules ...which sadly (?) doesn't include Xen or KVM, or any other hypervisors, but I'm sure there must be a similar set elsewhere. -anil _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 05:58:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDpJR-0004Dy-Ge; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:17 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDpJQ-0004Dt-Aq for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:16 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:5075] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 1A/8D-04712-7FE5CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:15 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392271092!265331!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.220.44] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9652 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 05:58:14 -0000 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.220.44) by server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 05:58:14 -0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id kq14so10305614pab.3 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:58:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SceJoouHtfhVvJ418rBp8b/74R5gEhaMqyoslgNdZEA=; b=edAYkznTXpuBpRY0xKoHAz6qRwml+bimxYt/Laz1k7xjNE9rAYa4M8lFL7RJtm5qqo 1oIcU1HM6PIlY6xJzHkmotDJshxCfT0mRNn+QA8g8UqLxRPrUnYlAWA3MmQLXNHUtvkf jG72jIUAfzvTMNL2vQYlYi9lNIebG9icl2/lYIGfTY57/CeB00R7rBhcnIyrkHGU/uau fLuN4CMGb/1dHNbAO6W4TTfniUzlzcm7yiaYXYWz2TJ709eKaS9u7X95uMcZn4/pNmN5 VP40PTdo5oNX8HFQzKC3dfAKx9smYr7LQLgUeQBJVdg3NTBf2NpX62w0SXhZpTRQCHAB TE9A== X-Received: by 10.68.231.5 with SMTP id tc5mr26289533pbc.154.1392271091980; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:58:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.26.11] ([128.177.190.114]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rb6sm2405142pbb.41.2014.02.12.21.58.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:58:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52FC5EF2.5090908@xen.org> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:10 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org, Russell Pavlicek References: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <04FD6B06-E037-40E1-9FFF-1C33DA7AABED@recoil.org> In-Reply-To: <04FD6B06-E037-40E1-9FFF-1C33DA7AABED@recoil.org> Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Hi all, thanks for the contributions. This is very valuable. https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/ is well worth a read! Thank you Tzach @Sarah, is this enough? @Russell, maybe you can add a couple of slides to the security talk Lars On 12/02/2014 13:55, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > On 12 Feb 2014, at 08:44, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:42 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >>> Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE >>> vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM >>> and containers. >> One thing worth remembering is that while Xen has a well defined >> security response process[0] and is proactive and transparent about >> issuing advisories (and CVEs) for anything which we become aware of, >> even relatively minor issues, while I don't believe the same can be said >> of Linux and by extension containers. >> >> AFAIK security fixes to Linux are made, deliberately and explicitly, in >> a very low key way and appear as any other bugfix. They are not >> highlighted as security relevant and mention of a CVE or security aspect >> is routinely stripped from the commit log comments. CVEs are issued >> after the fact, if at all, when someone who is watching the commit >> stream spots it, realises the security impact, and requests it for >> themselves/their distro/etc or when the original author does so >> independently. >> >> So the risk is that Xen CVEs will be over represented in the set of >> CVEs. On the other hand maybe the sheer volume of CVEs means that even >> if they are under reported there are loads of them anyway... > I think that's an excellent point. The flipside is to look at exploit > sets instead, which are basically independent of security processes. > > A quick look at Metasploit shows this collection: > https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/tree/master/modules > > ...which sadly (?) doesn't include Xen or KVM, or any other hypervisors, > but I'm sure there must be a similar set elsewhere. > > -anil > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 05:58:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDpJR-0004Dy-Ge; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:17 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDpJQ-0004Dt-Aq for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:16 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:5075] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 1A/8D-04712-7FE5CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:15 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392271092!265331!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.220.44] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9652 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 05:58:14 -0000 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.220.44) by server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 05:58:14 -0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id kq14so10305614pab.3 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:58:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SceJoouHtfhVvJ418rBp8b/74R5gEhaMqyoslgNdZEA=; b=edAYkznTXpuBpRY0xKoHAz6qRwml+bimxYt/Laz1k7xjNE9rAYa4M8lFL7RJtm5qqo 1oIcU1HM6PIlY6xJzHkmotDJshxCfT0mRNn+QA8g8UqLxRPrUnYlAWA3MmQLXNHUtvkf jG72jIUAfzvTMNL2vQYlYi9lNIebG9icl2/lYIGfTY57/CeB00R7rBhcnIyrkHGU/uau fLuN4CMGb/1dHNbAO6W4TTfniUzlzcm7yiaYXYWz2TJ709eKaS9u7X95uMcZn4/pNmN5 VP40PTdo5oNX8HFQzKC3dfAKx9smYr7LQLgUeQBJVdg3NTBf2NpX62w0SXhZpTRQCHAB TE9A== X-Received: by 10.68.231.5 with SMTP id tc5mr26289533pbc.154.1392271091980; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:58:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.26.11] ([128.177.190.114]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rb6sm2405142pbb.41.2014.02.12.21.58.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:58:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52FC5EF2.5090908@xen.org> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:58:10 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org, Russell Pavlicek References: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <04FD6B06-E037-40E1-9FFF-1C33DA7AABED@recoil.org> In-Reply-To: <04FD6B06-E037-40E1-9FFF-1C33DA7AABED@recoil.org> Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Hi all, thanks for the contributions. This is very valuable. https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/ is well worth a read! Thank you Tzach @Sarah, is this enough? @Russell, maybe you can add a couple of slides to the security talk Lars On 12/02/2014 13:55, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > On 12 Feb 2014, at 08:44, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:42 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >>> Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE >>> vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM >>> and containers. >> One thing worth remembering is that while Xen has a well defined >> security response process[0] and is proactive and transparent about >> issuing advisories (and CVEs) for anything which we become aware of, >> even relatively minor issues, while I don't believe the same can be said >> of Linux and by extension containers. >> >> AFAIK security fixes to Linux are made, deliberately and explicitly, in >> a very low key way and appear as any other bugfix. They are not >> highlighted as security relevant and mention of a CVE or security aspect >> is routinely stripped from the commit log comments. CVEs are issued >> after the fact, if at all, when someone who is watching the commit >> stream spots it, realises the security impact, and requests it for >> themselves/their distro/etc or when the original author does so >> independently. >> >> So the risk is that Xen CVEs will be over represented in the set of >> CVEs. On the other hand maybe the sheer volume of CVEs means that even >> if they are under reported there are loads of them anyway... > I think that's an excellent point. The flipside is to look at exploit > sets instead, which are basically independent of security processes. > > A quick look at Metasploit shows this collection: > https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/tree/master/modules > > ...which sadly (?) doesn't include Xen or KVM, or any other hypervisors, > but I'm sure there must be a similar set elsewhere. > > -anil > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 06:02:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:02:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDpNX-0004Wl-Tw; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:02:31 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDpNX-0004Wg-12 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:02:31 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:5921] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 37/01-11539-6FF5CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:02:30 +0000 X-Env-Sender: russell.pavlicek.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392271348!5292919!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.217.172] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 22329 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 06:02:29 -0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f172.google.com) (209.85.217.172) by server-2.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 06:02:29 -0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so7962454lbj.31 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:02:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SgdlgtHuZQCT+Co6+NgmyOz5w6lwRZTWSqMw+8B0x1c=; b=EF2BEIt6pU8w+YBH17//va5S1ZuGiHKmdC4dNm9EgzSwZgmT0WBDzs9Mq2meyq11Xs PGz/iW1zvt4AAmMPTsrqLCjU1xlM7IzFCxpEJxHVDzMZixbB6iqyCFWh82sKh4Hwxvtj VTi8ihAMafdvATjhnjmFnOJ9OvYNBIKPAw7pHMcvlqKgYte8lSrHjqY341/WbaJLBbMq CkAoKzllXA2LeA2kinpxQBClTyrGgR3TmLe9lzmfUs3ghM5z0Jk3WCFfRc5xcXB9mjzE poGMoUah0Nvg83CJD4ZOBC1B4T6NPt8AVz4RSYbvZlwRTcAlOkuilSn00MFoNULfg+Dt 2rhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.204.104 with SMTP id kx8mr32404879lbc.12.1392271348498; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.72.72 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:02:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FC5EF2.5090908@xen.org> References: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <04FD6B06-E037-40E1-9FFF-1C33DA7AABED@recoil.org> <52FC5EF2.5090908@xen.org> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:02:28 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2nkls4j9dgzM1WsbtZqUhvuuJUc Message-ID: From: Russ Pavlicek To: Lars Kurth Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org >@Russell, maybe you can add a couple of slides to the security talk I will definitely give it a shot when I get back home. On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Lars Kurth wrote: > Hi all, > thanks for the contributions. This is very valuable. > https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/ is well worth a read! Thank you Tzach > @Sarah, is this enough? > @Russell, maybe you can add a couple of slides to the security talk > Lars > > > On 12/02/2014 13:55, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> >> On 12 Feb 2014, at 08:44, Ian Campbell wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:42 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >>>> >>>> Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE >>>> vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM >>>> and containers. >>> >>> One thing worth remembering is that while Xen has a well defined >>> security response process[0] and is proactive and transparent about >>> issuing advisories (and CVEs) for anything which we become aware of, >>> even relatively minor issues, while I don't believe the same can be said >>> of Linux and by extension containers. >>> >>> AFAIK security fixes to Linux are made, deliberately and explicitly, in >>> a very low key way and appear as any other bugfix. They are not >>> highlighted as security relevant and mention of a CVE or security aspect >>> is routinely stripped from the commit log comments. CVEs are issued >>> after the fact, if at all, when someone who is watching the commit >>> stream spots it, realises the security impact, and requests it for >>> themselves/their distro/etc or when the original author does so >>> independently. >>> >>> So the risk is that Xen CVEs will be over represented in the set of >>> CVEs. On the other hand maybe the sheer volume of CVEs means that even >>> if they are under reported there are loads of them anyway... >> >> I think that's an excellent point. The flipside is to look at exploit >> sets instead, which are basically independent of security processes. >> >> A quick look at Metasploit shows this collection: >> https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/tree/master/modules >> >> ...which sadly (?) doesn't include Xen or KVM, or any other hypervisors, >> but I'm sure there must be a similar set elsewhere. >> >> -anil >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 06:02:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:02:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDpNX-0004Wl-Tw; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:02:31 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDpNX-0004Wg-12 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:02:31 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:5921] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 37/01-11539-6FF5CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:02:30 +0000 X-Env-Sender: russell.pavlicek.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392271348!5292919!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.217.172] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 22329 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 06:02:29 -0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f172.google.com) (209.85.217.172) by server-2.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 06:02:29 -0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so7962454lbj.31 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:02:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SgdlgtHuZQCT+Co6+NgmyOz5w6lwRZTWSqMw+8B0x1c=; b=EF2BEIt6pU8w+YBH17//va5S1ZuGiHKmdC4dNm9EgzSwZgmT0WBDzs9Mq2meyq11Xs PGz/iW1zvt4AAmMPTsrqLCjU1xlM7IzFCxpEJxHVDzMZixbB6iqyCFWh82sKh4Hwxvtj VTi8ihAMafdvATjhnjmFnOJ9OvYNBIKPAw7pHMcvlqKgYte8lSrHjqY341/WbaJLBbMq CkAoKzllXA2LeA2kinpxQBClTyrGgR3TmLe9lzmfUs3ghM5z0Jk3WCFfRc5xcXB9mjzE poGMoUah0Nvg83CJD4ZOBC1B4T6NPt8AVz4RSYbvZlwRTcAlOkuilSn00MFoNULfg+Dt 2rhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.204.104 with SMTP id kx8mr32404879lbc.12.1392271348498; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.72.72 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:02:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FC5EF2.5090908@xen.org> References: <89668017-8F02-4A5D-A463-731006025931@recoil.org> <1392194690.22033.35.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <04FD6B06-E037-40E1-9FFF-1C33DA7AABED@recoil.org> <52FC5EF2.5090908@xen.org> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:02:28 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2nkls4j9dgzM1WsbtZqUhvuuJUc Message-ID: From: Russ Pavlicek To: Lars Kurth Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org >@Russell, maybe you can add a couple of slides to the security talk I will definitely give it a shot when I get back home. On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Lars Kurth wrote: > Hi all, > thanks for the contributions. This is very valuable. > https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/ is well worth a read! Thank you Tzach > @Sarah, is this enough? > @Russell, maybe you can add a couple of slides to the security talk > Lars > > > On 12/02/2014 13:55, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> >> On 12 Feb 2014, at 08:44, Ian Campbell wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:42 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >>>> >>>> Perhaps the simplest thing is to look for a list of recent CVE >>>> vulnerabilities and highlight which ones would be blocked by Xen, KVM >>>> and containers. >>> >>> One thing worth remembering is that while Xen has a well defined >>> security response process[0] and is proactive and transparent about >>> issuing advisories (and CVEs) for anything which we become aware of, >>> even relatively minor issues, while I don't believe the same can be said >>> of Linux and by extension containers. >>> >>> AFAIK security fixes to Linux are made, deliberately and explicitly, in >>> a very low key way and appear as any other bugfix. They are not >>> highlighted as security relevant and mention of a CVE or security aspect >>> is routinely stripped from the commit log comments. CVEs are issued >>> after the fact, if at all, when someone who is watching the commit >>> stream spots it, realises the security impact, and requests it for >>> themselves/their distro/etc or when the original author does so >>> independently. >>> >>> So the risk is that Xen CVEs will be over represented in the set of >>> CVEs. On the other hand maybe the sheer volume of CVEs means that even >>> if they are under reported there are loads of them anyway... >> >> I think that's an excellent point. The flipside is to look at exploit >> sets instead, which are basically independent of security processes. >> >> A quick look at Metasploit shows this collection: >> https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/tree/master/modules >> >> ...which sadly (?) doesn't include Xen or KVM, or any other hypervisors, >> but I'm sure there must be a similar set elsewhere. >> >> -anil >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 10:14:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:14:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtJG-0004bp-IF; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:14:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtJF-0004bg-6x for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:14:21 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:41034] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 3C/2F-26923-AFA9CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:14:18 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392286448!582683!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTk3MjkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7473 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 10:14:09 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:14:09 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,838,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="102179569" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:14:07 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:14:06 -0500 Message-ID: <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:14:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5324969097388798803==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============5324969097388798803== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/1hxtRWfQKBUTu3uxcLL" --=-/1hxtRWfQKBUTu3uxcLL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-11 at 18:12 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Hello everyone, >=20 > This is the blog status update for this week (Feb 10th to 14th). >=20 > Last posts have been: > - Me, about FOSDEM (February 7) > - Konrad, about PVH and how to test it (January 31) >=20 > I have the following people in the pipeline already: >=20 > + George Dunlap=20 > + Julien Grall > + Stefano Stabellini >=20 > George, do you think it would be possible to have one of the two posts > you where preparing (PoD and the presentation to Huawei conf. blogified) > by the en of this week? >=20 > If not, Julien, any idea (and time to work on it)? Perhaps a blog > version of your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? >=20 Anyone? George? Julien? If none of the above is ready, perhaps we can at least have something about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of the dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _the_ one? That would still be something for George, I guess... BTW, I'd have swore you were in Cc to the previous e-mail, but looking at the headers of the copy of it I got from the list, I'm not so sure... In case you were not, sorry for that. :-/ Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-/1hxtRWfQKBUTu3uxcLL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL8mu0ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsT5cQCdE6JGLBKGcp4CAQt4ffYT0eoL OeQAn1c2wF6nF0TIG2h6N3Tkm+ai9pqs =5ASS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/1hxtRWfQKBUTu3uxcLL-- --===============5324969097388798803== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============5324969097388798803==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 10:14:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:14:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtJG-0004bp-IF; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:14:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtJF-0004bg-6x for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:14:21 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:41034] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 3C/2F-26923-AFA9CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:14:18 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392286448!582683!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTk3MjkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7473 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 10:14:09 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:14:09 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,838,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="102179569" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:14:07 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:14:06 -0500 Message-ID: <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:14:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5324969097388798803==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============5324969097388798803== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/1hxtRWfQKBUTu3uxcLL" --=-/1hxtRWfQKBUTu3uxcLL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-11 at 18:12 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Hello everyone, >=20 > This is the blog status update for this week (Feb 10th to 14th). >=20 > Last posts have been: > - Me, about FOSDEM (February 7) > - Konrad, about PVH and how to test it (January 31) >=20 > I have the following people in the pipeline already: >=20 > + George Dunlap=20 > + Julien Grall > + Stefano Stabellini >=20 > George, do you think it would be possible to have one of the two posts > you where preparing (PoD and the presentation to Huawei conf. blogified) > by the en of this week? >=20 > If not, Julien, any idea (and time to work on it)? Perhaps a blog > version of your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? >=20 Anyone? George? Julien? If none of the above is ready, perhaps we can at least have something about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of the dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _the_ one? That would still be something for George, I guess... BTW, I'd have swore you were in Cc to the previous e-mail, but looking at the headers of the copy of it I got from the list, I'm not so sure... In case you were not, sorry for that. :-/ Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-/1hxtRWfQKBUTu3uxcLL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL8mu0ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsT5cQCdE6JGLBKGcp4CAQt4ffYT0eoL OeQAn1c2wF6nF0TIG2h6N3Tkm+ai9pqs =5ASS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/1hxtRWfQKBUTu3uxcLL-- --===============5324969097388798803== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============5324969097388798803==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 10:20:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtP4-0004xU-Jt; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtP3-0004xC-0g for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:21 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:40160] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 94/62-31661-46C9CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:20 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392286818!5363016!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11341 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 10:20:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:20:19 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,838,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="102180606" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:20:18 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:20:17 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtOz-00068m-CZ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:17 +0000 Message-ID: <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:06 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli , References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/13/2014 10:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mar, 2014-02-11 at 18:12 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> This is the blog status update for this week (Feb 10th to 14th). >> >> Last posts have been: >> - Me, about FOSDEM (February 7) >> - Konrad, about PVH and how to test it (January 31) >> >> I have the following people in the pipeline already: >> >> + George Dunlap >> + Julien Grall >> + Stefano Stabellini >> >> George, do you think it would be possible to have one of the two posts >> you where preparing (PoD and the presentation to Huawei conf. blogified) >> by the en of this week? >> >> If not, Julien, any idea (and time to work on it)? Perhaps a blog >> version of your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? >> > Anyone? George? Julien? > > If none of the above is ready, perhaps we can at least have something > about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of the > dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _the_ > one? That would still be something for George, I guess... Sorry -- I can work on the PoD blog today. I think I should be able to finish it. -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 10:20:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtP4-0004xU-Jt; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtP3-0004xC-0g for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:21 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:40160] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 94/62-31661-46C9CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:20 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392286818!5363016!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11341 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 10:20:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:20:19 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,838,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="102180606" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:20:18 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:20:17 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtOz-00068m-CZ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:17 +0000 Message-ID: <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:20:06 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli , References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/13/2014 10:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mar, 2014-02-11 at 18:12 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> This is the blog status update for this week (Feb 10th to 14th). >> >> Last posts have been: >> - Me, about FOSDEM (February 7) >> - Konrad, about PVH and how to test it (January 31) >> >> I have the following people in the pipeline already: >> >> + George Dunlap >> + Julien Grall >> + Stefano Stabellini >> >> George, do you think it would be possible to have one of the two posts >> you where preparing (PoD and the presentation to Huawei conf. blogified) >> by the en of this week? >> >> If not, Julien, any idea (and time to work on it)? Perhaps a blog >> version of your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? >> > Anyone? George? Julien? > > If none of the above is ready, perhaps we can at least have something > about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of the > dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _the_ > one? That would still be something for George, I guess... Sorry -- I can work on the PoD blog today. I think I should be able to finish it. -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 10:30:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:30:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtYN-0005KR-5i; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:29:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtYL-0005KJ-8j; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:29:57 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:42793] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 41/13-01226-4AE9CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:29:56 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392287385!4020805!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDM3NDMgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 19765 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 10:29:47 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:29:47 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,838,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100396634" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:29:45 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:29:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:29:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1938994616652953632==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1938994616652953632== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7" --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Adding the Xen publicity mailing list] On gio, 2014-02-13 at 03:55 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Hi George, >=20 > I have updated the Latest Xen nested status in the Xen wiki page, please = have a look. > Hey Yang, This is something really useful to have on the wiki, thanks for doing it. > Although it is hard to say nested is good supported or product quality, i= t is ready to let people to know nested basically is supported by Xen. > Right. With that in mind, I think this topic would be a great one for a blog post on the Xen Project's blog! The content you have on the wiki is mostly fine as the core content of the blog post too, we'd just need a couple more "colloquial" glue paragraph here and there, both about nested virt in general and about Xen supporting it, for instance... > Especially, for Xen on Xen case, I didn't see any issue with it for more = than half of year. Besides, I am always using nested Xen to debug Xen booti= ng issue which doesn't need to reboot my real box. And it really helps me a= lot. > ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good example of what I meant above! :-) So, how do you feel about this? > So, if possible, I hope we can add nested support into Xen 4.4 release to= let people know current status. >=20 Sorry for my ignorance on the subject, what is it that is missing for making the above (and the content of the wiki) true for 4.4? Anyway, I don't think that, whatever the answer is, it will be less worth to have a blog post about nested virt... At most it will affect when we want it. If it's going to be a 4.4 feature, I think the sooner the better. If not, we can wait a little bit. Let me know your thoughts on the idea. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL8npYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSaFQCfVbJ9erMECygVJUbsvp32+Vk0 N3kAn2yv2Usyr48b8fhTg4rD4ZfEYSVM =CnHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7-- --===============1938994616652953632== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1938994616652953632==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 10:30:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:30:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtYN-0005KR-5i; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:29:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDtYL-0005KJ-8j; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:29:57 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:42793] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 41/13-01226-4AE9CF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:29:56 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392287385!4020805!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDM3NDMgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 19765 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 10:29:47 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:29:47 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,838,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100396634" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 10:29:45 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:29:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:29:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1938994616652953632==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1938994616652953632== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7" --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Adding the Xen publicity mailing list] On gio, 2014-02-13 at 03:55 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Hi George, >=20 > I have updated the Latest Xen nested status in the Xen wiki page, please = have a look. > Hey Yang, This is something really useful to have on the wiki, thanks for doing it. > Although it is hard to say nested is good supported or product quality, i= t is ready to let people to know nested basically is supported by Xen. > Right. With that in mind, I think this topic would be a great one for a blog post on the Xen Project's blog! The content you have on the wiki is mostly fine as the core content of the blog post too, we'd just need a couple more "colloquial" glue paragraph here and there, both about nested virt in general and about Xen supporting it, for instance... > Especially, for Xen on Xen case, I didn't see any issue with it for more = than half of year. Besides, I am always using nested Xen to debug Xen booti= ng issue which doesn't need to reboot my real box. And it really helps me a= lot. > ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good example of what I meant above! :-) So, how do you feel about this? > So, if possible, I hope we can add nested support into Xen 4.4 release to= let people know current status. >=20 Sorry for my ignorance on the subject, what is it that is missing for making the above (and the content of the wiki) true for 4.4? Anyway, I don't think that, whatever the answer is, it will be less worth to have a blog post about nested virt... At most it will affect when we want it. If it's going to be a 4.4 feature, I think the sooner the better. If not, we can wait a little bit. Let me know your thoughts on the idea. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL8npYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSaFQCfVbJ9erMECygVJUbsvp32+Vk0 N3kAn2yv2Usyr48b8fhTg4rD4ZfEYSVM =CnHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-P9gfs2oIxqIMALkrLAK7-- --===============1938994616652953632== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1938994616652953632==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 11:18:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:18:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDuJO-0006qb-KR; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:18:34 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDuJM-0006qW-FJ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:18:32 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:2841] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 45/FC-26923-70AACF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:18:31 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392290309!1610049!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 30495 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 11:18:30 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-14.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 11:18:30 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,838,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100407464" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 11:18:29 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:18:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:18:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6650317672706398350==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6650317672706398350== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-K3zw024UE4iOYQHnEFiq" --=-K3zw024UE4iOYQHnEFiq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-13 at 10:20 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/13/2014 10:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > If none of the above is ready, perhaps we can at least have something > > about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of the > > dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _the_ > > one? That would still be something for George, I guess... >=20 > Sorry -- I can work on the PoD blog today. I think I should be able to= =20 > finish it. >=20 Ok, that would definitely be fine. Let us know when you have a draft ready for being reviewed. Thanks, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-K3zw024UE4iOYQHnEFiq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL8qgIACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQcEACcCrj7toiGX+njMcGbE/PYj9yw a4QAniKw5VH6ojj6XM05cniMldX4iOck =owuO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-K3zw024UE4iOYQHnEFiq-- --===============6650317672706398350== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6650317672706398350==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 13 11:18:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:18:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDuJO-0006qb-KR; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:18:34 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDuJM-0006qW-FJ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:18:32 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:2841] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 45/FC-26923-70AACF25; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:18:31 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392290309!1610049!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 30495 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 11:18:30 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-14.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 11:18:30 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,838,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100407464" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 11:18:29 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:18:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:18:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6650317672706398350==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6650317672706398350== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-K3zw024UE4iOYQHnEFiq" --=-K3zw024UE4iOYQHnEFiq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-13 at 10:20 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/13/2014 10:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > If none of the above is ready, perhaps we can at least have something > > about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of the > > dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _the_ > > one? That would still be something for George, I guess... >=20 > Sorry -- I can work on the PoD blog today. I think I should be able to= =20 > finish it. >=20 Ok, that would definitely be fine. Let us know when you have a draft ready for being reviewed. Thanks, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-K3zw024UE4iOYQHnEFiq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL8qgIACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQcEACcCrj7toiGX+njMcGbE/PYj9yw a4QAniKw5VH6ojj6XM05cniMldX4iOck =owuO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-K3zw024UE4iOYQHnEFiq-- --===============6650317672706398350== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6650317672706398350==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 10:24:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEFws-0008N3-I7; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEFwr-0008Mo-2J; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:57633] by server-4.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id E8/B9-08092-CEEEDF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392373481!3918534!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13128 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 10:24:43 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 10:24:43 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,844,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="100739335" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 10:24:41 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 05:24:41 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WEFwm-0000GF-9b; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:40 +0000 Message-ID: <52FDEEDB.40305@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:27 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Zhang, Yang Z" , Dario Faggioli References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/14/2014 01:13 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-13: >> [Adding the Xen publicity mailing list] >> >> On gio, 2014-02-13 at 03:55 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: >>> Hi George, >>> >>> I have updated the Latest Xen nested status in the Xen wiki page, >>> please have a look. >>> >> Hey Yang, >> >> This is something really useful to have on the wiki, thanks for doing it. >> >>> Although it is hard to say nested is good supported or product >>> quality, it is ready to let people to know nested basically is supported by Xen. >>> >> Right. With that in mind, I think this topic would be a great one for >> a blog post on the Xen Project's blog! The content you have on the >> wiki is mostly fine as the core content of the blog post too, we'd just need a couple more "colloquial" >> glue paragraph here and there, both about nested virt in general and >> about Xen supporting it, for instance... >> >>> Especially, for Xen on Xen case, I didn't see any issue with it for >>> more than half >> of year. Besides, I am always using nested Xen to debug Xen booting >> issue which doesn't need to reboot my real box. And it really helps me a lot. >> ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good >> example of what I meant above! :-) >> >> So, how do you feel about this? >> > Sure. If you can do it, that's great. > >>> So, if possible, I hope we can add nested support into Xen 4.4 >>> release to let people know current status. >>> >> Sorry for my ignorance on the subject, what is it that is missing for >> making the above (and the content of the wiki) true for 4.4? >> > Sorry. I didn't clarify it clearly. Most of the patches to run nested are already in Xen upstream. What I want is to add "nested is basically supported in Xen 4.4" in the Xen 4.4 release note to let people know it. I'm afraid "basically supported" will imply to people that they might consider shipping it on production systems. But because of the issues with shadow-on-HAP, and the potential locking issues with the nested p2m table, both of which are in control of the guest admin rather than the host admin, I don't think that's a recommendation we can make at this time. But I do think making some kind of announcement about common functionality being complete and ready to be tested would be a good idea. When we come to make the release we can brainstorm on what wording to use. Actually, I wonder whether advertising Win7's XP compatibility mode as a separate "tech preview" feature would make sense. The people who use that feature are very likely very different than most other people who might think about using nested virtualization. Also, re what's missing: We had a discussion a few weeks ago about what it might take to move nested virt out of "tech preview/experimental" mode. I'll write those up and put them in my 4.4 planning e-mail so we can track the progress. -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 10:24:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEFws-0008N3-I7; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEFwr-0008Mo-2J; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:57633] by server-4.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id E8/B9-08092-CEEEDF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392373481!3918534!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13128 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 10:24:43 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-7.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 10:24:43 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,844,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="100739335" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 10:24:41 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 05:24:41 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WEFwm-0000GF-9b; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:40 +0000 Message-ID: <52FDEEDB.40305@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:24:27 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Zhang, Yang Z" , Dario Faggioli References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/14/2014 01:13 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-13: >> [Adding the Xen publicity mailing list] >> >> On gio, 2014-02-13 at 03:55 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: >>> Hi George, >>> >>> I have updated the Latest Xen nested status in the Xen wiki page, >>> please have a look. >>> >> Hey Yang, >> >> This is something really useful to have on the wiki, thanks for doing it. >> >>> Although it is hard to say nested is good supported or product >>> quality, it is ready to let people to know nested basically is supported by Xen. >>> >> Right. With that in mind, I think this topic would be a great one for >> a blog post on the Xen Project's blog! The content you have on the >> wiki is mostly fine as the core content of the blog post too, we'd just need a couple more "colloquial" >> glue paragraph here and there, both about nested virt in general and >> about Xen supporting it, for instance... >> >>> Especially, for Xen on Xen case, I didn't see any issue with it for >>> more than half >> of year. Besides, I am always using nested Xen to debug Xen booting >> issue which doesn't need to reboot my real box. And it really helps me a lot. >> ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good >> example of what I meant above! :-) >> >> So, how do you feel about this? >> > Sure. If you can do it, that's great. > >>> So, if possible, I hope we can add nested support into Xen 4.4 >>> release to let people know current status. >>> >> Sorry for my ignorance on the subject, what is it that is missing for >> making the above (and the content of the wiki) true for 4.4? >> > Sorry. I didn't clarify it clearly. Most of the patches to run nested are already in Xen upstream. What I want is to add "nested is basically supported in Xen 4.4" in the Xen 4.4 release note to let people know it. I'm afraid "basically supported" will imply to people that they might consider shipping it on production systems. But because of the issues with shadow-on-HAP, and the potential locking issues with the nested p2m table, both of which are in control of the guest admin rather than the host admin, I don't think that's a recommendation we can make at this time. But I do think making some kind of announcement about common functionality being complete and ready to be tested would be a good idea. When we come to make the release we can brainstorm on what wording to use. Actually, I wonder whether advertising Win7's XP compatibility mode as a separate "tech preview" feature would make sense. The people who use that feature are very likely very different than most other people who might think about using nested virtualization. Also, re what's missing: We had a discussion a few weeks ago about what it might take to move nested virt out of "tech preview/experimental" mode. I'll write those up and put them in my 4.4 planning e-mail so we can track the progress. -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:20:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:20:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJdK-00059W-LS; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:20:50 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJdJ-00059R-Ie for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:20:49 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:36080] by server-11.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 42/FE-04255-0462EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:20:48 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392387639!1916359!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.170] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8,RCVD_BY_IP,spamassassin: ,async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDU0NDEgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 10329 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:20:39 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f170.google.com) (74.125.82.170) by server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:20:39 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w62so8892460wes.15 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:20:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/r6JnqWfOR821K7wj/qgIkuwSanvv1TnRoSYyMqThj0=; b=JqT3dJ1JX6ru76hA2wtA0Gewo4rRjswncHiaCO6+kbqTHPar44Rct0uAltgimMch27 WP8mgO32VFGuJtmTHAhcdMQTlCBssyIInmkqKCxYT0IFbu6RGHFfHU7uq3FUIBMic+Lc 28vYp365vMaEY1no9GsdYaB9OZtWiqCA+v1Tw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/r6JnqWfOR821K7wj/qgIkuwSanvv1TnRoSYyMqThj0=; b=Hv0j175AmbqPNrNrh2YgWZDcJ0TvjTEgl/q3LJKjP7XysMbcoKJJA7373sNV/x1teO TvVtvyObBMk779v2FPeU0EgasY06V7S54Ljrxdn+Fm6CSjenKlGMtB7J1FBJLBuSEIr1 8UUkrvVBFn3HZEdelh2+5C5yQ2K/xADZQub+DxauyRZZSwmJR2RcjIbvOg1SRWA8O/iB izgFHXAWCJXSINDfXxz68OoXdpFxLl3H/VMwKuNSmxOFOyB/Vj9GkC9LM1m2UoUsi5pe lEbuchr+EvjjYPqWcbvrGtJ0cI85QFrtk+IPxgkTci+4wuN3Z9qxflPU3l1qSDrNJiXL fdXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkeGi7Is1yJ2R4zKtJMksnBK5vSC/FGIfbatiH0HIhb7b4FDOb/0/G545/HpxK/i06Wc2UJ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.71.116 with SMTP id t20mr2015415wju.51.1392387638871; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:20:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:20:38 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Dario Faggioli Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5284488870564302738==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============5284488870564302738== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcec649adcf704f25e82f1 --047d7bfcec649adcf704f25e82f1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Not sure if a 4.4 blog is in the works, but given that we are getting close to our PR launch, I'd suggest that we hold on blogs promoting 4.4 features at this point. I know there is public information online on 4.4 features, the latest RC, etc., but too much exposure can take the wind out of our formal press launch. Some reporters might consider it leaking the news ahead of time. Of course, OS savvy reporters can easily find the product roadmap and some deeply technical sites have even tracked 4.4 (ie. Phoronix) progress. But, in general, it's a good practice to save our 4.4 blogs for our launch at this point. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On gio, 2014-02-13 at 10:20 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > On 02/13/2014 10:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > If none of the above is ready, perhaps we can at least have something > > > about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of the > > > dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _the_ > > > one? That would still be something for George, I guess... > > > > Sorry -- I can work on the PoD blog today. I think I should be able to > > finish it. > > > Ok, that would definitely be fine. > > Let us know when you have a draft ready for being reviewed. > > Thanks, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7bfcec649adcf704f25e82f1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Not sure if a 4.4 blog is in th= e works, but given that we are getting close to our PR launch, I'd sugg= est that we hold on blogs promoting 4.4 features at this point. I know ther= e is public information online on 4.4 features, the latest RC, etc., but to= o much exposure can take the wind out of our formal press launch. Some repo= rters might consider it leaking the news ahead of time. Of course, OS savvy= reporters can easily find the product roadmap and some deeply technical si= tes have even tracked 4.4 (ie. Phoronix) progress. But, in general, it'= s a good practice to save our 4.4 blogs for our launch at this point.=A0

If you have any questi= ons, please let me know.

Thanks,


On Thu,= Feb 13, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.co= m> wrote:
On gio, 2014-02-13 at 10:20 = +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 10:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > If none of the above is ready, perhaps we c= an at least have something
> > about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of= the
> > dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _t= he_
> > one? That would still be something for George, I guess...
>
> Sorry -- I can work on the PoD blog today. =A0I think I should be able= to
> finish it.
>
Ok, that would definitely be fine.

Let us know when you have a draft ready for being reviewed.

Thanks,
Dario

--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majer= e)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Fou= ndation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7bfcec649adcf704f25e82f1-- --===============5284488870564302738== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============5284488870564302738==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:20:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:20:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJdK-00059W-LS; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:20:50 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJdJ-00059R-Ie for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:20:49 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:36080] by server-11.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 42/FE-04255-0462EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:20:48 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392387639!1916359!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.170] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8,RCVD_BY_IP,spamassassin: ,async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDU0NDEgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 10329 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:20:39 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f170.google.com) (74.125.82.170) by server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:20:39 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w62so8892460wes.15 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:20:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/r6JnqWfOR821K7wj/qgIkuwSanvv1TnRoSYyMqThj0=; b=JqT3dJ1JX6ru76hA2wtA0Gewo4rRjswncHiaCO6+kbqTHPar44Rct0uAltgimMch27 WP8mgO32VFGuJtmTHAhcdMQTlCBssyIInmkqKCxYT0IFbu6RGHFfHU7uq3FUIBMic+Lc 28vYp365vMaEY1no9GsdYaB9OZtWiqCA+v1Tw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/r6JnqWfOR821K7wj/qgIkuwSanvv1TnRoSYyMqThj0=; b=Hv0j175AmbqPNrNrh2YgWZDcJ0TvjTEgl/q3LJKjP7XysMbcoKJJA7373sNV/x1teO TvVtvyObBMk779v2FPeU0EgasY06V7S54Ljrxdn+Fm6CSjenKlGMtB7J1FBJLBuSEIr1 8UUkrvVBFn3HZEdelh2+5C5yQ2K/xADZQub+DxauyRZZSwmJR2RcjIbvOg1SRWA8O/iB izgFHXAWCJXSINDfXxz68OoXdpFxLl3H/VMwKuNSmxOFOyB/Vj9GkC9LM1m2UoUsi5pe lEbuchr+EvjjYPqWcbvrGtJ0cI85QFrtk+IPxgkTci+4wuN3Z9qxflPU3l1qSDrNJiXL fdXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkeGi7Is1yJ2R4zKtJMksnBK5vSC/FGIfbatiH0HIhb7b4FDOb/0/G545/HpxK/i06Wc2UJ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.71.116 with SMTP id t20mr2015415wju.51.1392387638871; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:20:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:20:38 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Dario Faggioli Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5284488870564302738==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============5284488870564302738== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcec649adcf704f25e82f1 --047d7bfcec649adcf704f25e82f1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Not sure if a 4.4 blog is in the works, but given that we are getting close to our PR launch, I'd suggest that we hold on blogs promoting 4.4 features at this point. I know there is public information online on 4.4 features, the latest RC, etc., but too much exposure can take the wind out of our formal press launch. Some reporters might consider it leaking the news ahead of time. Of course, OS savvy reporters can easily find the product roadmap and some deeply technical sites have even tracked 4.4 (ie. Phoronix) progress. But, in general, it's a good practice to save our 4.4 blogs for our launch at this point. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On gio, 2014-02-13 at 10:20 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > On 02/13/2014 10:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > If none of the above is ready, perhaps we can at least have something > > > about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of the > > > dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _the_ > > > one? That would still be something for George, I guess... > > > > Sorry -- I can work on the PoD blog today. I think I should be able to > > finish it. > > > Ok, that would definitely be fine. > > Let us know when you have a draft ready for being reviewed. > > Thanks, > Dario > > -- > <> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7bfcec649adcf704f25e82f1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Not sure if a 4.4 blog is in th= e works, but given that we are getting close to our PR launch, I'd sugg= est that we hold on blogs promoting 4.4 features at this point. I know ther= e is public information online on 4.4 features, the latest RC, etc., but to= o much exposure can take the wind out of our formal press launch. Some repo= rters might consider it leaking the news ahead of time. Of course, OS savvy= reporters can easily find the product roadmap and some deeply technical si= tes have even tracked 4.4 (ie. Phoronix) progress. But, in general, it'= s a good practice to save our 4.4 blogs for our launch at this point.=A0

If you have any questi= ons, please let me know.

Thanks,


On Thu,= Feb 13, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.co= m> wrote:
On gio, 2014-02-13 at 10:20 = +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 10:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > If none of the above is ready, perhaps we c= an at least have something
> > about 4.4 release status? I mean a quick blog-ification of one of= the
> > dev updates, latest RC, and expectations on which one could be _t= he_
> > one? That would still be something for George, I guess...
>
> Sorry -- I can work on the PoD blog today. =A0I think I should be able= to
> finish it.
>
Ok, that would definitely be fine.

Let us know when you have a draft ready for being reviewed.

