From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Nov 02 12:20:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:20:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtE6G-0003yW-Ev; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:20:36 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrTTL-0000M7-70 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:21:11 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-8.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 9D/C1-31069-6F5F0365; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:21:10 +0000 X-Env-Sender: differentreality@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1446049268!8188032!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.213.179] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.13.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 21748 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2015 16:21:09 -0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f179.google.com) (209.85.213.179) by server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Oct 2015 16:21:09 -0000 Received: by igbdj2 with SMTP id dj2so10863496igb.1 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:21:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OX4gVnM1maoR06zqQ2URfxTJTgWZ7U6PgTUss9QkNjQ=; b=0i+SggnPAQLpH9VdTY/iiSPLTA0dIkV39MlmozqmayUq8BHAXfAT3+8viGr4siHDR6 HqQnuzhBxJmhLl/4pXcpazdld5r5RisOzPFT+gC9wKGrRrNcHUf57Yo+VeFeYvQCE5GU 0/5Jm1HcXmlLrRZR2MokFC/JlGeC8jhCjIIIqW0Vg/iEgbvmjHN0Sb8kByyrvkDWVQB0 nIlb+5CtCAE9Q64jyG+5l8LWmA5qNZBNLrnd0HZtTd4/KoZRvrzHGDFOQu+IwIigaEQY FHqCTNtj6PkTGxRrzkEOFY9lWROqFCkfOVDdZfDp+MTjzA7J/Zs2c89TCpP9V7N4pf8f h0Aw== X-Received: by 10.50.36.5 with SMTP id m5mr4263300igj.65.1446049267964; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:21:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.36.203 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9B24AD42-1CB5-4866-9875-21B143C40C35@gmail.com> References: <9B24AD42-1CB5-4866-9875-21B143C40C35@gmail.com> From: "Stella Rouzi (differentreality)" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:20:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 44JwTxGbm8gsCwd8AqvcvxqbRYk Message-ID: To: Lars Kurth X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:20:34 +0000 Cc: "stands@fosdem.org" , publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] [FOSDEM-Stands] Xen Project stand submission for FOSDEM 2016 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Hello Lars, this year we have changed the way you apply for a stand. Please check the relevant announcement: https://fosdem.org/2016/news/2015-09-24-call-for-participation/ And submit your request via the form provided: https://fosdem.org/stands After you do that, you should receive an email acknowledging your submission. Thanks! Stella On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > Project name: Xen Project > > Stand description: This will be a stand for the Xen Project, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project that develops the following virtualisation and cloud related technologies: Xen Project hypervisor (ARM and x86), Mirage OS, Embedded and Automotive PV drivers for Android, QNX and other OS'es, PV drivers for Windows, etc. We will hand out swag with Xen Project logos/mascots. We will give demos with a laptop, explain how to engage with the community, etc. We will have a background pop-up with the project mascot. > > Project URLs: > http://xenproject.org/ the following links are accessible from the main site > http://wiki.xenproject.org > http://blog.xenproject.org/ > http://lists.xenproject.org/ > > Your name and relation to the project: Lars Kurth, Community Manager of the Xen Project and Chairman of the Xen Project Advisory Board > > Why should FOSDEM accept this proposal? > > In 2013, the Xen Project became a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. Since then, the project has built bridges to many other projects such as QEMU, the Linux Automotive Working Group, XenServer.org, OpenDayLight, OPNFV, Hyper, Android and many others. It has also intesivied bridges with Linux Distros such as CentOS, OpenSuse, ... and the BSD Distros. The project expanded into new areas, such as embedded and automotive and has steadily grown its contributor and user base. > > In 2013 - 2015, we had a booth at FOSDEM that was volunteer/community staffed and very well attended. Unlike some of the other stands, there was always presence by volunteers and plenty of activity at our stand. We also invited other projects which have a relationship with Xen to give demos (OSv, MirageOS, Qubes, Xen Orchestra...) of open source technology that work with and on top of Xen. We hope to build further bridges at FOSDEM and again act as a hub of collaborative activity at FOSDEM. > _______________________________________________ > stands mailing list > stands@lists.fosdem.org > https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/stands _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Nov 02 12:20:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:20:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtE6G-0003yW-Ev; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:20:36 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrTTL-0000M7-70 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:21:11 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-8.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 9D/C1-31069-6F5F0365; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:21:10 +0000 X-Env-Sender: differentreality@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1446049268!8188032!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.213.179] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.3 required=7.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.13.