Thanks,
Dario

--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majer= e)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Fou= ndation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7bfcec649adcf704f25e82f1-- --===============5284488870564302738== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============5284488870564302738==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:32:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:32:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJot-0005Oc-Da; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:32:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJor-0005OW-J7 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:32:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:64552] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 51/1D-11539-C092EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:32:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392388354!5716917!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjI0NzggKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3078 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:32:35 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:32:35 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100796364" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:32:33 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:32:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Sarah Conway Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:32:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4037548850656778371==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4037548850656778371== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X3dpZB7Xdkzu/dQvy4r6" --=-X3dpZB7Xdkzu/dQvy4r6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 09:20 -0500, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi all, >=20 Hi Sarah, > Not sure if a 4.4 blog is in the works, but given that we are getting > close to our PR launch, I'd suggest that we hold on blogs promoting > 4.4 features at this point. I know there is public information online > on 4.4 features, the latest RC, etc., but too much exposure can take > the wind out of our formal press launch. Some reporters might consider > it leaking the news ahead of time. Of course, OS savvy reporters can > easily find the product roadmap and some deeply technical sites have > even tracked 4.4 (ie. Phoronix) progress. But, in general, it's a good > practice to save our 4.4 blogs for our launch at this point.=20 >=20 Yeah, I see what you mean, and honestly, I had not thought at it that way, so thanks for pointing this out. Still, what I meant, was more something about the timing, a summary on what RC we've had up to know and how they went, perhaps some general mentioning on what is holding the release, etc.... Something that could set expectations without giving away too much of the content, to save it for official announcement as you were saying. Quite frankly, although I honestly think all I just said, it was also trying to suggest something quick and easy to write, to have something on the blog this week! :-P Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-X3dpZB7Xdkzu/dQvy4r6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+KP8ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQyJQCdGQzUfI+BbLbfNWtC9YaQ4qde iy4An0J1XBsF/NTA5FW8E5CnYUPYe6yT =pldt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X3dpZB7Xdkzu/dQvy4r6-- --===============4037548850656778371== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4037548850656778371==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:32:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:32:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJot-0005Oc-Da; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:32:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJor-0005OW-J7 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:32:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:64552] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 51/1D-11539-C092EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:32:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392388354!5716917!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjI0NzggKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3078 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:32:35 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:32:35 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100796364" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:32:33 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:32:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Sarah Conway Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:32:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4037548850656778371==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4037548850656778371== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X3dpZB7Xdkzu/dQvy4r6" --=-X3dpZB7Xdkzu/dQvy4r6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 09:20 -0500, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi all, >=20 Hi Sarah, > Not sure if a 4.4 blog is in the works, but given that we are getting > close to our PR launch, I'd suggest that we hold on blogs promoting > 4.4 features at this point. I know there is public information online > on 4.4 features, the latest RC, etc., but too much exposure can take > the wind out of our formal press launch. Some reporters might consider > it leaking the news ahead of time. Of course, OS savvy reporters can > easily find the product roadmap and some deeply technical sites have > even tracked 4.4 (ie. Phoronix) progress. But, in general, it's a good > practice to save our 4.4 blogs for our launch at this point.=20 >=20 Yeah, I see what you mean, and honestly, I had not thought at it that way, so thanks for pointing this out. Still, what I meant, was more something about the timing, a summary on what RC we've had up to know and how they went, perhaps some general mentioning on what is holding the release, etc.... Something that could set expectations without giving away too much of the content, to save it for official announcement as you were saying. Quite frankly, although I honestly think all I just said, it was also trying to suggest something quick and easy to write, to have something on the blog this week! :-P Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-X3dpZB7Xdkzu/dQvy4r6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+KP8ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQyJQCdGQzUfI+BbLbfNWtC9YaQ4qde iy4An0J1XBsF/NTA5FW8E5CnYUPYe6yT =pldt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X3dpZB7Xdkzu/dQvy4r6-- --===============4037548850656778371== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4037548850656778371==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:36:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:36:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJsR-0005Qi-0Q; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:36:27 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJsQ-0005Qa-6X; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:36:26 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:41677] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 10/A8-31661-9E92EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:36:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392388574!5731319!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjk2MTggKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 17975 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:36:15 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:36:15 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100797314" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:36:14 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:36:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1392388571.32038.258.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:36:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0460385859833458907==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0460385859833458907== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nMuMg6AJc84BEv2XeD1I" --=-nMuMg6AJc84BEv2XeD1I Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 01:13 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-13: > > ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good=20 > > example of what I meant above! :-) > >=20 > > So, how do you feel about this? > >=20 >=20 > Sure. If you can do it, that's great. > Cool! So, first step for this is you go to blog.xen.org and register, and then let me know your username, so that I can allow you to write blog posts. No need to rush, of course. Although, as per George summary, nested virt won't be advertised as production ready for 4.4, I still think that it may be worthwhile waiting after the release, as Sarah was suggesting. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-nMuMg6AJc84BEv2XeD1I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+KdsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ8ywCfe4OMiP8jNh0DHXi1Fg0ZhaSy NfkAoJNoFABtYwXxyos4TBozHdeBx1Ny =7Ic4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nMuMg6AJc84BEv2XeD1I-- --===============0460385859833458907== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0460385859833458907==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:36:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:36:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJsR-0005Qi-0Q; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:36:27 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJsQ-0005Qa-6X; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:36:26 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:41677] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 10/A8-31661-9E92EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:36:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392388574!5731319!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjk2MTggKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 17975 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:36:15 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:36:15 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100797314" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:36:14 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:36:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1392388571.32038.258.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:36:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0460385859833458907==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0460385859833458907== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nMuMg6AJc84BEv2XeD1I" --=-nMuMg6AJc84BEv2XeD1I Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 01:13 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-13: > > ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good=20 > > example of what I meant above! :-) > >=20 > > So, how do you feel about this? > >=20 >=20 > Sure. If you can do it, that's great. > Cool! So, first step for this is you go to blog.xen.org and register, and then let me know your username, so that I can allow you to write blog posts. No need to rush, of course. Although, as per George summary, nested virt won't be advertised as production ready for 4.4, I still think that it may be worthwhile waiting after the release, as Sarah was suggesting. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-nMuMg6AJc84BEv2XeD1I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+KdsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ8ywCfe4OMiP8jNh0DHXi1Fg0ZhaSy NfkAoJNoFABtYwXxyos4TBozHdeBx1Ny =7Ic4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nMuMg6AJc84BEv2XeD1I-- --===============0460385859833458907== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0460385859833458907==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:41:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:41:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJx0-0005cD-4A; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:41:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJwy-0005c0-7p; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:41:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:28781] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 52/FD-11539-30B2EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:41:07 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392388865!5729302!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 21991 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:41:06 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-6.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:41:06 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="102570325" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:40:44 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:40:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1392388841.32038.263.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:40:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FDEEDB.40305@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> <52FDEEDB.40305@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "Zhang, Yang Z" , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1913193969257052547==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1913193969257052547== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bAqudo5HkAOoCWA/Gsud" --=-bAqudo5HkAOoCWA/Gsud Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 10:24 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/14/2014 01:13 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > > Sorry. I didn't clarify it clearly. Most of the patches to run nested a= re already in Xen upstream. What I want is to add "nested is basically supp= orted in Xen 4.4" in the Xen 4.4 release note to let people know it. >=20 > I'm afraid "basically supported" will imply to people that they might=20 > consider shipping it on production systems. But because of the issues= =20 > with shadow-on-HAP, and the potential locking issues with the nested p2m= =20 > table, both of which are in control of the guest admin rather than the= =20 > host admin, I don't think that's a recommendation we can make at this tim= e. >=20 > But I do think making some kind of announcement about common=20 > functionality being complete and ready to be tested would be a good=20 > idea. When we come to make the release we can brainstorm on what=20 > wording to use. >=20 I agree. Let's not sell something not entirely ready, as that could backfire, but we should at least hint that it's there and it's improved. > Actually, I wonder whether advertising Win7's XP compatibility mode as a= =20 > separate "tech preview" feature would make sense. The people who use=20 > that feature are very likely very different than most other people who= =20 > might think about using nested virtualization. >=20 Completely agree again. And this is something that could be very well described in a blog post on the subject (happening after the release), I think. :-) Regads, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-bAqudo5HkAOoCWA/Gsud Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+KukACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ4tACfXLfD6/UNNwiY8tCd/BYn8rsk Zf0An2kKVXb1Fzy9AozhEaLEXDTxoBhy =bxmP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bAqudo5HkAOoCWA/Gsud-- --===============1913193969257052547== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1913193969257052547==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:41:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:41:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJx0-0005cD-4A; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:41:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEJwy-0005c0-7p; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:41:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:28781] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 52/FD-11539-30B2EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:41:07 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392388865!5729302!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 21991 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:41:06 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-6.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:41:06 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="102570325" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:40:44 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:40:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1392388841.32038.263.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:40:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FDEEDB.40305@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> <52FDEEDB.40305@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "Zhang, Yang Z" , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1913193969257052547==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1913193969257052547== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bAqudo5HkAOoCWA/Gsud" --=-bAqudo5HkAOoCWA/Gsud Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 10:24 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/14/2014 01:13 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > > Sorry. I didn't clarify it clearly. Most of the patches to run nested a= re already in Xen upstream. What I want is to add "nested is basically supp= orted in Xen 4.4" in the Xen 4.4 release note to let people know it. >=20 > I'm afraid "basically supported" will imply to people that they might=20 > consider shipping it on production systems. But because of the issues= =20 > with shadow-on-HAP, and the potential locking issues with the nested p2m= =20 > table, both of which are in control of the guest admin rather than the= =20 > host admin, I don't think that's a recommendation we can make at this tim= e. >=20 > But I do think making some kind of announcement about common=20 > functionality being complete and ready to be tested would be a good=20 > idea. When we come to make the release we can brainstorm on what=20 > wording to use. >=20 I agree. Let's not sell something not entirely ready, as that could backfire, but we should at least hint that it's there and it's improved. > Actually, I wonder whether advertising Win7's XP compatibility mode as a= =20 > separate "tech preview" feature would make sense. The people who use=20 > that feature are very likely very different than most other people who= =20 > might think about using nested virtualization. >=20 Completely agree again. And this is something that could be very well described in a blog post on the subject (happening after the release), I think. :-) Regads, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-bAqudo5HkAOoCWA/Gsud Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+KukACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ4tACfXLfD6/UNNwiY8tCd/BYn8rsk Zf0An2kKVXb1Fzy9AozhEaLEXDTxoBhy =bxmP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bAqudo5HkAOoCWA/Gsud-- --===============1913193969257052547== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1913193969257052547==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:45:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:45:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEK1S-0005nG-19; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:45:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEK1Q-0005n7-Fz for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:45:44 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:49099] by server-8.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 28/C0-05298-71C2EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:45:43 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392389132!3979296!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjQwNTUgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31093 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:45:33 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-4.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:45:33 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100800230" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:45:32 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:45:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1392389128.32038.268.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Joanna Rutkowska Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:45:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FA8195.9060408@invisiblethingslab.com> References: <1387302668.3880.16.camel@Solace> <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> <52FA8195.9060408@invisiblethingslab.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM booth demo: QubesOS X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4000377041984097236==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4000377041984097236== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0U3zDUPlOEkO40VlLfWd" --=-0U3zDUPlOEkO40VlLfWd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-11 at 21:01 +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: > Hi Dario, >=20 Hey, > Thanks for the update and for undertaking all the efforts to show of > Qubes OS :) >=20 My pleasure. And believe me, it was a lot of fun. :-) > I think that a non-working windows support on a FOSDEM conference might > just not be that much of a problem anyway ;) > Indeed!! BTW, we did never do that kind-of-interview to you, and perhaps a second one, more technical, to both you and Marek, about Qubes OS for the Xen blog we discussed a bunch of time ago. I know it's my mostly fault dropping it, as I was overloaded by other stuff, sorry for that. So, are you still up for it? If yes, I can work on it a bit, and we can aim at having something ready for after Xen 4.4 release. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-0U3zDUPlOEkO40VlLfWd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+LAgACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRzEACeND+T2gQ51BNIE7ACRo/WbQ/a D7oAoI8IORrGSIPZkZOY0ip6r9MRZ+2h =29zj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0U3zDUPlOEkO40VlLfWd-- --===============4000377041984097236== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4000377041984097236==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 14:45:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:45:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEK1S-0005nG-19; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:45:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEK1Q-0005n7-Fz for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:45:44 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:49099] by server-8.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 28/C0-05298-71C2EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:45:43 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392389132!3979296!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjQwNTUgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31093 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 14:45:33 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-4.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:45:33 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100800230" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 14:45:32 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:45:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1392389128.32038.268.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Joanna Rutkowska Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:45:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FA8195.9060408@invisiblethingslab.com> References: <1387302668.3880.16.camel@Solace> <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> <52FA8195.9060408@invisiblethingslab.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM booth demo: QubesOS X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4000377041984097236==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4000377041984097236== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0U3zDUPlOEkO40VlLfWd" --=-0U3zDUPlOEkO40VlLfWd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-11 at 21:01 +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: > Hi Dario, >=20 Hey, > Thanks for the update and for undertaking all the efforts to show of > Qubes OS :) >=20 My pleasure. And believe me, it was a lot of fun. :-) > I think that a non-working windows support on a FOSDEM conference might > just not be that much of a problem anyway ;) > Indeed!! BTW, we did never do that kind-of-interview to you, and perhaps a second one, more technical, to both you and Marek, about Qubes OS for the Xen blog we discussed a bunch of time ago. I know it's my mostly fault dropping it, as I was overloaded by other stuff, sorry for that. So, are you still up for it? If yes, I can work on it a bit, and we can aim at having something ready for after Xen 4.4 release. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-0U3zDUPlOEkO40VlLfWd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+LAgACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRzEACeND+T2gQ51BNIE7ACRo/WbQ/a D7oAoI8IORrGSIPZkZOY0ip6r9MRZ+2h =29zj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0U3zDUPlOEkO40VlLfWd-- --===============4000377041984097236== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4000377041984097236==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 15:12:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:12:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEKR7-0006rm-Qm; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:12:17 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEKR7-0006rh-3E for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:12:17 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:12531] by server-16.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 40/DC-29917-0523EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:12:16 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392390729!1937375!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6162 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 15:12:10 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:12:10 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="100810026" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:11:45 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:11:45 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WEKQa-0004Od-Rm; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:11:44 +0000 Message-ID: <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:11:31 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli , Sarah Conway References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if > George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I > guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. Well I've got this much done: http://blog.xen.org/?p=8848&preview=true It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical description. I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams to make the user description more understandable, and going through and trying to describe more of the technical details. Let me know what you think. -G _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 15:12:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:12:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEKR7-0006rm-Qm; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:12:17 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEKR7-0006rh-3E for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:12:17 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:12531] by server-16.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 40/DC-29917-0523EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:12:16 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392390729!1937375!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6162 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 15:12:10 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:12:10 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="100810026" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:11:45 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:11:45 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WEKQa-0004Od-Rm; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:11:44 +0000 Message-ID: <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:11:31 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli , Sarah Conway References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if > George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I > guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. Well I've got this much done: http://blog.xen.org/?p=8848&preview=true It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical description. I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams to make the user description more understandable, and going through and trying to describe more of the technical details. Let me know what you think. -G _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 15:50:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:50:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL2B-0007n2-Br; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:50:35 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL21-0007mv-Ds for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:50:30 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:40527] by server-8.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 0C/8D-16039-04B3EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:50:24 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392393023!680852!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.177] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5659 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 15:50:23 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:50:23 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id e4so602733wiv.16 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:50:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=alNWvkrXX2eHRNvjSaxx7biXXZmNm0U8URVmMqdzD0E=; b=JJTRat7NhJeGqTfMRI8XxTVJonnLgBjRhf/Cc/eb6MuunBsOXC2dC6kG5A96COJIJr kgUCJintWyQp1tFGat8UhW3y8oLdt9EKqtPK/oZpSIoNy1K+FJxFjuGSxl+17dK34w8s ATWHSC3vN/35OziDdotSOuxL6LQ20zwgtWnCQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=alNWvkrXX2eHRNvjSaxx7biXXZmNm0U8URVmMqdzD0E=; b=hypwnm7mywXdmfGZYCEkzWln8ZtapMkfOWFfri6aHqon23HX3KlvcZilUHzbt5SM+4 hskLMC3M0itNCGmhLQe49GeQCi1EnWDr1q9jd6ZNYFGq2gzjIq9HtwvPQktgy0AZ0cOS X9LYcbYLNkzPcmjhWiYpZTrKFxyfw6krxaOSXbLu3OHMwaIy/IbEe6wURCjxO8JBp3xc r4sl952TfkSDO3XR5KGNpSdFNbA7VHsx5nocalhBz0ZCMXMj0sObVUGGDXf8UJQnJmuR dEykmbR/8xRaOlrP0dNRZdKbgS5MlKqZ/423cMH3mNQlGNtKJntR12nJypN4S4Vp/6Y8 sKwg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlm5eWIiBX3SdGn8WisyZ1qEP6NnX03pX18H4m8+8GVX4VxxV7l0Bi0agz5iQWQNDPmTqPI MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.22.232 with SMTP id h8mr2428997wjf.53.1392393023044; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:50:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:50:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:50:22 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: George Dunlap Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0140576318978860400==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0140576318978860400== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d22ba86d36104f25fc37f --047d7b5d22ba86d36104f25fc37f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I made a few grammar edits. Just wanted to point out this sentence, which is a bit awkward to me, especially the ending. Thanks, Populate-on-demand comes into play in Xen whenever you start an HVM guest with maxmem and memory set do different values. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:11 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >> Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if >> George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I >> guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. >> > > Well I've got this much done: > > http://blog.xen.org/?p=8848&preview=true > > It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical > description. I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams to > make the user description more understandable, and going through and trying > to describe more of the technical details. > > Let me know what you think. > > -G > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7b5d22ba86d36104f25fc37f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,=A0

I made a few grammar edits. = Just wanted to point out this sentence, which is a bit awkward to me, espec= ially the ending.

Thanks,

Populate-on-demand comes into play in Xen whenever you start an HVM gue= st with=A0maxmem=A0and=A0memory=A0set do different va= lues.=A0


O= n Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:11 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu= .citrix.com> wrote:
On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dari= o Faggioli wrote:
Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if
George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I
guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine.=

Well I've got this much done:

http://blog.xen.org/?p=3D8848&preview=3Dtrue

It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical = description. =A0I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams = to make the user description more understandable, and going through and try= ing to describe more of the technical details.

Let me know what you think.<= br>
=A0-G



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The= Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7b5d22ba86d36104f25fc37f-- --===============0140576318978860400== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0140576318978860400==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 15:50:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:50:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL2B-0007n2-Br; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:50:35 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL21-0007mv-Ds for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:50:30 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:40527] by server-8.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 0C/8D-16039-04B3EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:50:24 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392393023!680852!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.177] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5659 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 15:50:23 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by server-13.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:50:23 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id e4so602733wiv.16 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:50:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=alNWvkrXX2eHRNvjSaxx7biXXZmNm0U8URVmMqdzD0E=; b=JJTRat7NhJeGqTfMRI8XxTVJonnLgBjRhf/Cc/eb6MuunBsOXC2dC6kG5A96COJIJr kgUCJintWyQp1tFGat8UhW3y8oLdt9EKqtPK/oZpSIoNy1K+FJxFjuGSxl+17dK34w8s ATWHSC3vN/35OziDdotSOuxL6LQ20zwgtWnCQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=alNWvkrXX2eHRNvjSaxx7biXXZmNm0U8URVmMqdzD0E=; b=hypwnm7mywXdmfGZYCEkzWln8ZtapMkfOWFfri6aHqon23HX3KlvcZilUHzbt5SM+4 hskLMC3M0itNCGmhLQe49GeQCi1EnWDr1q9jd6ZNYFGq2gzjIq9HtwvPQktgy0AZ0cOS X9LYcbYLNkzPcmjhWiYpZTrKFxyfw6krxaOSXbLu3OHMwaIy/IbEe6wURCjxO8JBp3xc r4sl952TfkSDO3XR5KGNpSdFNbA7VHsx5nocalhBz0ZCMXMj0sObVUGGDXf8UJQnJmuR dEykmbR/8xRaOlrP0dNRZdKbgS5MlKqZ/423cMH3mNQlGNtKJntR12nJypN4S4Vp/6Y8 sKwg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlm5eWIiBX3SdGn8WisyZ1qEP6NnX03pX18H4m8+8GVX4VxxV7l0Bi0agz5iQWQNDPmTqPI MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.22.232 with SMTP id h8mr2428997wjf.53.1392393023044; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:50:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:50:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:50:22 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: George Dunlap Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0140576318978860400==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0140576318978860400== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d22ba86d36104f25fc37f --047d7b5d22ba86d36104f25fc37f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I made a few grammar edits. Just wanted to point out this sentence, which is a bit awkward to me, especially the ending. Thanks, Populate-on-demand comes into play in Xen whenever you start an HVM guest with maxmem and memory set do different values. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:11 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >> Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if >> George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I >> guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. >> > > Well I've got this much done: > > http://blog.xen.org/?p=8848&preview=true > > It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical > description. I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams to > make the user description more understandable, and going through and trying > to describe more of the technical details. > > Let me know what you think. > > -G > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7b5d22ba86d36104f25fc37f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,=A0

I made a few grammar edits. = Just wanted to point out this sentence, which is a bit awkward to me, espec= ially the ending.

Thanks,

Populate-on-demand comes into play in Xen whenever you start an HVM gue= st with=A0maxmem=A0and=A0memory=A0set do different va= lues.=A0


O= n Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:11 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu= .citrix.com> wrote:
On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dari= o Faggioli wrote:
Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if
George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I
guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine.=

Well I've got this much done:

http://blog.xen.org/?p=3D8848&preview=3Dtrue

It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical = description. =A0I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams = to make the user description more understandable, and going through and try= ing to describe more of the technical details.

Let me know what you think.<= br>
=A0-G



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The= Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7b5d22ba86d36104f25fc37f-- --===============0140576318978860400== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0140576318978860400==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 15:57:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL8n-0000v3-6x; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:25 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL8m-0000uo-CD for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:24 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:7946] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id A6/B0-31661-3EC3EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:23 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392393441!5764215!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 2914 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 15:57:22 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-9.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:57:22 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="100825951" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:57:14 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:57:14 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL8b-00053F-M0; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:13 +0000 Message-ID: <52FE3CCC.8030303@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:00 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4235737855916174756==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4235737855916174756== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070807060005030201000006" --------------070807060005030201000006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/14/2014 03:50 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi all, > > I made a few grammar edits. Just wanted to point out this sentence, > which is a bit awkward to me, especially the ending. > > Thanks, > > Populate-on-demand comes into play in Xen whenever you start an HVM > guest with |maxmem| and |memory| set do different values. Sorry, that should be "set *to* different values". Does that make more sense? -George --------------070807060005030201000006 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 02/14/2014 03:50 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all, 

I made a few grammar edits. Just wanted to point out this sentence, which is a bit awkward to me, especially the ending.

Thanks,

Populate-on-demand comes into play in Xen whenever you start an HVM guest with maxmem and memory set do different values.

Sorry, that should be "set *to* different values".  Does that make more sense?

 -George

--------------070807060005030201000006-- --===============4235737855916174756== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4235737855916174756==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 15:57:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL8n-0000v3-6x; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:25 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL8m-0000uo-CD for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:24 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:7946] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id A6/B0-31661-3EC3EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:23 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392393441!5764215!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 2914 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 15:57:22 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-9.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:57:22 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="100825951" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 15:57:14 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:57:14 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WEL8b-00053F-M0; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:13 +0000 Message-ID: <52FE3CCC.8030303@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:57:00 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4235737855916174756==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4235737855916174756== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070807060005030201000006" --------------070807060005030201000006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/14/2014 03:50 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi all, > > I made a few grammar edits. Just wanted to point out this sentence, > which is a bit awkward to me, especially the ending. > > Thanks, > > Populate-on-demand comes into play in Xen whenever you start an HVM > guest with |maxmem| and |memory| set do different values. Sorry, that should be "set *to* different values". Does that make more sense? -George --------------070807060005030201000006 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 02/14/2014 03:50 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all, 

I made a few grammar edits. Just wanted to point out this sentence, which is a bit awkward to me, especially the ending.

Thanks,

Populate-on-demand comes into play in Xen whenever you start an HVM guest with maxmem and memory set do different values.

Sorry, that should be "set *to* different values".  Does that make more sense?

 -George

--------------070807060005030201000006-- --===============4235737855916174756== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4235737855916174756==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:09:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:09:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELKY-0001YR-Pf; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:09:34 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELKX-0001YM-Fr for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:09:33 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:43923] by server-1.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 27/27-12859-CBF3EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:09:32 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392394170!4019665!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 613 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:09:31 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:09:31 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100830688" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:09:29 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:09:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:09:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7601605664292169402==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============7601605664292169402== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dJ9SOaw8EJMhmhb14Eyk" --=-dJ9SOaw8EJMhmhb14Eyk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 15:11 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if > > George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I > > guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. >=20 > Well I've got this much done: >=20 > http://blog.xen.org/?p=3D8848&preview=3Dtrue >=20 Oh, great! And now I've had a look at it. > It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical= =20 > description. =20 > Yes, and it's a really nice writeup of that. > I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams=20 > to make the user description more understandable, and going through and= =20 > trying to describe more of the technical details. >=20 > Let me know what you think. >=20 I'm not sure either. I'd say that the post as it is, even better with a/some diagram, is already a really nice one. The only thing that puzzles me in this case, is that it, yes, describes what PoD is and how it functions, but, since the user can't really do nothing about or with PoD (or can he?), it'd all be for the sake of knowing it, which may be a bit weak of a motivation. Of course, if there were the technical and implementation details, that would be "fixed", but I don't know how much time and effort it's required be to add those. TBH, I really would like to have a more technical and implementation focused post about this, as I think it's something important that not many dominate, and because it's a while we haven't had a 'Xen internals' post. Of course, we can make this a process with two phases, the first one of which is what you have, the second is the more technical description. On that ground, and if you're up to writing "episode II" (in a few weeks, of course, e.g., when it will be your turn to blog again!), I'd say, stick there a few hyperlinks, a cool (and copyleft) photo of some balloons, a diagram --if possible-- and go for it! Does that make sense? Oh, if doing it this way, one thing that I'd mention, at the bottom, is what happens in PV. Just very lightly and quickly, but I guess, since you mention HVM, someone not super-knowledgeable about the Xen architecture, while being perfectly able to follow the post until there, could wonder something like: <> Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-dJ9SOaw8EJMhmhb14Eyk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+P7cACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTd3wCggXkMMMhsmI7P2jJbQLg80aet snkAn25OJouxw5U6bA3Qhuplu+pqq4yo =tH4Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dJ9SOaw8EJMhmhb14Eyk-- --===============7601605664292169402== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============7601605664292169402==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:09:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:09:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELKY-0001YR-Pf; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:09:34 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELKX-0001YM-Fr for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:09:33 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:43923] by server-1.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 27/27-12859-CBF3EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:09:32 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392394170!4019665!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 613 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:09:31 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:09:31 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100830688" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:09:29 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:09:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:09:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7601605664292169402==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============7601605664292169402== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dJ9SOaw8EJMhmhb14Eyk" --=-dJ9SOaw8EJMhmhb14Eyk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 15:11 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if > > George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I > > guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. >=20 > Well I've got this much done: >=20 > http://blog.xen.org/?p=3D8848&preview=3Dtrue >=20 Oh, great! And now I've had a look at it. > It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical= =20 > description. =20 > Yes, and it's a really nice writeup of that. > I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams=20 > to make the user description more understandable, and going through and= =20 > trying to describe more of the technical details. >=20 > Let me know what you think. >=20 I'm not sure either. I'd say that the post as it is, even better with a/some diagram, is already a really nice one. The only thing that puzzles me in this case, is that it, yes, describes what PoD is and how it functions, but, since the user can't really do nothing about or with PoD (or can he?), it'd all be for the sake of knowing it, which may be a bit weak of a motivation. Of course, if there were the technical and implementation details, that would be "fixed", but I don't know how much time and effort it's required be to add those. TBH, I really would like to have a more technical and implementation focused post about this, as I think it's something important that not many dominate, and because it's a while we haven't had a 'Xen internals' post. Of course, we can make this a process with two phases, the first one of which is what you have, the second is the more technical description. On that ground, and if you're up to writing "episode II" (in a few weeks, of course, e.g., when it will be your turn to blog again!), I'd say, stick there a few hyperlinks, a cool (and copyleft) photo of some balloons, a diagram --if possible-- and go for it! Does that make sense? Oh, if doing it this way, one thing that I'd mention, at the bottom, is what happens in PV. Just very lightly and quickly, but I guess, since you mention HVM, someone not super-knowledgeable about the Xen architecture, while being perfectly able to follow the post until there, could wonder something like: <> Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-dJ9SOaw8EJMhmhb14Eyk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+P7cACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTd3wCggXkMMMhsmI7P2jJbQLg80aet snkAn25OJouxw5U6bA3Qhuplu+pqq4yo =tH4Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dJ9SOaw8EJMhmhb14Eyk-- --===============7601605664292169402== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============7601605664292169402==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:27:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:27:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELbd-0001xY-3R; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:27:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELbc-0001xT-EQ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:27:12 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:40523] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 78/03-01226-FD34EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:27:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: joanna@invisiblethingslab.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392395217!4414827!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.111.4.26] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTExLjQuMjYgPT4gMTIyNTM=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5770 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:27:04 -0000 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26) by server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:27:04 -0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A41D21077 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:26:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:26:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= invisiblethingslab.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=9h KHgj8FPpb+Q2XhLSTrbZe1bxU=; b=ekSNP+DMKDp/yLBygQ8bzHNFjROgF1ozap tktIz2lUyyqzJ3pDyLFuORcLtYb2lNjHRX9/fcWq+SCW0REn7LxYFLImBT/x7CHM Xh3qlD/vhn0Tc9hh2IlYNmDTj9bYf3LNu34oDmLPki7pK4OHGq9tUizzpwQU9MEQ d5HXNPG3s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=9hKH gj8FPpb+Q2XhLSTrbZe1bxU=; b=CJV+w/yuRfv4NXB/+0yELH07IhTxj/cX0QNW QzMAEpBUg7CaISrSEL66QVOqwzcGv7BrMPQQoX/FIm5uchS25GUrf+Z3DNhwzDKq U0b4bu1tjmtYqjZxsZAbXs2AQRjFieyCg2PD8rgpBIGcTjkxSC3vm47dF6gK77Em NcwXSrs= X-Sasl-enc: qo4BPuiglvmIKBFw0Shn2to6GSmtfp9Zb2sScS5ILLPY 1392395214 Received: from [10.137.1.33] (unknown [46.205.140.127]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 629F3C007AB; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:26:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52FE43C9.6040608@invisiblethingslab.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:26:49 +0100 From: Joanna Rutkowska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1387302668.3880.16.camel@Solace> <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> <52FA8195.9060408@invisiblethingslab.com> <1392389128.32038.268.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392389128.32038.268.camel@Solace> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM booth demo: QubesOS X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6660544455781045247==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============6660544455781045247== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5UPcWdoIcJ6eof5OE8NBe4BoWoIhK1wEL" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --5UPcWdoIcJ6eof5OE8NBe4BoWoIhK1wEL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/14/14 15:45, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mar, 2014-02-11 at 21:01 +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: >> Hi Dario, >> > Hey, >=20 >> Thanks for the update and for undertaking all the efforts to show of >> Qubes OS :) >> > My pleasure. And believe me, it was a lot of fun. :-) >=20 >> I think that a non-working windows support on a FOSDEM conference migh= t >> just not be that much of a problem anyway ;) >> > Indeed!! >=20 > BTW, we did never do that kind-of-interview to you, and perhaps a secon= d > one, more technical, to both you and Marek, about Qubes OS for the Xen > blog we discussed a bunch of time ago. >=20 > I know it's my mostly fault dropping it, as I was overloaded by other > stuff, sorry for that. So, are you still up for it? If yes, I can work > on it a bit, and we can aim at having something ready for after Xen 4.4= > release. Sure, with pleasure. joanna. --5UPcWdoIcJ6eof5OE8NBe4BoWoIhK1wEL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS/kPJAAoJEJwtLfzExk0LVoIH/RK94Ppmmol0EgSok8XPsQRG v1Wr3UzrJrK+I4IYLME7XOtgoii4NN6suvtMI6gCoHBjbUpVJlejTNUJXIZIVSHh uqeslAfnFBFY78HcCZ4PIbynsM9kNfH3LnLEAxECKxeqXlCptTv+kuslcbd+PV+A 2Ek2bqBFYxoDomuuVD5ivzOViwzQmYfMiwLzHhfqsRuwJS4k0LZAkgssLRpsqAjH 7X8hSoYgMzQgR0sE+40RR4u7njHIY5GvhGxROPgdu352r2Y5ySf7sJb4wBfPnTDs d9EzZJGUWNzNUfyO6IXcq0YjKhkP9BoPP16z1PjxdmZuQjDkzN/k2KAHjYen9tY= =Um4G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5UPcWdoIcJ6eof5OE8NBe4BoWoIhK1wEL-- --===============6660544455781045247== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6660544455781045247==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:27:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:27:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELbd-0001xY-3R; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:27:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELbc-0001xT-EQ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:27:12 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:40523] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 78/03-01226-FD34EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:27:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: joanna@invisiblethingslab.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392395217!4414827!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.111.4.26] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTExLjQuMjYgPT4gMTIyNTM=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5770 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:27:04 -0000 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26) by server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:27:04 -0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A41D21077 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:26:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:26:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= invisiblethingslab.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=9h KHgj8FPpb+Q2XhLSTrbZe1bxU=; b=ekSNP+DMKDp/yLBygQ8bzHNFjROgF1ozap tktIz2lUyyqzJ3pDyLFuORcLtYb2lNjHRX9/fcWq+SCW0REn7LxYFLImBT/x7CHM Xh3qlD/vhn0Tc9hh2IlYNmDTj9bYf3LNu34oDmLPki7pK4OHGq9tUizzpwQU9MEQ d5HXNPG3s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=9hKH gj8FPpb+Q2XhLSTrbZe1bxU=; b=CJV+w/yuRfv4NXB/+0yELH07IhTxj/cX0QNW QzMAEpBUg7CaISrSEL66QVOqwzcGv7BrMPQQoX/FIm5uchS25GUrf+Z3DNhwzDKq U0b4bu1tjmtYqjZxsZAbXs2AQRjFieyCg2PD8rgpBIGcTjkxSC3vm47dF6gK77Em NcwXSrs= X-Sasl-enc: qo4BPuiglvmIKBFw0Shn2to6GSmtfp9Zb2sScS5ILLPY 1392395214 Received: from [10.137.1.33] (unknown [46.205.140.127]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 629F3C007AB; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:26:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52FE43C9.6040608@invisiblethingslab.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:26:49 +0100 From: Joanna Rutkowska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1387302668.3880.16.camel@Solace> <52B4245B.2020700@invisiblethingslab.com> <1392142776.30734.44.camel@Solace> <52FA8195.9060408@invisiblethingslab.com> <1392389128.32038.268.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392389128.32038.268.camel@Solace> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] FOSDEM booth demo: QubesOS X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6660544455781045247==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============6660544455781045247== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5UPcWdoIcJ6eof5OE8NBe4BoWoIhK1wEL" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --5UPcWdoIcJ6eof5OE8NBe4BoWoIhK1wEL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/14/14 15:45, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mar, 2014-02-11 at 21:01 +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: >> Hi Dario, >> > Hey, >=20 >> Thanks for the update and for undertaking all the efforts to show of >> Qubes OS :) >> > My pleasure. And believe me, it was a lot of fun. :-) >=20 >> I think that a non-working windows support on a FOSDEM conference migh= t >> just not be that much of a problem anyway ;) >> > Indeed!! >=20 > BTW, we did never do that kind-of-interview to you, and perhaps a secon= d > one, more technical, to both you and Marek, about Qubes OS for the Xen > blog we discussed a bunch of time ago. >=20 > I know it's my mostly fault dropping it, as I was overloaded by other > stuff, sorry for that. So, are you still up for it? If yes, I can work > on it a bit, and we can aim at having something ready for after Xen 4.4= > release. Sure, with pleasure. joanna. --5UPcWdoIcJ6eof5OE8NBe4BoWoIhK1wEL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS/kPJAAoJEJwtLfzExk0LVoIH/RK94Ppmmol0EgSok8XPsQRG v1Wr3UzrJrK+I4IYLME7XOtgoii4NN6suvtMI6gCoHBjbUpVJlejTNUJXIZIVSHh uqeslAfnFBFY78HcCZ4PIbynsM9kNfH3LnLEAxECKxeqXlCptTv+kuslcbd+PV+A 2Ek2bqBFYxoDomuuVD5ivzOViwzQmYfMiwLzHhfqsRuwJS4k0LZAkgssLRpsqAjH 7X8hSoYgMzQgR0sE+40RR4u7njHIY5GvhGxROPgdu352r2Y5ySf7sJb4wBfPnTDs d9EzZJGUWNzNUfyO6IXcq0YjKhkP9BoPP16z1PjxdmZuQjDkzN/k2KAHjYen9tY= =Um4G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5UPcWdoIcJ6eof5OE8NBe4BoWoIhK1wEL-- --===============6660544455781045247== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6660544455781045247==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:29:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELdW-00021V-An; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELdV-00021P-JK for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:09 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:57292] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 53/91-31661-4544EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:08 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392395346!5772891!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13487 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:29:07 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:29:07 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="100838303" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:29:06 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:29:05 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WELa7-0005Wq-Vn; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:25:39 +0000 Message-ID: <52FE4376.7040500@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:25:26 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/14/2014 04:09 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-14 at 15:11 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if >>> George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I >>> guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. >> Well I've got this much done: >> >> http://blog.xen.org/?p=8848&preview=true >> > Oh, great! > > And now I've had a look at it. > >> It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical >> description. >> > Yes, and it's a really nice writeup of that. > >> I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams >> to make the user description more understandable, and going through and >> trying to describe more of the technical details. >> >> Let me know what you think. >> > I'm not sure either. I'd say that the post as it is, even better with > a/some diagram, is already a really nice one. The only thing that > puzzles me in this case, is that it, yes, describes what PoD is and how > it functions, but, since the user can't really do nothing about or with > PoD (or can he?), it'd all be for the sake of knowing it, which may be a > bit weak of a motivation. Of course, if there were the technical and > implementation details, that would be "fixed", but I don't know how much > time and effort it's required be to add those. > > TBH, I really would like to have a more technical and implementation > focused post about this, as I think it's something important that not > many dominate, and because it's a while we haven't had a 'Xen internals' > post. Of course, we can make this a process with two phases, the first > one of which is what you have, the second is the more technical > description. > > On that ground, and if you're up to writing "episode II" (in a few > weeks, of course, e.g., when it will be your turn to blog again!), I'd > say, stick there a few hyperlinks, a cool (and copyleft) photo of some > balloons, a diagram --if possible-- and go for it! > > Does that make sense? As it happens, I'm about halfway through a "technical internals" description, so I think I'll just finish it up. -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:29:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELdW-00021V-An; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELdV-00021P-JK for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:09 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:57292] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 53/91-31661-4544EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:29:08 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392395346!5772891!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13487 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:29:07 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:29:07 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="100838303" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:29:06 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:29:05 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WELa7-0005Wq-Vn; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:25:39 +0000 Message-ID: <52FE4376.7040500@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:25:26 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/14/2014 04:09 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-14 at 15:11 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/14/2014 02:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> Anyway, again, I totally agree with what you say. Just to clarify, if >>> George manage to get out the post on PoD (next week, at this point, I >>> guess?), that's definitely not a 4.4 new feature, so it should be fine. >> Well I've got this much done: >> >> http://blog.xen.org/?p=8848&preview=true >> > Oh, great! > > And now I've had a look at it. > >> It's basically just PoD from a user perspective, without the technical >> description. >> > Yes, and it's a really nice writeup of that. > >> I was dithering a bit between trying to draw some diagrams >> to make the user description more understandable, and going through and >> trying to describe more of the technical details. >> >> Let me know what you think. >> > I'm not sure either. I'd say that the post as it is, even better with > a/some diagram, is already a really nice one. The only thing that > puzzles me in this case, is that it, yes, describes what PoD is and how > it functions, but, since the user can't really do nothing about or with > PoD (or can he?), it'd all be for the sake of knowing it, which may be a > bit weak of a motivation. Of course, if there were the technical and > implementation details, that would be "fixed", but I don't know how much > time and effort it's required be to add those. > > TBH, I really would like to have a more technical and implementation > focused post about this, as I think it's something important that not > many dominate, and because it's a while we haven't had a 'Xen internals' > post. Of course, we can make this a process with two phases, the first > one of which is what you have, the second is the more technical > description. > > On that ground, and if you're up to writing "episode II" (in a few > weeks, of course, e.g., when it will be your turn to blog again!), I'd > say, stick there a few hyperlinks, a cool (and copyleft) photo of some > balloons, a diagram --if possible-- and go for it! > > Does that make sense? As it happens, I'm about halfway through a "technical internals" description, so I think I'll just finish it up. -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:40:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELoM-0002OE-NW; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELoL-0002O8-01 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:21 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:38694] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 38/D5-13775-4F64EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:20 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392396009!389029!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDYzNTYgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 22578 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:40:10 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-2.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:40:10 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="102613840" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:40:08 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:40:07 -0500 Message-ID: <1392396006.32038.310.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:40:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FE4376.7040500@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> <52FE4376.7040500@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4831843822943539191==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4831843822943539191== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4IbmKKwvAMr682lWaNY7" --=-4IbmKKwvAMr682lWaNY7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 16:25 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > Does that make sense? >=20 > As it happens, I'm about halfway through a "technical internals"=20 > description,=20 > Aha, right... virtues and vices of asynchronous communication, I guess. :-) > so I think I'll just finish it up. >=20 Sure, go ahead. Having both (non tech + tech) was actually the original plan. I was providing alternative assuming that you couldn't put the 'tech' part there now, but if you can, I think that is the absolute best. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-4IbmKKwvAMr682lWaNY7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+RuYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQf+QCgrdL7AWsnvMXHE2iC8ocAeWus fQsAoJvBzyQCSv9c+gCiw5oLvxcjUHGz =koyq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4IbmKKwvAMr682lWaNY7-- --===============4831843822943539191== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4831843822943539191==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:40:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELoM-0002OE-NW; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELoL-0002O8-01 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:21 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:38694] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 38/D5-13775-4F64EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:20 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392396009!389029!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDYzNTYgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 22578 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:40:10 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-2.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:40:10 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="102613840" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:40:08 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:40:07 -0500 Message-ID: <1392396006.32038.310.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: George Dunlap Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:40:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52FE4376.7040500@eu.citrix.com> References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> <52FE4376.7040500@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4831843822943539191==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4831843822943539191== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4IbmKKwvAMr682lWaNY7" --=-4IbmKKwvAMr682lWaNY7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2014-02-14 at 16:25 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > Does that make sense? >=20 > As it happens, I'm about halfway through a "technical internals"=20 > description,=20 > Aha, right... virtues and vices of asynchronous communication, I guess. :-) > so I think I'll just finish it up. >=20 Sure, go ahead. Having both (non tech + tech) was actually the original plan. I was providing alternative assuming that you couldn't put the 'tech' part there now, but if you can, I think that is the absolute best. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-4IbmKKwvAMr682lWaNY7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+RuYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQf+QCgrdL7AWsnvMXHE2iC8ocAeWus fQsAoJvBzyQCSv9c+gCiw5oLvxcjUHGz =koyq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4IbmKKwvAMr682lWaNY7-- --===============4831843822943539191== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4831843822943539191==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:44:54 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:44:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELsk-0002PW-CD; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:44:54 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELsi-0002PJ-Nh; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:44:52 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:9366] by server-11.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 2A/88-24604-3084EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:44:51 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392396279!4428764!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTYzNDkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 29228 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:44:40 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:44:40 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100843627" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:44:39 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:44:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1392396276.32038.313.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Anil Madhavapeddy Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:44:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <484CB6F6-CB8B-45C7-AB06-60AA725B72DE@recoil.org> References: <99DF25E9-B4D5-48BE-B7D1-0DD06C4EDE8B@gmail.com> <1386839335.14726.50.camel@Abyss> <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> <484CB6F6-CB8B-45C7-AB06-60AA725B72DE@recoil.org> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , Amir Chaudhry , Publicity list , "mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [MirageOS-devel] Scheduling some posts for openmirage.org X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8805145426825448271==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8805145426825448271== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-99xTVm1Eg3CZmgdXkzoq" --=-99xTVm1Eg3CZmgdXkzoq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-11 at 19:01 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > A timely question! We have quite a few articles that have gone up now; > the front page has a summary of recent updates; http://www.openmirage.org= / >=20 Terrific! > Some specific articles that may be of interest from the docs page: > http://www.openmirage.org/docs/ >=20 > - How Xen events work: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-events > - How Xen suspend/resume works: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-suspend > - Building custom disk backends: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-synthesiz= e-virtual-disk > - A walkthrough building a Hello World Xen kernel: http://openmirage.org/= wiki/hello-world >=20 Right, some of them, I saw, some other I missed... I'll have a look. Thanks for the complete set of pointers. > As for distilling these down to a Xen blog post, I'll defer to someone wi= th a little more time than I have right now. I like the thinking though :-= ) >=20 You mean you like the thinking behind, 'distilling these into summary doc...'? Well, I bit you do, since it's you that said it, earlier in the thread. :-D :-D As per actually doing such distilling, I'll have a look at the articles and then provide my view, by pinging again this thread. Will this be fine, or is there someone in particular I should be talking to? Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-99xTVm1Eg3CZmgdXkzoq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+R/QACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSwpQCdEkLO2s1w+F73gKB0UjbeYBPa bH0AnRMIaeU2sEH33Iigpv5MbswfJUNU =Br9S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-99xTVm1Eg3CZmgdXkzoq-- --===============8805145426825448271== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8805145426825448271==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 16:44:54 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:44:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELsk-0002PW-CD; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:44:54 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WELsi-0002PJ-Nh; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:44:52 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:9366] by server-11.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 2A/88-24604-3084EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:44:51 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392396279!4428764!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTYzNDkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 29228 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 16:44:40 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:44:40 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="100843627" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:44:39 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:44:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1392396276.32038.313.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Anil Madhavapeddy Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:44:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <484CB6F6-CB8B-45C7-AB06-60AA725B72DE@recoil.org> References: <99DF25E9-B4D5-48BE-B7D1-0DD06C4EDE8B@gmail.com> <1386839335.14726.50.camel@Abyss> <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> <484CB6F6-CB8B-45C7-AB06-60AA725B72DE@recoil.org> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , Amir Chaudhry , Publicity list , "mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [MirageOS-devel] Scheduling some posts for openmirage.org X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8805145426825448271==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8805145426825448271== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-99xTVm1Eg3CZmgdXkzoq" --=-99xTVm1Eg3CZmgdXkzoq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-11 at 19:01 +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > A timely question! We have quite a few articles that have gone up now; > the front page has a summary of recent updates; http://www.openmirage.org= / >=20 Terrific! > Some specific articles that may be of interest from the docs page: > http://www.openmirage.org/docs/ >=20 > - How Xen events work: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-events > - How Xen suspend/resume works: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-suspend > - Building custom disk backends: http://openmirage.org/wiki/xen-synthesiz= e-virtual-disk > - A walkthrough building a Hello World Xen kernel: http://openmirage.org/= wiki/hello-world >=20 Right, some of them, I saw, some other I missed... I'll have a look. Thanks for the complete set of pointers. > As for distilling these down to a Xen blog post, I'll defer to someone wi= th a little more time than I have right now. I like the thinking though :-= ) >=20 You mean you like the thinking behind, 'distilling these into summary doc...'? Well, I bit you do, since it's you that said it, earlier in the thread. :-D :-D As per actually doing such distilling, I'll have a look at the articles and then provide my view, by pinging again this thread. Will this be fine, or is there someone in particular I should be talking to? Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-99xTVm1Eg3CZmgdXkzoq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlL+R/QACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSwpQCdEkLO2s1w+F73gKB0UjbeYBPa bH0AnRMIaeU2sEH33Iigpv5MbswfJUNU =Br9S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-99xTVm1Eg3CZmgdXkzoq-- --===============8805145426825448271== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8805145426825448271==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 18:07:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WENB6-00060J-SI; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:56 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WENB5-000604-Qh for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:56 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:13179] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 61/F3-26923-B7B5EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:55 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392401272!966338!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 26907 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 18:07:54 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 18:07:54 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,846,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="100869701" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 18:07:46 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:07:45 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WENAv-0006wl-9h; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:45 +0000 Message-ID: <52FE5B64.7050804@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:32 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> <52FE4376.7040500@eu.citrix.com> <1392396006.32038.310.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392396006.32038.310.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/14/2014 04:40 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-14 at 16:25 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >>> Does that make sense? >> As it happens, I'm about halfway through a "technical internals" >> description, >> > Aha, right... virtues and vices of asynchronous communication, I > guess. :-) > >> so I think I'll just finish it up. >> > Sure, go ahead. Having both (non tech + tech) was actually the original > plan. I was providing alternative assuming that you couldn't put the > 'tech' part there now, but if you can, I think that is the absolute > best. OK, I've got the basics up. I've still got one more section to write, about zero page reclamation, but feedback / editing on what I've got is welcome. -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 14 18:07:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WENB6-00060J-SI; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:56 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WENB5-000604-Qh for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:56 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:13179] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 61/F3-26923-B7B5EF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:55 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392401272!966338!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 26907 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 18:07:54 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 18:07:54 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,846,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="100869701" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 18:07:46 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:07:45 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WENAv-0006wl-9h; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:45 +0000 Message-ID: <52FE5B64.7050804@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:07:32 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392138742.30734.26.camel@Solace> <1392286445.32038.29.camel@Solace> <52FC9C56.6080201@eu.citrix.com> <1392290306.32038.47.camel@Solace> <1392388351.32038.254.camel@Solace> <52FE3223.2090506@eu.citrix.com> <1392394167.32038.293.camel@Solace> <52FE4376.7040500@eu.citrix.com> <1392396006.32038.310.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392396006.32038.310.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 10 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/14/2014 04:40 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On ven, 2014-02-14 at 16:25 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >>> Does that make sense? >> As it happens, I'm about halfway through a "technical internals" >> description, >> > Aha, right... virtues and vices of asynchronous communication, I > guess. :-) > >> so I think I'll just finish it up. >> > Sure, go ahead. Having both (non tech + tech) was actually the original > plan. I was providing alternative assuming that you couldn't put the > 'tech' part there now, but if you can, I think that is the absolute > best. OK, I've got the basics up. I've still got one more section to write, about zero page reclamation, but feedback / editing on what I've got is welcome. -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sat Feb 15 12:03:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEdxd-0005Tr-Jk; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:09 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEdxc-0005TY-DL for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:48062] by server-6.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id C1/72-09180-B775FF25; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:07 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392465786!2033011!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 15492 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2014 12:03:06 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2014 12:03:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 20654 invoked by uid 634); 15 Feb 2014 12:03:06 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from cpc7-cmbg14-2-0-cust238.5-4.cable.virginm.net (HELO [192.168.1.94]) (86.30.244.239) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:06 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <1392396276.32038.313.camel@Solace> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:04 +0000 Message-Id: <2C33CD07-81EB-4C4D-8C5C-641AD38F7D72@recoil.org> References: <99DF25E9-B4D5-48BE-B7D1-0DD06C4EDE8B@gmail.com> <1386839335.14726.50.camel@Abyss> <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> <484CB6F6-CB8B-45C7-AB06-60AA725B72DE@recoil.org> <1392396276.32038.313.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Lars Kurth , Amir Chaudhry , Publicity list , "mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [MirageOS-devel] Scheduling some posts for openmirage.org X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 14 Feb 2014, at 16:44, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >> As for distilling these down to a Xen blog post, I'll defer to someone with a little more time than I have right now. I like the thinking though :-) >> > You mean you like the thinking behind, 'distilling these into summary > doc...'? Well, I bit you do, since it's you that said it, earlier in the > thread. :-D :-D > > As per actually doing such distilling, I'll have a look at the articles > and then provide my view, by pinging again this thread. Will this be > fine, or is there someone in particular I should be talking to? > This thread's just fine -- Dave, Jon and I definitely want to continue to write these little blog posts to explain individual libraries as we find time, as it's very helpful way to code review portions of Mirage as well. This is especially true now that the basic libraries structures have settled down in Mirage 1.1.x, thanks to Dave's splitting up of the Xen libxc bits into fully parallel installable bits. I'm currently working on rebasing our fork of MiniOS back to upstream Xen, using ocaml-ctypes for the glue bindings. This is both in hope of a future ARM MiniOS, but also to make the 'how a VM boots' part of Mirage much easier to explain and to support HVM booting. -anil _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sat Feb 15 12:03:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEdxd-0005Tr-Jk; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:09 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WEdxc-0005TY-DL for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:48062] by server-6.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id C1/72-09180-B775FF25; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:07 +0000 X-Env-Sender: anil@recoil.org X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392465786!2033011!1 X-Originating-IP: [89.16.177.154] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 15492 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2014 12:03:06 -0000 Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) (89.16.177.154) by server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2014 12:03:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 20654 invoked by uid 634); 15 Feb 2014 12:03:06 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from cpc7-cmbg14-2-0-cust238.5-4.cable.virginm.net (HELO [192.168.1.94]) (86.30.244.239) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:06 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <1392396276.32038.313.camel@Solace> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:03:04 +0000 Message-Id: <2C33CD07-81EB-4C4D-8C5C-641AD38F7D72@recoil.org> References: <99DF25E9-B4D5-48BE-B7D1-0DD06C4EDE8B@gmail.com> <1386839335.14726.50.camel@Abyss> <1392145061.30734.59.camel@Solace> <484CB6F6-CB8B-45C7-AB06-60AA725B72DE@recoil.org> <1392396276.32038.313.camel@Solace> To: Dario Faggioli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Cc: Lars Kurth , Amir Chaudhry , Publicity list , "mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [MirageOS-devel] Scheduling some posts for openmirage.org X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 14 Feb 2014, at 16:44, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >> As for distilling these down to a Xen blog post, I'll defer to someone with a little more time than I have right now. I like the thinking though :-) >> > You mean you like the thinking behind, 'distilling these into summary > doc...'? Well, I bit you do, since it's you that said it, earlier in the > thread. :-D :-D > > As per actually doing such distilling, I'll have a look at the articles > and then provide my view, by pinging again this thread. Will this be > fine, or is there someone in particular I should be talking to? > This thread's just fine -- Dave, Jon and I definitely want to continue to write these little blog posts to explain individual libraries as we find time, as it's very helpful way to code review portions of Mirage as well. This is especially true now that the basic libraries structures have settled down in Mirage 1.1.x, thanks to Dave's splitting up of the Xen libxc bits into fully parallel installable bits. I'm currently working on rebasing our fork of MiniOS back to upstream Xen, using ocaml-ctypes for the glue bindings. This is both in hope of a future ARM MiniOS, but also to make the 'how a VM boots' part of Mirage much easier to explain and to support HVM booting. -anil _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 08:38:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFJiY-0001gB-0M; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WE7LN-0001tU-Qj; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:13:30 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:7688] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 2B/1D-11539-9BD6DF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:13:29 +0000 X-Env-Sender: yang.z.zhang@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392340407!5571172!1 X-Originating-IP: [134.134.136.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTM0LjEzNC4xMzYuMjQgPT4gMzkwOTcx\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31633 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 01:13:28 -0000 Received: from mga09.intel.com (HELO mga09.intel.com) (134.134.136.24) by server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 01:13:28 -0000 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 17:09:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,842,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="455223371" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.35]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 17:13:26 -0800 Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) by FMSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:13:26 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.227]) by SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.185]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:13:24 +0800 From: "Zhang, Yang Z" To: Dario Faggioli Thread-Topic: [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki Thread-Index: Ac8oaRnW+W8g7uSZQTu9nFY+Bt3JcP//9LMA//6KNmA= Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:13:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:21 +0000 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-13: > [Adding the Xen publicity mailing list] > > On gio, 2014-02-13 at 03:55 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: >> Hi George, >> >> I have updated the Latest Xen nested status in the Xen wiki page, >> please have a look. >> > Hey Yang, > > This is something really useful to have on the wiki, thanks for doing it. > >> Although it is hard to say nested is good supported or product >> quality, it is ready to let people to know nested basically is supported by Xen. >> > Right. With that in mind, I think this topic would be a great one for > a blog post on the Xen Project's blog! The content you have on the > wiki is mostly fine as the core content of the blog post too, we'd just need a couple more "colloquial" > glue paragraph here and there, both about nested virt in general and > about Xen supporting it, for instance... > >> Especially, for Xen on Xen case, I didn't see any issue with it for >> more than half > of year. Besides, I am always using nested Xen to debug Xen booting > issue which doesn't need to reboot my real box. And it really helps me a lot. >> > ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good > example of what I meant above! :-) > > So, how do you feel about this? > Sure. If you can do it, that's great. >> So, if possible, I hope we can add nested support into Xen 4.4 >> release to let people know current status. >> > Sorry for my ignorance on the subject, what is it that is missing for > making the above (and the content of the wiki) true for 4.4? > Sorry. I didn't clarify it clearly. Most of the patches to run nested are already in Xen upstream. What I want is to add "nested is basically supported in Xen 4.4" in the Xen 4.4 release note to let people know it. > Anyway, I don't think that, whatever the answer is, it will be less > worth to have a blog post about nested virt... At most it will affect > when we want it. If it's going to be a 4.4 feature, I think the sooner > the better. If not, we can wait a little bit. > > Let me know your thoughts on the idea. > > Regards, > Dario > Best regards, Yang _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 08:38:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFJiX-0001g7-V7; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:21 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVC6-0002wU-98 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:29:23 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:48186] by server-3.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id E6/3E-00432-1E03BF25; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:29:21 +0000 X-Env-Sender: glommer@cloudius-systems.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392193758!3719516!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.219.51] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.7 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3005 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2014 08:29:19 -0000 Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.219.51) by server-14.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Feb 2014 08:29:19 -0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id h16so10547356oag.38 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:29:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aJyJtB/RWePXgpZT3xxGCXUiEfzG3EgP/Q5w3N7FT0w=; b=ajvOgJa01tXdd0yyEBGSHvoJZcx0/3NB7NCmLAsX/j7FjDHNmy3VA3mvYw+d4c8sDr E9X4XGF1SC432tpr38u9rsTUl5cbD+z8AHPCEF0INrEg71ZT7WNI3AJpdWbsbFFXtVA4 W2iZDzPdCsqx2MYBLtcgGBtRX3Vq6pZAfZM9s+uIsKHKvoTu1da8xKSCwtxymqrFAAud BUrXQFvP+WGL0FditYmOhaM0AtPRIUuHXcheiMI8vJ80vDn6XN9SMx2XaNzwpIjCH5qU UgpzGe7VhpDS7EI4p3BiVKulqtDR5Hfdglvgsvm0+/Qfni1hswDIdblyB+Qv5ellLLUX bbHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkq0HIexyFnietVzRhfuDTKWUKR3waLXqCz4IWWsVcw2hkCFhMiKNbvzlKPLWlOYzQFsN03 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.226.165 with SMTP id rt5mr490938oec.60.1392193757684; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.39.65 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:29:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:29:17 +0400 Message-ID: From: Glauber Costa To: Tzach Livyatan X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:21 +0000 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3047897714086284830==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3047897714086284830== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136a11662bc9c04f2315e90 --001a1136a11662bc9c04f2315e90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Tzach Livyatan wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:36 PM, George Dunlap < > george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > >> There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think we >> need to think about how to get a counter-message out. >> >> The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms >> of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably >> not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or >> PVH mode on Xen). >> >> But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call >> interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have >> been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the >> system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would >> give an attacker control of all containers on the system. >> >> By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to >> break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only >> worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but >> I'm sure it's similar. >> >> So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud >> environment, where users who don't trust each other share the same >> hardware. Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that >> successfully attacking one server cannot easily attack other servers. >> >> The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, >> particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the >> public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical >> than performance. >> >> Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate >> with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing >> anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; >> particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their >> approach. >> > > We are on-side! > Our own Glauber Costa (cc) gave a talk at on the subject of HV vs > Containers which can be found here https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/ > Some points to use from this are: > - OS is traditionally bad at truly isolating basic resources like CPU and > memory usage between groups of tasks > - Containers comes with a price paid in complexity. > - HV take advantage of continues HW improvements (containers do not) > > Glauber, feel free to add relevant points. > > Hi So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side. When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text: https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I published, it reached a small audience because we had very little followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast or link to it. Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want to reach. -For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS. - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment? - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure. The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant. Tzach > > > >> -George >> >> >> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >>> FYI, >>> >>> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is >>> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now >>> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >>> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >>> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >>> >>> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that >>> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >>> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >>> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By >>> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >>> portability, efficiency and security." >>> >>> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications- >>> and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container- >>> virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium= >>> feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >>> >>> An article from Dec. 2013: >>> >>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >>> >>> Some additional messaging from their web site: >>> >>> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: >>> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 >>> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >>> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >>> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >>> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >>> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >>> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >>> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >>> >>> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like >>> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from >>> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question >>> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >>> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >>> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >>> virtualization, etc. >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> > > --001a1136a11662bc9c04f2315e90 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Tzach Livyatan = <tzach@c= loudius-systems.com> wrote:



On Tue, Feb 11, 2= 014 at 9:36 PM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com&g= t; wrote:
There does seem to be a r= eally big push for containers, and I do think we need to think about how to= get a counter-message out.

The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms o= f memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably not= for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH = mode on Xen).

But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. =A0The system call in= terface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. =A0There have be= en dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system = call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an = attacker control of all containers on the system.

By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to brea= k into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worked = in PV mode, on Intel boxes. =A0I don't know what KVM's record is, b= ut I'm sure it's similar.

So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, = where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. =A0Nor = are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking o= ne server cannot easily attack other servers.

The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particularly= if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing se= rvices are lower value, where security is less critical than performance.
Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate wit= h KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? =A0Are RedHat or Canonical doing = anything with containers? =A0I think the OSv guys should be on-side; partic= ularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach.

We are on-side!
Our own Glauber = Costa (cc) gave a talk at on the subject of HV vs Containers which can be f= ound here=A0= https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/
Some points to use from this are:
- OS is traditionally = bad at truly isolating basic resources like CPU and memory usage between gr= oups of tasks
- Containers comes with a =A0price paid in comp= lexity.=A0
- HV take advantage of continues HW improvements (containers=A0do not)=

Glauber, feel free to add relevant points.
<= div>

Hi

So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was m= ore a containers overview when I was working in the containers side.
When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text:
https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa
My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, becau= se it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I
published, it reached a small audience because we had very littl= e followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcastor link to it.

Other aspects for consideration: It depends really = which audience we want to reach.
-For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out= (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be = in control
of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start us= ing it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This make= s it a no-go
for whoever is selling IaaS.

- The performance thing wit= h containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much = as I have succeeded to make that cost go down,
it is still ex= pensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should = start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment?

- I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg sh= rinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it i= s still impossible
to properly control kernel memory used by each contai= ner. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. = There are many other holes to gap,
and while they are there containers are particularly insecure.

The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that = it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you ca= n leave
all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for mem= ory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broa= dly
relevant.


Tzach=A0



=A0-George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They ar= e
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors tha= t
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating syste= m. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-appl= ications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container= -virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium= =3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%2= 9

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/= containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are no= w
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici= ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin= fo/publicity


--001a1136a11662bc9c04f2315e90-- --===============3047897714086284830== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3047897714086284830==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 08:38:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFJiX-0001g7-V7; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:21 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVC6-0002wU-98 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:29:23 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:48186] by server-3.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id E6/3E-00432-1E03BF25; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:29:21 +0000 X-Env-Sender: glommer@cloudius-systems.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392193758!3719516!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.219.51] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.7 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3005 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2014 08:29:19 -0000 Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.219.51) by server-14.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Feb 2014 08:29:19 -0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id h16so10547356oag.38 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:29:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aJyJtB/RWePXgpZT3xxGCXUiEfzG3EgP/Q5w3N7FT0w=; b=ajvOgJa01tXdd0yyEBGSHvoJZcx0/3NB7NCmLAsX/j7FjDHNmy3VA3mvYw+d4c8sDr E9X4XGF1SC432tpr38u9rsTUl5cbD+z8AHPCEF0INrEg71ZT7WNI3AJpdWbsbFFXtVA4 W2iZDzPdCsqx2MYBLtcgGBtRX3Vq6pZAfZM9s+uIsKHKvoTu1da8xKSCwtxymqrFAAud BUrXQFvP+WGL0FditYmOhaM0AtPRIUuHXcheiMI8vJ80vDn6XN9SMx2XaNzwpIjCH5qU UgpzGe7VhpDS7EI4p3BiVKulqtDR5Hfdglvgsvm0+/Qfni1hswDIdblyB+Qv5ellLLUX bbHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkq0HIexyFnietVzRhfuDTKWUKR3waLXqCz4IWWsVcw2hkCFhMiKNbvzlKPLWlOYzQFsN03 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.226.165 with SMTP id rt5mr490938oec.60.1392193757684; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.39.65 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:29:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:29:17 +0400 Message-ID: From: Glauber Costa To: Tzach Livyatan X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:21 +0000 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3047897714086284830==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3047897714086284830== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136a11662bc9c04f2315e90 --001a1136a11662bc9c04f2315e90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Tzach Livyatan wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:36 PM, George Dunlap < > george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > >> There does seem to be a really big push for containers, and I do think we >> need to think about how to get a counter-message out. >> >> The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms >> of memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably >> not for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or >> PVH mode on Xen). >> >> But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. The system call >> interface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. There have >> been dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the >> system call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would >> give an attacker control of all containers on the system. >> >> By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to >> break into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only >> worked in PV mode, on Intel boxes. I don't know what KVM's record is, but >> I'm sure it's similar. >> >> So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud >> environment, where users who don't trust each other share the same >> hardware. Nor are they appropriate if you want to make sure that >> successfully attacking one server cannot easily attack other servers. >> >> The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, >> particularly if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the >> public-facing services are lower value, where security is less critical >> than performance. >> >> Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate >> with KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? Are RedHat or Canonical doing >> anything with containers? I think the OSv guys should be on-side; >> particularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their >> approach. >> > > We are on-side! > Our own Glauber Costa (cc) gave a talk at on the subject of HV vs > Containers which can be found here https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/ > Some points to use from this are: > - OS is traditionally bad at truly isolating basic resources like CPU and > memory usage between groups of tasks > - Containers comes with a price paid in complexity. > - HV take advantage of continues HW improvements (containers do not) > > Glauber, feel free to add relevant points. > > Hi So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side. When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text: https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I published, it reached a small audience because we had very little followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast or link to it. Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want to reach. -For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS. - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment? - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure. The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant. Tzach > > > >> -George >> >> >> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >>> FYI, >>> >>> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is >>> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now >>> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >>> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >>> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >>> >>> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that >>> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >>> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >>> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By >>> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >>> portability, efficiency and security." >>> >>> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications- >>> and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container- >>> virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium= >>> feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >>> >>> An article from Dec. 2013: >>> >>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >>> >>> Some additional messaging from their web site: >>> >>> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: >>> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 >>> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >>> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >>> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >>> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >>> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >>> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >>> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >>> >>> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like >>> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from >>> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question >>> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >>> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >>> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >>> virtualization, etc. >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> > > --001a1136a11662bc9c04f2315e90 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Tzach Livyatan = <tzach@c= loudius-systems.com> wrote:



On Tue, Feb 11, 2= 014 at 9:36 PM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com&g= t; wrote:
There does seem to be a r= eally big push for containers, and I do think we need to think about how to= get a counter-message out.

The basic facts are that containers probably are lower overhead, in terms o= f memory and cpu overhead, than virtualizing a full OS (though probably not= for cloud OSes like OSv or Mirage -- particularly if running in PV or PVH = mode on Xen).

But they are absolutely less secure than hypervisors. =A0The system call in= terface is much more porous than the hypervisor interface. =A0There have be= en dozens of Linux privilege escalation vulnerabilities through the system = call layers over the years: any one of these vulnerabilities would give an = attacker control of all containers on the system.

By contrast, Xen has had only one vulnerability that allows a guest to brea= k into the hypervisor, and that due to a processor bug: and it only worked = in PV mode, on Intel boxes. =A0I don't know what KVM's record is, b= ut I'm sure it's similar.

So containers are completely inappropriate for a public cloud environment, = where users who don't trust each other share the same hardware. =A0Nor = are they appropriate if you want to make sure that successfully attacking o= ne server cannot easily attack other servers.

The place where they make the most sense is in private clouds, particularly= if there aren't any public-facing services, or if the public-facing se= rvices are lower value, where security is less critical than performance.
Just tossing this out there -- would it make sense at all to coordinate wit= h KVM (or even VMWare) people about this? =A0Are RedHat or Canonical doing = anything with containers? =A0I think the OSv guys should be on-side; partic= ularly if it gives them an opportunity to make a case for their approach.

We are on-side!
Our own Glauber = Costa (cc) gave a talk at on the subject of HV vs Containers which can be f= ound here=A0= https://lwn.net/Articles/524952/
Some points to use from this are:
- OS is traditionally = bad at truly isolating basic resources like CPU and memory usage between gr= oups of tasks
- Containers comes with a =A0price paid in comp= lexity.=A0
- HV take advantage of continues HW improvements (containers=A0do not)=

Glauber, feel free to add relevant points.
<= div>

Hi

So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was m= ore a containers overview when I was working in the containers side.
When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text:
https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa
My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, becau= se it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I
published, it reached a small audience because we had very littl= e followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcastor link to it.

Other aspects for consideration: It depends really = which audience we want to reach.
-For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out= (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be = in control
of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start us= ing it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This make= s it a no-go
for whoever is selling IaaS.

- The performance thing wit= h containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much = as I have succeeded to make that cost go down,
it is still ex= pensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should = start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment?

- I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg sh= rinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it i= s still impossible
to properly control kernel memory used by each contai= ner. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. = There are many other holes to gap,
and while they are there containers are particularly insecure.

The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that = it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you ca= n leave
all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for mem= ory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broa= dly
relevant.


Tzach=A0



=A0-George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They ar= e
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors tha= t
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating syste= m. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-appl= ications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container= -virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium= =3Dfeed&utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%2= 9

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/= containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are no= w
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici= ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin= fo/publicity


--001a1136a11662bc9c04f2315e90-- --===============3047897714086284830== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3047897714086284830==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 08:38:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFJiY-0001gB-0M; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WE7LN-0001tU-Qj; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:13:30 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:7688] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 2B/1D-11539-9BD6DF25; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:13:29 +0000 X-Env-Sender: yang.z.zhang@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392340407!5571172!1 X-Originating-IP: [134.134.136.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTM0LjEzNC4xMzYuMjQgPT4gMzkwOTcx\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31633 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 01:13:28 -0000 Received: from mga09.intel.com (HELO mga09.intel.com) (134.134.136.24) by server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 01:13:28 -0000 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 17:09:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,842,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="455223371" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.35]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2014 17:13:26 -0800 Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) by FMSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:13:26 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.227]) by SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.185]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:13:24 +0800 From: "Zhang, Yang Z" To: Dario Faggioli Thread-Topic: [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki Thread-Index: Ac8oaRnW+W8g7uSZQTu9nFY+Bt3JcP//9LMA//6KNmA= Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:13:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:21 +0000 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-13: > [Adding the Xen publicity mailing list] > > On gio, 2014-02-13 at 03:55 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: >> Hi George, >> >> I have updated the Latest Xen nested status in the Xen wiki page, >> please have a look. >> > Hey Yang, > > This is something really useful to have on the wiki, thanks for doing it. > >> Although it is hard to say nested is good supported or product >> quality, it is ready to let people to know nested basically is supported by Xen. >> > Right. With that in mind, I think this topic would be a great one for > a blog post on the Xen Project's blog! The content you have on the > wiki is mostly fine as the core content of the blog post too, we'd just need a couple more "colloquial" > glue paragraph here and there, both about nested virt in general and > about Xen supporting it, for instance... > >> Especially, for Xen on Xen case, I didn't see any issue with it for >> more than half > of year. Besides, I am always using nested Xen to debug Xen booting > issue which doesn't need to reboot my real box. And it really helps me a lot. >> > ...something like this line above... It's actually a quite good > example of what I meant above! :-) > > So, how do you feel about this? > Sure. If you can do it, that's great. >> So, if possible, I hope we can add nested support into Xen 4.4 >> release to let people know current status. >> > Sorry for my ignorance on the subject, what is it that is missing for > making the above (and the content of the wiki) true for 4.4? > Sorry. I didn't clarify it clearly. Most of the patches to run nested are already in Xen upstream. What I want is to add "nested is basically supported in Xen 4.4" in the Xen 4.4 release note to let people know it. > Anyway, I don't think that, whatever the answer is, it will be less > worth to have a blog post about nested virt... At most it will affect > when we want it. If it's going to be a 4.4 feature, I think the sooner > the better. If not, we can wait a little bit. > > Let me know your thoughts on the idea. > > Regards, > Dario > Best regards, Yang _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 08:38:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFJiY-0001gF-1a; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFCp6-0006RW-A9; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:16:40 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:33789] by server-8.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 43/64-16039-7F261035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:16:39 +0000 X-Env-Sender: yang.z.zhang@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392599797!924143!1 X-Originating-IP: [134.134.136.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTM0LjEzNC4xMzYuMjQgPT4gMzkwOTcx\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1423 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 01:16:38 -0000 Received: from mga09.intel.com (HELO mga09.intel.com) (134.134.136.24) by server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 01:16:38 -0000 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2014 17:12:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,857,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="456590102" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.36]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2014 17:16:23 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:16:22 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by FMSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:16:22 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.227]) by SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.26]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:16:21 +0800 From: "Zhang, Yang Z" To: Dario Faggioli , George Dunlap Thread-Topic: [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki Thread-Index: Ac8oaRnW+W8g7uSZQTu9nFY+Bt3JcP//9LMA//6KNmCAAwangIAAR5eA//unM+A= Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:16:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> <52FDEEDB.40305@eu.citrix.com> <1392388841.32038.263.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392388841.32038.263.camel@Solace> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:21 +0000 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-14: > On ven, 2014-02-14 at 10:24 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/14/2014 01:13 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > >>> Sorry. I didn't clarify it clearly. Most of the patches to run nested are already > in Xen upstream. What I want is to add "nested is basically supported in Xen > 4.4" in the Xen 4.4 release note to let people know it. >> >> I'm afraid "basically supported" will imply to people that they might >> consider shipping it on production systems. But because of the issues >> with shadow-on-HAP, and the potential locking issues with the nested p2m >> table, both of which are in control of the guest admin rather than the Hi, George, Can you elaborate the two issues? I am not in the background. >> host admin, I don't think that's a recommendation we can make at this time. >> >> But I do think making some kind of announcement about common >> functionality being complete and ready to be tested would be a good >> idea. When we come to make the release we can brainstorm on what >> wording to use. >> > I agree. Let's not sell something not entirely ready, as that could > backfire, but we should at least hint that it's there and it's improved. > I agree too. A hint to say it is there should be ok to me. >> Actually, I wonder whether advertising Win7's XP compatibility mode as a >> separate "tech preview" feature would make sense. The people who use >> that feature are very likely very different than most other people who >> might think about using nested virtualization. >> > Completely agree again. And this is something that could be very well > described in a blog post on the subject (happening after the release), I > think. :-) > > Regads, > Dario > Best regards, Yang _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 08:38:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFJiY-0001gF-1a; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:22 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFCp6-0006RW-A9; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:16:40 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:33789] by server-8.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 43/64-16039-7F261035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:16:39 +0000 X-Env-Sender: yang.z.zhang@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392599797!924143!1 X-Originating-IP: [134.134.136.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTM0LjEzNC4xMzYuMjQgPT4gMzkwOTcx\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1423 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 01:16:38 -0000 Received: from mga09.intel.com (HELO mga09.intel.com) (134.134.136.24) by server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 01:16:38 -0000 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2014 17:12:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,857,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="456590102" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.36]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2014 17:16:23 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:16:22 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by FMSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:16:22 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.227]) by SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.26]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:16:21 +0800 From: "Zhang, Yang Z" To: Dario Faggioli , George Dunlap Thread-Topic: [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki Thread-Index: Ac8oaRnW+W8g7uSZQTu9nFY+Bt3JcP//9LMA//6KNmCAAwangIAAR5eA//unM+A= Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:16:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1392287382.32038.34.camel@Solace> <52FDEEDB.40305@eu.citrix.com> <1392388841.32038.263.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392388841.32038.263.camel@Solace> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:38:21 +0000 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , "'Jan Beulich \(JBeulich@suse.com\)'" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" Subject: Re: [Publicity] [Xen-devel] Xen nested wiki X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-14: > On ven, 2014-02-14 at 10:24 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/14/2014 01:13 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > >>> Sorry. I didn't clarify it clearly. Most of the patches to run nested are already > in Xen upstream. What I want is to add "nested is basically supported in Xen > 4.4" in the Xen 4.4 release note to let people know it. >> >> I'm afraid "basically supported" will imply to people that they might >> consider shipping it on production systems. But because of the issues >> with shadow-on-HAP, and the potential locking issues with the nested p2m >> table, both of which are in control of the guest admin rather than the Hi, George, Can you elaborate the two issues? I am not in the background. >> host admin, I don't think that's a recommendation we can make at this time. >> >> But I do think making some kind of announcement about common >> functionality being complete and ready to be tested would be a good >> idea. When we come to make the release we can brainstorm on what >> wording to use. >> > I agree. Let's not sell something not entirely ready, as that could > backfire, but we should at least hint that it's there and it's improved. > I agree too. A hint to say it is there should be ok to me. >> Actually, I wonder whether advertising Win7's XP compatibility mode as a >> separate "tech preview" feature would make sense. The people who use >> that feature are very likely very different than most other people who >> might think about using nested virtualization. >> > Completely agree again. And this is something that could be very well > described in a blog post on the subject (happening after the release), I > think. :-) > > Regads, > Dario > Best regards, Yang _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 10:46:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFLit-0003Jt-V6; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:51 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFLis-0003Jo-TR for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:51 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:4755] by server-7.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 3F/11-14867-A98E1035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:50 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392634005!4366882!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.52] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5469 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 10:46:47 -0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by server-13.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 10:46:47 -0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so2129942wgh.19 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:46:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=PnG4VZ6AulZVBsGiAuVPQvcQ1yDobjbv7Ee480NXhQk=; b=oEKnCF4HplD9is781Mb1kxI9PgfFukFhOxu8JcbGsN2N3HeV/fR5ta9qqkq4lMW1Ry IC8XN8GDbRETR5IeVpMwvKglAbKqBhlbkqCDgilUnu1FDfA12pu7jI+OxlHTmwOntI3y nlI8qhpRnnI3bMcetV5D0HhuLW3jxQkfc4W3w3+g8HWWsPhv6VByO36SVfDCLgMxZa7/ NLpAv3SCmU4oKoy16SPPtqy9nc3793ov71QNS4S32rmbeJX5M6AzMl51ig2bmHIbKJqU OztWyd/J4XSWNb92mKSTEgVexhhCjUWDbT/esDEHRxapseF1ZuKqCqmMv2k1BmFyXjAf EDrw== X-Received: by 10.180.188.66 with SMTP id fy2mr12366881wic.45.1392634005281; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:46:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.26.11] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xt1sm35727815wjb.17.2014.02.17.02.46.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:46:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5301E894.1000809@xen.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:46:44 -0800 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glauber Costa , Tzach Livyatan References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6083926962470802916==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============6083926962470802916== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090800080704000503030501" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090800080704000503030501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote: > > Hi > Glauber, sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week. I was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords. > So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a > containers overview when I was working in the containers side. > When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text: > https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa > > My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it > bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I > published, it reached a small audience because we had very little > followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast > or link to it. @Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up. I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought. > > Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we > want to reach. > -For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out > (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to > be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you > start using it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. > This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS. > > - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use > cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that > cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against > Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks > against a container environment? That is a good point. > > - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), > and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is > still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each > container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy > everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are > there containers are particularly insecure. > > The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it > allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you > can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are > restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is > probably not that broadly relevant. > > > Tzach > > > > -George > > > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > FYI, > > Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. > (1.0 version is > expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly > Docker can now > "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." > They are > positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, > pigeon-holing > hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. > > The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization > hypervisors that > power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't > virtualize an entire > operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application > containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host > operating system. By > virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer > greater > portability, efficiency and security." > > http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 > > An article from Dec. 2013: > > http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors > > Some additional messaging from their web site: > > Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is > expanding rapidly: > Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has > received over 7,500 > Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more > than 200 > community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications > are now > available at the Docker public index, and third party > projects and > partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating > systems, > hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 > user-created case > studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, > Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and > RelateIQ. > > I suggest we finesse our messaging against container > technologies like > Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. > Feedback from > the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely > be a question > that comes up in the near future. We could also try to > piggy-back any > Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April > timeframe, > offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. > virtualization, etc. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------090800080704000503030501 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote:

Hi

Glauber,

sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week.  I was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords.

So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side.
When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text:
https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa

My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I
published, it reached a small audience because we had very little followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast
or link to it.
@Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up.

I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought.


Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want to reach.
-For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS.

- The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment?
That is a good point.


- I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure.

The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant.


Tzach 



 -George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire
operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly:
Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from
the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------090800080704000503030501-- --===============6083926962470802916== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6083926962470802916==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 10:46:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFLit-0003Jt-V6; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:51 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFLis-0003Jo-TR for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:51 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:4755] by server-7.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 3F/11-14867-A98E1035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:50 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392634005!4366882!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.52] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5469 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 10:46:47 -0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by server-13.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 10:46:47 -0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so2129942wgh.19 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:46:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=PnG4VZ6AulZVBsGiAuVPQvcQ1yDobjbv7Ee480NXhQk=; b=oEKnCF4HplD9is781Mb1kxI9PgfFukFhOxu8JcbGsN2N3HeV/fR5ta9qqkq4lMW1Ry IC8XN8GDbRETR5IeVpMwvKglAbKqBhlbkqCDgilUnu1FDfA12pu7jI+OxlHTmwOntI3y nlI8qhpRnnI3bMcetV5D0HhuLW3jxQkfc4W3w3+g8HWWsPhv6VByO36SVfDCLgMxZa7/ NLpAv3SCmU4oKoy16SPPtqy9nc3793ov71QNS4S32rmbeJX5M6AzMl51ig2bmHIbKJqU OztWyd/J4XSWNb92mKSTEgVexhhCjUWDbT/esDEHRxapseF1ZuKqCqmMv2k1BmFyXjAf EDrw== X-Received: by 10.180.188.66 with SMTP id fy2mr12366881wic.45.1392634005281; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:46:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.26.11] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xt1sm35727815wjb.17.2014.02.17.02.46.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:46:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5301E894.1000809@xen.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:46:44 -0800 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glauber Costa , Tzach Livyatan References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6083926962470802916==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============6083926962470802916== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090800080704000503030501" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090800080704000503030501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote: > > Hi > Glauber, sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week. I was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords. > So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a > containers overview when I was working in the containers side. > When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text: > https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa > > My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it > bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I > published, it reached a small audience because we had very little > followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast > or link to it. @Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up. I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought. > > Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we > want to reach. > -For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out > (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to > be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you > start using it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. > This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS. > > - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use > cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that > cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against > Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks > against a container environment? That is a good point. > > - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), > and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is > still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each > container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy > everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are > there containers are particularly insecure. > > The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it > allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you > can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are > restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is > probably not that broadly relevant. > > > Tzach > > > > -George > > > On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > FYI, > > Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. > (1.0 version is > expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly > Docker can now > "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." > They are > positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, > pigeon-holing > hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. > > The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization > hypervisors that > power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't > virtualize an entire > operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application > containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host > operating system. By > virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer > greater > portability, efficiency and security." > > http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 > > An article from Dec. 2013: > > http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors > > Some additional messaging from their web site: > > Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is > expanding rapidly: > Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has > received over 7,500 > Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more > than 200 > community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications > are now > available at the Docker public index, and third party > projects and > partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating > systems, > hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 > user-created case > studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, > Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and > RelateIQ. > > I suggest we finesse our messaging against container > technologies like > Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. > Feedback from > the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely > be a question > that comes up in the near future. We could also try to > piggy-back any > Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April > timeframe, > offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. > virtualization, etc. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------090800080704000503030501 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote:

Hi

Glauber,

sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week.  I was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords.

So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side.
When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text:
https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa

My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I
published, it reached a small audience because we had very little followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast
or link to it.
@Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up.

I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought.


Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want to reach.
-For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS.

- The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment?
That is a good point.


- I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure.

The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant.


Tzach 



 -George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire
operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly:
Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from
the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------090800080704000503030501-- --===============6083926962470802916== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6083926962470802916==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 13:23:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:23:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFOAj-00007y-Kz; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:23:45 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFOAi-00007r-Tr for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:23:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:49412] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 69/92-31661-06D02035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:23:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392643421!6242118!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.50] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4406 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 13:23:41 -0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50) by server-3.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 13:23:41 -0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id z12so2225113wgg.17 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=U79W3RbX+3SrRI8S6BVWEAVPDp0eRfDKMxVmrbEHWYQ=; b=OX1y1tyDpaHzQ101exCeDXOFoSYWnjGvUR3WCAUkuHRhPy3QtjBnm/oQn/S4F4AV4i yBpXSRe8x5j6E7y40rlMknDCSbaiZhFwDoxm5VfVgUTyPec09PQMmlMQvX8eQubIhFFm 65cer90FmZAlk6EipvX23fzthTBAYVUaNgLUI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=U79W3RbX+3SrRI8S6BVWEAVPDp0eRfDKMxVmrbEHWYQ=; b=Kcm1qUcMVin8NpZqWIGNhNeu77S8sLyNFe7E3YmxazA8kGWvouJVIdRcQW9Wdmu0zO 0BDyFKpg0IeqP2G12WXTEyK3/pewbMuKa5vG4Fn8tQMiQ7jSEDcqXm+VTVJ8RxOVn6UB Iq3wIz7rRkgWJYnc1GTW64EtX7VfTP8V1mrYo5K5nq+RY18mU8q7IzXad4Ef4HKJBBAG o7clM7cr4skMjVDVH+eHAzROukkTGHeW9TORyQ9TQE1McawpbmysyQpWATj9FS5v7a6s +Kmzz7Of8tRdj2wmsIkWqi+1II23DrQ03sVPcTVmoeak+a418ALHndHLz9oDGFv0gx8/ IfXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/Eljnh6ev7fwGX84wTcr277GxIeCbIfgx9SBIXWGbw9903bMHEeonwb5SyiIZjkV+REbz MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.161.136 with SMTP id xs8mr1855163wjb.56.1392643421406; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5301E894.1000809@xen.org> References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> <5301E894.1000809@xen.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:23:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Lars Kurth Cc: Glauber Costa , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0319010390259698277==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0319010390259698277== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc30a6e8f0604f29a1068 --089e013cc30a6e8f0604f29a1068 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Thank you everyone for providing more background on this and offering ways to differentiate/educate the market on hypervisors vs./and containers. I'll summarize the content in this email chain this week into a media pitch to send to reporters who are covering companies like Docker, offering up someone from Xen Project as an expert spokesperson on the topic. I can inquire about the possible collaboration with OVA. To Lars' point, it would be helpful if someone would volunteer to be a spokesperson for Xen Project on this topic. Some technical background is necessary, of course. Reporters are also watching the company Docker evolve, covering news like its recent venture funding. They are keeping their eyes on moves like RedHat including Docker in its beta release and Google adding it to its Google Compute Engine Service. Docker also seems to be positioning its technology as a "DevOps tool." So, reporters may go beyond pure technical feature questions and ask about these market shifts and developments. Here are examples of some recent Docker coverage and the reporters I'd be approaching to offer an interview: http://www.infoworld.com/d/virtualization/docker-challenges-virtualization-market-containers-235897 http://www.eweek.com/enterprise-apps/docker-brings-open-source-container-virtualization-to-apple-mac-os-x.html http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software-companies/why-red-hats-roger-egan-joined-docker Thanks, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote: > > > Hi > > Glauber, > > sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week. I was > travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords. > > > So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a > containers overview when I was working in the containers side. > When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text: > https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa > > My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it > bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I > published, it reached a small audience because we had very little > followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast > or link to it. > > @Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? > Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in > the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical > depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up. > > I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to > containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who > handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought. > > > > Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want > to reach. > -For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out > (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be > in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using > it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a > no-go for whoever is selling IaaS. > > - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, > which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, > it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, > maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container > environment? > > That is a good point. > > > > - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), > and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still > impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is > still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are > many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are > particularly insecure. > > The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it > allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can > leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted > for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not > that broadly relevant. > > > Tzach >> >> >> >>> -George >>> >>> >>> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >>> >>>> FYI, >>>> >>>> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is >>>> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now >>>> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >>>> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >>>> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >>>> >>>> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that >>>> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >>>> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >>>> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By >>>> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >>>> portability, efficiency and security." >>>> >>>> >>>> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >>>> >>>> An article from Dec. 2013: >>>> >>>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >>>> >>>> Some additional messaging from their web site: >>>> >>>> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: >>>> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 >>>> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >>>> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >>>> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >>>> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >>>> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >>>> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >>>> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >>>> >>>> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like >>>> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from >>>> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question >>>> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >>>> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >>>> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >>>> virtualization, etc. >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Publicity mailing list >>> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >>> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing listPublicity@lists.xenproject.orghttp://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e013cc30a6e8f0604f29a1068 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Thank you everyone for providin= g more background on this and offering ways to differentiate/educate the ma= rket on hypervisors vs./and containers. I'll summarize the content in t= his email chain this week into a media pitch to send to reporters who are c= overing companies like Docker, offering up someone from Xen Project as an e= xpert spokesperson on the topic. I can inquire about the possible collabora= tion with OVA. =A0

To Lars' point, it would be helpful if someone woul= d volunteer to be a spokesperson for Xen Project on this topic. Some techni= cal background is necessary, of course. Reporters are also watching the com= pany Docker evolve, covering news like its recent venture funding. They are= keeping their eyes on moves like RedHat including Docker in its beta relea= se and Google adding it to its Google Compute Engine Service. Docker also s= eems to be positioning its technology as a "DevOps tool." So, rep= orters may go beyond pure technical feature questions and ask about these m= arket shifts and developments.=A0

Here are examples of some recent Docker coverage and th= e reporters I'd be approaching to offer an interview:=A0

=

Thanks,

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Lars Kurth= <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote:
=20 =20 =20

On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote:

Hi

Glauber,

sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week.=A0 I was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords.
<= br>
So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side.
When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text:
https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080= 430/posts/fgzsepcScTa

My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I
published, it reached a small audience because we had very little followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast
or link to it.
@Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up.

I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought.



Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want to reach.
-For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using it, it'= s harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS.

- The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment?
That is a good point.



- I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure.

The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant.