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 21748 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2015 16:21:09 -0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f179.google.com) (209.85.213.179) by server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Oct 2015 16:21:09 -0000 Received: by igbdj2 with SMTP id dj2so10863496igb.1 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:21:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OX4gVnM1maoR06zqQ2URfxTJTgWZ7U6PgTUss9QkNjQ=; b=0i+SggnPAQLpH9VdTY/iiSPLTA0dIkV39MlmozqmayUq8BHAXfAT3+8viGr4siHDR6 HqQnuzhBxJmhLl/4pXcpazdld5r5RisOzPFT+gC9wKGrRrNcHUf57Yo+VeFeYvQCE5GU 0/5Jm1HcXmlLrRZR2MokFC/JlGeC8jhCjIIIqW0Vg/iEgbvmjHN0Sb8kByyrvkDWVQB0 nIlb+5CtCAE9Q64jyG+5l8LWmA5qNZBNLrnd0HZtTd4/KoZRvrzHGDFOQu+IwIigaEQY FHqCTNtj6PkTGxRrzkEOFY9lWROqFCkfOVDdZfDp+MTjzA7J/Zs2c89TCpP9V7N4pf8f h0Aw== X-Received: by 10.50.36.5 with SMTP id m5mr4263300igj.65.1446049267964; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:21:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.36.203 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9B24AD42-1CB5-4866-9875-21B143C40C35@gmail.com> References: <9B24AD42-1CB5-4866-9875-21B143C40C35@gmail.com> From: "Stella Rouzi (differentreality)" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:20:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 44JwTxGbm8gsCwd8AqvcvxqbRYk Message-ID: To: Lars Kurth X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:20:34 +0000 Cc: "stands@fosdem.org" , publicity@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Publicity] [FOSDEM-Stands] Xen Project stand submission for FOSDEM 2016 X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Hello Lars, this year we have changed the way you apply for a stand. Please check the relevant announcement: https://fosdem.org/2016/news/2015-09-24-call-for-participation/ And submit your request via the form provided: https://fosdem.org/stands After you do that, you should receive an email acknowledging your submission. Thanks! Stella On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > Project name: Xen Project > > Stand description: This will be a stand for the Xen Project, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project that develops the following virtualisation and cloud related technologies: Xen Project hypervisor (ARM and x86), Mirage OS, Embedded and Automotive PV drivers for Android, QNX and other OS'es, PV drivers for Windows, etc. We will hand out swag with Xen Project logos/mascots. We will give demos with a laptop, explain how to engage with the community, etc. We will have a background pop-up with the project mascot. > > Project URLs: > http://xenproject.org/ the following links are accessible from the main site > http://wiki.xenproject.org > http://blog.xenproject.org/ > http://lists.xenproject.org/ > > Your name and relation to the project: Lars Kurth, Community Manager of the Xen Project and Chairman of the Xen Project Advisory Board > > Why should FOSDEM accept this proposal? > > In 2013, the Xen Project became a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. Since then, the project has built bridges to many other projects such as QEMU, the Linux Automotive Working Group, XenServer.org, OpenDayLight, OPNFV, Hyper, Android and many others. It has also intesivied bridges with Linux Distros such as CentOS, OpenSuse, ... and the BSD Distros. The project expanded into new areas, such as embedded and automotive and has steadily grown its contributor and user base. > > In 2013 - 2015, we had a booth at FOSDEM that was volunteer/community staffed and very well attended. Unlike some of the other stands, there was always presence by volunteers and plenty of activity at our stand. We also invited other projects which have a relationship with Xen to give demos (OSv, MirageOS, Qubes, Xen Orchestra...) of open source technology that work with and on top of Xen. We hope to build further bridges at FOSDEM and again act as a hub of collaborative activity at FOSDEM. > _______________________________________________ > stands mailing list > stands@lists.fosdem.org > https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/stands _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 04 15:06:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:06:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztzdy-0003O2-0F; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:06:34 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztzdw-0003Nx-ON for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:06:32 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 78/67-01748-7FE1A365; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:06:31 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1446649590!947200!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.169] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14993 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2015 15:06:30 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169) by server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 4 Nov 2015 15:06:30 -0000 Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so94207628wij.0 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 07:06:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version; bh=b1KcEP4t5Fd8rVWRLg1DZFlk2KMsOauKPx5wrpSdzKQ=; b=IaRbQAFK0sYaok4Xb4I7VQusgbeN6Nlu1CQRGh8szVP2MBxsgB4hQWoaECK9vAZjrX 91hsY3mCCBsp7IF/OTCyHJWq8PBlcjk4pXoR0uNUkrv5WjR63Vz76NNlQaCK12RDcc3n QQ7oEnfi4rF9/QuazP7WLAr2iHUNt5LhWPP81+4I3rdSFbKAEGbAysUYRi0TOt4dC4BA erUHesoIdTiKyICiW+H3My/q24RbDO6dLWhWlLWuwSPPDXer3o3ZdPML8gQqp/EbsfaD sZAtB8BIgyvYhYILjOOfZ8bcFFEgaGhP9Tj7Mx7qNCDQ7jbJQa+b3Hrs+zzotIgPrSJO wZYA== X-Received: by 10.194.205.162 with SMTP id lh2mr2416047wjc.61.1446649590155; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 07:06:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm2027089wjf.18.2015.11.04.07.06.