Tzach=A0



=A0-George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire
operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-meta= l" host operating system. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.= com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-= container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium=3Dfeed= &utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworl= d.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly:
Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from
the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin= /mailman/listinfo/publicity




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici=
ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ=
icity


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Fou= ndation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--089e013cc30a6e8f0604f29a1068-- --===============0319010390259698277== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0319010390259698277==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 13:23:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:23:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFOAj-00007y-Kz; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:23:45 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFOAi-00007r-Tr for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:23:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:49412] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 69/92-31661-06D02035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:23:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392643421!6242118!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.50] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4406 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 13:23:41 -0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50) by server-3.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 13:23:41 -0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id z12so2225113wgg.17 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=U79W3RbX+3SrRI8S6BVWEAVPDp0eRfDKMxVmrbEHWYQ=; b=OX1y1tyDpaHzQ101exCeDXOFoSYWnjGvUR3WCAUkuHRhPy3QtjBnm/oQn/S4F4AV4i yBpXSRe8x5j6E7y40rlMknDCSbaiZhFwDoxm5VfVgUTyPec09PQMmlMQvX8eQubIhFFm 65cer90FmZAlk6EipvX23fzthTBAYVUaNgLUI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=U79W3RbX+3SrRI8S6BVWEAVPDp0eRfDKMxVmrbEHWYQ=; b=Kcm1qUcMVin8NpZqWIGNhNeu77S8sLyNFe7E3YmxazA8kGWvouJVIdRcQW9Wdmu0zO 0BDyFKpg0IeqP2G12WXTEyK3/pewbMuKa5vG4Fn8tQMiQ7jSEDcqXm+VTVJ8RxOVn6UB Iq3wIz7rRkgWJYnc1GTW64EtX7VfTP8V1mrYo5K5nq+RY18mU8q7IzXad4Ef4HKJBBAG o7clM7cr4skMjVDVH+eHAzROukkTGHeW9TORyQ9TQE1McawpbmysyQpWATj9FS5v7a6s +Kmzz7Of8tRdj2wmsIkWqi+1II23DrQ03sVPcTVmoeak+a418ALHndHLz9oDGFv0gx8/ IfXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/Eljnh6ev7fwGX84wTcr277GxIeCbIfgx9SBIXWGbw9903bMHEeonwb5SyiIZjkV+REbz MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.161.136 with SMTP id xs8mr1855163wjb.56.1392643421406; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:23:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5301E894.1000809@xen.org> References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> <5301E894.1000809@xen.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:23:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Lars Kurth Cc: Glauber Costa , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0319010390259698277==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0319010390259698277== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc30a6e8f0604f29a1068 --089e013cc30a6e8f0604f29a1068 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Thank you everyone for providing more background on this and offering ways to differentiate/educate the market on hypervisors vs./and containers. I'll summarize the content in this email chain this week into a media pitch to send to reporters who are covering companies like Docker, offering up someone from Xen Project as an expert spokesperson on the topic. I can inquire about the possible collaboration with OVA. To Lars' point, it would be helpful if someone would volunteer to be a spokesperson for Xen Project on this topic. Some technical background is necessary, of course. Reporters are also watching the company Docker evolve, covering news like its recent venture funding. They are keeping their eyes on moves like RedHat including Docker in its beta release and Google adding it to its Google Compute Engine Service. Docker also seems to be positioning its technology as a "DevOps tool." So, reporters may go beyond pure technical feature questions and ask about these market shifts and developments. Here are examples of some recent Docker coverage and the reporters I'd be approaching to offer an interview: http://www.infoworld.com/d/virtualization/docker-challenges-virtualization-market-containers-235897 http://www.eweek.com/enterprise-apps/docker-brings-open-source-container-virtualization-to-apple-mac-os-x.html http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software-companies/why-red-hats-roger-egan-joined-docker Thanks, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote: > > > Hi > > Glauber, > > sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week. I was > travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords. > > > So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a > containers overview when I was working in the containers side. > When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text: > https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa > > My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it > bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I > published, it reached a small audience because we had very little > followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast > or link to it. > > @Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? > Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in > the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical > depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up. > > I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to > containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who > handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought. > > > > Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want > to reach. > -For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out > (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be > in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using > it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a > no-go for whoever is selling IaaS. > > - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, > which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, > it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, > maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container > environment? > > That is a good point. > > > > - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), > and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still > impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is > still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are > many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are > particularly insecure. > > The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it > allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can > leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted > for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not > that broadly relevant. > > > Tzach >> >> >> >>> -George >>> >>> >>> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >>> >>>> FYI, >>>> >>>> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is >>>> expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now >>>> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are >>>> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing >>>> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >>>> >>>> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that >>>> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire >>>> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application >>>> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By >>>> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater >>>> portability, efficiency and security." >>>> >>>> >>>> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >>>> >>>> An article from Dec. 2013: >>>> >>>> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >>>> >>>> Some additional messaging from their web site: >>>> >>>> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly: >>>> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500 >>>> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200 >>>> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now >>>> available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and >>>> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems, >>>> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case >>>> studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare, >>>> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ. >>>> >>>> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like >>>> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from >>>> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question >>>> that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any >>>> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe, >>>> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs. >>>> virtualization, etc. >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Publicity mailing list >>> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >>> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing listPublicity@lists.xenproject.orghttp://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e013cc30a6e8f0604f29a1068 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Thank you everyone for providin= g more background on this and offering ways to differentiate/educate the ma= rket on hypervisors vs./and containers. I'll summarize the content in t= his email chain this week into a media pitch to send to reporters who are c= overing companies like Docker, offering up someone from Xen Project as an e= xpert spokesperson on the topic. I can inquire about the possible collabora= tion with OVA. =A0

To Lars' point, it would be helpful if someone woul= d volunteer to be a spokesperson for Xen Project on this topic. Some techni= cal background is necessary, of course. Reporters are also watching the com= pany Docker evolve, covering news like its recent venture funding. They are= keeping their eyes on moves like RedHat including Docker in its beta relea= se and Google adding it to its Google Compute Engine Service. Docker also s= eems to be positioning its technology as a "DevOps tool." So, rep= orters may go beyond pure technical feature questions and ask about these m= arket shifts and developments.=A0

Here are examples of some recent Docker coverage and th= e reporters I'd be approaching to offer an interview:=A0

=

Thanks,

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Lars Kurth= <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote:
=20 =20 =20

On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote:

Hi

Glauber,

sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week.=A0 I was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords.
<= br>
So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side.
When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text:
https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080= 430/posts/fgzsepcScTa

My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I
published, it reached a small audience because we had very little followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast
or link to it.
@Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up.

I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought.



Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want to reach.
-For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using it, it'= s harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS.

- The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment?
That is a good point.



- I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure.

The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant.


Tzach=A0



=A0-George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire
operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-meta= l" host operating system. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.= com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-= container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=3Dfeedburner&utm_medium=3Dfeed= &utm_campaign=3DFeed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworl= d.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly:
Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from
the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin= /mailman/listinfo/publicity




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici=
ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ=
icity


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Fou= ndation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--089e013cc30a6e8f0604f29a1068-- --===============0319010390259698277== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0319010390259698277==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 14:40:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPMm-0001eg-E3; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:16 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPMl-0001eV-Jq for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:15 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:33322] by server-10.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 8C/2E-08578-E4F12035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:14 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392648013!4400633!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.180] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.5 required=7.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13082 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 14:40:13 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f180.google.com) (74.125.82.180) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 14:40:13 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u57so10610748wes.39 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:40:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=iiKad9uJlhhrOyEMz+iTKj+s0D/bDD51jeQ5qn9k92U=; b=Krw60SPOdeahpee0pOfjhU5bK7WyMBiQ/zqAhHB+NRGhNPJbtpnAkveR1/7aNaCr0v BUJXYfm/TU76kS/qSmjfp/0+SNXWIhH/JR/JYx+3X9VPtSgJxtXKdwa0LRPwlX/gwSvY yUDGyhg1V0g+Tc3kdB/w9MPwXdvhYb8aicJRyyfVKOdewh24Ww2aZPU2pHbJKFZ0Ny09 1vJhO4vmFhG1Vp/AuIp6KJGCwQW+0GQmt3jbUMls+F/P8uEa6zu6krTxct5UdPDVVo2p FGPA46Ih4uGHmzlGtFrS++Gp35iNAGrip84opOOQwJm/VLOWTWNt8VMljkvUG5VuS/y3 51xQ== X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr17872271wjd.11.1392648012871; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:40:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t6sm32929851wix.4.2014.02.17.06.40.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:40:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <53021F4A.4080606@xen.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:10 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefano Stabellini , Ian Campbell References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Lars Kurth , Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0188722888810419490==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0188722888810419490== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020605080105080604080102" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020605080105080604080102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16/12/2013 13:57, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Stefano, this list is still to technical for a press release. > * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and > U-boot > * PSCI support in Xen How about: improved boot and firmware support: Xen 4.4 now supports ARM multiboot, U-Boot and Power State Coordination Interface (PSCI) BTW, which PSCI version do we support? >> Some things which spring to mind: >> * We now generate guest device trees automatically, instead of >> requiring the user to supply one. >> * Our host DTB handling is much improved. It is not generally >> necessary to have the DTB for Xen any more We will not spell these out and just add "usability improvements" alongside "*stability and performance updates" * > * Safe DMA in Dom0 even with no hardware IOMMUs What does this actually imply and mean? --------------020605080105080604080102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 16/12/2013 13:57, Stefano Stabellini wrote:

Stefano,
this list is still to technical for a press release.

* ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and U-boot
* PSCI support in Xen
How about:
improved boot and firmware support: Xen 4.4 now supports ARM multiboot, U-Boot and Power State Coordination Interface (PSCI)
BTW, which PSCI version do we support?

Some things which spring to mind:
      * We now generate guest device trees automatically, instead of
        requiring the user to supply one.
      * Our host DTB handling is much improved. It is not generally
        necessary to have the DTB for Xen any more
We will not spell these out and just add "usability improvements" alongside "stability and performance updates"
* Safe DMA in Dom0 even with no hardware IOMMUs
What does this actually imply and mean?

--------------020605080105080604080102-- --===============0188722888810419490== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0188722888810419490==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 14:40:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPMm-0001eg-E3; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:16 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPMl-0001eV-Jq for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:15 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:33322] by server-10.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 8C/2E-08578-E4F12035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:14 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392648013!4400633!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.180] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.5 required=7.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13082 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 14:40:13 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f180.google.com) (74.125.82.180) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 14:40:13 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u57so10610748wes.39 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:40:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=iiKad9uJlhhrOyEMz+iTKj+s0D/bDD51jeQ5qn9k92U=; b=Krw60SPOdeahpee0pOfjhU5bK7WyMBiQ/zqAhHB+NRGhNPJbtpnAkveR1/7aNaCr0v BUJXYfm/TU76kS/qSmjfp/0+SNXWIhH/JR/JYx+3X9VPtSgJxtXKdwa0LRPwlX/gwSvY yUDGyhg1V0g+Tc3kdB/w9MPwXdvhYb8aicJRyyfVKOdewh24Ww2aZPU2pHbJKFZ0Ny09 1vJhO4vmFhG1Vp/AuIp6KJGCwQW+0GQmt3jbUMls+F/P8uEa6zu6krTxct5UdPDVVo2p FGPA46Ih4uGHmzlGtFrS++Gp35iNAGrip84opOOQwJm/VLOWTWNt8VMljkvUG5VuS/y3 51xQ== X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr17872271wjd.11.1392648012871; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:40:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t6sm32929851wix.4.2014.02.17.06.40.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:40:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <53021F4A.4080606@xen.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:40:10 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefano Stabellini , Ian Campbell References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Lars Kurth , Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0188722888810419490==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0188722888810419490== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020605080105080604080102" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020605080105080604080102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16/12/2013 13:57, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Stefano, this list is still to technical for a press release. > * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and > U-boot > * PSCI support in Xen How about: improved boot and firmware support: Xen 4.4 now supports ARM multiboot, U-Boot and Power State Coordination Interface (PSCI) BTW, which PSCI version do we support? >> Some things which spring to mind: >> * We now generate guest device trees automatically, instead of >> requiring the user to supply one. >> * Our host DTB handling is much improved. It is not generally >> necessary to have the DTB for Xen any more We will not spell these out and just add "usability improvements" alongside "*stability and performance updates" * > * Safe DMA in Dom0 even with no hardware IOMMUs What does this actually imply and mean? --------------020605080105080604080102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 16/12/2013 13:57, Stefano Stabellini wrote:

Stefano,
this list is still to technical for a press release.

* ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and U-boot
* PSCI support in Xen
How about:
improved boot and firmware support: Xen 4.4 now supports ARM multiboot, U-Boot and Power State Coordination Interface (PSCI)
BTW, which PSCI version do we support?

Some things which spring to mind:
      * We now generate guest device trees automatically, instead of
        requiring the user to supply one.
      * Our host DTB handling is much improved. It is not generally
        necessary to have the DTB for Xen any more
We will not spell these out and just add "usability improvements" alongside "stability and performance updates"
* Safe DMA in Dom0 even with no hardware IOMMUs
What does this actually imply and mean?

--------------020605080105080604080102-- --===============0188722888810419490== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0188722888810419490==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 14:48:49 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPV3-0001s4-3t; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:49 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPV2-0001ry-09 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:48 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:5687] by server-6.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A3/20-09180-F4122035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:47 +0000 X-Env-Sender: julien.grall@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392648524!2378341!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31134 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 14:48:46 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 14:48:46 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,861,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="103182679" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2014 14:48:44 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:48:44 -0500 Received: from chilopoda.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.139]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPUx-00012T-Eu; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:43 +0000 Message-ID: <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:43 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefano Stabellini References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 12/16/2013 01:57 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > At the very least we should mention: > > * significant stability improvements across the board > * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and > U-boot This part is wrong. The implementation in U-boot was discarded or at least never upstreamed. > * PSCI support in Xen > > >> Some things which spring to mind: >> * We now generate guest device trees automatically, instead of >> requiring the user to supply one. >> * Our host DTB handling is much improved. It is not generally >> necessary to have the DTB for Xen any more > > On this topic, we should have a blog post on stable ABI (and block ABI > breakage) as soon as Konrad sends the pull request on block ABI change > in Linux. Konrad already pulled the block ABI patch a couple of weeks ago. -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 14:48:49 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPV3-0001s4-3t; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:49 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPV2-0001ry-09 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:48 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:5687] by server-6.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A3/20-09180-F4122035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:47 +0000 X-Env-Sender: julien.grall@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392648524!2378341!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31134 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 14:48:46 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 14:48:46 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,861,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="103182679" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2014 14:48:44 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:48:44 -0500 Received: from chilopoda.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.139]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPUx-00012T-Eu; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:43 +0000 Message-ID: <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:43 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefano Stabellini References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Lars Kurth , Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 12/16/2013 01:57 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > At the very least we should mention: > > * significant stability improvements across the board > * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and > U-boot This part is wrong. The implementation in U-boot was discarded or at least never upstreamed. > * PSCI support in Xen > > >> Some things which spring to mind: >> * We now generate guest device trees automatically, instead of >> requiring the user to supply one. >> * Our host DTB handling is much improved. It is not generally >> necessary to have the DTB for Xen any more > > On this topic, we should have a blog post on stable ABI (and block ABI > breakage) as soon as Konrad sends the pull request on block ABI change > in Linux. Konrad already pulled the block ABI patch a couple of weeks ago. -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 15:08:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPng-0002xx-0w; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:04 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPnf-0002xo-CF for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:03 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:65318] by server-10.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 8A/BB-08578-2D522035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:02 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392649682!4409080!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14117 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 15:08:02 -0000 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 15:08:02 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,861,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="9605437" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2014 15:08:02 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net ([169.254.8.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:08:01 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini Thread-Topic: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release Thread-Index: AQHO+mDiu2DR8PG1DkSmg1xf5+16k5pWvpKAgAAJkICAYxENgIAAFbDQ Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.160] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org >> * significant stability improvements across the board >> * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and >> U-boot > > This part is wrong. The implementation in U-boot was discarded or at least never upstreamed. OK. I removed Uboot from the draft release >> On this topic, we should have a blog post on stable ABI (and block ABI >> breakage) as soon as Konrad sends the pull request on block ABI change >> in Linux. > > Konrad already pulled the block ABI patch a couple of weeks ago. OK. Does this mean we can declare the ABIs as stable? _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 17 15:08:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPng-0002xx-0w; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:04 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFPnf-0002xo-CF for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:03 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:65318] by server-10.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 8A/BB-08578-2D522035; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:02 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392649682!4409080!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14117 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 15:08:02 -0000 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2014 15:08:02 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,861,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="9605437" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2014 15:08:02 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net ([169.254.8.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:08:01 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini Thread-Topic: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release Thread-Index: AQHO+mDiu2DR8PG1DkSmg1xf5+16k5pWvpKAgAAJkICAYxENgIAAFbDQ Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:08:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.160] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org >> * significant stability improvements across the board >> * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and >> U-boot > > This part is wrong. The implementation in U-boot was discarded or at least never upstreamed. OK. I removed Uboot from the draft release >> On this topic, we should have a blog post on stable ABI (and block ABI >> breakage) as soon as Konrad sends the pull request on block ABI change >> in Linux. > > Konrad already pulled the block ABI patch a couple of weeks ago. OK. Does this mean we can declare the ABIs as stable? _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 10:56:33 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFiLp-00004t-3a; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:33 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFiLo-0008WT-1R for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:32 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:43411] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id E3/41-10891-F5C33035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:31 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392720989!6439589!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 19241 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 10:56:30 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 10:56:30 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,501,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="101697509" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 10:56:29 +0000 Received: from [10.80.2.80] (10.80.2.80) by FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:56:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1392720987.11080.20.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> From: Ian Campbell To: Lars Kurth Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:27 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.80] X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 15:08 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> * significant stability improvements across the board > >> * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and > >> U-boot > > > > This part is wrong. The implementation in U-boot was discarded or at least never upstreamed. > > OK. I removed Uboot from the draft release I think we could reasonably say that the ability to implement the boot protocol using existing u-boot features (specifically the "fdt set" command) counts. > >> On this topic, we should have a blog post on stable ABI (and block ABI > >> breakage) as soon as Konrad sends the pull request on block ABI change > >> in Linux. > > > > Konrad already pulled the block ABI patch a couple of weeks ago. > > OK. Does this mean we can declare the ABIs as stable? Yes, we should declare the Xen ARM ABI stable in 4.4. Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 10:56:33 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFiLp-00004t-3a; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:33 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFiLo-0008WT-1R for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:32 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:43411] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id E3/41-10891-F5C33035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:31 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392720989!6439589!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 19241 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 10:56:30 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 10:56:30 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,501,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="101697509" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 10:56:29 +0000 Received: from [10.80.2.80] (10.80.2.80) by FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:56:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1392720987.11080.20.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> From: Ian Campbell To: Lars Kurth Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:56:27 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.80] X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 15:08 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> * significant stability improvements across the board > >> * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and > >> U-boot > > > > This part is wrong. The implementation in U-boot was discarded or at least never upstreamed. > > OK. I removed Uboot from the draft release I think we could reasonably say that the ability to implement the boot protocol using existing u-boot features (specifically the "fdt set" command) counts. > >> On this topic, we should have a blog post on stable ABI (and block ABI > >> breakage) as soon as Konrad sends the pull request on block ABI change > >> in Linux. > > > > Konrad already pulled the block ABI patch a couple of weeks ago. > > OK. Does this mean we can declare the ABIs as stable? Yes, we should declare the Xen ARM ABI stable in 4.4. Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 11:05:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:05:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFiU1-0000Q3-KA; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:05:01 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFiU0-0000Py-NC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:05:01 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:54375] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id FF/1D-26923-B5E33035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:04:59 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392721499!1023898!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 25218 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 11:04:59 -0000 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-2.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 11:04:59 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,501,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="9619522" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 11:04:59 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([10.69.46.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:04:59 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: Ian Campbell Thread-Topic: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release Thread-Index: AQHO+mDiu2DR8PG1DkSmg1xf5+16k5pWvpKAgAAJkICAYxENgIAAFbDQgAE7wICAABKsQA== Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:04:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> <1392720987.11080.20.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <1392720987.11080.20.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.168] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org > > OK. I removed Uboot from the draft release > > I think we could reasonably say that the ability to implement the boot protocol using existing u-boot features (specifically the "fdt set" > command) counts. I think we should mention this in the blog post for the Xen 4.4 release, but it's not really suitable for the press release. It's already too long and needs to be simplified Lars -----Original Message----- From: Ian Campbell Sent: 18 February 2014 10:56 To: Lars Kurth Cc: Julien Grall; Stefano Stabellini; publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 15:08 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> * significant stability improvements across the board > >> * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and > >> U-boot > > > > This part is wrong. The implementation in U-boot was discarded or at least never upstreamed. > > OK. I removed Uboot from the draft release I think we could reasonably say that the ability to implement the boot protocol using existing u-boot features (specifically the "fdt set" command) counts. > >> On this topic, we should have a blog post on stable ABI (and block > >> ABI > >> breakage) as soon as Konrad sends the pull request on block ABI > >> change in Linux. > > > > Konrad already pulled the block ABI patch a couple of weeks ago. > > OK. Does this mean we can declare the ABIs as stable? Yes, we should declare the Xen ARM ABI stable in 4.4. Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 11:05:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:05:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFiU1-0000Q3-KA; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:05:01 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFiU0-0000Py-NC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:05:01 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:54375] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id FF/1D-26923-B5E33035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:04:59 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392721499!1023898!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 25218 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 11:04:59 -0000 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-2.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 11:04:59 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,501,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="9619522" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 11:04:59 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([10.69.46.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:04:59 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: Ian Campbell Thread-Topic: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release Thread-Index: AQHO+mDiu2DR8PG1DkSmg1xf5+16k5pWvpKAgAAJkICAYxENgIAAFbDQgAE7wICAABKsQA== Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:04:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <52AEFCEB.20603@eu.citrix.com> <1387200225.10247.33.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5302214B.5090605@citrix.com> <1392720987.11080.20.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <1392720987.11080.20.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.168] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: Stefano Stabellini , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org > > OK. I removed Uboot from the draft release > > I think we could reasonably say that the ability to implement the boot protocol using existing u-boot features (specifically the "fdt set" > command) counts. I think we should mention this in the blog post for the Xen 4.4 release, but it's not really suitable for the press release. It's already too long and needs to be simplified Lars -----Original Message----- From: Ian Campbell Sent: 18 February 2014 10:56 To: Lars Kurth Cc: Julien Grall; Stefano Stabellini; publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Xen 4.4 features for press release On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 15:08 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> * significant stability improvements across the board > >> * ARM/multiboot booting protocol design and implementation in Xen and > >> U-boot > > > > This part is wrong. The implementation in U-boot was discarded or at least never upstreamed. > > OK. I removed Uboot from the draft release I think we could reasonably say that the ability to implement the boot protocol using existing u-boot features (specifically the "fdt set" command) counts. > >> On this topic, we should have a blog post on stable ABI (and block > >> ABI > >> breakage) as soon as Konrad sends the pull request on block ABI > >> change in Linux. > > > > Konrad already pulled the block ABI patch a couple of weeks ago. > > OK. Does this mean we can declare the ABIs as stable? Yes, we should declare the Xen ARM ABI stable in 4.4. Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 15:15:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmOZ-0002J7-N6; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:39 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmOX-0002Iw-Oi for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:38 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:29076] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 4A/EA-04712-91973035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:37 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392736534!2640545!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4685 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 15:15:36 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 15:15:36 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,502,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="101792364" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 15:15:32 +0000 Received: from [10.80.2.80] (10.80.2.80) by FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:15:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1392736530.11080.95.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> From: Ian Campbell To: Glauber Costa Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.80] X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 12:29 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use > cgroups, which are expensive. I think knew this in my subconcious (having read about it on LWN etc way back when) but hadn't really dragged it up to my forebrain ;-), this is a very interesting point. > As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, > it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a > guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a > container environment? It would certainly be interesting to know the answer IMHO. > - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), > and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is > still impossible > to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still > trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are > many other holes to gap, > and while they are there containers are particularly insecure. Worth knowing! > The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it > allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you > can leave > all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted > for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably > not that broadly > relevant. They also share e.g. a page cache, although with multiple containers I don't know how beneficial that is in practice -- do they have any sort of "cross-container" memory sharing? Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 15:15:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmOZ-0002J7-N6; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:39 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmOX-0002Iw-Oi for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:38 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:29076] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 4A/EA-04712-91973035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:37 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392736534!2640545!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4685 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 15:15:36 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 15:15:36 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,502,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="101792364" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 15:15:32 +0000 Received: from [10.80.2.80] (10.80.2.80) by FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:15:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1392736530.11080.95.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> From: Ian Campbell To: Glauber Costa Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.80] X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 12:29 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use > cgroups, which are expensive. I think knew this in my subconcious (having read about it on LWN etc way back when) but hadn't really dragged it up to my forebrain ;-), this is a very interesting point. > As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, > it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a > guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a > container environment? It would certainly be interesting to know the answer IMHO. > - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), > and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is > still impossible > to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still > trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are > many other holes to gap, > and while they are there containers are particularly insecure. Worth knowing! > The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it > allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you > can leave > all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted > for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably > not that broadly > relevant. They also share e.g. a page cache, although with multiple containers I don't know how beneficial that is in practice -- do they have any sort of "cross-container" memory sharing? Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 17:56:58 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoug-0001VZ-4C; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:58 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoue-0001VI-Fr for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:56 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:22707] by server-6.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 1E/A5-14342-7EE93035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:55 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392746213!4739451!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4869 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 17:56:54 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 17:56:54 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,502,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="103600269" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 17:56:53 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:56:52 -0500 Message-ID: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:56:51 +0100 Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7114817285441489762==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============7114817285441489762== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7Gs13UxGQt6CobTLvGiB" --=-7Gs13UxGQt6CobTLvGiB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, This is the blog status update for this week (Feb 17th to 21st). Last posts have been: - George, about PoD (February 14) http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/02/14/ballooning-rebooting-and-the-fe= ature-youve-never-heard-of/ Thanks a lot for the great work! *** These are the last 3 entries on the blog LRU: + Julien Grall + Stefano Stabellini + Ian Jackson Julien, as asked last week already, what about a blog-ified version of your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? In fact, I think it would really be particularly interesting and useful to have a comprehensive and well written and formatted documentation on how to port an OS on Xen on ARM. Of course, that's a big and longer task, and something more suited for the Wiki rather that the blog... But, having at least what you covered in Brussels there, would be a really nice first step. Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-7Gs13UxGQt6CobTLvGiB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlMDnuMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQvegCgoX/w6u1l/NkpFxGwnCWj61hw lbEAmweEZKA93lERsEQhVt60aFtpWAJG =RaXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7Gs13UxGQt6CobTLvGiB-- --===============7114817285441489762== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============7114817285441489762==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 17:56:58 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoug-0001VZ-4C; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:58 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoue-0001VI-Fr for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:56 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:22707] by server-6.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 1E/A5-14342-7EE93035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:55 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392746213!4739451!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , surbl: (ASYNC_NO) c3VyYmxfcmVjaGVja19kZWxheTogMCAoYWJhbmRv bmVkOiBhYm91dC5tZS9kYXJpby5mYWdnaW9s\naSk=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4869 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 17:56:54 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 17:56:54 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,502,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="103600269" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 17:56:53 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:56:52 -0500 Message-ID: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:56:51 +0100 Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7114817285441489762==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============7114817285441489762== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7Gs13UxGQt6CobTLvGiB" --=-7Gs13UxGQt6CobTLvGiB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, This is the blog status update for this week (Feb 17th to 21st). Last posts have been: - George, about PoD (February 14) http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/02/14/ballooning-rebooting-and-the-fe= ature-youve-never-heard-of/ Thanks a lot for the great work! *** These are the last 3 entries on the blog LRU: + Julien Grall + Stefano Stabellini + Ian Jackson Julien, as asked last week already, what about a blog-ified version of your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? In fact, I think it would really be particularly interesting and useful to have a comprehensive and well written and formatted documentation on how to port an OS on Xen on ARM. Of course, that's a big and longer task, and something more suited for the Wiki rather that the blog... But, having at least what you covered in Brussels there, would be a really nice first step. Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-7Gs13UxGQt6CobTLvGiB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlMDnuMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQvegCgoX/w6u1l/NkpFxGwnCWj61hw lbEAmweEZKA93lERsEQhVt60aFtpWAJG =RaXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7Gs13UxGQt6CobTLvGiB-- --===============7114817285441489762== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============7114817285441489762==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 18:21:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpIH-0002ZH-3o; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:21 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpIF-0002ZC-QO for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:20 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:44884] by server-3.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id DB/97-00432-F94A3035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:19 +0000 X-Env-Sender: julien.grall@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392747677!1525889!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 23986 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 18:21:18 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-12.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 18:21:18 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,502,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="103611288" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 18:21:16 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:21:15 -0500 Received: from chilopoda.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.139]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpIA-0007eW-Eq; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:14 +0000 Message-ID: <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:14 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/18/2014 05:56 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Hello everyone, Hi Dario, > Julien, as asked last week already, what about a blog-ified version of > your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? > > In fact, I think it would really be particularly interesting and useful > to have a comprehensive and well written and formatted documentation on > how to port an OS on Xen on ARM. Of course, that's a big and longer > task, and something more suited for the Wiki rather that the blog... > But, having at least what you covered in Brussels there, would be a > really nice first step. > > Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a > couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even > early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) Sorry for the late answer. I will be off for 2 weeks next thursday (citrix connect, holidays, linaro connect) and I would like to clean up and send a couple of patch series before the end of the week. Honestly, except if I don't sleep until friday, I won't be able to write a blog post. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 18:21:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpIH-0002ZH-3o; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:21 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpIF-0002ZC-QO for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:20 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:44884] by server-3.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id DB/97-00432-F94A3035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:19 +0000 X-Env-Sender: julien.grall@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392747677!1525889!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 23986 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 18:21:18 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-12.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 18:21:18 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,502,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="103611288" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 18:21:16 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:21:15 -0500 Received: from chilopoda.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.139]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpIA-0007eW-Eq; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:14 +0000 Message-ID: <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:21:14 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/18/2014 05:56 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Hello everyone, Hi Dario, > Julien, as asked last week already, what about a blog-ified version of > your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? > > In fact, I think it would really be particularly interesting and useful > to have a comprehensive and well written and formatted documentation on > how to port an OS on Xen on ARM. Of course, that's a big and longer > task, and something more suited for the Wiki rather that the blog... > But, having at least what you covered in Brussels there, would be a > really nice first step. > > Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a > couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even > early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) Sorry for the late answer. I will be off for 2 weeks next thursday (citrix connect, holidays, linaro connect) and I would like to clean up and send a couple of patch series before the end of the week. Honestly, except if I don't sleep until friday, I won't be able to write a blog post. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 18:45:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpfj-0003AB-5K; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:35 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpfh-0003A5-TR for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:34 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:2281] by server-11.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 62/A2-04255-D4AA3035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:33 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392749132!2696446!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.181] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.2 required=7.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9481 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 18:45:32 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f181.google.com) (74.125.82.181) by server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 18:45:32 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w61so11550205wes.26 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:45:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IjB9jSoPIyRBHpo834d+ZlQjFa/ulL5Z4M+EAIa0zYU=; b=1Bg34ew6uE1/cHw4uZ7sGcM6QMhLNFnt9YpBDHE8C/ztoO1gj3RyGsh0bB9vGorRVS lJspIneuVQ2AIiqzAq3OdPQZaUnEL7n2gRwaI1Ql+74RZee7+OJSxDKG3zrbep760s3G bGpPldgoIu5x7M++elmwUWTlee8ALW7F2YDX98qgWOnTwKmZBl4KdcmIL3L/lVToHYL7 6kdCong5CR2Wjqs4dU3mni4tOloWugp8Bg3H7mcQYlg88O+RvRJ2lVWRoe3DcFuVCYwq Rsb6ELAYeJJHDxunRYAmVpQ9SATz/cKAkGVnsM6xlSClOfWSpYiGO25Fj+sv2L4CDElQ 2T7g== X-Received: by 10.180.103.227 with SMTP id fz3mr19215963wib.29.1392749131883; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pm2sm44985861wic.0.2014.02.18.10.45.30 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:45:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5303AA4A.3090203@xen.org> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:30 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org We did have http://blog.xenproject.org/index.php/2014/02/18/announcing-xen-4-3-2-and-4-2-4-releases today Lars On 18/02/2014 18:21, Julien Grall wrote: > On 02/18/2014 05:56 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> Hello everyone, > Hi Dario, > >> Julien, as asked last week already, what about a blog-ified version of >> your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? >> >> In fact, I think it would really be particularly interesting and useful >> to have a comprehensive and well written and formatted documentation on >> how to port an OS on Xen on ARM. Of course, that's a big and longer >> task, and something more suited for the Wiki rather that the blog... >> But, having at least what you covered in Brussels there, would be a >> really nice first step. >> >> Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a >> couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even >> early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) > Sorry for the late answer. > > I will be off for 2 weeks next thursday (citrix connect, holidays, > linaro connect) and I would like to clean up and send a couple of patch > series before the end of the week. > Honestly, except if I don't sleep until friday, I won't be able to write > a blog post. > > Regards, > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 18 18:45:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpfj-0003AB-5K; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:35 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpfh-0003A5-TR for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:34 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:2281] by server-11.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 62/A2-04255-D4AA3035; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:33 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392749132!2696446!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.181] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.2 required=7.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9481 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2014 18:45:32 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f181.google.com) (74.125.82.181) by server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2014 18:45:32 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w61so11550205wes.26 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:45:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IjB9jSoPIyRBHpo834d+ZlQjFa/ulL5Z4M+EAIa0zYU=; b=1Bg34ew6uE1/cHw4uZ7sGcM6QMhLNFnt9YpBDHE8C/ztoO1gj3RyGsh0bB9vGorRVS lJspIneuVQ2AIiqzAq3OdPQZaUnEL7n2gRwaI1Ql+74RZee7+OJSxDKG3zrbep760s3G bGpPldgoIu5x7M++elmwUWTlee8ALW7F2YDX98qgWOnTwKmZBl4KdcmIL3L/lVToHYL7 6kdCong5CR2Wjqs4dU3mni4tOloWugp8Bg3H7mcQYlg88O+RvRJ2lVWRoe3DcFuVCYwq Rsb6ELAYeJJHDxunRYAmVpQ9SATz/cKAkGVnsM6xlSClOfWSpYiGO25Fj+sv2L4CDElQ 2T7g== X-Received: by 10.180.103.227 with SMTP id fz3mr19215963wib.29.1392749131883; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pm2sm44985861wic.0.2014.02.18.10.45.30 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:45:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5303AA4A.3090203@xen.org> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:30 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org We did have http://blog.xenproject.org/index.php/2014/02/18/announcing-xen-4-3-2-and-4-2-4-releases today Lars On 18/02/2014 18:21, Julien Grall wrote: > On 02/18/2014 05:56 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> Hello everyone, > Hi Dario, > >> Julien, as asked last week already, what about a blog-ified version of >> your FOSDEM talk about FreeBSD on Xen on ARM? >> >> In fact, I think it would really be particularly interesting and useful >> to have a comprehensive and well written and formatted documentation on >> how to port an OS on Xen on ARM. Of course, that's a big and longer >> task, and something more suited for the Wiki rather that the blog... >> But, having at least what you covered in Brussels there, would be a >> really nice first step. >> >> Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a >> couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even >> early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) > Sorry for the late answer. > > I will be off for 2 weeks next thursday (citrix connect, holidays, > linaro connect) and I would like to clean up and send a couple of patch > series before the end of the week. > Honestly, except if I don't sleep until friday, I won't be able to write > a blog post. > > Regards, > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 11:38:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5Td-000562-8K; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:09 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5Tb-00055u-OC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:45580] by server-11.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 80/F6-23886-E9794035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:06 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392809881!4905124!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 17477 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 11:38:02 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 11:38:02 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,505,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="103853502" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 11:38:00 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:38:00 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5TT-0004dV-QC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:37:59 +0000 Message-ID: <53049794.6090203@eu.citrix.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:37:56 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> <5301E894.1000809@xen.org> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8182629777337571011==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8182629777337571011== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070807060705060400010807" --------------070807060705060400010807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I can volunteer to be spokesperson -- what exactly will it entail? -George On 02/17/2014 01:23 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi all, > > Thank you everyone for providing more background on this and offering > ways to differentiate/educate the market on hypervisors vs./and > containers. I'll summarize the content in this email chain this week > into a media pitch to send to reporters who are covering companies > like Docker, offering up someone from Xen Project as an expert > spokesperson on the topic. I can inquire about the possible > collaboration with OVA. > > To Lars' point, it would be helpful if someone would volunteer to be a > spokesperson for Xen Project on this topic. Some technical background > is necessary, of course. Reporters are also watching the company > Docker evolve, covering news like its recent venture funding. They are > keeping their eyes on moves like RedHat including Docker in its beta > release and Google adding it to its Google Compute Engine Service. > Docker also seems to be positioning its technology as a "DevOps tool." > So, reporters may go beyond pure technical feature questions and ask > about these market shifts and developments. > > Here are examples of some recent Docker coverage and the reporters I'd > be approaching to offer an interview: > > http://www.infoworld.com/d/virtualization/docker-challenges-virtualization-market-containers-235897 > http://www.eweek.com/enterprise-apps/docker-brings-open-source-container-virtualization-to-apple-mac-os-x.html > http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software-companies/why-red-hats-roger-egan-joined-docker > > Thanks, > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Lars Kurth > wrote: > > > On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote: >> >> Hi >> > Glauber, > > sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week. I > was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords. > > >> So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was >> more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side. >> When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text: >> https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa >> >> My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because >> it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I >> published, it reached a small audience because we had very little >> followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to >> broadcast >> or link to it. > @Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly > when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be > out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't > have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to > step up. > > I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a > response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the > OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA > though. Just a thought. > > >> >> Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience >> we want to reach. >> -For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out >> (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your >> ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), >> and once you start using it, it's harder to maintain an >> heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is >> selling IaaS. >> >> - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use >> cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make >> that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks >> against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing >> benchmarks against a container environment? > That is a good point. > > >> >> - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg >> shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means >> is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory >> used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious >> containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to >> gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure. >> >> The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is >> that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For >> instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, >> while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in >> some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant. >> >> >> Tzach >> >> >> >> -George >> >> >> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >> FYI, >> >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker >> release. (1.0 version is >> expected in April.) With these new releases, >> supposedly Docker can now >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS >> solutions." They are >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, >> pigeon-holing >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >> >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the >> virtualization hypervisors that >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't >> virtualize an entire >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized >> application >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host >> operating system. By >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can >> offer greater >> portability, efficiency and security." >> >> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >> >> An article from Dec. 2013: >> >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >> >> Some additional messaging from their web site: >> >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is >> expanding rapidly: >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has >> received over 7,500 >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from >> more than 200 >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" >> applications are now >> available at the Docker public index, and third party >> projects and >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, >> operating systems, >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 >> user-created case >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, >> Cloudflare, >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and >> RelateIQ. >> >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container >> technologies like >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right >> now. Feedback from >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will >> likely be a question >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try >> to piggy-back any >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the >> April timeframe, >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on >> containers vs. >> virtualization, etc. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------070807060705060400010807 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I can volunteer to be spokesperson -- what exactly will it entail?

 -George

On 02/17/2014 01:23 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all,

Thank you everyone for providing more background on this and offering ways to differentiate/educate the market on hypervisors vs./and containers. I'll summarize the content in this email chain this week into a media pitch to send to reporters who are covering companies like Docker, offering up someone from Xen Project as an expert spokesperson on the topic. I can inquire about the possible collaboration with OVA.  

To Lars' point, it would be helpful if someone would volunteer to be a spokesperson for Xen Project on this topic. Some technical background is necessary, of course. Reporters are also watching the company Docker evolve, covering news like its recent venture funding. They are keeping their eyes on moves like RedHat including Docker in its beta release and Google adding it to its Google Compute Engine Service. Docker also seems to be positioning its technology as a "DevOps tool." So, reporters may go beyond pure technical feature questions and ask about these market shifts and developments.


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote:

On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote:

Hi

Glauber,

sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week.  I was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords.


So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side.
When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text:
https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa

My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I
published, it reached a small audience because we had very little followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast
or link to it.
@Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up.

I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought.



Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want to reach.
-For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS.

- The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment?
That is a good point.



- I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure.

The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant.


Tzach 



 -George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire
operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly:
Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from
the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------070807060705060400010807-- --===============8182629777337571011== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8182629777337571011==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 11:38:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5Td-000562-8K; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:09 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5Tb-00055u-OC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:45580] by server-11.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 80/F6-23886-E9794035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:06 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392809881!4905124!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 17477 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 11:38:02 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 11:38:02 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,505,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="103853502" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 11:38:00 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:38:00 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5TT-0004dV-QC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:37:59 +0000 Message-ID: <53049794.6090203@eu.citrix.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:37:56 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <52FA7BCE.3050202@eu.citrix.com> <5301E894.1000809@xen.org> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker Open Source Container Virtualization on the Rise X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8182629777337571011==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8182629777337571011== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070807060705060400010807" --------------070807060705060400010807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I can volunteer to be spokesperson -- what exactly will it entail? -George On 02/17/2014 01:23 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi all, > > Thank you everyone for providing more background on this and offering > ways to differentiate/educate the market on hypervisors vs./and > containers. I'll summarize the content in this email chain this week > into a media pitch to send to reporters who are covering companies > like Docker, offering up someone from Xen Project as an expert > spokesperson on the topic. I can inquire about the possible > collaboration with OVA. > > To Lars' point, it would be helpful if someone would volunteer to be a > spokesperson for Xen Project on this topic. Some technical background > is necessary, of course. Reporters are also watching the company > Docker evolve, covering news like its recent venture funding. They are > keeping their eyes on moves like RedHat including Docker in its beta > release and Google adding it to its Google Compute Engine Service. > Docker also seems to be positioning its technology as a "DevOps tool." > So, reporters may go beyond pure technical feature questions and ask > about these market shifts and developments. > > Here are examples of some recent Docker coverage and the reporters I'd > be approaching to offer an interview: > > http://www.infoworld.com/d/virtualization/docker-challenges-virtualization-market-containers-235897 > http://www.eweek.com/enterprise-apps/docker-brings-open-source-container-virtualization-to-apple-mac-os-x.html > http://thevarguy.com/open-source-application-software-companies/why-red-hats-roger-egan-joined-docker > > Thanks, > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Lars Kurth > wrote: > > > On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote: >> >> Hi >> > Glauber, > > sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week. I > was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords. > > >> So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was >> more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side. >> When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text: >> https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa >> >> My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because >> it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I >> published, it reached a small audience because we had very little >> followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to >> broadcast >> or link to it. > @Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly > when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be > out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't > have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to > step up. > > I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a > response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the > OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA > though. Just a thought. > > >> >> Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience >> we want to reach. >> -For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out >> (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your >> ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), >> and once you start using it, it's harder to maintain an >> heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is >> selling IaaS. >> >> - The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use >> cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make >> that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks >> against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing >> benchmarks against a container environment? > That is a good point. > > >> >> - I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg >> shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means >> is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory >> used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious >> containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to >> gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure. >> >> The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is >> that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For >> instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, >> while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in >> some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant. >> >> >> Tzach >> >> >> >> -George >> >> >> On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >> FYI, >> >> Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker >> release. (1.0 version is >> expected in April.) With these new releases, >> supposedly Docker can now >> "meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS >> solutions." They are >> positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, >> pigeon-holing >> hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS. >> >> The article goes on to say: "Unlike the >> virtualization hypervisors that >> power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't >> virtualize an entire >> operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized >> application >> containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host >> operating system. By >> virtualizing at the application level, Docker can >> offer greater >> portability, efficiency and security." >> >> http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29 >> >> An article from Dec. 2013: >> >> http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors >> >> Some additional messaging from their web site: >> >> Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is >> expanding rapidly: >> Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has >> received over 7,500 >> Github stars, and is receiving contributions from >> more than 200 >> community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" >> applications are now >> available at the Docker public index, and third party >> projects and >> partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, >> operating systems, >> hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 >> user-created case >> studies are available from companies such as eBay, >> Cloudflare, >> Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and >> RelateIQ. >> >> I suggest we finesse our messaging against container >> technologies like >> Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right >> now. Feedback from >> the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will >> likely be a question >> that comes up in the near future. We could also try >> to piggy-back any >> Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the >> April timeframe, >> offering reporters a counter opinion/view on >> containers vs. >> virtualization, etc. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------070807060705060400010807 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I can volunteer to be spokesperson -- what exactly will it entail?

 -George

On 02/17/2014 01:23 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all,

Thank you everyone for providing more background on this and offering ways to differentiate/educate the market on hypervisors vs./and containers. I'll summarize the content in this email chain this week into a media pitch to send to reporters who are covering companies like Docker, offering up someone from Xen Project as an expert spokesperson on the topic. I can inquire about the possible collaboration with OVA.  

To Lars' point, it would be helpful if someone would volunteer to be a spokesperson for Xen Project on this topic. Some technical background is necessary, of course. Reporters are also watching the company Docker evolve, covering news like its recent venture funding. They are keeping their eyes on moves like RedHat including Docker in its beta release and Google adding it to its Google Compute Engine Service. Docker also seems to be positioning its technology as a "DevOps tool." So, reporters may go beyond pure technical feature questions and ask about these market shifts and developments.


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote:

On 12/02/2014 00:29, Glauber Costa wrote:

Hi

Glauber,

sorry your mail was stuck in the moderator queue for a week.  I was travelling and forgot my little notebook of passwords.


So that talk I gave was not really an HV vs containers, it was more a containers overview when I was working in the containers side.
When I joined Cloudius, I have published the following text:
https://plus.google.com/107787008629542080430/posts/fgzsepcScTa

My main message was that an OS like OSv changes the game, because it bridges the duplication gap without giving up the rest. When I
published, it reached a small audience because we had very little followers. If you have a broader channel, it would be good to broadcast
or link to it.
@Sarah, can you outline what you were planning to do and roughly when? Also, you mentioned you needed a spokesperson. As I will be out hiking in the Australian outback for a few weeks and I don't have the technical depth, it may make sense for someone else to step up.

I am also wondering whether it makes sense to coordinate a response to containers with (or at least coordinated) with the OVA. I don't know who handles press and PR matters at the OVA though. Just a thought.



Other aspects for consideration: It depends really which audience we want to reach.
-For more sophisticated audiences, it is worthwhile to point out (although obvious) that using containers will restrict your ability to be in control of your kernel (even talking cross-OS), and once you start using it, it's harder to maintain an heterogeneous environment. This makes it a no-go for whoever is selling IaaS.

- The performance thing with containers is *not* true. They use cgroups, which are expensive. As much as I have succeeded to make that cost go down, it is still expensive. We are doing benchmarks against Linux as a guest, maybe we should start looking at doing benchmarks against a container environment?
That is a good point.



- I am following the follow up of my work closely (kmemcg shrinking), and this is not yet complete in Linux. What it means is that it is still impossible to properly control kernel memory used by each container. It is still trivial for a malicious containers to destroy everything. There are many other holes to gap, and while they are there containers are particularly insecure.

The advantage of containers that we do need to be aware of, is that it allows for greater flexibility of resource sharing. For instance, you can leave all processes to use the disk cpu freely, while they are restricted for memory only. This can be handy in some cases, but it is probably not that broadly relevant.


Tzach 



 -George


On 02/11/2014 07:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
FYI,

Below is VARGuy coverage of the latest Docker release. (1.0 version is
expected in April.) With these new releases, supposedly Docker can now
"meet the demands of cloud computing and PaaS solutions." They are
positioning it as the next logical step for PaaS, pigeon-holing
hypervisors as only beneficial to IaaS.

The article goes on to say: "Unlike the virtualization hypervisors that
power most virtual servers today, Docker doesn't virtualize an entire
operating system. Instead, it provides virtualized application
containers that run on top of a "bare-metal" host operating system. By
virtualizing at the application level, Docker can offer greater
portability, efficiency and security."

http://thevarguy.com/virtualization-applications-and-technologies/021014/docker-open-source-container-virtualization-rise?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29

An article from Dec. 2013:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/containers-new-hypervisors

Some additional messaging from their web site:

Seven months after launching, the Docker ecosystem is expanding rapidly:
Docker has been downloaded over 200,000 times, has received over 7,500
Github stars, and is receiving contributions from more than 200
community developers. Over 2,500 "Dockerized" applications are now
available at the Docker public index, and third party projects and
partnerships built on top of Docker span PaaS, operating systems,
hosting services, CI platforms, and more. Over 50 user-created case
studies are available from companies such as eBay, Cloudflare,
Rackspace/Mailgun, Yandex, Cambridge Health Care, and RelateIQ.

I suggest we finesse our messaging against container technologies like
Docker, which are gaining traction in the press right now. Feedback from
the AB on this point would be appreciated. It will likely be a question
that comes up in the near future. We could also try to piggy-back any
Docker 1.0 coverage that might be coming out in the April timeframe,
offering reporters a counter opinion/view on containers vs.
virtualization, etc.


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------070807060705060400010807-- --===============8182629777337571011== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8182629777337571011==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 16:33:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:33:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGA5C-0000bJ-6g; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:33:14 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGA5A-0000bB-Pl for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:33:13 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:41398] by server-4.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A6/15-04858-8CCD4035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:33:12 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392827581!1625318!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjQyMDQgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 23287 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 16:33:02 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 16:33:02 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="102245807" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 16:33:00 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:32:59 -0500 Message-ID: <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Julien Grall Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:32:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3484544405560045257==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3484544405560045257== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l8tSlVqan8410DmQySgr" --=-l8tSlVqan8410DmQySgr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-18 at 18:21 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > On 02/18/2014 05:56 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a > > couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even > > early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) >=20 > Sorry for the late answer. >=20 > I will be off for 2 weeks next thursday (citrix connect, holidays, > linaro connect) and I would like to clean up and send a couple of patch > series before the end of the week. > Honestly, except if I don't sleep until friday, I won't be able to write > a blog post. >=20 Well, that is fine, considering that IanJ volunteered (in an off-list meeting) to cover up for this week. :-) So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-l8tSlVqan8410DmQySgr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlME3LkACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRQ5wCfQqab00L42VcVYjgD/KpE+MiS tLEAoI4Oe4tOpoVkzKPd63zcdhpieJBA =gEC2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l8tSlVqan8410DmQySgr-- --===============3484544405560045257== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3484544405560045257==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 16:33:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:33:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGA5C-0000bJ-6g; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:33:14 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGA5A-0000bB-Pl for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:33:13 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:41398] by server-4.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A6/15-04858-8CCD4035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:33:12 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392827581!1625318!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjQyMDQgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 23287 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 16:33:02 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-16.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 16:33:02 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="102245807" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 16:33:00 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:32:59 -0500 Message-ID: <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Julien Grall Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:32:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3484544405560045257==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3484544405560045257== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l8tSlVqan8410DmQySgr" --=-l8tSlVqan8410DmQySgr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-18 at 18:21 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > On 02/18/2014 05:56 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a > > couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even > > early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) >=20 > Sorry for the late answer. >=20 > I will be off for 2 weeks next thursday (citrix connect, holidays, > linaro connect) and I would like to clean up and send a couple of patch > series before the end of the week. > Honestly, except if I don't sleep until friday, I won't be able to write > a blog post. >=20 Well, that is fine, considering that IanJ volunteered (in an off-list meeting) to cover up for this week. :-) So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-l8tSlVqan8410DmQySgr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlME3LkACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRQ5wCfQqab00L42VcVYjgD/KpE+MiS tLEAoI4Oe4tOpoVkzKPd63zcdhpieJBA =gEC2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l8tSlVqan8410DmQySgr-- --===============3484544405560045257== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3484544405560045257==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 16:54:59 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAQF-0001T4-0M; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAQE-0001Sy-5P for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:58 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:50041] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id ED/3F-10891-1E1E4035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:57 +0000 X-Env-Sender: julien.grall@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392828895!6858584!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5934 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 16:54:56 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-6.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 16:54:56 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="102254345" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 16:54:55 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:54:54 -0500 Received: from chilopoda.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.139]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAQ9-0001KB-Q0; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:53 +0000 Message-ID: <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:53 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/19/2014 04:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mar, 2014-02-18 at 18:21 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 02/18/2014 05:56 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> Hello everyone, > >>> Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a >>> couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even >>> early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) >> >> Sorry for the late answer. >> >> I will be off for 2 weeks next thursday (citrix connect, holidays, >> linaro connect) and I would like to clean up and send a couple of patch >> series before the end of the week. >> Honestly, except if I don't sleep until friday, I won't be able to write >> a blog post. >> > Well, that is fine, considering that IanJ volunteered (in an off-list > meeting) to cover up for this week. :-) > > So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could > you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? > That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. I will be away until Monday 10 March. So if possible, not before this date :). Many thanks, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 16:54:59 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAQF-0001T4-0M; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAQE-0001Sy-5P for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:58 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:50041] by server-2.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id ED/3F-10891-1E1E4035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:57 +0000 X-Env-Sender: julien.grall@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392828895!6858584!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 5934 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 16:54:56 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-6.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 16:54:56 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="102254345" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 16:54:55 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:54:54 -0500 Received: from chilopoda.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.139]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAQ9-0001KB-Q0; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:53 +0000 Message-ID: <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:54:53 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/19/2014 04:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mar, 2014-02-18 at 18:21 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 02/18/2014 05:56 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> Hello everyone, > >>> Do you think you can give it a go during the week? Having it ready in a >>> couple of days would be great. We can afford publishing Friday, or even >>> early next week, but let's at least try, ok? :-) >> >> Sorry for the late answer. >> >> I will be off for 2 weeks next thursday (citrix connect, holidays, >> linaro connect) and I would like to clean up and send a couple of patch >> series before the end of the week. >> Honestly, except if I don't sleep until friday, I won't be able to write >> a blog post. >> > Well, that is fine, considering that IanJ volunteered (in an off-list > meeting) to cover up for this week. :-) > > So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could > you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? > That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. I will be away until Monday 10 March. So if possible, not before this date :). Many thanks, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 17:14:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:14:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAj9-0003z6-5H; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:14:31 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAj7-0003ys-Qr for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:14:30 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:62997] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 7A/E8-31661-576E4035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:14:29 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392830067!6883121!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9194 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 17:14:28 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:14:28 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="103965761" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:14:27 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:14:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Julien Grall Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:14:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6640185652788548600==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6640185652788548600== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HNDOEWs+5tFkIjjVnX4p" --=-HNDOEWs+5tFkIjjVnX4p Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2014-02-19 at 16:54 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > On 02/19/2014 04:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could > > you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? > > That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. >=20 > I will be away until Monday 10 March. So if possible, not before this > date :). >=20 Ok, I'll sign you up for right that week. That means you should have the post ready for review, ideally, by Wed 12 March. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-HNDOEWs+5tFkIjjVnX4p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlME5nAACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRzfACgpISb4h0XFjoUa3xVwyiuaGd1 RMMAoKaKXHN96s0yI+ZKK1Tlgb5vqnQ4 =a/+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HNDOEWs+5tFkIjjVnX4p-- --===============6640185652788548600== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6640185652788548600==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 17:14:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:14:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAj9-0003z6-5H; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:14:31 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAj7-0003ys-Qr for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:14:30 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:62997] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 7A/E8-31661-576E4035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:14:29 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1392830067!6883121!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9194 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 17:14:28 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-13.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:14:28 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="103965761" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:14:27 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:14:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Julien Grall Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:14:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6640185652788548600==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6640185652788548600== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HNDOEWs+5tFkIjjVnX4p" --=-HNDOEWs+5tFkIjjVnX4p Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2014-02-19 at 16:54 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > On 02/19/2014 04:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could > > you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? > > That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. >=20 > I will be away until Monday 10 March. So if possible, not before this > date :). >=20 Ok, I'll sign you up for right that week. That means you should have the post ready for review, ideally, by Wed 12 March. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-HNDOEWs+5tFkIjjVnX4p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlME5nAACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRzfACgpISb4h0XFjoUa3xVwyiuaGd1 RMMAoKaKXHN96s0yI+ZKK1Tlgb5vqnQ4 =a/+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HNDOEWs+5tFkIjjVnX4p-- --===============6640185652788548600== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6640185652788548600==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 17:18:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAma-0004BT-Fq; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:04 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAmZ-0004BK-Hp for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:03 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:48579] by server-16.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 05/DD-29917-A47E4035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:02 +0000 X-Env-Sender: julien.grall@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392830280!2956839!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7945 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 17:18:02 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:18:02 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="102264166" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:17:59 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:17:59 -0500 Received: from chilopoda.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.139]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAmU-0001gN-LO; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:17:58 +0000 Message-ID: <5304E746.3090704@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:17:58 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/19/2014 05:14 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mer, 2014-02-19 at 16:54 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 02/19/2014 04:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could >>> you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? >>> That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. >> >> I will be away until Monday 10 March. So if possible, not before this >> date :). >> > Ok, I'll sign you up for right that week. That means you should have the > post ready for review, ideally, by Wed 12 March. Thanks, now I know what I will have to do during my 13 hours flight :). -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 19 17:18:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAma-0004BT-Fq; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:04 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAmZ-0004BK-Hp for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:03 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:48579] by server-16.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 05/DD-29917-A47E4035; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:02 +0000 X-Env-Sender: julien.grall@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392830280!2956839!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7945 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2014 17:18:02 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:18:02 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="102264166" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:17:59 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:17:59 -0500 Received: from chilopoda.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.139]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGAmU-0001gN-LO; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:17:58 +0000 Message-ID: <5304E746.3090704@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:17:58 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Faggioli References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On 02/19/2014 05:14 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mer, 2014-02-19 at 16:54 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 02/19/2014 04:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could >>> you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? >>> That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. >> >> I will be away until Monday 10 March. So if possible, not before this >> date :). >> > Ok, I'll sign you up for right that week. That means you should have the > post ready for review, ideally, by Wed 12 March. Thanks, now I know what I will have to do during my 13 hours flight :). -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 15:27:36 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:27:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGVXE-00018s-4p; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:27:36 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGVXD-00018n-71 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:27:35 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:28976] by server-6.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id F8/BA-14342-6EE16035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:27:34 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392910052!677614!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 15468 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 15:27:33 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-11.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 15:27:33 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,512,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104345539" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 15:25:41 +0000 Received: from norwich.cam.xci-test.com (10.80.248.129) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:25:40 -0500 Received: from mariner.cam.xci-test.com ([10.80.2.22] helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by norwich.cam.xci-test.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGVVM-0001ap-IT for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:25:40 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGVVM-0000nL-CC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:25:40 +0000 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:25:40 +0000 To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup[link to a flight results page?] runs on a small set of hardware in space borrowed from Citrix. Because it's on the Citrix network it's not possible to give access to other community members. The underlying systems are creaking rather. And the system is too small - we already find that testing is rather too slow. The Xen Project Test Framework Working Group has agreed to press forward with a plan to provide a new setup (in a public colo, probably). We have a budget for this from the Advisory Board which we think will be sufficient to provide a bigger and better setup than we have now. We have decided to separate this immediately pressing concern - the inadequate and inaccessible hosting - from the longer-term questions of how to make more use of Xen community members' existing test software. In particular, we have deferred the question of whether to stick with the existing osstest[link to osstest.git] system long-term, or move to another system such as Citrix's XenRT. We'll consider whether, when and how to make such a transition after we have sorted out our underlying infrastructure. We will make sure that the hardware and facilities we are organising now will be suitable for whatever software system we might want to run. So our immediate task now is to set out a more detailed plan for the amount and kind of hardware to acquire, and to identify a suitable hosting facility. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 15:27:36 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:27:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGVXE-00018s-4p; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:27:36 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGVXD-00018n-71 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:27:35 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:28976] by server-6.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id F8/BA-14342-6EE16035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:27:34 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392910052!677614!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 15468 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 15:27:33 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-11.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 15:27:33 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,512,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104345539" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 15:25:41 +0000 Received: from norwich.cam.xci-test.com (10.80.248.129) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:25:40 -0500 Received: from mariner.cam.xci-test.com ([10.80.2.22] helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by norwich.cam.xci-test.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGVVM-0001ap-IT for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:25:40 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGVVM-0000nL-CC for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:25:40 +0000 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:25:40 +0000 To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup[link to a flight results page?] runs on a small set of hardware in space borrowed from Citrix. Because it's on the Citrix network it's not possible to give access to other community members. The underlying systems are creaking rather. And the system is too small - we already find that testing is rather too slow. The Xen Project Test Framework Working Group has agreed to press forward with a plan to provide a new setup (in a public colo, probably). We have a budget for this from the Advisory Board which we think will be sufficient to provide a bigger and better setup than we have now. We have decided to separate this immediately pressing concern - the inadequate and inaccessible hosting - from the longer-term questions of how to make more use of Xen community members' existing test software. In particular, we have deferred the question of whether to stick with the existing osstest[link to osstest.git] system long-term, or move to another system such as Citrix's XenRT. We'll consider whether, when and how to make such a transition after we have sorted out our underlying infrastructure. We will make sure that the hardware and facilities we are organising now will be suitable for whatever software system we might want to run. So our immediate task now is to set out a more detailed plan for the amount and kind of hardware to acquire, and to identify a suitable hosting facility. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 16:19:58 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWLu-0002YO-P6; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:58 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWLs-0002YC-Uc for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:57 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:55431] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id D4/97-01226-C2B26035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:56 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392913193!5735596!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 29025 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 16:19:55 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 16:19:55 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104371886" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 16:19:34 +0000 Received: from [10.80.2.80] (10.80.2.80) by FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:19:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> From: Ian Campbell To: Ian Jackson Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.80] X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:25 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing > it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the > blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] > > Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup[link to a flight > results page?] Those have a tendency to get cleansed and leave dead links, so I took a copy of one at http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/osstest-output-example/24438/ Some of the larger files have been replaced with the text "Omitted to save space" but nothing which impacts the structure. The rest of it looks fine to me, for what that is worth. Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 16:19:58 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWLu-0002YO-P6; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:58 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWLs-0002YC-Uc for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:57 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:55431] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id D4/97-01226-C2B26035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:56 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392913193!5735596!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 29025 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 16:19:55 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 16:19:55 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104371886" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 16:19:34 +0000 Received: from [10.80.2.80] (10.80.2.80) by FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:19:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> From: Ian Campbell To: Ian Jackson Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:19:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.80] X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:25 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing > it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the > blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] > > Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup[link to a flight > results page?] Those have a tendency to get cleansed and leave dead links, so I took a copy of one at http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/osstest-output-example/24438/ Some of the larger files have been replaced with the text "Omitted to save space" but nothing which impacts the structure. The rest of it looks fine to me, for what that is worth. Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 16:35:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWam-0004Nf-Uz; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:20 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWal-0004NZ-Fd for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:19 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:24778] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id FF/9E-01226-6CE26035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:18 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392914116!5727712!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14308 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 16:35:18 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-14.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 16:35:18 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104379154" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 16:35:16 +0000 Received: from norwich.cam.xci-test.com (10.80.248.129) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:35:16 -0500 Received: from mariner.cam.xci-test.com ([10.80.2.22] helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by norwich.cam.xci-test.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWah-0001ws-OA; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:15 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWah-00016d-H0; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:15 +0000 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <21254.11971.343608.124598@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:15 +0000 To: Ian Campbell In-Reply-To: <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure"): > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:25 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing > > it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the > > blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] > > > > Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup[link to a flight > > results page?] > > Those have a tendency to get cleansed and leave dead links, so I took a > copy of one at http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/osstest-output-example/24438/ > Some of the larger files have been replaced with the text "Omitted to > save space" but nothing which impacts the structure. Oh well done. > The rest of it looks fine to me, for what that is worth. Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 16:35:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWam-0004Nf-Uz; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:20 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWal-0004NZ-Fd for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:19 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:24778] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id FF/9E-01226-6CE26035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:18 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392914116!5727712!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14308 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 16:35:18 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-14.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 16:35:18 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104379154" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 16:35:16 +0000 Received: from norwich.cam.xci-test.com (10.80.248.129) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:35:16 -0500 Received: from mariner.cam.xci-test.com ([10.80.2.22] helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by norwich.cam.xci-test.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWah-0001ws-OA; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:15 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWah-00016d-H0; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:15 +0000 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <21254.11971.343608.124598@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:35:15 +0000 To: Ian Campbell In-Reply-To: <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure"): > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:25 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing > > it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the > > blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] > > > > Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup[link to a flight > > results page?] > > Those have a tendency to get cleansed and leave dead links, so I took a > copy of one at http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/osstest-output-example/24438/ > Some of the larger files have been replaced with the text "Omitted to > save space" but nothing which impacts the structure. Oh well done. > The rest of it looks fine to me, for what that is worth. Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:00:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:00:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGXus-0000YS-L0; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:00:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGXuq-0000YI-CH for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:00:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:54550] by server-1.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id CA/B4-17293-7A246035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:00:07 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392919195!1965076!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDU2NTYgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6507 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 17:59:57 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 17:59:57 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="104415821" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 17:59:37 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:59:36 -0500 Message-ID: <1392919172.32038.823.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Ian Campbell Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:59:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1025467962908737160==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1025467962908737160== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Vb6Wlsvv7zWxAZRqfK9t" --=-Vb6Wlsvv7zWxAZRqfK9t Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-20 at 16:19 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:25 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing > > it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the > > blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] > >=20 > > Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup[link to a flight > > results page?] > > The rest of it looks fine to me, for what that is worth. >=20 It looks good to me too. We've had a test infra post already, some time ago: http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/09/04/evolving-the-xen-project-test-infr= astructure/ I'd consider mentioning, or just linking back to there from somewhere, although I'm 100% sure, as things seem to have changed (or at least delayed) from what that says. If it were me, I guess I would link to it, but I'm happy to let you decide. :-) Blog schedule wise, anytime tomorrow would be a good time. Feel free to upload and publish it at your ease, or ping me if you think I need to do something. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-Vb6Wlsvv7zWxAZRqfK9t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlMGQoQACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ5KwCghlFESEHPVD7Nvk9oI6yVFv8v SlYAmgKf+SA1oiZ2Cs/0O0TavBebVZvn =Ba5u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Vb6Wlsvv7zWxAZRqfK9t-- --===============1025467962908737160== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1025467962908737160==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:00:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:00:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGXus-0000YS-L0; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:00:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGXuq-0000YI-CH for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:00:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:54550] by server-1.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id CA/B4-17293-7A246035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:00:07 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392919195!1965076!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDU2NTYgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6507 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 17:59:57 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 17:59:57 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="104415821" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 17:59:37 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:59:36 -0500 Message-ID: <1392919172.32038.823.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Ian Campbell Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:59:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1025467962908737160==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1025467962908737160== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Vb6Wlsvv7zWxAZRqfK9t" --=-Vb6Wlsvv7zWxAZRqfK9t Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On gio, 2014-02-20 at 16:19 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:25 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing > > it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the > > blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] > >=20 > > Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup[link to a flight > > results page?] > > The rest of it looks fine to me, for what that is worth. >=20 It looks good to me too. We've had a test infra post already, some time ago: http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/09/04/evolving-the-xen-project-test-infr= astructure/ I'd consider mentioning, or just linking back to there from somewhere, although I'm 100% sure, as things seem to have changed (or at least delayed) from what that says. If it were me, I guess I would link to it, but I'm happy to let you decide. :-) Blog schedule wise, anytime tomorrow would be a good time. Feel free to upload and publish it at your ease, or ping me if you think I need to do something. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-Vb6Wlsvv7zWxAZRqfK9t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlMGQoQACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQ5KwCghlFESEHPVD7Nvk9oI6yVFv8v SlYAmgKf+SA1oiZ2Cs/0O0TavBebVZvn =Ba5u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Vb6Wlsvv7zWxAZRqfK9t-- --===============1025467962908737160== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1025467962908737160==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:13:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:13:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGY7S-0000q8-KQ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:13:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGY7R-0000pg-BV for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:13:09 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:26661] by server-8.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id E4/B6-05298-4B546035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:13:08 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392919986!5264974!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.174] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14382 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:13:06 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:13:06 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id f8so6189263wiw.7 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:13:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lAEprf5h+u1sKdhyZMPZEPiG1KYPaFDXQLpTP/kZCA0=; b=Bw021VEf+wlrJqJfzJFmb2+FXMMbF4UTkljwA57X6oxaQ+d8qsIx30dEH2ZxdBCj5Z 4aL1VovyaGws8syZUy8msC7967riu5Ocuqeo2iwl7nb4ad7i2nXdcz8+2CW+obRYW8zp dxJC3WV06q10Y8dc4QD8/yBjxMpBajtp0B76Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lAEprf5h+u1sKdhyZMPZEPiG1KYPaFDXQLpTP/kZCA0=; b=gJRZD8sX/g7gOHB5yOncDBNrDtCOSIhOscrnj68r9NGLOzUs2L7XiqaeFkgNdz5/jW 7ehhPQaPfd4U01swY+DuzVuq6Y8d2s7EqtcUnUPvevnoz/dskVGbJwwbOFMynRSykhhr aw39Onmk3LFE38avBIptglBb9aoi5zwQ76D6/ottID4RJduzSjNDj3+o0ChkSidF+2Wv HAgfnBZVGawpPwWQNsnBhVMdricS2SlG8P4Eb04xCFOOHPj+BG9qjcSXyeiGlOWoxPO5 Ji6n1meFjLoTL6qoqbnb7fCOnBnYC6dk/C5LzeEjPdcqOyNFWmVabOJLfX73F5dA75m/ WXcw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDtwCWQA6Bb5exHjhK1x3Yir5OkR5vWmlDnUb/2/mp6Fy6C6i3+2QDq6lB1g+xR3NOs+Cn MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.2.228 with SMTP id 4mr3199761wjx.83.1392919985577; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:13:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:13:05 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Ian Jackson Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3353412158820269225==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3353412158820269225== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343c8cf0efce04f2da7477 --047d7b343c8cf0efce04f2da7477 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Ian, Just made a few grammar edits inline. Thanks, On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing > it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the > blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] > > Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup [link to a flight > results page?] runs on a small set of hardware in space borrowed from > Citrix. Because it's on the Citrix network, it's not possible to give > access to other community members. The underlying systems are > creaking rather. And the system is too small - we already find that > testing is rather too slow. > > The Xen Project Test Framework Working Group has agreed to press > forward with a plan to provide a new setup (in a public colo, > probably). We have a budget for this from the Advisory Board, which we > believe will be sufficient to provide a bigger and better setup than we > have now. > > We decided to separate this immediately pressing concern - the > inadequate and inaccessible hosting - from the longer-term questions > of how to make more use of Xen community members' existing test > software. In particular, we have deferred the question of whether to > stick with the existing osstest [link to osstest.git] system long-term, > or move to another system such as Citrix's XenRT. > > We'll consider whether, when and how to make such a transition after > we sort out our underlying infrastructure. We will make sure > that the hardware and facilities we are organising now will be > suitable for whatever software system we might want to run. > > So, our immediate task now is to create a more detailed plan for the > amount and kind of hardware to acquire and to identify a suitable > hosting facility. > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7b343c8cf0efce04f2da7477 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ian,

Just made a few grammar edits i= nline.

Thanks,

<= br>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Ian Jackson= <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
[ Here is a draft blog posting text. =A0Comm= ents welcome. =A0I'm editing
=A0 it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the =A0 blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ]

Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup [link to a flight results page?] runs on a small set of hardware in space borrowed from
Citrix. =A0Because it's on the Citrix network, it's not possible to= give
access to other community members. =A0The underlying systems are
creaking rather. =A0And the system is too small - we already find that
testing is rather too slow.

The Xen Project Test Framework Working Group has agreed to press
forward with a plan to provide a new setup (in a public colo,
probably). =A0We have a budget for this from the Advisory Board, which webelieve will be sufficient to provide a bigger and better setup than we have now.

We decided to separate this immediately pressing concern - the
inadequate and inaccessible hosting - from the longer-term questions
of how to make more use of Xen community members' existing test
software. In particular, we have deferred the question of whether to
stick with the existing osstest [link to osstest.git] system long-term,
or move to another system such as Citrix's XenRT.

We'll consider whether, when and how to make such a transition after we sort out our underlying infrastructure. =A0We will make sure
that the hardware and facilities we are organising now will be
suitable for whatever software system we might want to run.

So, our immediate task now is to create a more detailed plan for the
amount and kind of hardware to acquire and to identify a suitable
hosting facility.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7b343c8cf0efce04f2da7477-- --===============3353412158820269225== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3353412158820269225==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:13:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:13:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGY7S-0000q8-KQ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:13:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGY7R-0000pg-BV for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:13:09 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:26661] by server-8.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id E4/B6-05298-4B546035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:13:08 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392919986!5264974!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.174] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14382 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:13:06 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by server-12.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:13:06 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id f8so6189263wiw.7 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:13:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lAEprf5h+u1sKdhyZMPZEPiG1KYPaFDXQLpTP/kZCA0=; b=Bw021VEf+wlrJqJfzJFmb2+FXMMbF4UTkljwA57X6oxaQ+d8qsIx30dEH2ZxdBCj5Z 4aL1VovyaGws8syZUy8msC7967riu5Ocuqeo2iwl7nb4ad7i2nXdcz8+2CW+obRYW8zp dxJC3WV06q10Y8dc4QD8/yBjxMpBajtp0B76Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lAEprf5h+u1sKdhyZMPZEPiG1KYPaFDXQLpTP/kZCA0=; b=gJRZD8sX/g7gOHB5yOncDBNrDtCOSIhOscrnj68r9NGLOzUs2L7XiqaeFkgNdz5/jW 7ehhPQaPfd4U01swY+DuzVuq6Y8d2s7EqtcUnUPvevnoz/dskVGbJwwbOFMynRSykhhr aw39Onmk3LFE38avBIptglBb9aoi5zwQ76D6/ottID4RJduzSjNDj3+o0ChkSidF+2Wv HAgfnBZVGawpPwWQNsnBhVMdricS2SlG8P4Eb04xCFOOHPj+BG9qjcSXyeiGlOWoxPO5 Ji6n1meFjLoTL6qoqbnb7fCOnBnYC6dk/C5LzeEjPdcqOyNFWmVabOJLfX73F5dA75m/ WXcw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDtwCWQA6Bb5exHjhK1x3Yir5OkR5vWmlDnUb/2/mp6Fy6C6i3+2QDq6lB1g+xR3NOs+Cn MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.2.228 with SMTP id 4mr3199761wjx.83.1392919985577; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:13:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:13:05 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Ian Jackson Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3353412158820269225==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3353412158820269225== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343c8cf0efce04f2da7477 --047d7b343c8cf0efce04f2da7477 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Ian, Just made a few grammar edits inline. Thanks, On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > [ Here is a draft blog posting text. Comments welcome. I'm editing > it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the > blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ] > > Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup [link to a flight > results page?] runs on a small set of hardware in space borrowed from > Citrix. Because it's on the Citrix network, it's not possible to give > access to other community members. The underlying systems are > creaking rather. And the system is too small - we already find that > testing is rather too slow. > > The Xen Project Test Framework Working Group has agreed to press > forward with a plan to provide a new setup (in a public colo, > probably). We have a budget for this from the Advisory Board, which we > believe will be sufficient to provide a bigger and better setup than we > have now. > > We decided to separate this immediately pressing concern - the > inadequate and inaccessible hosting - from the longer-term questions > of how to make more use of Xen community members' existing test > software. In particular, we have deferred the question of whether to > stick with the existing osstest [link to osstest.git] system long-term, > or move to another system such as Citrix's XenRT. > > We'll consider whether, when and how to make such a transition after > we sort out our underlying infrastructure. We will make sure > that the hardware and facilities we are organising now will be > suitable for whatever software system we might want to run. > > So, our immediate task now is to create a more detailed plan for the > amount and kind of hardware to acquire and to identify a suitable > hosting facility. > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7b343c8cf0efce04f2da7477 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ian,

Just made a few grammar edits i= nline.

Thanks,

<= br>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Ian Jackson= <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
[ Here is a draft blog posting text. =A0Comm= ents welcome. =A0I'm editing
=A0 it in plain text here in my editor for now; I'll put it into the =A0 blog software and linkify it when the structure seems stable. ]

Currently the Xen Project's automatic testing setup [link to a flight results page?] runs on a small set of hardware in space borrowed from
Citrix. =A0Because it's on the Citrix network, it's not possible to= give
access to other community members. =A0The underlying systems are
creaking rather. =A0And the system is too small - we already find that
testing is rather too slow.

The Xen Project Test Framework Working Group has agreed to press
forward with a plan to provide a new setup (in a public colo,
probably). =A0We have a budget for this from the Advisory Board, which webelieve will be sufficient to provide a bigger and better setup than we have now.

We decided to separate this immediately pressing concern - the
inadequate and inaccessible hosting - from the longer-term questions
of how to make more use of Xen community members' existing test
software. In particular, we have deferred the question of whether to
stick with the existing osstest [link to osstest.git] system long-term,
or move to another system such as Citrix's XenRT.

We'll consider whether, when and how to make such a transition after we sort out our underlying infrastructure. =A0We will make sure
that the hardware and facilities we are organising now will be
suitable for whatever software system we might want to run.

So, our immediate task now is to create a more detailed plan for the
amount and kind of hardware to acquire and to identify a suitable
hosting facility.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7b343c8cf0efce04f2da7477-- --===============3353412158820269225== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3353412158820269225==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:18:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYCq-0001Hp-H2; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:44 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYCo-0001Hb-SP for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:43 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:54614] by server-4.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 1A/9F-32066-20746035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:42 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392920320!5794607!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13771 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:18:41 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:18:41 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="102730494" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:18:39 +0000 Received: from norwich.cam.xci-test.com (10.80.248.129) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:18:39 -0500 Received: from mariner.cam.xci-test.com ([10.80.2.22] helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by norwich.cam.xci-test.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYCl-0002TB-6C; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:39 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYCk-0001em-W6; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:39 +0000 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <21254.18174.706609.710770@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:38 +0000 To: Dario Faggioli In-Reply-To: <1392919172.32038.823.camel@Solace> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1392919172.32038.823.camel@Solace> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure"): > I'd consider mentioning, or just linking back to there from somewhere, > although I'm 100% sure, as things seem to have changed (or at least > delayed) from what that says. If it were me, I guess I would link to it, > but I'm happy to let you decide. :-) I managed to find a thing to make a link to that. > Blog schedule wise, anytime tomorrow would be a good time. > > Feel free to upload and publish it at your ease, or ping me if you think > I need to do something. I have saved this as a draft: http://blog.xen.org/?p=8878&preview=true Further comments welcome. I plan to publish this tomorrow lunchtime. Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:18:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYCq-0001Hp-H2; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:44 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYCo-0001Hb-SP for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:43 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:54614] by server-4.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 1A/9F-32066-20746035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:42 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392920320!5794607!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13771 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:18:41 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:18:41 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="102730494" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:18:39 +0000 Received: from norwich.cam.xci-test.com (10.80.248.129) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:18:39 -0500 Received: from mariner.cam.xci-test.com ([10.80.2.22] helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by norwich.cam.xci-test.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYCl-0002TB-6C; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:39 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYCk-0001em-W6; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:39 +0000 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <21254.18174.706609.710770@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:18:38 +0000 To: Dario Faggioli In-Reply-To: <1392919172.32038.823.camel@Solace> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1392913172.32657.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1392919172.32038.823.camel@Solace> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure"): > I'd consider mentioning, or just linking back to there from somewhere, > although I'm 100% sure, as things seem to have changed (or at least > delayed) from what that says. If it were me, I guess I would link to it, > but I'm happy to let you decide. :-) I managed to find a thing to make a link to that. > Blog schedule wise, anytime tomorrow would be a good time. > > Feel free to upload and publish it at your ease, or ping me if you think > I need to do something. I have saved this as a draft: http://blog.xen.org/?p=8878&preview=true Further comments welcome. I plan to publish this tomorrow lunchtime. Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:23:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYHR-0001f0-1s; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:29 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYHQ-0001ep-5Q for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:28 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:39186] by server-1.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 00/A0-15438-F1846035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:27 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392920605!5795399!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3382 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:23:26 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:23:26 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="102732235" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:23:25 +0000 Received: from norwich.cam.xci-test.com (10.80.248.129) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:23:24 -0500 Received: from mariner.cam.xci-test.com ([10.80.2.22] helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by norwich.cam.xci-test.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYHM-0002VH-Mp; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:24 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYHM-0001rp-En; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:24 +0000 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <21254.18460.233042.877337@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:24 +0000 To: Sarah Conway In-Reply-To: References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sarah Conway writes ("Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure"): > Just made a few grammar edits inline. Thanks. I used wdiff to see them. I have added (to the version in wordpress) the commas you suggested, but I preferred my own use of tenses. The links you edited the formatting of have been made into real links. Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:23:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYHR-0001f0-1s; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:29 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYHQ-0001ep-5Q for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:28 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:39186] by server-1.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 00/A0-15438-F1846035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:27 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Jackson@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392920605!5795399!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3382 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:23:26 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-10.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:23:26 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,513,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="102732235" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:23:25 +0000 Received: from norwich.cam.xci-test.com (10.80.248.129) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:23:24 -0500 Received: from mariner.cam.xci-test.com ([10.80.2.22] helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by norwich.cam.xci-test.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYHM-0002VH-Mp; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:24 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYHM-0001rp-En; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:24 +0000 From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <21254.18460.233042.877337@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:23:24 +0000 To: Sarah Conway In-Reply-To: References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sarah Conway writes ("Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure"): > Just made a few grammar edits inline. Thanks. I used wdiff to see them. I have added (to the version in wordpress) the commas you suggested, but I preferred my own use of tenses. The links you edited the formatting of have been made into real links. Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:48:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:48:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYfc-0002M2-3D; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:48:28 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYfa-0002Kw-6B for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:48:26 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:64687] by server-8.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id F9/58-16039-9FD46035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:48:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392922104!3231207!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.182] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11517 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:48:24 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:48:24 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f8so19119wiw.9 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:48:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=URAVnos6blgH8Q89CbDC3zHp1+NhRFOLzAXHfLDWdc0=; b=VxGocqiiSu2lGjEjjTmlq5hRx4iS0wTiUBWzgT6EUfNmkFkjG3cgWIb6o2/SexF1TU xAdQ+TRT6aJTOxQynGzjhcWcS/a0e0La/s8x/gJw+vpT1UyOcf6K8ozVDn7fXM+rsoSC i9DcYoH5uRMiAI7OmHHPjw8aFmCt2d5BJyE4M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=URAVnos6blgH8Q89CbDC3zHp1+NhRFOLzAXHfLDWdc0=; b=h6gbgWQnAGoY4zjQAcmNkWZzHnxmIwSaDWR+RFJ4Xo+eMttNun0wkCI54hENhj7WYL cHXRh7OdHwzZ0b3LhO8zrv0XKlHI2iB1xzA97gejx01+nA4fF5y1JcwhEkcWGuj58LLc 6mmcnyToZnriqG1cEIJObQxeAg/En2fA9hVAdvcrqm+XnPybSlzV6dNg8o2ooz5a+F6Y glGhR7AFzBOOAOzC4/vUsnS8AXGI3eKnrNS2ATo9+Xvf/fZX1povrhV0CBrPD5SFkvzw tfFfGdpxPQNKZOboKT5NxjlxMNwtTeGvErmwWzGj9cGsdRXT+/AlMigeY4kJA6n7KToo /ckA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlalRdGBDCB7JvYb5WNVw8qSS8RtIcf+gFZ0gQz1lkb+W030SfC9SxB6kWeNSe2VaaWPyqO MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.161.136 with SMTP id xs8mr3609058wjb.56.1392922103990; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:48:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:48:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <21254.18460.233042.877337@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <21254.18460.233042.877337@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:48:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Ian Jackson Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1082697665911462499==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1082697665911462499== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc30a355d8704f2daf340 --089e013cc30a355d8704f2daf340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sounds good. Sarah On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Sarah Conway writes ("Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing > on community infrastructure"): > > Just made a few grammar edits inline. > > Thanks. I used wdiff to see them. I have added (to the version in > wordpress) the commas you suggested, but I preferred my own use of > tenses. The links you edited the formatting of have been made into > real links. > > Thanks, > Ian. > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e013cc30a355d8704f2daf340 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sounds good.=A0

Sarah=A0


On Thu, Feb 20, = 2014 at 1:23 PM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
Sarah Conway writes ("Re: [Publicity] D= raft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure"):
> Just made a few grammar edits inline.

Thanks. =A0I used wdiff to see them. =A0I have added (to the version = in
wordpress) the commas you suggested, but I preferred my own use of
tenses. =A0The links you edited the formatting of have been made into
real links.

Thanks,
Ian.



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--089e013cc30a355d8704f2daf340-- --===============1082697665911462499== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1082697665911462499==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 20 18:48:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:48:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYfc-0002M2-3D; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:48:28 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYfa-0002Kw-6B for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:48:26 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:64687] by server-8.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id F9/58-16039-9FD46035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:48:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392922104!3231207!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.182] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11517 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:48:24 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2014 18:48:24 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f8so19119wiw.9 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:48:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=URAVnos6blgH8Q89CbDC3zHp1+NhRFOLzAXHfLDWdc0=; b=VxGocqiiSu2lGjEjjTmlq5hRx4iS0wTiUBWzgT6EUfNmkFkjG3cgWIb6o2/SexF1TU xAdQ+TRT6aJTOxQynGzjhcWcS/a0e0La/s8x/gJw+vpT1UyOcf6K8ozVDn7fXM+rsoSC i9DcYoH5uRMiAI7OmHHPjw8aFmCt2d5BJyE4M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=URAVnos6blgH8Q89CbDC3zHp1+NhRFOLzAXHfLDWdc0=; b=h6gbgWQnAGoY4zjQAcmNkWZzHnxmIwSaDWR+RFJ4Xo+eMttNun0wkCI54hENhj7WYL cHXRh7OdHwzZ0b3LhO8zrv0XKlHI2iB1xzA97gejx01+nA4fF5y1JcwhEkcWGuj58LLc 6mmcnyToZnriqG1cEIJObQxeAg/En2fA9hVAdvcrqm+XnPybSlzV6dNg8o2ooz5a+F6Y glGhR7AFzBOOAOzC4/vUsnS8AXGI3eKnrNS2ATo9+Xvf/fZX1povrhV0CBrPD5SFkvzw tfFfGdpxPQNKZOboKT5NxjlxMNwtTeGvErmwWzGj9cGsdRXT+/AlMigeY4kJA6n7KToo /ckA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlalRdGBDCB7JvYb5WNVw8qSS8RtIcf+gFZ0gQz1lkb+W030SfC9SxB6kWeNSe2VaaWPyqO MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.161.136 with SMTP id xs8mr3609058wjb.56.1392922103990; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:48:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:48:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <21254.18460.233042.877337@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <21254.7796.191869.241500@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <21254.18460.233042.877337@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:48:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Ian Jackson Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1082697665911462499==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============1082697665911462499== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc30a355d8704f2daf340 --089e013cc30a355d8704f2daf340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sounds good. Sarah On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Sarah Conway writes ("Re: [Publicity] Draft: Xen Project automatic testing > on community infrastructure"): > > Just made a few grammar edits inline. > > Thanks. I used wdiff to see them. I have added (to the version in > wordpress) the commas you suggested, but I preferred my own use of > tenses. The links you edited the formatting of have been made into > real links. > > Thanks, > Ian. > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e013cc30a355d8704f2daf340 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sounds good.=A0

Sarah=A0


On Thu, Feb 20, = 2014 at 1:23 PM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
Sarah Conway writes ("Re: [Publicity] D= raft: Xen Project automatic testing on community infrastructure"):
> Just made a few grammar edits inline.

Thanks. =A0I used wdiff to see them. =A0I have added (to the version = in
wordpress) the commas you suggested, but I preferred my own use of
tenses. =A0The links you edited the formatting of have been made into
real links.

Thanks,
Ian.