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2015 07:06:28 -0800 (PST) From: Lars Kurth Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:06:30 +0000 Message-Id: <19F1F0F2-06B9-487C-A962-68138513C91E@gmail.com> To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: Jan Beulich Subject: [Publicity] Draft Blog Post: Xen Project 4.5.2 Maintenance Release Available X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11133&preview=true Regards Lars The text is ---- I am pleased to announce the release of Xen 4.5.2. Xen Project Maintenance releases are released roughly every 4 months, in line with our Maintenance Release Policy. We recommend that all users of the 4.5 stable series update to this point release. Xen 4.5.2 is available immediately from its git repository:     xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable-4.5     (tag RELEASE-4.5.2) or from the Xen Project download page at www.xenproject.org/downloads/xen-archives/xen-45-series/xen-452.html. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. For a complete list of changes in this release, please check lists of changes on the download page. ---- _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 04 15:06:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:06:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztzdy-0003O2-0F; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:06:34 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztzdw-0003Nx-ON for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:06:32 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 78/67-01748-7FE1A365; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:06:31 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1446649590!947200!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.212.169] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14993 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2015 15:06:30 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169) by server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 4 Nov 2015 15:06:30 -0000 Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so94207628wij.0 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 07:06:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version; bh=b1KcEP4t5Fd8rVWRLg1DZFlk2KMsOauKPx5wrpSdzKQ=; b=IaRbQAFK0sYaok4Xb4I7VQusgbeN6Nlu1CQRGh8szVP2MBxsgB4hQWoaECK9vAZjrX 91hsY3mCCBsp7IF/OTCyHJWq8PBlcjk4pXoR0uNUkrv5WjR63Vz76NNlQaCK12RDcc3n QQ7oEnfi4rF9/QuazP7WLAr2iHUNt5LhWPP81+4I3rdSFbKAEGbAysUYRi0TOt4dC4BA erUHesoIdTiKyICiW+H3My/q24RbDO6dLWhWlLWuwSPPDXer3o3ZdPML8gQqp/EbsfaD sZAtB8BIgyvYhYILjOOfZ8bcFFEgaGhP9Tj7Mx7qNCDQ7jbJQa+b3Hrs+zzotIgPrSJO wZYA== X-Received: by 10.194.205.162 with SMTP id lh2mr2416047wjc.61.1446649590155; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 07:06:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm2027089wjf.18.2015.11.04.07.06.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2015 07:06:28 -0800 (PST) From: Lars Kurth Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:06:30 +0000 Message-Id: <19F1F0F2-06B9-487C-A962-68138513C91E@gmail.com> To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: Jan Beulich Subject: [Publicity] Draft Blog Post: Xen Project 4.5.2 Maintenance Release Available X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11133&preview=true Regards Lars The text is ---- I am pleased to announce the release of Xen 4.5.2. Xen Project Maintenance releases are released roughly every 4 months, in line with our Maintenance Release Policy. We recommend that all users of the 4.5 stable series update to this point release. Xen 4.5.2 is available immediately from its git repository:     xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable-4.5     (tag RELEASE-4.5.2) or from the Xen Project download page at www.xenproject.org/downloads/xen-archives/xen-45-series/xen-452.html. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. For a complete list of changes in this release, please check lists of changes on the download page. ---- _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Nov 05 15:52:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:52:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuMqH-0002hE-Fi; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:52:49 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuMqG-0002ga-Es for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:52:48 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-14.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id EF/11-05979-9146B365; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:13:45 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1446732824!1254910!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.44] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 558 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2015 14:13:44 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 5 Nov 2015 14:13:44 -0000 Received: by wmnn186 with SMTP id n186so15359086wmn.1 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 06:13:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=2khIlhxbkY9QCMCdr5LcYO/8OcDN3vFLcyImypehnfY=; b=KTttWd2SkaiLKEghmY75zvKgPPk11eGSjIm+ethTnkHKuir1N7nNk1a0jMr6LL440Z XghUBuNoULOR3slAnIjfWB0On39QIiG3OXEIrSgjNQRtht+e/KFbCiM/xissHpLPxyDF zAReHDMj3kNmglT1QQ/IFImAMz1rusehXwgbJbsJ9e4NU5MFsGM+MjBWHcbxAPKWZZLc HZdF2u0YJ/nwLqTYCIx1KUAUYorKkeGZOLgwgdG6Cqda3bwAHNIfTANJdTd4WdkL7vR+ NFjPCw5f/KYTkRAI1BZdioLKXi3CbOI8W7vrvmV3SN9xiLdk79hHnpHysrEowEe0vcSF 3M2w== X-Received: by 10.28.19.78 with SMTP id 75mr4178787wmt.101.1446732824459; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 06:13:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id it4sm7248278wjb.0.2015.11.05.06.13.