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--089e013cc30a355d8704f2daf340-- --===============1082697665911462499== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============1082697665911462499==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 21 12:19:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGp56-0003Sm-69; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:52 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGp54-0003Sh-KB for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:50 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:9763] by server-11.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id AF/01-24604-56447035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:49 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392985188!641703!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 616 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 12:19:49 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-7.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 12:19:49 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,518,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104643818" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2014 12:19:47 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:19:47 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGp51-0004Vo-60; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:47 +0000 Message-ID: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:40 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Sarah Conway , Russell Pavlicek X-DLP: MIA1 Subject: [Publicity] 4.4 Release announcement X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sarah, There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on Monday; to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At that point, RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is ready for it to be. I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with Russ) in Lars' absence. I'll take a look at the release announcement this afternoon. Is there anything else you need from me? Thanks! -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 21 12:19:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGp56-0003Sm-69; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:52 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGp54-0003Sh-KB for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:50 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:9763] by server-11.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id AF/01-24604-56447035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:49 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1392985188!641703!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 616 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 12:19:49 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-7.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 12:19:49 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,518,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104643818" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2014 12:19:47 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:19:47 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGp51-0004Vo-60; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:47 +0000 Message-ID: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:19:40 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Sarah Conway , Russell Pavlicek X-DLP: MIA1 Subject: [Publicity] 4.4 Release announcement X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sarah, There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on Monday; to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At that point, RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is ready for it to be. I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with Russ) in Lars' absence. I'll take a look at the release announcement this afternoon. Is there anything else you need from me? Thanks! -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 21 15:04:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGreU-00033c-4b; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:34 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGreT-00033V-5d for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:33 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:63922] by server-9.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id EA/ED-10184-00B67035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:32 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392995070!2156751!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4256 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 15:04:31 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:04:31 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,519,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104689836" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:04:29 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:04:29 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGreP-0006r3-60; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:29 +0000 Message-ID: <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:22 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Sarah Conway , Russell Pavlicek , Lars Kurth References: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> X-DLP: MIA1 Subject: Re: [Publicity] 4.4 Release announcement X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Lars / Sarah, Who is the release announcement supposed to be targeting? And about how long is an expected release announcement meant to be? It seems awfully technical in places. The main point of the ARM section I think is to demonstrate that our support is growing significantly (hence naming the boards makes sense) and that this release has stopped being so much of a "tech preview" and is going to have a stable ABI, working user-space tools, &c &c. People who need to know the technical details can then look more into them. -George On 02/21/2014 12:19 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > Sarah, > > There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on > Monday; to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At > that point, RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is > ready for it to be. > > I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with > Russ) in Lars' absence. I'll take a look at the release announcement > this afternoon. Is there anything else you need from me? > > Thanks! > > -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 21 15:04:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGreU-00033c-4b; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:34 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGreT-00033V-5d for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:33 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:63922] by server-9.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id EA/ED-10184-00B67035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:32 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1392995070!2156751!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4256 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 15:04:31 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:04:31 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,519,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="104689836" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:04:29 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:04:29 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGreP-0006r3-60; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:29 +0000 Message-ID: <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:04:22 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Sarah Conway , Russell Pavlicek , Lars Kurth References: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> X-DLP: MIA1 Subject: Re: [Publicity] 4.4 Release announcement X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Lars / Sarah, Who is the release announcement supposed to be targeting? And about how long is an expected release announcement meant to be? It seems awfully technical in places. The main point of the ARM section I think is to demonstrate that our support is growing significantly (hence naming the boards makes sense) and that this release has stopped being so much of a "tech preview" and is going to have a stable ABI, working user-space tools, &c &c. People who need to know the technical details can then look more into them. -George On 02/21/2014 12:19 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > Sarah, > > There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on > Monday; to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At > that point, RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is > ready for it to be. > > I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with > Russ) in Lars' absence. I'll take a look at the release announcement > this afternoon. Is there anything else you need from me? > > Thanks! > > -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 21 15:38:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGsBg-0004aI-AL; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:52 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGsBf-0004aD-8Z for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:51 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:10229] by server-7.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id FF/65-14867-A0377035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:50 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392997129!5428270!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24810 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 15:38:49 -0000 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:38:49 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,519,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="9723407" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:38:49 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net ([169.254.8.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:38:49 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Sarah Conway , Russell Pavlicek Thread-Topic: 4.4 Release announcement Thread-Index: AQHPLxY5fZ5RWCi9ZE6duCgMg3vN1pq/15pQ Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.160] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Publicity] 4.4 Release announcement X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org I agree. Stefano had a go at simplifying the ARM section, but it can clearly be simplified more Lars -----Original Message----- From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com] Sent: 21 February 2014 15:04 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Sarah Conway; Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth Subject: Re: 4.4 Release announcement Lars / Sarah, Who is the release announcement supposed to be targeting? And about how long is an expected release announcement meant to be? It seems awfully technical in places. The main point of the ARM section I think is to demonstrate that our support is growing significantly (hence naming the boards makes sense) and that this release has stopped being so much of a "tech preview" and is going to have a stable ABI, working user-space tools, &c &c. People who need to know the technical details can then look more into them. -George On 02/21/2014 12:19 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > Sarah, > > There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on > Monday; to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At > that point, RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is > ready for it to be. > > I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with > Russ) in Lars' absence. I'll take a look at the release announcement > this afternoon. Is there anything else you need from me? > > Thanks! > > -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 21 15:38:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGsBg-0004aI-AL; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:52 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGsBf-0004aD-8Z for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:51 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:10229] by server-7.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id FF/65-14867-A0377035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:50 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392997129!5428270!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24810 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 15:38:49 -0000 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:38:49 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,519,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="9723407" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:38:49 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net ([169.254.8.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:38:49 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" , Sarah Conway , Russell Pavlicek Thread-Topic: 4.4 Release announcement Thread-Index: AQHPLxY5fZ5RWCi9ZE6duCgMg3vN1pq/15pQ Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:38:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.160] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Publicity] 4.4 Release announcement X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org I agree. Stefano had a go at simplifying the ARM section, but it can clearly be simplified more Lars -----Original Message----- From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com] Sent: 21 February 2014 15:04 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Sarah Conway; Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth Subject: Re: 4.4 Release announcement Lars / Sarah, Who is the release announcement supposed to be targeting? And about how long is an expected release announcement meant to be? It seems awfully technical in places. The main point of the ARM section I think is to demonstrate that our support is growing significantly (hence naming the boards makes sense) and that this release has stopped being so much of a "tech preview" and is going to have a stable ABI, working user-space tools, &c &c. People who need to know the technical details can then look more into them. -George On 02/21/2014 12:19 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > Sarah, > > There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on > Monday; to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At > that point, RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is > ready for it to be. > > I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with > Russ) in Lars' absence. I'll take a look at the release announcement > this afternoon. Is there anything else you need from me? > > Thanks! > > -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 21 15:41:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:41:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGsE3-0004sg-Uw; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:41:19 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGsE1-0004sZ-Uu for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:41:18 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:60592] by server-14.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id CD/46-27598-D9377035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:41:17 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392997275!5428791!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.173] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4133 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 15:41:15 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:41:15 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id bs8so973659wib.0 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:41:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=b7a4CkgppDETIvZ5n2uCdjAwwoFYNzTZ25HXtwejCgA=; b=K/YVOES0NJO2z2K5La9gXcIGm2TWY508fvyJlQJ1r/1GGpP3zzGhrr01jYwkkdGKyM td6uf3yDfkbLG5j4HE1Fqy0ueb4BfFXKd3e6HVuL7Blow/8rufWtfMjnaB1iJK5LAimz w2lRw6spAIlwRwD/2dPn3esD/hpPkU9HSdG5s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b7a4CkgppDETIvZ5n2uCdjAwwoFYNzTZ25HXtwejCgA=; b=PuHlWHKLMrEs756X2m4XwMPIk1PUXqrQ1I215Vex+EyZK0dkvIX9SsF8IcSI5vXtnH /q+0dBGLday7IvIvcchEIUzyuTW75jdjpgaQBeKpQo71UbsRO8lHBQw0hN1ltHsp7xYc T/Ih9DmCQDLzH4ZlkAG3HyGNYyMUXULiah56GW65S1pfJSjT/X2H5rJaWTK2ZcuEcoDS 422+frKiy7hcP9o/QO0E4psFDsKmsStDSMcJ3w/yS4FIR/wPnWjE+clnjUD6ZM/aQQz3 /rGZAXY/hlVQDb6qe9EwNN7aPvQ6doW3zn6kclpfPrdn8DNVBdCN4Wv4ZCS3uDBC0hcM LrSg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQktOoTjL0IOalU2WliAl8ZDkbmG9qjOLr2j4djgKXa4oyVLsZegA14cyJNB2SWxCZ3vfto1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.207.15 with SMTP id ls15mr3815392wic.50.1392997275307; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:41:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> References: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:41:15 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: George Dunlap Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] 4.4 Release announcement X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3450500343605874359==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3450500343605874359== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c33b66c4dc6904f2ec73bd --001a11c33b66c4dc6904f2ec73bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi George et all, The release is targeted at press covering enterprise technologies and trends like security, cloud, mobile, big data, infrastructure, app dev. These could be business-level IT managers and decision-makers making IT purchases to a range of IT professionals -- sysadmins, datacenter managers, devops professionals, IT architects, etc. -- solving IT problems. The publications range from targeting end users to SIs, consultants, etc. As a next step, I'll reconocile the many edits that have circulated this week to create an updated draft. I agree that it's highly technical still. Ideally the release should be about 2 pages long maximum. I'll revise the ARM section accordingly based on your feedback and remove some additional technical features in the bullet section. Happy to discuss this live via the phone too. I've had some guidance on the top 2-3 biggest new features, but since there are still so many technical details, perhaps a chat would be useful. A product release should include the first, best, only features, the pain point the new features will solve, who will -- or already is -- benefiting from the newest features (quote from user). We are also using the product release to demonstrate Xen Project community activity and momentum. Does this help? I'll also put together a timeline of next steps and what still needs to happen prior to the PR launch/release date. Thanks, On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:04 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > Lars / Sarah, > > Who is the release announcement supposed to be targeting? And about how > long is an expected release announcement meant to be? It seems awfully > technical in places. > > The main point of the ARM section I think is to demonstrate that our > support is growing significantly (hence naming the boards makes sense) and > that this release has stopped being so much of a "tech preview" and is > going to have a stable ABI, working user-space tools, &c &c. People who > need to know the technical details can then look more into them. > > -George > > > On 02/21/2014 12:19 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > >> Sarah, >> >> There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on Monday; >> to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At that point, >> RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is ready for it to be. >> >> I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with >> Russ) in Lars' absence. I'll take a look at the release announcement this >> afternoon. Is there anything else you need from me? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -George >> > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --001a11c33b66c4dc6904f2ec73bd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi George et all,=A0

The release is tar= geted at press covering enterprise technologies and trends like security, c= loud, mobile, big data, infrastructure, app dev. These could be business-le= vel IT managers and decision-makers making IT purchases to a range of IT pr= ofessionals -- sysadmins, datacenter managers, devops professionals, IT arc= hitects, etc. -- solving IT problems. The publications range from targeting= end users to SIs, consultants, etc.=A0

As a next step, I'll reconocile the many edits that= have circulated this week to create an updated draft. I agree that it'= s highly technical still. Ideally the release should be about 2 pages long = maximum. I'll revise the ARM section accordingly based on your feedback= and remove some additional technical features in the bullet section. Happy= to discuss this live via the phone too. I've had some guidance on the = top 2-3 biggest new features, but since there are still so many technical d= etails, perhaps a chat would be useful.=A0

A product release should include the first, best, only = features, the pain point the new features will solve, who will -- or alread= y is -- benefiting from the newest features (quote from user). We are also = using the product release to demonstrate Xen Project community activity and= momentum.=A0

Does this help? I'll also put together a timeline o= f next steps and what still needs to happen prior to the PR launch/release = date.

Thanks,



On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:04 AM, George= Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
Lars / Sarah,

Who is the release announcement supposed to be targeting? And about how lon= g is an expected release announcement meant to be? It seems awfully technic= al in places.

The main point of the ARM section I think is to demonstrate that our suppor= t is growing significantly (hence naming the boards makes sense) and that t= his release has stopped being so much of a "tech preview" and is = going to have a stable ABI, working user-space tools, &c &c. =A0Peo= ple who need to know the technical details can then look more into them.

=A0-George


On 02/21/2014 12:19 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
Sarah,

There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on Monday= ; to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At that point= , RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is ready for it to be= .

I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with = Russ) in Lars' absence. =A0I'll take a look at the release announce= ment this afternoon. =A0Is there anything else you need from me?

Thanks!

=A0-George




--
=
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The L= inux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--001a11c33b66c4dc6904f2ec73bd-- --===============3450500343605874359== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3450500343605874359==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 21 15:41:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:41:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGsE3-0004sg-Uw; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:41:19 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WGsE1-0004sZ-Uu for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:41:18 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:60592] by server-14.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id CD/46-27598-D9377035; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:41:17 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1392997275!5428791!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.173] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4133 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 15:41:15 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 15:41:15 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id bs8so973659wib.0 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:41:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=b7a4CkgppDETIvZ5n2uCdjAwwoFYNzTZ25HXtwejCgA=; b=K/YVOES0NJO2z2K5La9gXcIGm2TWY508fvyJlQJ1r/1GGpP3zzGhrr01jYwkkdGKyM td6uf3yDfkbLG5j4HE1Fqy0ueb4BfFXKd3e6HVuL7Blow/8rufWtfMjnaB1iJK5LAimz w2lRw6spAIlwRwD/2dPn3esD/hpPkU9HSdG5s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b7a4CkgppDETIvZ5n2uCdjAwwoFYNzTZ25HXtwejCgA=; b=PuHlWHKLMrEs756X2m4XwMPIk1PUXqrQ1I215Vex+EyZK0dkvIX9SsF8IcSI5vXtnH /q+0dBGLday7IvIvcchEIUzyuTW75jdjpgaQBeKpQo71UbsRO8lHBQw0hN1ltHsp7xYc T/Ih9DmCQDLzH4ZlkAG3HyGNYyMUXULiah56GW65S1pfJSjT/X2H5rJaWTK2ZcuEcoDS 422+frKiy7hcP9o/QO0E4psFDsKmsStDSMcJ3w/yS4FIR/wPnWjE+clnjUD6ZM/aQQz3 /rGZAXY/hlVQDb6qe9EwNN7aPvQ6doW3zn6kclpfPrdn8DNVBdCN4Wv4ZCS3uDBC0hcM LrSg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQktOoTjL0IOalU2WliAl8ZDkbmG9qjOLr2j4djgKXa4oyVLsZegA14cyJNB2SWxCZ3vfto1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.207.15 with SMTP id ls15mr3815392wic.50.1392997275307; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:41:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> References: <5307445C.1090501@eu.citrix.com> <53076AF6.4090207@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:41:15 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: George Dunlap Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] 4.4 Release announcement X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3450500343605874359==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3450500343605874359== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c33b66c4dc6904f2ec73bd --001a11c33b66c4dc6904f2ec73bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi George et all, The release is targeted at press covering enterprise technologies and trends like security, cloud, mobile, big data, infrastructure, app dev. These could be business-level IT managers and decision-makers making IT purchases to a range of IT professionals -- sysadmins, datacenter managers, devops professionals, IT architects, etc. -- solving IT problems. The publications range from targeting end users to SIs, consultants, etc. As a next step, I'll reconocile the many edits that have circulated this week to create an updated draft. I agree that it's highly technical still. Ideally the release should be about 2 pages long maximum. I'll revise the ARM section accordingly based on your feedback and remove some additional technical features in the bullet section. Happy to discuss this live via the phone too. I've had some guidance on the top 2-3 biggest new features, but since there are still so many technical details, perhaps a chat would be useful. A product release should include the first, best, only features, the pain point the new features will solve, who will -- or already is -- benefiting from the newest features (quote from user). We are also using the product release to demonstrate Xen Project community activity and momentum. Does this help? I'll also put together a timeline of next steps and what still needs to happen prior to the PR launch/release date. Thanks, On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:04 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > Lars / Sarah, > > Who is the release announcement supposed to be targeting? And about how > long is an expected release announcement meant to be? It seems awfully > technical in places. > > The main point of the ARM section I think is to demonstrate that our > support is growing significantly (hence naming the boards makes sense) and > that this release has stopped being so much of a "tech preview" and is > going to have a stable ABI, working user-space tools, &c &c. People who > need to know the technical details can then look more into them. > > -George > > > On 02/21/2014 12:19 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > >> Sarah, >> >> There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on Monday; >> to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At that point, >> RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is ready for it to be. >> >> I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with >> Russ) in Lars' absence. I'll take a look at the release announcement this >> afternoon. Is there anything else you need from me? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -George >> > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --001a11c33b66c4dc6904f2ec73bd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi George et all,=A0

The release is tar= geted at press covering enterprise technologies and trends like security, c= loud, mobile, big data, infrastructure, app dev. These could be business-le= vel IT managers and decision-makers making IT purchases to a range of IT pr= ofessionals -- sysadmins, datacenter managers, devops professionals, IT arc= hitects, etc. -- solving IT problems. The publications range from targeting= end users to SIs, consultants, etc.=A0

As a next step, I'll reconocile the many edits that= have circulated this week to create an updated draft. I agree that it'= s highly technical still. Ideally the release should be about 2 pages long = maximum. I'll revise the ARM section accordingly based on your feedback= and remove some additional technical features in the bullet section. Happy= to discuss this live via the phone too. I've had some guidance on the = top 2-3 biggest new features, but since there are still so many technical d= etails, perhaps a chat would be useful.=A0

A product release should include the first, best, only = features, the pain point the new features will solve, who will -- or alread= y is -- benefiting from the newest features (quote from user). We are also = using the product release to demonstrate Xen Project community activity and= momentum.=A0

Does this help? I'll also put together a timeline o= f next steps and what still needs to happen prior to the PR launch/release = date.

Thanks,



On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:04 AM, George= Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
Lars / Sarah,

Who is the release announcement supposed to be targeting? And about how lon= g is an expected release announcement meant to be? It seems awfully technic= al in places.

The main point of the ARM section I think is to demonstrate that our suppor= t is growing significantly (hence naming the boards makes sense) and that t= his release has stopped being so much of a "tech preview" and is = going to have a stable ABI, working user-space tools, &c &c. =A0Peo= ple who need to know the technical details can then look more into them.

=A0-George


On 02/21/2014 12:19 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
Sarah,

There haven't been any really big issues since RC4 was tagged on Monday= ; to the plan is to tag RC5 today, and then Monday to branch. At that point= , RC5 will become Xen 4.4.0 whenever the PR machinery is ready for it to be= .

I've volunteered to help coordinate the announcement stuff (along with = Russ) in Lars' absence. =A0I'll take a look at the release announce= ment this afternoon. =A0Is there anything else you need from me?

Thanks!

=A0-George




--
=
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The L= inux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--001a11c33b66c4dc6904f2ec73bd-- --===============3450500343605874359== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3450500343605874359==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sun Feb 23 13:04:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHYjL-0004e6-Jq; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:27 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHYjJ-0004e1-9l for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:25 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:36100] by server-13.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 8D/46-18801-7D1F9035; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:23 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1393160662!5637895!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24306 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2014 13:04:22 -0000 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 23 Feb 2014 13:04:22 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,529,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="9739043" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2014 13:04:22 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([10.69.46.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 14:04:21 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: susie li , "Lv, Zhiyuan" , dexuan cui , OTC PRC VGT Thread-Topic: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough Thread-Index: Ac8wPx8F1wJ3Wdq5RV2/1DTGKXFv9QAFjCWAAA71LPAAAWttoA== Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <90B205B787589546A1197E4FC0AE9C1E0205730E@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <8B32EF375D191B489EDA3BE5F9B27845110C9582@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <8B32EF375D191B489EDA3BE5F9B27845110C9582@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.168] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0315979240716938777==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0315979240716938777== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9145AA9AMSPEX01CL01citri_" --_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9145AA9AMSPEX01CL01citri_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, > This is the first news report(and the only one so far). :) Congratulations. I will be on vacation for the next 3 weeks, so I am adding the publicity li= st (http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity). Note t= hat blog posts and other PR are be managed through the publicity list and t= hat the Xen Project will be very happy to promote XenGT and other Intel wor= k. I added everyone on the CC list to the you to the sender filters, but you m= ay want to sign up to receive mails. Best Regards Lars From: Li, Susie [mailto:susie.li@intel.com] Sent: 23 February 2014 12:17 To: dexuan cui; Lv, Zhiyuan; OTC PRC VGT Cc: Lars Kurth Subject: RE: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough That's a good suggestion. + Lars, Xen community manager here. thanks -susie _____________________________________________ From: Cui, Dexuan Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:12 PM To: Lv, Zhiyuan; OTC PRC VGT Subject: RE: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough This is the first news report(and the only one so far). :) Kevin, should we copy our blog(https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graph= ics-virtualization-xengt) to blog.xen.org to draw more attention? Thanks, -- Dexuan _____________________________________________ From: Lv, Zhiyuan Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:31 AM To: OTC PRC VGT Subject: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DMTYxMjI Thanks! -Zhiyuan --_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9145AA9AMSPEX01CL01citri_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,=

 <= /p>

> This is the first news report(and the onl= y one so far). J

Congratulations.

 <= /p>

I will be on vacation for= the next 3 weeks, so I am adding the publicity list (http://lists.xenproje= ct.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity). Note that blog posts and other PR are be managed through the publicity list and that the = Xen Project will be very happy to promote XenGT and other Intel work.<= /o:p>

 <= /p>

I added everyone on the C= C list to the you to the sender filters, but you may want to sign up to rec= eive mails.

 <= /p>

Best Regards

Lars

 <= /p>

From: Li, Susie [mailto:susie.li@intel.com]
Sent: 23 February 2014 12:17
To: dexuan cui; Lv, Zhiyuan; OTC PRC VGT
Cc: Lars Kurth
Subject: RE: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passt= hrough

 

That’s a good suggestion. + Lars, Xen community manager here.= thanks -susie

 

________________________________________= _____
From: Cui, Dexuan
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:12 PM
To: Lv, Zhiyuan; OTC PRC VGT
Subject: RE: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passt= hrough

 

 

This is the first news report(and the only one so far). J

 

Kevin, should we copy our blog(https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/= 2013/graphics-virtualization-xengt) to blog.xen.org to draw more attention?

 

Thanks,

-- Dexuan

 

 

________________________________________= _____
From: Lv, Zhiyuan
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:31 AM
To: OTC PRC VGT
Subject: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrou= gh

 

 

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DMTYxMj= I

 

Thanks!

-Zhiyuan

 

 

--_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9145AA9AMSPEX01CL01citri_-- --===============0315979240716938777== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0315979240716938777==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sun Feb 23 13:04:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHYjL-0004e6-Jq; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:27 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHYjJ-0004e1-9l for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:25 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:36100] by server-13.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 8D/46-18801-7D1F9035; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:23 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1393160662!5637895!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24306 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2014 13:04:22 -0000 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 23 Feb 2014 13:04:22 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,529,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="9739043" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2014 13:04:22 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([10.69.46.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 14:04:21 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: susie li , "Lv, Zhiyuan" , dexuan cui , OTC PRC VGT Thread-Topic: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough Thread-Index: Ac8wPx8F1wJ3Wdq5RV2/1DTGKXFv9QAFjCWAAA71LPAAAWttoA== Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:04:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <90B205B787589546A1197E4FC0AE9C1E0205730E@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <8B32EF375D191B489EDA3BE5F9B27845110C9582@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <8B32EF375D191B489EDA3BE5F9B27845110C9582@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.168] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0315979240716938777==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0315979240716938777== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9145AA9AMSPEX01CL01citri_" --_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9145AA9AMSPEX01CL01citri_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, > This is the first news report(and the only one so far). :) Congratulations. I will be on vacation for the next 3 weeks, so I am adding the publicity li= st (http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity). Note t= hat blog posts and other PR are be managed through the publicity list and t= hat the Xen Project will be very happy to promote XenGT and other Intel wor= k. I added everyone on the CC list to the you to the sender filters, but you m= ay want to sign up to receive mails. Best Regards Lars From: Li, Susie [mailto:susie.li@intel.com] Sent: 23 February 2014 12:17 To: dexuan cui; Lv, Zhiyuan; OTC PRC VGT Cc: Lars Kurth Subject: RE: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough That's a good suggestion. + Lars, Xen community manager here. thanks -susie _____________________________________________ From: Cui, Dexuan Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:12 PM To: Lv, Zhiyuan; OTC PRC VGT Subject: RE: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough This is the first news report(and the only one so far). :) Kevin, should we copy our blog(https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graph= ics-virtualization-xengt) to blog.xen.org to draw more attention? Thanks, -- Dexuan _____________________________________________ From: Lv, Zhiyuan Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:31 AM To: OTC PRC VGT Subject: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrough http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DMTYxMjI Thanks! -Zhiyuan --_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9145AA9AMSPEX01CL01citri_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,=

 <= /p>

> This is the first news report(and the onl= y one so far). J

Congratulations.

 <= /p>

I will be on vacation for= the next 3 weeks, so I am adding the publicity list (http://lists.xenproje= ct.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity). Note that blog posts and other PR are be managed through the publicity list and that the = Xen Project will be very happy to promote XenGT and other Intel work.<= /o:p>

 <= /p>

I added everyone on the C= C list to the you to the sender filters, but you may want to sign up to rec= eive mails.

 <= /p>

Best Regards

Lars

 <= /p>

From: Li, Susie [mailto:susie.li@intel.com]
Sent: 23 February 2014 12:17
To: dexuan cui; Lv, Zhiyuan; OTC PRC VGT
Cc: Lars Kurth
Subject: RE: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passt= hrough

 

That’s a good suggestion. + Lars, Xen community manager here.= thanks -susie

 

________________________________________= _____
From: Cui, Dexuan
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:12 PM
To: Lv, Zhiyuan; OTC PRC VGT
Subject: RE: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passt= hrough

 

 

This is the first news report(and the only one so far). J

 

Kevin, should we copy our blog(https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/= 2013/graphics-virtualization-xengt) to blog.xen.org to draw more attention?

 

Thanks,

-- Dexuan

 

 

________________________________________= _____
From: Lv, Zhiyuan
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:31 AM
To: OTC PRC VGT
Subject: Phoronix news: Intel Makes XenGT For Mediated GPU Passthrou= gh

 

 

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DMTYxMj= I

 

Thanks!

-Zhiyuan

 

 

--_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9145AA9AMSPEX01CL01citri_-- --===============0315979240716938777== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0315979240716938777==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 15:42:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHxgB-0001f5-Bk; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:51 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHxgA-0001eg-1g for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:50 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:34333] by server-16.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 6A/05-21945-9786B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:49 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393256567!2471946!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13673 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 15:42:48 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-9.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 15:42:48 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,535,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="103570087" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 15:42:47 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:42:46 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHxg6-00070l-AP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:46 +0000 Message-ID: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:45 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway , Russell Pavlicek , Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sarah, We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re the press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another week, we could? Thanks, -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 15:42:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHxgB-0001f5-Bk; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:51 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHxgA-0001eg-1g for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:50 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:34333] by server-16.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 6A/05-21945-9786B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:49 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393256567!2471946!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13673 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 15:42:48 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-9.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 15:42:48 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,535,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="103570087" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 15:42:47 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:42:46 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHxg6-00070l-AP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:46 +0000 Message-ID: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:42:45 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway , Russell Pavlicek , Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sarah, We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re the press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another week, we could? Thanks, -George _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 18:02:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHzqp-0000Eo-T9; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:01:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHzqn-0000Ej-UB for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:01:58 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:41805] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id D0/5A-04712-4198B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:01:56 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393264916!2643426!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.178] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 19044 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 18:01:56 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:01:56 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q59so4855077wes.23 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:01:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GRLcZG2Ozw8J548jfvnDj6X1hc7CBaRF4UO0Lsry0uw=; b=Jl3sLsIuqVK/GJjNLBxeZ8RFUZcxl0QxM15U/owqmWpmhttXIqUqmRENDrGSL6u4ED b7tkl1gbupGfXqWgPbSps0ToF5XUwuQN5PsmD06uVq+gPaWMly/4Q80e05A66zFchdrw Fn4jspoBtUyJmFV/Ys2l7eHd3P6JqpDcA5zHU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GRLcZG2Ozw8J548jfvnDj6X1hc7CBaRF4UO0Lsry0uw=; b=ifGTzm2s62nNPkHCbR3WTrqP4Dr/JnNrJG5emPOh5x5tV15S2sLjNcWxgDlV8xkzt9 uKi+u2wYDOiuESX911bc9uoPh5TakgdRmucRrAoc+Al1tiHAmOg3ZlAxrfv0k07tPZWP SMs+iBNcrydS5SzORXzrS5uVur7E/VWEkY6JylESeud/yUa8GJq14n0a2W1sCCj4oEii BNYGxOPKYbia1a83lpvU9vS1Jr3044GXcCc/Oku3V/xk9XRAP//veqXgfq1m0AeMcX4d CGQC5io5dSVc6aZJOnQSLj83W+cGvuZS4il5xHX7RlFey4cRuOFm4zcymWajEi0y/iwG ynrA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMuVIblTQP23wLvNfyyehjwMV9E3zr+aoI8HsOGXjyWBVeMhe/TP3fbGm9SQiqNzq6oGpv MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr20214118wjd.11.1393264915760; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:01:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:01:55 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: George Dunlap Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8977005656537952252==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8977005656537952252== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04f6861db9804f32ac434 --047d7bb04f6861db9804f32ac434 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release with a timeline of next steps. Thanks, Sarah On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > Sarah, > > We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re the > press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit > the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another > week, we could? > > Thanks, > -George > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7bb04f6861db9804f32ac434 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a rev= ised release with a timeline of next steps.=A0

Thanks,

Sarah=A0
=

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap = <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. =A0What's the situati= on re the press release? =A0I haven't heard from you, so I assume that = we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the = release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
=A0-George



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7bb04f6861db9804f32ac434-- --===============8977005656537952252== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8977005656537952252==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 18:02:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHzqp-0000Eo-T9; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:01:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WHzqn-0000Ej-UB for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:01:58 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:41805] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id D0/5A-04712-4198B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:01:56 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393264916!2643426!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.178] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 19044 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 18:01:56 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:01:56 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q59so4855077wes.23 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:01:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GRLcZG2Ozw8J548jfvnDj6X1hc7CBaRF4UO0Lsry0uw=; b=Jl3sLsIuqVK/GJjNLBxeZ8RFUZcxl0QxM15U/owqmWpmhttXIqUqmRENDrGSL6u4ED b7tkl1gbupGfXqWgPbSps0ToF5XUwuQN5PsmD06uVq+gPaWMly/4Q80e05A66zFchdrw Fn4jspoBtUyJmFV/Ys2l7eHd3P6JqpDcA5zHU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GRLcZG2Ozw8J548jfvnDj6X1hc7CBaRF4UO0Lsry0uw=; b=ifGTzm2s62nNPkHCbR3WTrqP4Dr/JnNrJG5emPOh5x5tV15S2sLjNcWxgDlV8xkzt9 uKi+u2wYDOiuESX911bc9uoPh5TakgdRmucRrAoc+Al1tiHAmOg3ZlAxrfv0k07tPZWP SMs+iBNcrydS5SzORXzrS5uVur7E/VWEkY6JylESeud/yUa8GJq14n0a2W1sCCj4oEii BNYGxOPKYbia1a83lpvU9vS1Jr3044GXcCc/Oku3V/xk9XRAP//veqXgfq1m0AeMcX4d CGQC5io5dSVc6aZJOnQSLj83W+cGvuZS4il5xHX7RlFey4cRuOFm4zcymWajEi0y/iwG ynrA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMuVIblTQP23wLvNfyyehjwMV9E3zr+aoI8HsOGXjyWBVeMhe/TP3fbGm9SQiqNzq6oGpv MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr20214118wjd.11.1393264915760; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:01:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:01:55 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: George Dunlap Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8977005656537952252==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8977005656537952252== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04f6861db9804f32ac434 --047d7bb04f6861db9804f32ac434 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release with a timeline of next steps. Thanks, Sarah On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > Sarah, > > We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re the > press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit > the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another > week, we could? > > Thanks, > -George > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7bb04f6861db9804f32ac434 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a rev= ised release with a timeline of next steps.=A0

Thanks,

Sarah=A0
=

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap = <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. =A0What's the situati= on re the press release? =A0I haven't heard from you, so I assume that = we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the = release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
=A0-George



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7bb04f6861db9804f32ac434-- --===============8977005656537952252== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8977005656537952252==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 18:31:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0JE-0000ri-8q; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:20 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0J9-0000r9-Ml for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:18 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:51384] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 0C/78-31661-2FF8B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:14 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393266672!7950618!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4848 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 18:31:13 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:31:13 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,536,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="103629964" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:31:11 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:31:11 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0J4-0001Ng-Ra; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:10 +0000 Message-ID: <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:10 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6958543691328066128==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6958543691328066128== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010802010004030001080602" --------------010802010004030001080602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush. Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel 2. Developers determine that a release is ready 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press release process 4. The release happens on the specified date Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the specified date no matter what. Which means that, we need to make sure that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen until #2 happens. :-) At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't changed our minds again. Is that about right? -George On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release > with a timeline of next steps. > > Thanks, > > Sarah > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap > > wrote: > > Sarah, > > We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the > situation re the press release? I haven't heard from you, so I > assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we > needed to delay the release for another week, we could? > > Thanks, > -George > > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway --------------010802010004030001080602 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sure that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't changed our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

Thanks,

Sarah 


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situation re the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway

--------------010802010004030001080602-- --===============6958543691328066128== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6958543691328066128==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 18:31:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0JE-0000ri-8q; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:20 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0J9-0000r9-Ml for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:18 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:51384] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 0C/78-31661-2FF8B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:14 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393266672!7950618!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4848 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 18:31:13 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:31:13 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,536,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="103629964" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:31:11 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:31:11 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0J4-0001Ng-Ra; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:10 +0000 Message-ID: <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:31:10 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6958543691328066128==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6958543691328066128== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010802010004030001080602" --------------010802010004030001080602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush. Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel 2. Developers determine that a release is ready 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press release process 4. The release happens on the specified date Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the specified date no matter what. Which means that, we need to make sure that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen until #2 happens. :-) At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't changed our minds again. Is that about right? -George On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release > with a timeline of next steps. > > Thanks, > > Sarah > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap > > wrote: > > Sarah, > > We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the > situation re the press release? I haven't heard from you, so I > assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we > needed to delay the release for another week, we could? > > Thanks, > -George > > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway --------------010802010004030001080602 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sure that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't changed our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

Thanks,

Sarah 


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situation re the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway

--------------010802010004030001080602-- --===============6958543691328066128== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6958543691328066128==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 18:38:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0Q9-0000u9-2C; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:29 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0Q7-0000u1-DW for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:27 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:46844] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 51/4E-31661-2A19B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:26 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393267104!7954942!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 10299 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 18:38:25 -0000 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-12.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:38:25 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,536,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="9764829" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:38:24 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([10.69.46.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:38:24 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: George Dunlap , Sarah Conway Thread-Topic: Release Thread-Index: AQHPMXcRWWl1f0YOa0axPdfcfiRqcJrEoU+AgAAILACAABGr0A== Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.168] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4420409110717730568==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4420409110717730568== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9146836AMSPEX01CL01citri_" --_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9146836AMSPEX01CL01citri_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible pres= s release process It's not exactly like this. Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and the releas= e going to the wire (it's like an aggregator for journalists) When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with time-zone = issues), there cannot be a change. Ideally, you don't want to have to re-schedule press briefings with journal= ists either. Regards Lars From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com] Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31 To: Sarah Conway Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: Release OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our si= de; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush. Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel 2. Developers determine that a release is ready 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press = release process 4. The release happens on the specified date Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the= specified date no matter what. Which means that, we need to make sure tha= t there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen un= til #2 happens. :-) At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually star= t #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't change= d our minds again. Is that about right? -George On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release with= a timeline of next steps. Thanks, Sarah On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap > wrote: Sarah, We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re the = press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit t= he point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another = week, we could? Thanks, -George -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9146836AMSPEX01CL01citri_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible= press release process

It’s not exactly like this.

Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing jou= rnalists and the release going to the wire (it’s like an aggregator f= or journalists)

When that date has passed (probably in reality a day= before with time-zone issues), there cannot be a change.

Ideally, you don’t want to have to re-schedule= press briefings with journalists either.

 

Regards

Lars

 <= /p>

From:= George Dunlap [mail= to:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31
To: Sarah Conway
Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Release

 

OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we need= to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't be= ing held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press = release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the= specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sur= e that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happ= en until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually star= t #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't change= d our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:

Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out= a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

 

Thanks,

 

Sarah 

 

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <= george.dun= lap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situation re= the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we hav= en't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release fo= r another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



 

--

Sarah Conway

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@li= nuxfoundation.org

(978) 578-5300  Cell

Skype:  sarah.k.conway

 

--_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9146836AMSPEX01CL01citri_-- --===============4420409110717730568== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4420409110717730568==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 18:38:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0Q9-0000u9-2C; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:29 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0Q7-0000u1-DW for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:27 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:46844] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 51/4E-31661-2A19B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:26 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393267104!7954942!1 X-Originating-IP: [185.25.65.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 10299 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 18:38:25 -0000 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) (185.25.65.24) by server-12.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:38:25 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,536,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="9764829" Received: from unknown (HELO AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.69.60.9]) by AMSPIP01.EU.Citrix.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:38:24 +0000 Received: from AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.6.60]) by AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([10.69.46.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:38:24 +0100 From: Lars Kurth To: George Dunlap , Sarah Conway Thread-Topic: Release Thread-Index: AQHPMXcRWWl1f0YOa0axPdfcfiRqcJrEoU+AgAAILACAABGr0A== Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:38:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.2.168] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: AMS1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4420409110717730568==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4420409110717730568== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9146836AMSPEX01CL01citri_" --_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9146836AMSPEX01CL01citri_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible pres= s release process It's not exactly like this. Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and the releas= e going to the wire (it's like an aggregator for journalists) When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with time-zone = issues), there cannot be a change. Ideally, you don't want to have to re-schedule press briefings with journal= ists either. Regards Lars From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com] Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31 To: Sarah Conway Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: Release OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our si= de; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush. Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel 2. Developers determine that a release is ready 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press = release process 4. The release happens on the specified date Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the= specified date no matter what. Which means that, we need to make sure tha= t there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen un= til #2 happens. :-) At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually star= t #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't change= d our minds again. Is that about right? -George On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release with= a timeline of next steps. Thanks, Sarah On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap > wrote: Sarah, We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re the = press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit t= he point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another = week, we could? Thanks, -George -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9146836AMSPEX01CL01citri_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible= press release process

It’s not exactly like this.

Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing jou= rnalists and the release going to the wire (it’s like an aggregator f= or journalists)

When that date has passed (probably in reality a day= before with time-zone issues), there cannot be a change.

Ideally, you don’t want to have to re-schedule= press briefings with journalists either.

 

Regards

Lars

 <= /p>

From:= George Dunlap [mail= to:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31
To: Sarah Conway
Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Release

 

OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we need= to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't be= ing held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press = release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the= specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sur= e that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happ= en until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually star= t #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't change= d our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:

Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out= a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

 

Thanks,

 

Sarah 

 

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <= george.dun= lap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situation re= the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we hav= en't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release fo= r another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



 

--

Sarah Conway

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@li= nuxfoundation.org

(978) 578-5300  Cell

Skype:  sarah.k.conway

 

--_000_B5EC053C78C5D746BD8AC3386F2303C9146836AMSPEX01CL01citri_-- --===============4420409110717730568== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4420409110717730568==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 18:50:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:50:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0bs-00017t-1y; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:50:36 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0bp-00017o-JN for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:50:34 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:58253] by server-14.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 34/94-27598-8749B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:50:32 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1393267830!5902837!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.176] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24867 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 18:50:31 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by server-14.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:50:31 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi5so3468443wib.15 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:50:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z8ISk4r9FSYqqdLf0Sz3KH/rmJSN4CJ5FIBVktZtvAE=; b=HT5eyrw9e/O+nuuhNil/0GBdkihx0GD6oWsMmBTudO7Ff3/Dm90sK3g8prqznPGsvf 99WNdXbdjkn+a6y/UY8nktRULm7P9Ff2zUbQKUNYkhOYUZ8UkHl3ftPWWWComrLI5rLZ l/4l4UkF1J2LhZ5dMJXFdgBqRRvVDz6V7Xy7U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Z8ISk4r9FSYqqdLf0Sz3KH/rmJSN4CJ5FIBVktZtvAE=; b=PQ478aou4BP4REzBhU5TaK7wxQp1FdWyuNT/sIINfKDw+vmyFrNl91gfFE65qIfykd welrFRsB4FuktmQ0rJvv7gjNSLxF4NzXudieY0hvmjaTfBaqDcBRL7B8WKTESo93mRC1 kiUgGlH0u00GxTuPh8IE4xbm8HejkH8s2XP29ToxGAfXmtk1La2VSFY000koj4Oci/Og 04M0oqX4JxnC12laZpnwR3hjjYiELLb5aMr4/FuQBJ5B21chI4BrO6p8jT2fBr85+okc pPdbWzSH4Qf9R9p7Byfxv4HXQOl8nTBfIdRkaAiwHCj2rwwa7YJKVa3QnANJf0PoXWR2 4+NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/VX70y9/Cb24LDz0PL1mNroClyVx3+JNFgZSqmmLR1BHQbj4wWTXpPiuqhdojqa+c8NeL MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.71.116 with SMTP id t20mr20383330wju.51.1393267830748; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:50:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:50:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:50:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Lars Kurth Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8921385949618438187==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8921385949618438187== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcec642107f504f32b72da --047d7bfcec642107f504f32b72da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi George and Lars, Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date. With this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the next 2 weeks: Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time, ask for all final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to Oracle for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure how long Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release date. I'm waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters news under embargo for interviews. Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching, Xen Project participate in any media interviews (could be live via phone or email requests) Xen Project team prepares technical blog to accompany news release Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, continues pitching, posts to all social channels Xen Project publishes blog Please let me know if this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted on what I hear from Oracle. Feel free to email if there are more questions. Thanks, On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible > press release process > > It's not exactly like this. > > Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and the > release going to the wire (it's like an aggregator for journalists) > > When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with time-zone > issues), there cannot be a change. > > Ideally, you don't want to have to re-schedule press briefings with > journalists either. > > > > Regards > > Lars > > > > *From:* George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com] > *Sent:* 24 February 2014 18:31 > *To:* Sarah Conway > *Cc:* Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org > *Subject:* Re: Release > > > > OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our > side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush. > > Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: > 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel > 2. Developers determine that a release is ready > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press > release process > 4. The release happens on the specified date > > Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at > the specified date no matter what. Which means that, we need to make sure > that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen > until #2 happens. :-) > > At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually > start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't > changed our minds again. > > Is that about right? > > -George > > On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release > with a timeline of next steps. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sarah > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap < > george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > Sarah, > > We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re the > press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit > the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another > week, we could? > > Thanks, > -George > > > > > > -- > > Sarah Conway > > PR Manager > > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > > (978) 578-5300 Cell > > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7bfcec642107f504f32b72da Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi George and Lars, 

Gi= ven where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Th= ursday, March 6th as our release date. 

With = this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the next 2 w= eeks:

Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time= , ask for all final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to= Oracle for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure h= ow long Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release da= te. I'm waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. 

Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters= news under embargo for interviews.

Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching,= Xen Project participate in any media interviews (could be live via phone o= r email requests)
Xen Project team prepares technical blog to acco= mpany news release

Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, = continues pitching, posts to all social channels
Xen Project publishes blog 

Please let me know if= this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted on what I hear fr= om Oracle. 

Feel free t= o email if there are more questions.

Thanks,

On= Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com&g= t; wrote:

> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible= press release process

It’s not exactly like this.

Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing jou= rnalists and the release going to the wire (it’s like an aggregator f= or journalists)

When that date has passed (probably in reality a day= before with time-zone issues), there cannot be a change.

Ideally, you don’t want to have to re-schedule= press briefings with journalists either.

 

Regards

Lars

 

From:= George Dunlap [mail= to:george.= dunlap@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31
To: Sarah Conway
Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Release

 

OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we = need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development = isn't being held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press = release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the= specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sur= e that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't = happen until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually = start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven'= t changed our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:

Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out= a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

 

Thanks,

 

Sarah 

 <= /p>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <= george.dun= lap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situ= ation re the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume= that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to dela= y the release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



 

--

Sarah Conway

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@li= nuxfoundation.org

Skype:  sarah.k.conway

 




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway
<= /div>
--047d7bfcec642107f504f32b72da-- --===============8921385949618438187== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8921385949618438187==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 18:50:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:50:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0bs-00017t-1y; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:50:36 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0bp-00017o-JN for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:50:34 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:58253] by server-14.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 34/94-27598-8749B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:50:32 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1393267830!5902837!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.176] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24867 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 18:50:31 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by server-14.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:50:31 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi5so3468443wib.15 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:50:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z8ISk4r9FSYqqdLf0Sz3KH/rmJSN4CJ5FIBVktZtvAE=; b=HT5eyrw9e/O+nuuhNil/0GBdkihx0GD6oWsMmBTudO7Ff3/Dm90sK3g8prqznPGsvf 99WNdXbdjkn+a6y/UY8nktRULm7P9Ff2zUbQKUNYkhOYUZ8UkHl3ftPWWWComrLI5rLZ l/4l4UkF1J2LhZ5dMJXFdgBqRRvVDz6V7Xy7U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Z8ISk4r9FSYqqdLf0Sz3KH/rmJSN4CJ5FIBVktZtvAE=; b=PQ478aou4BP4REzBhU5TaK7wxQp1FdWyuNT/sIINfKDw+vmyFrNl91gfFE65qIfykd welrFRsB4FuktmQ0rJvv7gjNSLxF4NzXudieY0hvmjaTfBaqDcBRL7B8WKTESo93mRC1 kiUgGlH0u00GxTuPh8IE4xbm8HejkH8s2XP29ToxGAfXmtk1La2VSFY000koj4Oci/Og 04M0oqX4JxnC12laZpnwR3hjjYiELLb5aMr4/FuQBJ5B21chI4BrO6p8jT2fBr85+okc pPdbWzSH4Qf9R9p7Byfxv4HXQOl8nTBfIdRkaAiwHCj2rwwa7YJKVa3QnANJf0PoXWR2 4+NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/VX70y9/Cb24LDz0PL1mNroClyVx3+JNFgZSqmmLR1BHQbj4wWTXpPiuqhdojqa+c8NeL MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.71.116 with SMTP id t20mr20383330wju.51.1393267830748; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:50:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:50:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:50:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Lars Kurth Cc: George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8921385949618438187==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8921385949618438187== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcec642107f504f32b72da --047d7bfcec642107f504f32b72da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi George and Lars, Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date. With this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the next 2 weeks: Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time, ask for all final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to Oracle for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure how long Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release date. I'm waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters news under embargo for interviews. Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching, Xen Project participate in any media interviews (could be live via phone or email requests) Xen Project team prepares technical blog to accompany news release Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, continues pitching, posts to all social channels Xen Project publishes blog Please let me know if this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted on what I hear from Oracle. Feel free to email if there are more questions. Thanks, On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible > press release process > > It's not exactly like this. > > Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and the > release going to the wire (it's like an aggregator for journalists) > > When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with time-zone > issues), there cannot be a change. > > Ideally, you don't want to have to re-schedule press briefings with > journalists either. > > > > Regards > > Lars > > > > *From:* George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com] > *Sent:* 24 February 2014 18:31 > *To:* Sarah Conway > *Cc:* Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org > *Subject:* Re: Release > > > > OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our > side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush. > > Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: > 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel > 2. Developers determine that a release is ready > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press > release process > 4. The release happens on the specified date > > Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at > the specified date no matter what. Which means that, we need to make sure > that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen > until #2 happens. :-) > > At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually > start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't > changed our minds again. > > Is that about right? > > -George > > On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release > with a timeline of next steps. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sarah > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap < > george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > Sarah, > > We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re the > press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit > the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another > week, we could? > > Thanks, > -George > > > > > > -- > > Sarah Conway > > PR Manager > > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > > (978) 578-5300 Cell > > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7bfcec642107f504f32b72da Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi George and Lars, 

Gi= ven where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Th= ursday, March 6th as our release date. 

With = this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the next 2 w= eeks:

Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time= , ask for all final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to= Oracle for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure h= ow long Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release da= te. I'm waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. 

Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters= news under embargo for interviews.

Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching,= Xen Project participate in any media interviews (could be live via phone o= r email requests)
Xen Project team prepares technical blog to acco= mpany news release

Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, = continues pitching, posts to all social channels
Xen Project publishes blog 

Please let me know if= this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted on what I hear fr= om Oracle. 

Feel free t= o email if there are more questions.

Thanks,

On= Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com&g= t; wrote:

> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible= press release process

It’s not exactly like this.

Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing jou= rnalists and the release going to the wire (it’s like an aggregator f= or journalists)

When that date has passed (probably in reality a day= before with time-zone issues), there cannot be a change.

Ideally, you don’t want to have to re-schedule= press briefings with journalists either.

 

Regards

Lars

 

From:= George Dunlap [mail= to:george.= dunlap@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31
To: Sarah Conway
Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Release

 

OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we = need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development = isn't being held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press = release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the= specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sur= e that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't = happen until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually = start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven'= t changed our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:

Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out= a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

 

Thanks,

 

Sarah 

 <= /p>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <= george.dun= lap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situ= ation re the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume= that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to dela= y the release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



 

--

Sarah Conway

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@li= nuxfoundation.org

Skype:  sarah.k.conway

 




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway
<= /div>
--047d7bfcec642107f504f32b72da-- --===============8921385949618438187== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8921385949618438187==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 19:01:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0m8-0001Y7-NL; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:12 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0m5-0001Xu-O1 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:11 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:59141] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 27/6D-04712-4F69B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:08 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393268466!3914046!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.182] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.5 required=7.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 842 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 19:01:06 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 19:01:06 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f8so3467610wiw.15 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:01:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=NhepDyPqmMN2f6M62JB294rH6GBXVdn4lMRY5aOss/g=; b=xdaREaTU+2Nf6O9L5Uv5TPw4RVsWKC4THxv4MA8mlleninDZoBhPBDR2IOoLpfEmUm esCs2ZmJ8ATUc5lfIO3eGdbyP3QhKguu879uS56yZmrPjLKStjE2Z3YqdXiU2HBZwgPc Oo5BKkIxW/crGXcaV4GMxPITxV34arJ7zYORtJebTC6xHXHGX1HLo4oewT2LKNSqcnMZ nbwL0aZIn0DDmRbkM4zR86GC/paX01kVRBuF9T/hRQbnoBQ5I2jTjueUWjzfHi8MuxKc 0LGeCVHzy0YK7UVFZ/HUgrs911LrfbTIZhn1e/f0Pvamw/k6/Do+xyPYIzD/UiTE1raK tFCA== X-Received: by 10.194.250.34 with SMTP id yz2mr20325770wjc.18.1393268466288; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:01:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm26745073wiv.2.2014.02.24.11.01.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:01:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <530B96F0.60202@xen.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:04 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0842739429354927665==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0842739429354927665== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060904040204070207030102" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060904040204070207030102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date. Timeline makes sense. You may want to give the AB an extra day Regards Lars On 24/02/2014 18:50, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi George and Lars, > > Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next > Thursday, March 6th as our release date. > > With this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the > next 2 weeks: > > Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time, ask for all > final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to Oracle > for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure how long > Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release date. I'm > waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. > > Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters news under > embargo for interviews. > > Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching, Xen Project participate > in any media interviews (could be live via phone or email requests) > Xen Project team prepares technical blog to accompany news release > > Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, > continues pitching, posts to all social channels > Xen Project publishes blog > > Please let me know if this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you > posted on what I hear from Oracle. > > Feel free to email if there are more questions. > > Thanks, > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth > wrote: > > > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the > irreversible press release process > > It's not exactly like this. > > Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and > the release going to the wire (it's like an aggregator for > journalists) > > When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with > time-zone issues), there cannot be a change. > > Ideally, you don't want to have to re-schedule press briefings > with journalists either. > > Regards > > Lars > > *From:*George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com > ] > *Sent:* 24 February 2014 18:31 > *To:* Sarah Conway > *Cc:* Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org > > *Subject:* Re: Release > > OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything > on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held > up -- so no rush. > > Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: > 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel > 2. Developers determine that a release is ready > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the > irreversible press release process > 4. The release happens on the specified date > > Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to > happen at the specified date no matter what. Which means that, we > need to make sure that there is a coordination between us to make > sure that #3 doesn't happen until #2 happens. :-) > > At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you > actually start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make > sure we haven't changed our minds again. > > Is that about right? > > -George > > On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised > release with a timeline of next steps. > > Thanks, > > Sarah > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap > > wrote: > > Sarah, > > We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the > situation re the press release? I haven't heard from you, so > I assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if > we needed to delay the release for another week, we could? > > Thanks, > -George > > > > -- > > Sarah Conway > > PR Manager > > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > > (978) 578-5300 Cell > > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------060904040204070207030102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date.
Timeline makes sense. You may want to give the AB an extra day

Regards
Lars

On 24/02/2014 18:50, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi George and Lars, 

Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date. 

With this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the next 2 weeks:

Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time, ask for all final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to Oracle for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure how long Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release date. I'm waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. 

Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters news under embargo for interviews.

Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching, Xen Project participate in any media interviews (could be live via phone or email requests)
Xen Project team prepares technical blog to accompany news release

Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, continues pitching, posts to all social channels
Xen Project publishes blog 

Please let me know if this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted on what I hear from Oracle. 

Feel free to email if there are more questions.

Thanks,

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com> wrote:

> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press release process

It’s not exactly like this.

Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and the release going to the wire (it’s like an aggregator for journalists)

When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with time-zone issues), there cannot be a change.

Ideally, you don’t want to have to re-schedule press briefings with journalists either.

 

Regards

Lars

 

From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31
To: Sarah Conway
Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Release

 

OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sure that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't changed our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:

Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

 

Thanks,

 

Sarah 

 

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situation re the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



 

--

Sarah Conway

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org

Skype:  sarah.k.conway

 




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------060904040204070207030102-- --===============0842739429354927665== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0842739429354927665==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 19:01:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0m8-0001Y7-NL; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:12 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI0m5-0001Xu-O1 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:11 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:59141] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 27/6D-04712-4F69B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:08 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393268466!3914046!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.182] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.5 required=7.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 842 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 19:01:06 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 19:01:06 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f8so3467610wiw.15 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:01:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=NhepDyPqmMN2f6M62JB294rH6GBXVdn4lMRY5aOss/g=; b=xdaREaTU+2Nf6O9L5Uv5TPw4RVsWKC4THxv4MA8mlleninDZoBhPBDR2IOoLpfEmUm esCs2ZmJ8ATUc5lfIO3eGdbyP3QhKguu879uS56yZmrPjLKStjE2Z3YqdXiU2HBZwgPc Oo5BKkIxW/crGXcaV4GMxPITxV34arJ7zYORtJebTC6xHXHGX1HLo4oewT2LKNSqcnMZ nbwL0aZIn0DDmRbkM4zR86GC/paX01kVRBuF9T/hRQbnoBQ5I2jTjueUWjzfHi8MuxKc 0LGeCVHzy0YK7UVFZ/HUgrs911LrfbTIZhn1e/f0Pvamw/k6/Do+xyPYIzD/UiTE1raK tFCA== X-Received: by 10.194.250.34 with SMTP id yz2mr20325770wjc.18.1393268466288; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:01:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm26745073wiv.2.2014.02.24.11.01.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:01:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <530B96F0.60202@xen.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:01:04 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0842739429354927665==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0842739429354927665== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060904040204070207030102" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060904040204070207030102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date. Timeline makes sense. You may want to give the AB an extra day Regards Lars On 24/02/2014 18:50, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi George and Lars, > > Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next > Thursday, March 6th as our release date. > > With this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the > next 2 weeks: > > Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time, ask for all > final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to Oracle > for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure how long > Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release date. I'm > waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. > > Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters news under > embargo for interviews. > > Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching, Xen Project participate > in any media interviews (could be live via phone or email requests) > Xen Project team prepares technical blog to accompany news release > > Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, > continues pitching, posts to all social channels > Xen Project publishes blog > > Please let me know if this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you > posted on what I hear from Oracle. > > Feel free to email if there are more questions. > > Thanks, > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth > wrote: > > > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the > irreversible press release process > > It's not exactly like this. > > Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and > the release going to the wire (it's like an aggregator for > journalists) > > When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with > time-zone issues), there cannot be a change. > > Ideally, you don't want to have to re-schedule press briefings > with journalists either. > > Regards > > Lars > > *From:*George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com > ] > *Sent:* 24 February 2014 18:31 > *To:* Sarah Conway > *Cc:* Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org > > *Subject:* Re: Release > > OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything > on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held > up -- so no rush. > > Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: > 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel > 2. Developers determine that a release is ready > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the > irreversible press release process > 4. The release happens on the specified date > > Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to > happen at the specified date no matter what. Which means that, we > need to make sure that there is a coordination between us to make > sure that #3 doesn't happen until #2 happens. :-) > > At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you > actually start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make > sure we haven't changed our minds again. > > Is that about right? > > -George > > On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised > release with a timeline of next steps. > > Thanks, > > Sarah > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap > > wrote: > > Sarah, > > We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the > situation re the press release? I haven't heard from you, so > I assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if > we needed to delay the release for another week, we could? > > Thanks, > -George > > > > -- > > Sarah Conway > > PR Manager > > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > > (978) 578-5300 Cell > > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------060904040204070207030102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date.
Timeline makes sense. You may want to give the AB an extra day

Regards
Lars

On 24/02/2014 18:50, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi George and Lars, 

Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date. 

With this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the next 2 weeks:

Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time, ask for all final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to Oracle for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure how long Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release date. I'm waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. 

Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters news under embargo for interviews.

Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching, Xen Project participate in any media interviews (could be live via phone or email requests)
Xen Project team prepares technical blog to accompany news release

Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, continues pitching, posts to all social channels
Xen Project publishes blog 

Please let me know if this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted on what I hear from Oracle. 

Feel free to email if there are more questions.

Thanks,

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com> wrote:

> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press release process

It’s not exactly like this.

Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and the release going to the wire (it’s like an aggregator for journalists)

When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with time-zone issues), there cannot be a change.

Ideally, you don’t want to have to re-schedule press briefings with journalists either.

 

Regards

Lars

 

From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31
To: Sarah Conway
Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Release

 

OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sure that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't changed our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:

Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

 

Thanks,

 

Sarah 

 

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situation re the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



 

--

Sarah Conway

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org

Skype:  sarah.k.conway

 




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------060904040204070207030102-- --===============0842739429354927665== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0842739429354927665==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 19:27:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:27:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI1Bq-0001pz-23; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:27:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI1Bo-0001pu-JG for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:27:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:7603] by server-13.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 45/57-18801-F2D9B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:27:43 +0000 X-Env-Sender: jennifer@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1393270061!1398494!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.215.49] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13767 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 19:27:42 -0000 Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-la0-f49.google.com) (209.85.215.49) by server-5.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 19:27:42 -0000 Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id mc6so2820858lab.22 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:27:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=S7M9t2M6U/grAFQZlZXCO035dONlzkNboTJ/ov+TyE8=; b=NQnar9d+NKp+MbER9ohKPdZ2cx8qwKOwqB1lRZ4fUIPvUC1uYDJuP59DFU5MNcthgG mjGjL2t1ZQ53IeJlph3GhaPmj31eg2N9R693DBDFYbLzEfyTkUTwEm1j9xF8abFhoECL vFelVECP+/uj2Pt/AK6ZpPD7Ma/1LbrvRHVGU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=S7M9t2M6U/grAFQZlZXCO035dONlzkNboTJ/ov+TyE8=; b=ahPdmhbjV1y4HDuW4E6l2NbkVv/T6Tx0OdPk5/+n8AoHuQymRqXTGImslO2GdQnX4C zhsL0AUf7XRWnu2Hj3pWsvsn7yIcuSBU9N+xQm9Um1FlpjSHPGZ78t76QxzuzsQm6sAZ bZNN7FpmlCNL6Mh3NyF20U8R9DYJ+d5+ej3stpceGD5DJxMS9ZJGdyC+vh8wRUt/8oqH LoG59Y1GuPOl9YStH0mUUH1hQbvXAF8ags81TeKiaeBTGAznDlHpc9j2XYYlLMAdLjO9 OzF5Hjqv//jDCSDrxEpFbUAQTCXReSpWuk+bwjUmYEPhOR7pxZjR2ew52laRnXZLYSgK Id+g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJra2FcBAQh9RB6HedXwwZswNWy1AKUYRJsryLiuhfVELXd7ZF8uXsz3wEmNcFE33ZCklZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.163.167 with SMTP id yj7mr567194lbb.88.1393270060990; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.147.226 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:27:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:27:40 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jennifer Cloer To: Sarah Conway Cc: Lars Kurth , George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4127301063007508188==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4127301063007508188== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115fe1a0fd75a04f32bf775 --089e0115fe1a0fd75a04f32bf775 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This timeline looks really good. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi George and Lars, > > Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next > Thursday, March 6th as our release date. > > With this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the next 2 > weeks: > > Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time, ask for all final > edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to Oracle for > review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure how long Oracle's > approval will take. This might push out the release date. I'm waiting for > feedback from Oracle on this. > > Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters news under embargo > for interviews. > > Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching, Xen Project participate in > any media interviews (could be live via phone or email requests) > Xen Project team prepares technical blog to accompany news release > > Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, continues > pitching, posts to all social channels > Xen Project publishes blog > > Please let me know if this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted > on what I hear from Oracle. > > Feel free to email if there are more questions. > > Thanks, > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible >> press release process >> >> It's not exactly like this. >> >> Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and the >> release going to the wire (it's like an aggregator for journalists) >> >> When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with >> time-zone issues), there cannot be a change. >> >> Ideally, you don't want to have to re-schedule press briefings with >> journalists either. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Lars >> >> >> >> *From:* George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com] >> *Sent:* 24 February 2014 18:31 >> *To:* Sarah Conway >> *Cc:* Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> *Subject:* Re: Release >> >> >> >> OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our >> side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush. >> >> Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: >> 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel >> 2. Developers determine that a release is ready >> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible >> press release process >> 4. The release happens on the specified date >> >> Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at >> the specified date no matter what. Which means that, we need to make sure >> that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen >> until #2 happens. :-) >> >> At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually >> start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't >> changed our minds again. >> >> Is that about right? >> >> -George >> >> On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >> Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release >> with a timeline of next steps. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Sarah >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap < >> george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> >> Sarah, >> >> We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re >> the press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't >> hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for >> another week, we could? >> >> Thanks, >> -George >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sarah Conway >> >> PR Manager >> >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> >> Skype: sarah.k.conway >> >> >> > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > -- Jennifer Cloer The Linux Foundation Director of Communications 503-867-2304 jennifer@linuxfoundation.org Skype: jencloer Twitter: jennifercloer --089e0115fe1a0fd75a04f32bf775 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This timeline looks really good.



On Mon, Feb 24, 20= 14 at 10:50 AM, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org>= ; wrote:
Hi George and Lars,&nb= sp;

Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 n= ow, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date. =

With this date in mind, here's what our timeline lo= oks like for the next 2 weeks:

Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time= , ask for all final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to= Oracle for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure h= ow long Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release da= te. I'm waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. 

Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters= news under embargo for interviews.

Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching,= Xen Project participate in any media interviews (could be live via phone o= r email requests)
Xen Project team prepares technical blog to acco= mpany news release

Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, = continues pitching, posts to all social channels
Xen Project publishes blog 

Please let me know if= this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted on what I hear fr= om Oracle. 

Feel free t= o email if there are more questions.

Thanks,


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com> wrote:

> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible= press release process

It’s not exactly like this.

Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing jou= rnalists and the release going to the wire (it’s like an aggregator f= or journalists)

When that date has passed (probably in reality a day= before with time-zone issues), there cannot be a change.

Ideally, you don’t want to have to re-schedule= press briefings with journalists either.

 

Regards

Lars

 

From:= George Dunlap [mail= to:george.= dunlap@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31
To: Sarah Conway
Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Release

 

OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we = need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development = isn't being held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press = release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the= specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sur= e that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't = happen until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually = start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven'= t changed our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:

Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out= a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

 

Thanks,

 

Sarah 

 <= /p>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <= george.dun= lap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situ= ation re the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume= that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to dela= y the release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



 

--

Sarah Conway

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@li= nuxfoundation.org

Skype:  sarah.k.conway

 




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
Skype:  sarah.k.conway=

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity




--
Jennifer= Cloer
The Linux Foundation
Director of Communications
503-867-230= 4
jenn= ifer@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: jencloer
Twitter: jennifercloer
--089e0115fe1a0fd75a04f32bf775-- --===============4127301063007508188== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4127301063007508188==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Feb 24 19:27:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:27:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI1Bq-0001pz-23; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:27:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI1Bo-0001pu-JG for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:27:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:7603] by server-13.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 45/57-18801-F2D9B035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:27:43 +0000 X-Env-Sender: jennifer@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1393270061!1398494!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.215.49] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13767 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2014 19:27:42 -0000 Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-la0-f49.google.com) (209.85.215.49) by server-5.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2014 19:27:42 -0000 Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id mc6so2820858lab.22 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:27:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=S7M9t2M6U/grAFQZlZXCO035dONlzkNboTJ/ov+TyE8=; b=NQnar9d+NKp+MbER9ohKPdZ2cx8qwKOwqB1lRZ4fUIPvUC1uYDJuP59DFU5MNcthgG mjGjL2t1ZQ53IeJlph3GhaPmj31eg2N9R693DBDFYbLzEfyTkUTwEm1j9xF8abFhoECL vFelVECP+/uj2Pt/AK6ZpPD7Ma/1LbrvRHVGU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=S7M9t2M6U/grAFQZlZXCO035dONlzkNboTJ/ov+TyE8=; b=ahPdmhbjV1y4HDuW4E6l2NbkVv/T6Tx0OdPk5/+n8AoHuQymRqXTGImslO2GdQnX4C zhsL0AUf7XRWnu2Hj3pWsvsn7yIcuSBU9N+xQm9Um1FlpjSHPGZ78t76QxzuzsQm6sAZ bZNN7FpmlCNL6Mh3NyF20U8R9DYJ+d5+ej3stpceGD5DJxMS9ZJGdyC+vh8wRUt/8oqH LoG59Y1GuPOl9YStH0mUUH1hQbvXAF8ags81TeKiaeBTGAznDlHpc9j2XYYlLMAdLjO9 OzF5Hjqv//jDCSDrxEpFbUAQTCXReSpWuk+bwjUmYEPhOR7pxZjR2ew52laRnXZLYSgK Id+g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJra2FcBAQh9RB6HedXwwZswNWy1AKUYRJsryLiuhfVELXd7ZF8uXsz3wEmNcFE33ZCklZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.163.167 with SMTP id yj7mr567194lbb.88.1393270060990; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.147.226 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:27:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <530B6875.8040805@eu.citrix.com> <530B8FEE.3030509@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:27:40 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jennifer Cloer To: Sarah Conway Cc: Lars Kurth , George Dunlap , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Release X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4127301063007508188==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4127301063007508188== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115fe1a0fd75a04f32bf775 --089e0115fe1a0fd75a04f32bf775 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This timeline looks really good. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi George and Lars, > > Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 now, I wanted to propose next > Thursday, March 6th as our release date. > > With this date in mind, here's what our timeline looks like for the next 2 > weeks: > > Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time, ask for all final > edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to Oracle for > review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure how long Oracle's > approval will take. This might push out the release date. I'm waiting for > feedback from Oracle on this. > > Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters news under embargo > for interviews. > > Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching, Xen Project participate in > any media interviews (could be live via phone or email requests) > Xen Project team prepares technical blog to accompany news release > > Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, continues > pitching, posts to all social channels > Xen Project publishes blog > > Please let me know if this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted > on what I hear from Oracle. > > Feel free to email if there are more questions. > > Thanks, > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> > 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible >> press release process >> >> It's not exactly like this. >> >> Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing journalists and the >> release going to the wire (it's like an aggregator for journalists) >> >> When that date has passed (probably in reality a day before with >> time-zone issues), there cannot be a change. >> >> Ideally, you don't want to have to re-schedule press briefings with >> journalists either. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Lars >> >> >> >> *From:* George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com] >> *Sent:* 24 February 2014 18:31 >> *To:* Sarah Conway >> *Cc:* Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> *Subject:* Re: Release >> >> >> >> OK, cool. As it happens, I don't think we need to delay anything on our >> side; and as we've branched, development isn't being held up -- so no rush. >> >> Just to understand the general process, my understanding was: >> 1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel >> 2. Developers determine that a release is ready >> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible >> press release process >> 4. The release happens on the specified date >> >> Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at >> the specified date no matter what. Which means that, we need to make sure >> that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't happen >> until #2 happens. :-) >> >> At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually >> start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven't >> changed our minds again. >> >> Is that about right? >> >> -George >> >> On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >> Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out a revised release >> with a timeline of next steps. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Sarah >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap < >> george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> >> Sarah, >> >> We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5. What's the situation re >> the press release? I haven't heard from you, so I assume that we haven't >> hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to delay the release for >> another week, we could? >> >> Thanks, >> -George >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sarah Conway >> >> PR Manager >> >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> >> Skype: sarah.k.conway >> >> >> > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > -- Jennifer Cloer The Linux Foundation Director of Communications 503-867-2304 jennifer@linuxfoundation.org Skype: jencloer Twitter: jennifercloer --089e0115fe1a0fd75a04f32bf775 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This timeline looks really good.



On Mon, Feb 24, 20= 14 at 10:50 AM, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org>= ; wrote:
Hi George and Lars,&nb= sp;

Given where we're at with steps 1 &2 n= ow, I wanted to propose next Thursday, March 6th as our release date. =

With this date in mind, here's what our timeline lo= oks like for the next 2 weeks:

Today, 2/24 - LF to send latest rev to AB one more time= , ask for all final edits back by Wed., Feb. 26, LF to also send release to= Oracle for review/approval on their quote. Please note, I'm not sure h= ow long Oracle's approval will take. This might push out the release da= te. I'm waiting for feedback from Oracle on this. 

Thurs.-Fri. 2/27- 2/28 - LF to start pitching reporters= news under embargo for interviews.

Mon.-Wed., 3/3-3/5 - LF to continue pitching,= Xen Project participate in any media interviews (could be live via phone o= r email requests)
Xen Project team prepares technical blog to acco= mpany news release

Thurs., 3/6 - LF issues news release over Marketwire service, = continues pitching, posts to all social channels
Xen Project publishes blog 

Please let me know if= this seems to work on your end. I'll keep you posted on what I hear fr= om Oracle. 

Feel free t= o email if there are more questions.

Thanks,


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com> wrote:

> 3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible= press release process

It’s not exactly like this.

Typically we would agree a date for pre-briefing jou= rnalists and the release going to the wire (it’s like an aggregator f= or journalists)

When that date has passed (probably in reality a day= before with time-zone issues), there cannot be a change.

Ideally, you don’t want to have to re-schedule= press briefings with journalists either.

 

Regards

Lars

 

From:= George Dunlap [mail= to:george.= dunlap@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 18:31
To: Sarah Conway
Cc: Russell Pavlicek; Lars Kurth; publicity@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Release

 

OK, cool.  As it happens, I don't think we = need to delay anything on our side; and as we've branched, development = isn't being held up -- so no rush.

Just to understand the general process, my understanding was:
1. Development and release preparation happen in parallel
2. Developers determine that a release is ready
3. LF specifies an official release date and begins the irreversible press = release process
4. The release happens on the specified date

Lars made it clear that once #3 happened, #4 basically had to happen at the= specified date no matter what.  Which means that, we need to make sur= e that there is a coordination between us to make sure that #3 doesn't = happen until #2 happens. :-)

At the moment, we're good to go on our side -- but before you actually = start #3, it would be good to touch base with us to make sure we haven'= t changed our minds again.

Is that about right?

 -George

On 02/24/2014 06:01 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:

Yes, in fact that is preferred. Planning to send out= a revised release with a timeline of next steps. 

 

Thanks,

 

Sarah 

 <= /p>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, George Dunlap <= george.dun= lap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

Sarah,

We've just found a couple of bugs in the RC5.  What's the situ= ation re the press release?  I haven't heard from you, so I assume= that we haven't hit the point of no return yet -- if we needed to dela= y the release for another week, we could?

Thanks,
 -George



 

--

Sarah Conway

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@li= nuxfoundation.org

Skype:  sarah.k.conway

 




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
Skype:  sarah.k.conway=

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity




--
Jennifer= Cloer
The Linux Foundation
Director of Communications
503-867-230= 4
jenn= ifer@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: jencloer
Twitter: jennifercloer
--089e0115fe1a0fd75a04f32bf775-- --===============4127301063007508188== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4127301063007508188==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 25 02:07:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI7Qe-0003I3-25; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:28 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI7Qd-0003Hy-3x for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:27 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:7248] by server-12.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 82/2A-01674-EDAFB035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:26 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dexuan.cui@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393294044!3957614!1 X-Originating-IP: [134.134.136.20] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTM0LjEzNC4xMzYuMjAgPT4gMzU1MzU4\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 29786 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 02:07:25 -0000 Received: from mga02.intel.com (HELO mga02.intel.com) (134.134.136.20) by server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 02:07:25 -0000 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:07:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,538,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="461634578" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.35]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:07:23 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:07:22 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.202]) by SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:07:20 +0800 From: "Cui, Dexuan" To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Thread-Topic: Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? Thread-Index: Ac8xzPVEnp4uLT4NSpiCArz7zg9Syg== Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:20 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Lars Kurth Subject: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Hi all, We announced an update to XenGT recently: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01848.html I think it would be great for us to have a xenproject blog about it. I think we can just copy the existing blog : https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-virtualization-xengt My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui. Any comment? Thanks! -- Dexuan _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 25 02:07:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI7Qe-0003I3-25; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:28 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WI7Qd-0003Hy-3x for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:27 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:7248] by server-12.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 82/2A-01674-EDAFB035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:26 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dexuan.cui@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393294044!3957614!1 X-Originating-IP: [134.134.136.20] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTM0LjEzNC4xMzYuMjAgPT4gMzU1MzU4\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 29786 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 02:07:25 -0000 Received: from mga02.intel.com (HELO mga02.intel.com) (134.134.136.20) by server-3.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 02:07:25 -0000 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:07:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,538,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="461634578" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.35]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 18:07:23 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:07:22 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.202]) by SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:07:20 +0800 From: "Cui, Dexuan" To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Thread-Topic: Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? Thread-Index: Ac8xzPVEnp4uLT4NSpiCArz7zg9Syg== Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:07:20 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Lars Kurth Subject: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Hi all, We announced an update to XenGT recently: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01848.html I think it would be great for us to have a xenproject blog about it. I think we can just copy the existing blog : https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-virtualization-xengt My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui. Any comment? Thanks! -- Dexuan _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 25 13:43:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIIHx-0004fs-L5; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIIHv-0004fj-VK for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:12 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:59313] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 87/3F-11539-FED9C035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393335790!8180211!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.182] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.2 required=7.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6923 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 13:43:10 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f182.google.com) (74.125.82.182) by server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 13:43:10 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u57so393321wes.41 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:43:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M4H/QBUJ2CPRnm/LDq9P/IavlUMAo0RbmENh7Cro1uU=; b=cmb2v2TYpxzDr2wNRrzPQ8ZSM9fTqscxEZ74T5MfmVBjglKN4eAnH1ethfm11wDn+3 uajc/ZsOI81Kt9ZwKqKwwJ5nImjPk04TWgFri6V/5nYWz3hLrCeYvWR8tMA/hgn4TYdA shtg0X2Vza8ZKXA/l9Vzlspigyod7GDHFHFa0/L4uzlUmkP5pUMe/AZBA+mj5g7TnPGs kdxJofvKTqxnImWfBrSxtwobWeEslSWlq+zEm95vp/RkHEl7PDr1K5CFtA7RpDxAQjxI c+NfC3VhiBPeK4iBAEkKg83+NTgn+HKvwSpOyAouG2UC8RvXaa3bi2y+BkMW9TYsQ3k9 0saQ== X-Received: by 10.180.37.178 with SMTP id z18mr49968wij.46.1393335789778; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u6sm273383wif.6.2014.02.25.05.43.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:43:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <530C9DEB.6090503@xen.org> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:07 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> <5304E746.3090704@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5304E746.3090704@citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org All, I am going to put together a blog post related to OPW and GSoC today Regards Lars On 19/02/2014 17:17, Julien Grall wrote: > On 02/19/2014 05:14 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> On mer, 2014-02-19 at 16:54 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >>> On 02/19/2014 04:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>>> So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could >>>> you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? >>>> That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. >>> I will be away until Monday 10 March. So if possible, not before this >>> date :). >>> >> Ok, I'll sign you up for right that week. That means you should have the >> post ready for review, ideally, by Wed 12 March. > Thanks, now I know what I will have to do during my 13 hours flight :). > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 25 13:43:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIIHx-0004fs-L5; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIIHv-0004fj-VK for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:12 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:59313] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 87/3F-11539-FED9C035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393335790!8180211!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.182] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.2 required=7.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6923 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 13:43:10 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f182.google.com) (74.125.82.182) by server-8.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 13:43:10 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u57so393321wes.41 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:43:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M4H/QBUJ2CPRnm/LDq9P/IavlUMAo0RbmENh7Cro1uU=; b=cmb2v2TYpxzDr2wNRrzPQ8ZSM9fTqscxEZ74T5MfmVBjglKN4eAnH1ethfm11wDn+3 uajc/ZsOI81Kt9ZwKqKwwJ5nImjPk04TWgFri6V/5nYWz3hLrCeYvWR8tMA/hgn4TYdA shtg0X2Vza8ZKXA/l9Vzlspigyod7GDHFHFa0/L4uzlUmkP5pUMe/AZBA+mj5g7TnPGs kdxJofvKTqxnImWfBrSxtwobWeEslSWlq+zEm95vp/RkHEl7PDr1K5CFtA7RpDxAQjxI c+NfC3VhiBPeK4iBAEkKg83+NTgn+HKvwSpOyAouG2UC8RvXaa3bi2y+BkMW9TYsQ3k9 0saQ== X-Received: by 10.180.37.178 with SMTP id z18mr49968wij.46.1393335789778; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.25.10] ([2.122.219.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u6sm273383wif.6.2014.02.25.05.43.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:43:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <530C9DEB.6090503@xen.org> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:43:07 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> <5304E746.3090704@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5304E746.3090704@citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org All, I am going to put together a blog post related to OPW and GSoC today Regards Lars On 19/02/2014 17:17, Julien Grall wrote: > On 02/19/2014 05:14 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> On mer, 2014-02-19 at 16:54 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >>> On 02/19/2014 04:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>>> So, Julien, forgive me, but I'm not sure I get it from above... Could >>>> you tell me what a reasonable date for a blog post from you could be? >>>> That way, I can put you back in a proper place in the pipeline. >>> I will be away until Monday 10 March. So if possible, not before this >>> date :). >>> >> Ok, I'll sign you up for right that week. That means you should have the >> post ready for review, ideally, by Wed 12 March. > Thanks, now I know what I will have to do during my 13 hours flight :). > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 25 17:45:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:45:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIM4i-0006tp-P9; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:45:48 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIM4g-0006tZ-Vf for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:45:47 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:18421] by server-12.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 89/8E-17220-AC6DC035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:45:46 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393350335!1491334!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDQxOTMgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4988 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 17:45:36 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 17:45:36 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,541,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="103992949" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2014 17:45:34 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:45:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1393350331.8606.30.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:45:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <530C9DEB.6090503@xen.org> References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> <5304E746.3090704@citrix.com> <530C9DEB.6090503@xen.org> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6334694263037777974==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6334694263037777974== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HPIoUxwIcK0Z1EKxlCNJ" --=-HPIoUxwIcK0Z1EKxlCNJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-25 at 13:43 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > All, > I am going to put together a blog post related to OPW and GSoC today > Seen it, thanks for that. Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-HPIoUxwIcK0Z1EKxlCNJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlMM1rsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQYnQCcDeFgYKaTiaprw1ENfujEjXT0 j5QAn1t6/YozEMT62Jl44ejzStrNvOZS =bhM+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HPIoUxwIcK0Z1EKxlCNJ-- --===============6334694263037777974== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6334694263037777974==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 25 17:45:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:45:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIM4i-0006tp-P9; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:45:48 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIM4g-0006tZ-Vf for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:45:47 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:18421] by server-12.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 89/8E-17220-AC6DC035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:45:46 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393350335!1491334!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDQxOTMgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 4988 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 17:45:36 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 17:45:36 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,541,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="103992949" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2014 17:45:34 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:45:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1393350331.8606.30.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:45:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <530C9DEB.6090503@xen.org> References: <1392746211.32038.588.camel@Solace> <5303A49A.8050309@citrix.com> <1392827577.32038.689.camel@Solace> <5304E1DD.600@citrix.com> <1392830064.32038.696.camel@Solace> <5304E746.3090704@citrix.com> <530C9DEB.6090503@xen.org> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of February 17 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6334694263037777974==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6334694263037777974== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HPIoUxwIcK0Z1EKxlCNJ" --=-HPIoUxwIcK0Z1EKxlCNJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mar, 2014-02-25 at 13:43 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > All, > I am going to put together a blog post related to OPW and GSoC today > Seen it, thanks for that. Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-HPIoUxwIcK0Z1EKxlCNJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlMM1rsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQYnQCcDeFgYKaTiaprw1ENfujEjXT0 j5QAn1t6/YozEMT62Jl44ejzStrNvOZS =bhM+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HPIoUxwIcK0Z1EKxlCNJ-- --===============6334694263037777974== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6334694263037777974==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 25 21:55:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:55:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPyI-0000kj-Vg; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:55:26 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPyI-0000kb-00 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:55:26 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:17687] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id EE/A2-31661-D411D035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:55:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393365323!8292847!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.172] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 16781 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 21:55:24 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f172.google.com) (74.125.82.172) by server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 21:55:24 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u56so969806wes.31 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UitKvLpG/JIR7JgUId3VRnMX12NwPMJVj7Ky2ewrGKo=; b=C0KV40mdAX6AVYpFzuSpS+hh1U9nbTRzwRGoxCrVxPQ2jRPbBeJeffrvKnhIpyo68X EPySDgeMbpOj/EIGRKkl3Vz1IqEU3UHtebEvYewxhCIzYt9FpQPNC2h6AZutmZ/hJaF4 3DCpiXMyP6Ke90K9YZyjlMrYqYR2tl8iSDgmg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UitKvLpG/JIR7JgUId3VRnMX12NwPMJVj7Ky2ewrGKo=; b=I+s5kHCJozxZks79GSedcLcNBOVQfPYmsPhLFWCgARWIsVKLhQynZZb57sCEWqQQo1 C+zC+/DDT9tjK6i9j4+z87/zs6MnE6L9+TmpRLjwBLrWQR//4nEuTU756ViF+9vl41TF xcIBem75UlF2x4/gODqKs9qzfXBbZaVfWv9o1a/7TZz+RqxBF5Kv4fj8LCnc/BPxVNmg V+4x6AoVjMiF/legpx2XqRZLrgYa7BzMEi/kOzM7JauVFjZ4Vr3TKP1ei/MmSCXLqzVt 6po2qAQJiXv6Xg5Y2MUuTgzp9qs6f6mCILUwCIcXpfwUMfIH7IDFIvrpysMusR9AmFOW t4Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUAwmBckXGqcrYQhJrT7LfiShjGWYfjPQo1cDUl4RjxzyfeTcJ+OvuPyiu6ov/O+m8V+aZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.207.15 with SMTP id ls15mr5108772wic.50.1393365323509; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:55:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: "Cui, Dexuan" Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0508615208920211029==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0508615208920211029== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c33b662684ac04f342256b --001a11c33b662684ac04f342256b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dexuan, I think this is a great idea. Might consider adding some context on the community development of XenGT and next steps for Xen Project at large for posting to blog.xen.org. Would that be possible? On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Hi all, > We announced an update to XenGT recently: > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01848.html > > I think it would be great for us to have a xenproject blog about it. > > I think we can just copy the existing blog : > https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-virtualization-xengt > > My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui. > > Any comment? > > Thanks! > -- Dexuan > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --001a11c33b662684ac04f342256b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dexuan,

I think this is a great idea= . Might consider adding some context on the community development of XenGT = and next steps for Xen Project at large for posting to blog.xen.org.

Would that be possible?


<= /div>


On= Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Cui, Dexuan <dexuan.cui@intel.com>= ; wrote:
Hi all,
We announced an update to XenGT recently:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/= msg01848.html

I think it would be great for us to have a xenproject blog about it.

I think we can just copy the existing blog :
https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-vir= tualization-xengt

My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui.

Any comment?

Thanks!
-- Dexuan


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--001a11c33b662684ac04f342256b-- --===============0508615208920211029== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0508615208920211029==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Feb 25 21:55:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:55:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPyI-0000kj-Vg; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:55:26 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPyI-0000kb-00 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:55:26 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:17687] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id EE/A2-31661-D411D035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:55:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393365323!8292847!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.172] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.4 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 16781 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 21:55:24 -0000 Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f172.google.com) (74.125.82.172) by server-15.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 21:55:24 -0000 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u56so969806wes.31 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UitKvLpG/JIR7JgUId3VRnMX12NwPMJVj7Ky2ewrGKo=; b=C0KV40mdAX6AVYpFzuSpS+hh1U9nbTRzwRGoxCrVxPQ2jRPbBeJeffrvKnhIpyo68X EPySDgeMbpOj/EIGRKkl3Vz1IqEU3UHtebEvYewxhCIzYt9FpQPNC2h6AZutmZ/hJaF4 3DCpiXMyP6Ke90K9YZyjlMrYqYR2tl8iSDgmg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UitKvLpG/JIR7JgUId3VRnMX12NwPMJVj7Ky2ewrGKo=; b=I+s5kHCJozxZks79GSedcLcNBOVQfPYmsPhLFWCgARWIsVKLhQynZZb57sCEWqQQo1 C+zC+/DDT9tjK6i9j4+z87/zs6MnE6L9+TmpRLjwBLrWQR//4nEuTU756ViF+9vl41TF xcIBem75UlF2x4/gODqKs9qzfXBbZaVfWv9o1a/7TZz+RqxBF5Kv4fj8LCnc/BPxVNmg V+4x6AoVjMiF/legpx2XqRZLrgYa7BzMEi/kOzM7JauVFjZ4Vr3TKP1ei/MmSCXLqzVt 6po2qAQJiXv6Xg5Y2MUuTgzp9qs6f6mCILUwCIcXpfwUMfIH7IDFIvrpysMusR9AmFOW t4Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUAwmBckXGqcrYQhJrT7LfiShjGWYfjPQo1cDUl4RjxzyfeTcJ+OvuPyiu6ov/O+m8V+aZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.207.15 with SMTP id ls15mr5108772wic.50.1393365323509; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:55:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: "Cui, Dexuan" Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0508615208920211029==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============0508615208920211029== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c33b662684ac04f342256b --001a11c33b662684ac04f342256b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dexuan, I think this is a great idea. Might consider adding some context on the community development of XenGT and next steps for Xen Project at large for posting to blog.xen.org. Would that be possible? On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Hi all, > We announced an update to XenGT recently: > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01848.html > > I think it would be great for us to have a xenproject blog about it. > > I think we can just copy the existing blog : > https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-virtualization-xengt > > My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui. > > Any comment? > > Thanks! > -- Dexuan > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --001a11c33b662684ac04f342256b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dexuan,

I think this is a great idea= . Might consider adding some context on the community development of XenGT = and next steps for Xen Project at large for posting to blog.xen.org.

Would that be possible?


<= /div>


On= Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Cui, Dexuan <dexuan.cui@intel.com>= ; wrote:
Hi all,
We announced an update to XenGT recently:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/= msg01848.html

I think it would be great for us to have a xenproject blog about it.

I think we can just copy the existing blog :
https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-vir= tualization-xengt

My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui.

Any comment?

Thanks!
-- Dexuan


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity



--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--001a11c33b662684ac04f342256b-- --===============0508615208920211029== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============0508615208920211029==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 26 01:08:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:08:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WISyn-0006fs-6l; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:08:09 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WISyd-0006fn-8X for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:07:59 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:31561] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 2C/DC-31661-E6E3D035; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:07:58 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dexuan.cui@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393376875!8297053!1 X-Originating-IP: [192.55.52.93] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTkyLjU1LjUyLjkzID0+IDMyNDY2NQ==\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 15310 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2014 01:07:56 -0000 Received: from mga11.intel.com (HELO mga11.intel.com) (192.55.52.93) by server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2014 01:07:56 -0000 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2014 17:07:33 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,543,1389772800"; d="scan'208,217";a="488108360" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.34]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2014 17:07:33 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.17.7) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:07:32 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.17.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:07:31 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.202]) by SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:07:29 +0800 From: "Cui, Dexuan" To: Sarah Conway Thread-Topic: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? Thread-Index: Ac8xzPVEnp4uLT4NSpiCArz7zg9SygAZEUKAABdgC2A= Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:07:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3040088836833028531==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3040088836833028531== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A25F549E4D43CD42B4C02DF47A191323110634C2SHSMSX103ccrcor_" --_000_A25F549E4D43CD42B4C02DF47A191323110634C2SHSMSX103ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sarah, Thanks for the good suggestion! We'll try to add the information in the blo= g. Thanks, -- Dexuan From: Sarah Conway [mailto:sconway@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 5:55 AM To: Cui, Dexuan Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Lars Kurth Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? Hi Dexuan, I think this is a great idea. Might consider adding some context on the com= munity development of XenGT and next steps for Xen Project at large for pos= ting to blog.xen.org. Would that be possible? On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Cui, Dexuan > wrote: Hi all, We announced an update to XenGT recently: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01848.html I think it would be great for us to have a xenproject blog about it. I think we can just copy the existing blog : https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-virtualization-xengt My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui. Any comment? Thanks! -- Dexuan _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --_000_A25F549E4D43CD42B4C02DF47A191323110634C2SHSMSX103ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Sarah,

Thanks for the good suggestion! We’ll try to add the information in = the blog.

 

Thanks,

-- Dexuan

=  

From: Sarah Conway [mailto:sconway@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26= , 2014 5:55 AM
To: Cui, Dexuan
Cc: publicity@lists.xenproje= ct.org; Lars Kurth
Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can= we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org?

 

Hi Dexuan,

 

I think this is a great idea. Might c= onsider adding some context on the community development of XenGT and next = steps for Xen Project at large for posting to blog.xen.org.

 

Would that be possible?

 

 

&= nbsp;

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Cui,= Dexuan <dexua= n.cui@intel.com> wrote:

Hi all,
We announced an update to XenGT recently:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/= msg01848.html

I think it would be great for us to have a xenprojec= t blog about it.

I think we can just copy the existing blog :
https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-vir= tualization-xengt

My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui.

Any comment?