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Nov 2015 06:13:43 -0800 (PST) From: Lars Kurth Message-Id: <77833BBD-A5D7-4E18-B61F-24B149B95CC3@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 14:13:41 +0000 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: [Publicity] Linux.com security series X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Note that - http://www.linux.com/news/enterprise/systems-management/863439-open-source-security-process-part-1-a-cloud-security-introduction - http://www.linux.com/news/enterprise/systems-management/864824-open-source-security-process-part-2-containers-vs-hypervisors-protecting-your-attack-surface have now been published. Part 3 will be published next Thursday and part 4 the Thursday after that Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Thu Nov 05 15:52:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:52:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuMqH-0002hE-Fi; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:52:49 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuMqG-0002ga-Es for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:52:48 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-14.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id EF/11-05979-9146B365; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:13:45 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1446732824!1254910!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.44] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 558 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2015 14:13:44 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by server-15.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 5 Nov 2015 14:13:44 -0000 Received: by wmnn186 with SMTP id n186so15359086wmn.1 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 06:13:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=2khIlhxbkY9QCMCdr5LcYO/8OcDN3vFLcyImypehnfY=; b=KTttWd2SkaiLKEghmY75zvKgPPk11eGSjIm+ethTnkHKuir1N7nNk1a0jMr6LL440Z XghUBuNoULOR3slAnIjfWB0On39QIiG3OXEIrSgjNQRtht+e/KFbCiM/xissHpLPxyDF zAReHDMj3kNmglT1QQ/IFImAMz1rusehXwgbJbsJ9e4NU5MFsGM+MjBWHcbxAPKWZZLc HZdF2u0YJ/nwLqTYCIx1KUAUYorKkeGZOLgwgdG6Cqda3bwAHNIfTANJdTd4WdkL7vR+ NFjPCw5f/KYTkRAI1BZdioLKXi3CbOI8W7vrvmV3SN9xiLdk79hHnpHysrEowEe0vcSF 3M2w== X-Received: by 10.28.19.78 with SMTP id 75mr4178787wmt.101.1446732824459; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 06:13:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id it4sm7248278wjb.0.2015.11.05.06.13.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Nov 2015 06:13:43 -0800 (PST) From: Lars Kurth Message-Id: <77833BBD-A5D7-4E18-B61F-24B149B95CC3@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 14:13:41 +0000 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: [Publicity] Linux.com security series X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Note that - http://www.linux.com/news/enterprise/systems-management/863439-open-source-security-process-part-1-a-cloud-security-introduction - http://www.linux.com/news/enterprise/systems-management/864824-open-source-security-process-part-2-containers-vs-hypervisors-protecting-your-attack-surface have now been published. Part 3 will be published next Thursday and part 4 the Thursday after that Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Nov 10 12:20:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw7uG-0007bI-NB; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:12 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw7uE-0007b9-NG for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:10 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-4.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 25/A5-09570-9F0E1465; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:09 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=749655d01=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447158008!2377834!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 63039 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 12:20:09 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2015 12:20:09 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,270,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="317040741" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:06 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Message-ID: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Hi all I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 release. Let me know if you have any comments. https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11139&preview=true Thanks Wei. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Nov 10 12:20:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw7uG-0007bI-NB; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:12 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw7uE-0007b9-NG for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:10 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-4.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 25/A5-09570-9F0E1465; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:09 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=749655d01=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447158008!2377834!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 63039 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 12:20:09 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-6.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2015 12:20:09 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,270,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="317040741" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:20:06 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Message-ID: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Subject: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Hi all I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 release. Let me know if you have any comments. https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11139&preview=true Thanks Wei. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Nov 10 16:11:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:11:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBVx-0004tW-G7; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:11:21 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBVv-0004tR-J9 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:11:19 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-4.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 93/CE-10715-62712465; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:11:18 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447171876!2084735!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.213.176] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11930 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 16:11:17 -0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2015 16:11:17 -0000 Received: by igbxm8 with SMTP id xm8so3591166igb.1 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=t9NpJ4Lvw29kDir6hlLstgHYZY2LdgHhE86OFZKVSXM=; b=fIXlM6vMfhs0Zy0lvXTu1pT4aOHRxkfgRYFqhPTSHlro8yn5Zx+c5y7489BAhMqgZc mUjlGd7K+8To5x1bzb1eEowmvEnjsCF7+iyYYh5UhnQKAn7fr9//HsiOi2VkwJ1orV1j +1qEV+r+GveMaLUvFqzW9F5sPtw5veVtp7KYg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=t9NpJ4Lvw29kDir6hlLstgHYZY2LdgHhE86OFZKVSXM=; b=MqBQd9A5jxmOECN6C73gtMKC1RMPK83uM+DQ2BXL+I/JDMn4+PLmfPm1YZKsUeYOyd nqdnYwiIaljd1bSizQoNVqz5C8apuAHtWCKzuDmXA4hKlVm5FJGBtMOfHgeDe5J3HZbv sFE+I3dr5oKwj271Kw13rMaLNLBOqTDsKt7lx6G6ar63ez/dIJyylBTRsOSIe1aRo9qx 0JiBLrK6YN5aHai8aUTw4NZfZOi1XTYMNOR35ZRJfA2mA+yH11JOXHpf3H9CB2GWtX/y GqBiceccgxumHDdg1e5E7xaL6mtZUjXN4KX8eGcets+Cubb1C7mjm/hMf0IBuKZD0RGA SpcA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaU6V5EVvALeguCdCh8k+s0R94gXUIE7ztYCC/oBAFdqYcsLd3YKnVGjH53ScusPAfRcPT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.43.201 with SMTP id y9mr4432034igl.67.1447171876283; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.220.193 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:11:16 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Wei Liu Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2585843860139505207==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============2585843860139505207== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011825c09da033052431f507 --089e011825c09da033052431f507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so please double-check that. A few comments: - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post. - Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release cycles shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that are following this trend. - I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot more strict on what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind it? - For those that are interested in joining, list the email, mailing list to use. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > Hi all > > I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 > release. Let me know if you have any comments. > > https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11139&preview=true > > Thanks > Wei. > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > -- Sarah Conway Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e011825c09da033052431f507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I made a few small copy edits. I wa= s not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so please double-ch= eck that.=C2=A0

A = few comments:
- I would delete this se= ntence:=C2=A0=C2=A0Some might be wonder= ing what took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post= .=C2=A0
- Do you see any = negatives stemming from continue to make release cycles shorter and more pr= edictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or alternatively, expand mor= e on the benefits of shorter, more predictable=C2=A0release cycles, draw=C2= =A0comparisons=C2=A0to other OS projects that are following this trend.=C2= =A0
- I looked over the slides = and it seems like you are a lot more strict on what can be added during the= RC part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind i= t?
- For those that are interested in = joining, list the email, mailing list to use.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:2= 0 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
Hi all

I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7
release. Let me know if you have any comments.

https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&am= p;preview=3Dtrue

Thanks
Wei.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/ma= ilman/listinfo/publicity



--
Sarah Conw= ay
Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects=C2=A0
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-530= 0 =C2=A0Cell
Skype: =C2=A0sarah.k.conway
<= /div>
--089e011825c09da033052431f507-- --===============2585843860139505207== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============2585843860139505207==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Nov 10 16:11:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:11:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBVx-0004tW-G7; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:11:21 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBVv-0004tR-J9 for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:11:19 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-4.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 93/CE-10715-62712465; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:11:18 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447171876!2084735!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.213.176] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11930 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 16:11:17 -0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by server-6.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2015 16:11:17 -0000 Received: by igbxm8 with SMTP id xm8so3