Thanks!
-- Dexuan


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity



 

--

Sarah Conway=

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@li= nuxfoundation.org

(978) 578-5300  Cell<= /span>

Skype:  s= arah.k.conway

--_000_A25F549E4D43CD42B4C02DF47A191323110634C2SHSMSX103ccrcor_-- --===============3040088836833028531== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3040088836833028531==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 26 01:08:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:08:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WISyn-0006fs-6l; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:08:09 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WISyd-0006fn-8X for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:07:59 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:31561] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 2C/DC-31661-E6E3D035; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:07:58 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dexuan.cui@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393376875!8297053!1 X-Originating-IP: [192.55.52.93] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTkyLjU1LjUyLjkzID0+IDMyNDY2NQ==\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 15310 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2014 01:07:56 -0000 Received: from mga11.intel.com (HELO mga11.intel.com) (192.55.52.93) by server-4.tower-21.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2014 01:07:56 -0000 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2014 17:07:33 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,543,1389772800"; d="scan'208,217";a="488108360" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.34]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2014 17:07:33 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.17.7) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:07:32 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.17.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:07:31 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.202]) by SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:07:29 +0800 From: "Cui, Dexuan" To: Sarah Conway Thread-Topic: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? Thread-Index: Ac8xzPVEnp4uLT4NSpiCArz7zg9SygAZEUKAABdgC2A= Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:07:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3040088836833028531==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3040088836833028531== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A25F549E4D43CD42B4C02DF47A191323110634C2SHSMSX103ccrcor_" --_000_A25F549E4D43CD42B4C02DF47A191323110634C2SHSMSX103ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sarah, Thanks for the good suggestion! We'll try to add the information in the blo= g. Thanks, -- Dexuan From: Sarah Conway [mailto:sconway@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 5:55 AM To: Cui, Dexuan Cc: publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Lars Kurth Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? Hi Dexuan, I think this is a great idea. Might consider adding some context on the com= munity development of XenGT and next steps for Xen Project at large for pos= ting to blog.xen.org. Would that be possible? On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Cui, Dexuan > wrote: Hi all, We announced an update to XenGT recently: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01848.html I think it would be great for us to have a xenproject blog about it. I think we can just copy the existing blog : https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-virtualization-xengt My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui. Any comment? Thanks! -- Dexuan _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --_000_A25F549E4D43CD42B4C02DF47A191323110634C2SHSMSX103ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Sarah,

Thanks for the good suggestion! We’ll try to add the information in = the blog.

 

Thanks,

-- Dexuan

=  

From: Sarah Conway [mailto:sconway@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26= , 2014 5:55 AM
To: Cui, Dexuan
Cc: publicity@lists.xenproje= ct.org; Lars Kurth
Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can= we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org?

 

Hi Dexuan,

 

I think this is a great idea. Might c= onsider adding some context on the community development of XenGT and next = steps for Xen Project at large for posting to blog.xen.org.

 

Would that be possible?

 

 

&= nbsp;

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Cui,= Dexuan <dexua= n.cui@intel.com> wrote:

Hi all,
We announced an update to XenGT recently:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/= msg01848.html

I think it would be great for us to have a xenprojec= t blog about it.

I think we can just copy the existing blog :
https://01.org/xen/blogs/srclarkx/2013/graphics-vir= tualization-xengt

My registered username on blog.xen.org is Dexuan_Cui.

Any comment?

Thanks!
-- Dexuan


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ= icity



 

--

Sarah Conway=

PR Manager

The Linux Foundation
sconway@li= nuxfoundation.org

(978) 578-5300  Cell<= /span>

Skype:  s= arah.k.conway

--_000_A25F549E4D43CD42B4C02DF47A191323110634C2SHSMSX103ccrcor_-- --===============3040088836833028531== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3040088836833028531==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 26 11:10:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIcNY-0005L3-Vk; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:20 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIcNX-0005Kx-Ox for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:19 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:18889] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 00/79-31661-B9BCD035; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:19 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393413017!8430910!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9740 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2014 11:10:18 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Feb 2014 11:10:18 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,547,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="105871834" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2014 11:10:16 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:10:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1393413014.3921.3.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "Cui, Dexuan" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:10:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9050838572383335207==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9050838572383335207== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+UClpV9PAOjEj2AjjBzE" --=-+UClpV9PAOjEj2AjjBzE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2014-02-26 at 01:07 +0000, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Hi Sarah, >=20 > Thanks for the good suggestion! We=E2=80=99ll try to add the information = in > the blog. >=20 Hi Dexuan, I think what you have there is already quite good, and it will become even better with Sarah's suggested additions. So, publishing time-wise, let's see how busy the blog will be for the upcoming Xen 4.4 release in the next weeks... In the meanwhile, have you registered on our Wordpress? Do you need me to make you an editor, so that you can start putting a draft together? Let me know. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-+UClpV9PAOjEj2AjjBzE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlMNy5YACgkQk4XaBE3IOsR6IACfTktC901IFHO/s8xt1P6lU7tO A64An3AC9LliyV89okY2EuM5Au3uFuTx =vnzw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+UClpV9PAOjEj2AjjBzE-- --===============9050838572383335207== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9050838572383335207==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 26 11:10:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIcNY-0005L3-Vk; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:20 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIcNX-0005Kx-Ox for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:19 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:18889] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 00/79-31661-B9BCD035; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:19 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393413017!8430910!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 9740 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2014 11:10:18 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Feb 2014 11:10:18 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,547,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="105871834" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2014 11:10:16 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:10:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1393413014.3921.3.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "Cui, Dexuan" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:10:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9050838572383335207==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9050838572383335207== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+UClpV9PAOjEj2AjjBzE" --=-+UClpV9PAOjEj2AjjBzE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2014-02-26 at 01:07 +0000, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Hi Sarah, >=20 > Thanks for the good suggestion! We=E2=80=99ll try to add the information = in > the blog. >=20 Hi Dexuan, I think what you have there is already quite good, and it will become even better with Sarah's suggested additions. So, publishing time-wise, let's see how busy the blog will be for the upcoming Xen 4.4 release in the next weeks... In the meanwhile, have you registered on our Wordpress? Do you need me to make you an editor, so that you can start putting a draft together? Let me know. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-+UClpV9PAOjEj2AjjBzE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlMNy5YACgkQk4XaBE3IOsR6IACfTktC901IFHO/s8xt1P6lU7tO A64An3AC9LliyV89okY2EuM5Au3uFuTx =vnzw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+UClpV9PAOjEj2AjjBzE-- --===============9050838572383335207== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9050838572383335207==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 26 11:13:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:13:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIcQC-0005O3-7g; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:13:04 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIcQA-0005Nx-Or for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:13:02 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:4379] by server-14.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 5D/67-08196-E3CCD035; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:13:02 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dexuan.cui@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393413180!1502885!1 X-Originating-IP: [134.134.136.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTM0LjEzNC4xMzYuMjQgPT4gMzkwOTcx\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11342 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2014 11:13:01 -0000 Received: from mga09.intel.com (HELO mga09.intel.com) (134.134.136.24) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2014 11:13:01 -0000 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2014 03:08:37 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,547,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="490041833" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.228]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2014 03:12:59 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.8) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:12:59 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:12:59 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.202]) by SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:12:56 +0800 From: "Cui, Dexuan" To: Dario Faggioli Thread-Topic: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? Thread-Index: Ac8xzPVEnp4uLT4NSpiCArz7zg9SygAZEUKAABdgC2AABGJ4AAAQ0nzA Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:12:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1393413014.3921.3.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1393413014.3921.3.camel@Solace> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org RGFyaW8gRmFnZ2lvbGkgd3JvdGUgb24gMjAxNC0wMi0yNjoNCj4gT24gbWVyLCAyMDE0LTAyLTI2 IGF0IDAxOjA3ICswMDAwLCBDdWksIERleHVhbiB3cm90ZToNCj4+IEhpIFNhcmFoLA0KPj4gDQo+ PiBUaGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBnb29kIHN1Z2dlc3Rpb24hIFdl4oCZbGwgdHJ5IHRvIGFkZCB0aGUg aW5mb3JtYXRpb24gaW4NCj4+IHRoZSBibG9nLg0KPj4gDQo+IEhpIERleHVhbiwNCj4gDQo+IEkg dGhpbmsgd2hhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZSB0aGVyZSBpcyBhbHJlYWR5IHF1aXRlIGdvb2QsIGFuZCBpdCB3 aWxsIGJlY29tZQ0KPiBldmVuIGJldHRlciB3aXRoIFNhcmFoJ3Mgc3VnZ2VzdGVkIGFkZGl0aW9u cy4NCj4gDQo+IFNvLCBwdWJsaXNoaW5nIHRpbWUtd2lzZSwgbGV0J3Mgc2VlIGhvdyBidXN5IHRo ZSBibG9nIHdpbGwgYmUgZm9yIHRoZQ0KPiB1cGNvbWluZyBYZW4gNC40IHJlbGVhc2UgaW4gdGhl IG5leHQgd2Vla3MuLi4gSW4gdGhlIG1lYW53aGlsZSwgaGF2ZSB5b3UNCk9rLg0KDQo+IHJlZ2lz dGVyZWQgb24gb3VyIFdvcmRwcmVzcz8gRG8geW91IG5lZWQgbWUgdG8gbWFrZSB5b3UgYW4gZWRp dG9yLCBzbw0KWWVzLiBNeSByZWdpc3RlcmVkIG5hbWUgaXMgRGV4Y3Vhbl9DdWkuDQo+IHRoYXQg eW91IGNhbiBzdGFydCBwdXR0aW5nIGEgZHJhZnQgdG9nZXRoZXI/DQpZZXMsIHBsZWFzZS4NCg0K VGhhbmtzLA0KLS0gRGV4dWFuDQoNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX18KUHVibGljaXR5IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApQdWJsaWNpdHlAbGlzdHMueGVu cHJvamVjdC5vcmcKaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLnhlbnByb2plY3Qub3JnL2NnaS1iaW4vbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9wdWJsaWNpdHkK From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Feb 26 11:13:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:13:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIcQC-0005O3-7g; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:13:04 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIcQA-0005Nx-Or for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:13:02 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:4379] by server-14.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 5D/67-08196-E3CCD035; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:13:02 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dexuan.cui@intel.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393413180!1502885!1 X-Originating-IP: [134.134.136.24] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTM0LjEzNC4xMzYuMjQgPT4gMzkwOTcx\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11342 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2014 11:13:01 -0000 Received: from mga09.intel.com (HELO mga09.intel.com) (134.134.136.24) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2014 11:13:01 -0000 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2014 03:08:37 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,547,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="490041833" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.228]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2014 03:12:59 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.8) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:12:59 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:12:59 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.202]) by SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:12:56 +0800 From: "Cui, Dexuan" To: Dario Faggioli Thread-Topic: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? Thread-Index: Ac8xzPVEnp4uLT4NSpiCArz7zg9SygAZEUKAABdgC2AABGJ4AAAQ0nzA Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:12:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1393413014.3921.3.camel@Solace> In-Reply-To: <1393413014.3921.3.camel@Solace> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org RGFyaW8gRmFnZ2lvbGkgd3JvdGUgb24gMjAxNC0wMi0yNjoNCj4gT24gbWVyLCAyMDE0LTAyLTI2 IGF0IDAxOjA3ICswMDAwLCBDdWksIERleHVhbiB3cm90ZToNCj4+IEhpIFNhcmFoLA0KPj4gDQo+ PiBUaGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBnb29kIHN1Z2dlc3Rpb24hIFdl4oCZbGwgdHJ5IHRvIGFkZCB0aGUg aW5mb3JtYXRpb24gaW4NCj4+IHRoZSBibG9nLg0KPj4gDQo+IEhpIERleHVhbiwNCj4gDQo+IEkg dGhpbmsgd2hhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZSB0aGVyZSBpcyBhbHJlYWR5IHF1aXRlIGdvb2QsIGFuZCBpdCB3 aWxsIGJlY29tZQ0KPiBldmVuIGJldHRlciB3aXRoIFNhcmFoJ3Mgc3VnZ2VzdGVkIGFkZGl0aW9u cy4NCj4gDQo+IFNvLCBwdWJsaXNoaW5nIHRpbWUtd2lzZSwgbGV0J3Mgc2VlIGhvdyBidXN5IHRo ZSBibG9nIHdpbGwgYmUgZm9yIHRoZQ0KPiB1cGNvbWluZyBYZW4gNC40IHJlbGVhc2UgaW4gdGhl IG5leHQgd2Vla3MuLi4gSW4gdGhlIG1lYW53aGlsZSwgaGF2ZSB5b3UNCk9rLg0KDQo+IHJlZ2lz dGVyZWQgb24gb3VyIFdvcmRwcmVzcz8gRG8geW91IG5lZWQgbWUgdG8gbWFrZSB5b3UgYW4gZWRp dG9yLCBzbw0KWWVzLiBNeSByZWdpc3RlcmVkIG5hbWUgaXMgRGV4Y3Vhbl9DdWkuDQo+IHRoYXQg eW91IGNhbiBzdGFydCBwdXR0aW5nIGEgZHJhZnQgdG9nZXRoZXI/DQpZZXMsIHBsZWFzZS4NCg0K VGhhbmtzLA0KLS0gRGV4dWFuDQoNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX18KUHVibGljaXR5IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApQdWJsaWNpdHlAbGlzdHMueGVu cHJvamVjdC5vcmcKaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLnhlbnByb2plY3Qub3JnL2NnaS1iaW4vbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9wdWJsaWNpdHkK From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 08:34:33 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIwQK-0000hp-R9; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:32 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIwQJ-0000hk-F1 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:31 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:16982] by server-9.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id B4/19-24895-698FE035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:30 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393490060!7123320!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTg5MzkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 28542 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 08:34:21 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 08:34:21 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,553,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="106199958" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 08:34:19 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 03:34:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1393490056.3921.11.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "Cui, Dexuan" Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:34:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1393413014.3921.3.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3845324763472803182==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3845324763472803182== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AUP/Oj/RvY7ozy8cKKcn" --=-AUP/Oj/RvY7ozy8cKKcn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2014-02-26 at 11:12 +0000, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-26: > > registered on our Wordpress? Do you need me to make you an editor, so > Yes. My registered name is Dexcuan_Cui. > Found it, you're an editor. :-) > > that you can start putting a draft together? > Yes, please. >=20 Go ahead at your ease and convenience. Ping us when the draft is ready. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-AUP/Oj/RvY7ozy8cKKcn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlMO+IkACgkQk4XaBE3IOsThkQCfSj+NchIAGJb696sB97PAVM0Z VPYAn1AQ80cdb3oLnQhMVSRQsOEkwy3s =c04V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AUP/Oj/RvY7ozy8cKKcn-- --===============3845324763472803182== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3845324763472803182==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 08:34:33 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIwQK-0000hp-R9; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:32 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WIwQJ-0000hk-F1 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:31 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:16982] by server-9.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id B4/19-24895-698FE035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:30 +0000 X-Env-Sender: dario.faggioli@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393490060!7123320!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNTg5MzkgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 28542 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 08:34:21 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 08:34:21 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,553,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="106199958" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 08:34:19 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 03:34:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1393490056.3921.11.camel@Solace> From: Dario Faggioli To: "Cui, Dexuan" Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:34:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1393413014.3921.3.camel@Solace> Organization: Citrix X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-1.fc20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: Lars Kurth , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Can we have a XenGT blog on blog.xen.org? X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3845324763472803182==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3845324763472803182== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AUP/Oj/RvY7ozy8cKKcn" --=-AUP/Oj/RvY7ozy8cKKcn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On mer, 2014-02-26 at 11:12 +0000, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Dario Faggioli wrote on 2014-02-26: > > registered on our Wordpress? Do you need me to make you an editor, so > Yes. My registered name is Dexcuan_Cui. > Found it, you're an editor. :-) > > that you can start putting a draft together? > Yes, please. >=20 Go ahead at your ease and convenience. Ping us when the draft is ready. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-AUP/Oj/RvY7ozy8cKKcn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlMO+IkACgkQk4XaBE3IOsThkQCfSj+NchIAGJb696sB97PAVM0Z VPYAn1AQ80cdb3oLnQhMVSRQsOEkwy3s =c04V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AUP/Oj/RvY7ozy8cKKcn-- --===============3845324763472803182== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3845324763472803182==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 15:08:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:08:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2ZD-0005D0-9I; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:08:07 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2ZC-0005CY-DY for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:08:07 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:42701] by server-15.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A7/5D-19263-5D45F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:08:05 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393513684!4592364!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.42] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.7 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3591 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 15:08:04 -0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:08:04 -0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id x13so2970213wgg.25 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HrEHgGOack/ykf0nGePfKm+oyeGVKzWDnsqYQ2UjSGU=; b=Iz3HGKBWF3sA/XNbeLrRBShWItW1VraU06M8JXLY179vqq1tzBubuJVnbnGGCWoawZ FC8C3f8lgf3O4SE4+Ry3vyDT/AMtSZazyf19anHg7Aa6u54j0W9sJ9Bye+R5DcrysuNE 6BXTQs9JuRRjlaFl/NRp6SkDQb1A1Fe2K8iC0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HrEHgGOack/ykf0nGePfKm+oyeGVKzWDnsqYQ2UjSGU=; b=gUt7pbkMk0o8HjNP9lM8qerwP53b9zLPHpn9h1YcMKyOg0D/02Ar68YPoX4WcG6fLm iamxtio2Bzd40UmWxBAa5hcBXiqdSLX30vhIvzL3S7k2QIjpsCwAx8f7s733Woxl6cgs wIygBjQRoS+1ppkODlXYsL+5OveOBWgam2C03c+9YMca7Ly0Kgyy0272ansuqxW6rhXt lYC/c0vZPkQ3V3KgUPwgsF+6ZIzpSBbk6QFdf+ulNY8FfcTtqssin4y5/1R+hRm34K/+ 4JJRKL6WMIdSiEg4dvEk/bjKOQcnHmds2SGefhBqNMterqYoDWaGZdJ8EobdmvODWcxr kFnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluyG0cabB6xb4m+SJbEeDOaQNTdlVK5geEj/qMihbTMTGEY0QUAOOenyViFIjqcvuo1Y6m MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.200.40 with SMTP id jp8mr1154757wjc.51.1393513684278; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:08:04 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3839378092977349233==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3839378092977349233== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b8740ba2432ed04f364b0b1 --047d7b8740ba2432ed04f364b0b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document: 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions. 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time. I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible. Thanks, -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7b8740ba2432ed04f364b0b1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release= concise, I've removed the following features from that document:=A0

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- = =A0XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on= the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml= language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux = distributions. =A0

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in ups= tream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ampl= e Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any= other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assi= gned to write this yet?=A0

It would be useful to include a ur= l to this blog in our release if possible.=A0

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation=
sconway@linuxfoundation.= org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7b8740ba2432ed04f364b0b1-- --===============3839378092977349233== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3839378092977349233==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 15:08:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:08:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2ZD-0005D0-9I; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:08:07 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2ZC-0005CY-DY for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:08:07 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:42701] by server-15.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A7/5D-19263-5D45F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:08:05 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1393513684!4592364!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.42] X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.7 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3591 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 15:08:04 -0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by server-9.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:08:04 -0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id x13so2970213wgg.25 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HrEHgGOack/ykf0nGePfKm+oyeGVKzWDnsqYQ2UjSGU=; b=Iz3HGKBWF3sA/XNbeLrRBShWItW1VraU06M8JXLY179vqq1tzBubuJVnbnGGCWoawZ FC8C3f8lgf3O4SE4+Ry3vyDT/AMtSZazyf19anHg7Aa6u54j0W9sJ9Bye+R5DcrysuNE 6BXTQs9JuRRjlaFl/NRp6SkDQb1A1Fe2K8iC0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HrEHgGOack/ykf0nGePfKm+oyeGVKzWDnsqYQ2UjSGU=; b=gUt7pbkMk0o8HjNP9lM8qerwP53b9zLPHpn9h1YcMKyOg0D/02Ar68YPoX4WcG6fLm iamxtio2Bzd40UmWxBAa5hcBXiqdSLX30vhIvzL3S7k2QIjpsCwAx8f7s733Woxl6cgs wIygBjQRoS+1ppkODlXYsL+5OveOBWgam2C03c+9YMca7Ly0Kgyy0272ansuqxW6rhXt lYC/c0vZPkQ3V3KgUPwgsF+6ZIzpSBbk6QFdf+ulNY8FfcTtqssin4y5/1R+hRm34K/+ 4JJRKL6WMIdSiEg4dvEk/bjKOQcnHmds2SGefhBqNMterqYoDWaGZdJ8EobdmvODWcxr kFnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluyG0cabB6xb4m+SJbEeDOaQNTdlVK5geEj/qMihbTMTGEY0QUAOOenyViFIjqcvuo1Y6m MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.200.40 with SMTP id jp8mr1154757wjc.51.1393513684278; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:08:04 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3839378092977349233==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============3839378092977349233== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b8740ba2432ed04f364b0b1 --047d7b8740ba2432ed04f364b0b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document: 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions. 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time. I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible. Thanks, -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --047d7b8740ba2432ed04f364b0b1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release= concise, I've removed the following features from that document:=A0

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- = =A0XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on= the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml= language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux = distributions. =A0

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in ups= tream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ampl= e Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any= other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assi= gned to write this yet?=A0

It would be useful to include a ur= l to this blog in our release if possible.=A0

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation=
sconway@linuxfoundation.= org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--047d7b8740ba2432ed04f364b0b1-- --===============3839378092977349233== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============3839378092977349233==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 15:10:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2bn-0005cq-BE; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2bl-0005cb-Bn for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:36707] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 00/55-11539-4755F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393513842!8807255!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13938 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 15:10:43 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:10:43 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,555,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="106296959" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:10:42 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:10:41 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2bh-0003mM-Hq; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:41 +0000 Message-ID: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:36 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" References: In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8936630157896818427==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8936630157896818427== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050207090601040602040204" --------------050207090601040602040204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog. When do you need the URL by? -George On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi all, > > To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following > features from that document: > > 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and Mirage > OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml > language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml > language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and > Linux distributions. > > 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration > > 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub > > I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review > time and pitching ahead of time. > > I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and > any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is > anyone assigned to write this yet? > > It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if > possible. > > Thanks, > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------050207090601040602040204 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog.

When do you need the URL by?

 -George

On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document: 

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects --  XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions.  

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? 

It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible. 

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------050207090601040602040204-- --===============8936630157896818427== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8936630157896818427==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 15:10:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2bn-0005cq-BE; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2bl-0005cb-Bn for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:36707] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 00/55-11539-4755F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393513842!8807255!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13938 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 15:10:43 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-14.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:10:43 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,555,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="106296959" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:10:42 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:10:41 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2bh-0003mM-Hq; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:41 +0000 Message-ID: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:10:36 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" References: In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8936630157896818427==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============8936630157896818427== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050207090601040602040204" --------------050207090601040602040204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog. When do you need the URL by? -George On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi all, > > To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following > features from that document: > > 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and Mirage > OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml > language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml > language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and > Linux distributions. > > 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration > > 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub > > I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review > time and pitching ahead of time. > > I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and > any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is > anyone assigned to write this yet? > > It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if > possible. > > Thanks, > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------050207090601040602040204 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog.

When do you need the URL by?

 -George

On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document: 

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects --  XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions.  

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? 

It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible. 

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------050207090601040602040204-- --===============8936630157896818427== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============8936630157896818427==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 15:16:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2hR-0005lV-B2; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:37 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2hQ-0005lK-8O for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:36 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:48294] by server-10.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 3D/DC-10711-3D65F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:35 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393514194!7246639!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.180] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 18126 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 15:16:34 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f180.google.com) (209.85.212.180) by server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:16:34 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hm4so3621945wib.1 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:16:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Uah3FzOmWhJa45WsV0qYcIA9azpTAvD3ihVhNnbUfU8=; b=QuTH4AKJMWuD+zB5ENeCCciX33F8uKQ8aYsIH+ZCq0SahewJ9ok2TZ22zlx8pxjLjY kIf1FPcL80YxspaXrQR/xCUoQjvBqmvQn1NqaqLIxn3xxMRerxdha+ZEzhERJEsMYN8z DRbhrBJzQPCi3vE148JJUW1fCLSkVWi/lT5vo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Uah3FzOmWhJa45WsV0qYcIA9azpTAvD3ihVhNnbUfU8=; b=Fe+qVkX11i3jXlxQGfux+xRgir+0L4EMglIMOzxQa6zz2fpLCC9oFAtU7uLe+Ij6Fc KXqj6cLoRf18c3+wz44+8h9K7BthqpZBsSAxCtvud3U6tbNm2pZjXOsPlpdSYwCeO0/R R0ll8bOY2OinuPAQrHWsUyRJDyHCKS7TMTyJqjM1czRE2RFl9gWB0Mk40TDMGcCwJFU0 fw07UpLJAUAMjtryBTlYmf7hUHUsecQjCnpwAZuYLOzSzvU7c+AicIc4cK65GcU/ZZnY uIYBYoV+0szr67ya1F53M0tbOny9NELAD4HJCcQeGc2tZEuUbjyaDF35hBOvE2KagN9o O+cg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDQZdCn7BaXMJaynDLSmJVAPY909UACtr3gYMmEPUHWLcsMtrx1qkHOSzDO9Gls3UTDTaD MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.161.136 with SMTP id xs8mr3147060wjb.56.1393514193910; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:16:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> References: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:16:33 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: George Dunlap Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7962202413583427269==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============7962202413583427269== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc30a84996804f364cea9 --089e013cc30a84996804f364cea9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi George, Thanks for updating me. I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work? Thanks, On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for > writing up the blog. > > When do you need the URL by? > > -George > > > On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > Hi all, > > To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features > from that document: > > 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and Mirage OS, > both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language > bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings > improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions. > > 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration > > 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub > > I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time > and pitching ahead of time. > > I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any > other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone > assigned to write this yet? > > It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if > possible. > > Thanks, > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing listPublicity@lists.xenproject.orghttp://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e013cc30a84996804f364cea9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi George,

Thanks for updating me.

I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9t= h. Does that work?

Thanks,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dun= lap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog.

When do you need the URL by?

=A0-George


On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
=20
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document:=A0

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- =A0XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions. =A0

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet?=A0

It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible.=A0

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici=
ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ=
icity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--089e013cc30a84996804f364cea9-- --===============7962202413583427269== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============7962202413583427269==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 15:16:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2hR-0005lV-B2; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:37 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2hQ-0005lK-8O for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:36 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:48294] by server-10.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 3D/DC-10711-3D65F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:35 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393514194!7246639!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.180] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 18126 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 15:16:34 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f180.google.com) (209.85.212.180) by server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:16:34 -0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hm4so3621945wib.1 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:16:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Uah3FzOmWhJa45WsV0qYcIA9azpTAvD3ihVhNnbUfU8=; b=QuTH4AKJMWuD+zB5ENeCCciX33F8uKQ8aYsIH+ZCq0SahewJ9ok2TZ22zlx8pxjLjY kIf1FPcL80YxspaXrQR/xCUoQjvBqmvQn1NqaqLIxn3xxMRerxdha+ZEzhERJEsMYN8z DRbhrBJzQPCi3vE148JJUW1fCLSkVWi/lT5vo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Uah3FzOmWhJa45WsV0qYcIA9azpTAvD3ihVhNnbUfU8=; b=Fe+qVkX11i3jXlxQGfux+xRgir+0L4EMglIMOzxQa6zz2fpLCC9oFAtU7uLe+Ij6Fc KXqj6cLoRf18c3+wz44+8h9K7BthqpZBsSAxCtvud3U6tbNm2pZjXOsPlpdSYwCeO0/R R0ll8bOY2OinuPAQrHWsUyRJDyHCKS7TMTyJqjM1czRE2RFl9gWB0Mk40TDMGcCwJFU0 fw07UpLJAUAMjtryBTlYmf7hUHUsecQjCnpwAZuYLOzSzvU7c+AicIc4cK65GcU/ZZnY uIYBYoV+0szr67ya1F53M0tbOny9NELAD4HJCcQeGc2tZEuUbjyaDF35hBOvE2KagN9o O+cg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDQZdCn7BaXMJaynDLSmJVAPY909UACtr3gYMmEPUHWLcsMtrx1qkHOSzDO9Gls3UTDTaD MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.161.136 with SMTP id xs8mr3147060wjb.56.1393514193910; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:16:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> References: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:16:33 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: George Dunlap Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7962202413583427269==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============7962202413583427269== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc30a84996804f364cea9 --089e013cc30a84996804f364cea9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi George, Thanks for updating me. I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work? Thanks, On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for > writing up the blog. > > When do you need the URL by? > > -George > > > On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > Hi all, > > To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features > from that document: > > 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and Mirage OS, > both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language > bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings > improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions. > > 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration > > 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub > > I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time > and pitching ahead of time. > > I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any > other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone > assigned to write this yet? > > It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if > possible. > > Thanks, > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing listPublicity@lists.xenproject.orghttp://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > -- Sarah Conway PR Manager The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e013cc30a84996804f364cea9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi George,

Thanks for updating me.

I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9t= h. Does that work?

Thanks,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dun= lap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog.

When do you need the URL by?

=A0-George


On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
=20
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document:=A0

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- =A0XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions. =A0

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet?=A0

It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible.=A0

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici=
ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publ=
icity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundat= ion
sco= nway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =A0Cell
Skype: =A0sarah.k.conway
--089e013cc30a84996804f364cea9-- --===============7962202413583427269== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============7962202413583427269==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 15:31:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2w5-0006WC-MV; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:45 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2w4-0006Vz-S8 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:45 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:39178] by server-8.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 96/76-18529-06A5F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393515101!7269198!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1278 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 15:31:42 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-8.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:31:42 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,555,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="106306018" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:31:24 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:31:23 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2vj-000480-3R; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:23 +0000 Message-ID: <530F5A46.9070404@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:18 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway References: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6020170615323518254==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6020170615323518254== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000300070904000408000001" --------------000300070904000408000001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, I think that should be fine, I think. I'll start writing it this afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what the final link will actually look like. :-) -George On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi George, > > Thanks for updating me. > > I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work? > > Thanks, > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap > > wrote: > > I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for > writing up the blog. > > When do you need the URL by? > > -George > > > On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following >> features from that document: >> >> 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and >> Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on >> the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of >> the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, >> Mirage OS and Linux distributions. >> >> 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration >> >> 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub >> >> I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle >> review time and pitching ahead of time. >> >> I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items >> and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen >> Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? >> >> It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release >> if possible. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Sarah Conway >> PR Manager >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> Skype: sarah.k.conway >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway --------------000300070904000408000001 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Yes, I think that should be fine, I think.  I'll start writing it this afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what the final link will actually look like. :-)

 -George

On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi George,

Thanks for updating me.

I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work?

Thanks,


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog.

When do you need the URL by?

 -George


On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document: 

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects --  XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions.  

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? 

It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible. 

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway

--------------000300070904000408000001-- --===============6020170615323518254== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6020170615323518254==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 15:31:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2w5-0006WC-MV; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:45 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2w4-0006Vz-S8 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:45 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:39178] by server-8.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 96/76-18529-06A5F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1393515101!7269198!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1278 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 15:31:42 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-8.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:31:42 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,555,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="106306018" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:31:24 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:31:23 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ2vj-000480-3R; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:23 +0000 Message-ID: <530F5A46.9070404@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:31:18 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway References: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6020170615323518254==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============6020170615323518254== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000300070904000408000001" --------------000300070904000408000001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, I think that should be fine, I think. I'll start writing it this afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what the final link will actually look like. :-) -George On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > Hi George, > > Thanks for updating me. > > I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work? > > Thanks, > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap > > wrote: > > I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for > writing up the blog. > > When do you need the URL by? > > -George > > > On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following >> features from that document: >> >> 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and >> Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on >> the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of >> the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, >> Mirage OS and Linux distributions. >> >> 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration >> >> 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub >> >> I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle >> review time and pitching ahead of time. >> >> I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items >> and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen >> Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? >> >> It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release >> if possible. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Sarah Conway >> PR Manager >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> Skype: sarah.k.conway >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway --------------000300070904000408000001 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Yes, I think that should be fine, I think.  I'll start writing it this afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what the final link will actually look like. :-)

 -George

On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi George,

Thanks for updating me.

I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work?

Thanks,


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog.

When do you need the URL by?

 -George


On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document: 

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects --  XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions.  

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? 

It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible. 

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway

--------------000300070904000408000001-- --===============6020170615323518254== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============6020170615323518254==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 17:31:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ4np-0003sL-C7; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:21 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ4no-0003sD-9d for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:20 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:64945] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id FA/16-11539-7667F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:19 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393522267!8843367!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDc3MzEgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 18571 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 17:31:08 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 17:31:08 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,556,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="106354148" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 17:31:07 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:31:06 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ4na-0005l3-G2; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:06 +0000 Message-ID: <530F7655.2020605@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:01 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway References: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> <530F5A46.9070404@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <530F5A46.9070404@eu.citrix.com> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2330477766814465583==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============2330477766814465583== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030907010800080809000303" --------------030907010800080809000303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit BTW, I put the checklist wiki page into a Google doc so that we could more easily track what had been done, and who was responsible for the rest of it. I basically have IanJ, Russ, Sarah, and myself as doing everything: (Request access) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ox2D7BKNpgN65XlAYXpXkz26XUb8hAPxcVBpqiVguWI Russ, are you good to do all the website stuff marked on there? -George On 02/27/2014 03:31 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > Yes, I think that should be fine, I think. I'll start writing it this > afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what > the final link will actually look like. :-) > > -George > > On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> Hi George, >> >> Thanks for updating me. >> >> I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap >> > wrote: >> >> I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for >> writing up the blog. >> >> When do you need the URL by? >> >> -George >> >> >> On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following >>> features from that document: >>> >>> 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and >>> Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on >>> the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of >>> the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, >>> Mirage OS and Linux distributions. >>> >>> 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration >>> >>> 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub >>> >>> I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle >>> review time and pitching ahead of time. >>> >>> I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items >>> and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen >>> Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? >>> >>> It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release >>> if possible. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- >>> Sarah Conway >>> PR Manager >>> The Linux Foundation >>> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >>> (978) 578-5300 Cell >>> Skype: sarah.k.conway >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Publicity mailing list >>> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >>> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sarah Conway >> PR Manager >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------030907010800080809000303 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
BTW, I put the checklist wiki page into a Google doc so that we could more easily track what had been done, and who was responsible for the rest of it.

I basically have IanJ, Russ, Sarah, and myself as doing everything:  (Request access)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ox2D7BKNpgN65XlAYXpXkz26XUb8hAPxcVBpqiVguWI

Russ, are you good to do all the website stuff marked on there?

 -George

On 02/27/2014 03:31 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
Yes, I think that should be fine, I think.  I'll start writing it this afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what the final link will actually look like. :-)

 -George

On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi George,

Thanks for updating me.

I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work?

Thanks,


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog.

When do you need the URL by?

 -George


On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document: 

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects --  XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions.  

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? 

It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible. 

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway



_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------030907010800080809000303-- --===============2330477766814465583== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============2330477766814465583==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Feb 27 17:31:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ4np-0003sL-C7; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:21 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ4no-0003sD-9d for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:20 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35:64945] by server-3.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id FA/16-11539-7667F035; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:19 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1393522267!8843367!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, spamassassin: , async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNDc3MzEgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 18571 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2014 17:31:08 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-16.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2014 17:31:08 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,556,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="106354148" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 17:31:07 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:31:06 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ4na-0005l3-G2; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:06 +0000 Message-ID: <530F7655.2020605@eu.citrix.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:31:01 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sarah Conway References: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> <530F5A46.9070404@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <530F5A46.9070404@eu.citrix.com> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2330477766814465583==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============2330477766814465583== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030907010800080809000303" --------------030907010800080809000303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit BTW, I put the checklist wiki page into a Google doc so that we could more easily track what had been done, and who was responsible for the rest of it. I basically have IanJ, Russ, Sarah, and myself as doing everything: (Request access) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ox2D7BKNpgN65XlAYXpXkz26XUb8hAPxcVBpqiVguWI Russ, are you good to do all the website stuff marked on there? -George On 02/27/2014 03:31 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > Yes, I think that should be fine, I think. I'll start writing it this > afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what > the final link will actually look like. :-) > > -George > > On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> Hi George, >> >> Thanks for updating me. >> >> I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap >> > wrote: >> >> I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for >> writing up the blog. >> >> When do you need the URL by? >> >> -George >> >> >> On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following >>> features from that document: >>> >>> 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and >>> Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on >>> the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of >>> the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, >>> Mirage OS and Linux distributions. >>> >>> 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration >>> >>> 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub >>> >>> I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle >>> review time and pitching ahead of time. >>> >>> I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items >>> and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen >>> Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? >>> >>> It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release >>> if possible. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- >>> Sarah Conway >>> PR Manager >>> The Linux Foundation >>> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >>> (978) 578-5300 Cell >>> Skype: sarah.k.conway >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Publicity mailing list >>> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >>> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sarah Conway >> PR Manager >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --------------030907010800080809000303 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
BTW, I put the checklist wiki page into a Google doc so that we could more easily track what had been done, and who was responsible for the rest of it.

I basically have IanJ, Russ, Sarah, and myself as doing everything:  (Request access)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ox2D7BKNpgN65XlAYXpXkz26XUb8hAPxcVBpqiVguWI

Russ, are you good to do all the website stuff marked on there?

 -George

On 02/27/2014 03:31 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
Yes, I think that should be fine, I think.  I'll start writing it this afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what the final link will actually look like. :-)

 -George

On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi George,

Thanks for updating me.

I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work?

Thanks,


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing up the blog.

When do you need the URL by?

 -George


On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote:
Hi all,

To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features from that document: 

1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects --  XAPI and Mirage OS, both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions.  

2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration

3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub

I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time and pitching ahead of time.

I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone assigned to write this yet? 

It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if possible. 

Thanks,

--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




--
Sarah Conway
PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway



_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

--------------030907010800080809000303-- --===============2330477766814465583== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============2330477766814465583==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 28 18:27:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJS9z-0001g3-Av; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJS9x-0001fy-MM for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:29772] by server-2.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 79/20-23037-025D0135; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: russell.pavlicek.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1393612053!3026784!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.217.170] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, RCVD_BY_IP,spamassassin: ,async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjAwNjEgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13600 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2014 18:27:34 -0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f170.google.com) (209.85.217.170) by server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Feb 2014 18:27:34 -0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id s7so2983536lbd.1 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SKVlJCPK1ZnwaPyNwsB0NpI0eBkeqQdyA8JFtpLzLWg=; b=FaRHFNjNVN3Ro9N043Jw9L3LQ7kLmW69uS6yf3nkxvEYwxQUzMk3vorU0VpF0jUND9 mdZlAitIJOp0sl1dDOiJoVf8ZdMIrWsaDJ9wZtTDiY/ymQjhX666kik6IqMDpQnJSHlN u9BI6ARILSEd8Zpms8Dva+kQpxyhxeKeGKaUCIdwKZQeIgQcDyxT4zbv+slKXWHjOxST CJk6gU872OEfkmdxZx2Ce0GtPt0ptRYFfzGCtPHwmFEj5Z6fXhFqm/oxU/eS1HjOV7ne 02cM8xzb+q7r+hNn78tQTDZM3kkdyORUsAS40vHGw40gx9MEVqAfBDvCxso+NS727Owi iwWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.205.11 with SMTP id lc11mr12383828lac.29.1393612053358; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.72.72 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530F7655.2020605@eu.citrix.com> References: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> <530F5A46.9070404@eu.citrix.com> <530F7655.2020605@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:27:33 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PKYoMA4gmeaMsfv82IDkOS8g4SM Message-ID: From: Russ Pavlicek To: George Dunlap Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org George, I should be able to get all the website stuff done. Thanks, Russ On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:31 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > BTW, I put the checklist wiki page into a Google doc so that we could more > easily track what had been done, and who was responsible for the rest of it. > > I basically have IanJ, Russ, Sarah, and myself as doing everything: > (Request access) > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ox2D7BKNpgN65XlAYXpXkz26XUb8hAPxcVBpqiVguWI > > Russ, are you good to do all the website stuff marked on there? > > -George > > > On 02/27/2014 03:31 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > > Yes, I think that should be fine, I think. I'll start writing it this > afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what the > final link will actually look like. :-) > > -George > > On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > Hi George, > > Thanks for updating me. > > I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work? > > Thanks, > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap > wrote: >> >> I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing >> up the blog. >> >> When do you need the URL by? >> >> -George >> >> >> On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features >> from that document: >> >> 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and Mirage OS, >> both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language >> bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings >> improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions. >> >> 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration >> >> 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub >> >> I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time >> and pitching ahead of time. >> >> I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any >> other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone >> assigned to write this yet? >> >> It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if >> possible. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Sarah Conway >> PR Manager >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> Skype: sarah.k.conway >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> >> > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Fri Feb 28 18:27:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJS9z-0001g3-Av; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJS9x-0001fy-MM for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:29772] by server-2.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 79/20-23037-025D0135; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:27:44 +0000 X-Env-Sender: russell.pavlicek.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1393612053!3026784!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.217.170] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_8, RCVD_BY_IP,spamassassin: ,async_handler: YXN5bmNfZGVsYXk6IDcwNjAwNjEgKHRpbWVvdXQp\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13600 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2014 18:27:34 -0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f170.google.com) (209.85.217.170) by server-10.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Feb 2014 18:27:34 -0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id s7so2983536lbd.1 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SKVlJCPK1ZnwaPyNwsB0NpI0eBkeqQdyA8JFtpLzLWg=; b=FaRHFNjNVN3Ro9N043Jw9L3LQ7kLmW69uS6yf3nkxvEYwxQUzMk3vorU0VpF0jUND9 mdZlAitIJOp0sl1dDOiJoVf8ZdMIrWsaDJ9wZtTDiY/ymQjhX666kik6IqMDpQnJSHlN u9BI6ARILSEd8Zpms8Dva+kQpxyhxeKeGKaUCIdwKZQeIgQcDyxT4zbv+slKXWHjOxST CJk6gU872OEfkmdxZx2Ce0GtPt0ptRYFfzGCtPHwmFEj5Z6fXhFqm/oxU/eS1HjOV7ne 02cM8xzb+q7r+hNn78tQTDZM3kkdyORUsAS40vHGw40gx9MEVqAfBDvCxso+NS727Owi iwWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.205.11 with SMTP id lc11mr12383828lac.29.1393612053358; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.72.72 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530F7655.2020605@eu.citrix.com> References: <530F556C.3070204@eu.citrix.com> <530F5A46.9070404@eu.citrix.com> <530F7655.2020605@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:27:33 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PKYoMA4gmeaMsfv82IDkOS8g4SM Message-ID: From: Russ Pavlicek To: George Dunlap Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Technical Blog for 4.4 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org George, I should be able to get all the website stuff done. Thanks, Russ On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:31 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > BTW, I put the checklist wiki page into a Google doc so that we could more > easily track what had been done, and who was responsible for the rest of it. > > I basically have IanJ, Russ, Sarah, and myself as doing everything: > (Request access) > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ox2D7BKNpgN65XlAYXpXkz26XUb8hAPxcVBpqiVguWI > > Russ, are you good to do all the website stuff marked on there? > > -George > > > On 02/27/2014 03:31 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > > Yes, I think that should be fine, I think. I'll start writing it this > afternoon, and hopefully wordpress will have a way to determine what the > final link will actually look like. :-) > > -George > > On 02/27/2014 03:16 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: > > Hi George, > > Thanks for updating me. > > I can include it as late as Sunday afternoon, March 9th. Does that work? > > Thanks, > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:10 AM, George Dunlap > wrote: >> >> I think the release coordinator (me) is basically responsible for writing >> up the blog. >> >> When do you need the URL by? >> >> -George >> >> >> On 02/27/2014 03:08 PM, Sarah Conway wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> To keep the PR new release concise, I've removed the following features >> from that document: >> >> 1) Improved support for Xen Project sub-projects -- XAPI and Mirage OS, >> both written in OCaml and used in XenServer, rely on the OCaml language >> bindings to operate well. A major overhaul of the OCaml language bindings >> improve compatibility between XAPI, Mirage OS and Linux distributions. >> >> 2) GlusterFS/Xen Integration >> >> 3) The bootable PV Xen image in upstream grub >> >> I'm targeting March 10th as our release date for ample Oracle review time >> and pitching ahead of time. >> >> I know we're planning a 4.4 blog(s) to elaborate on these items and any >> other Xen-related features/updates (ie. Xen Orchestration). Is anyone >> assigned to write this yet? >> >> It would be useful to include a url to this blog in our release if >> possible. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Sarah Conway >> PR Manager >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> Skype: sarah.k.conway >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> >> > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > PR Manager > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity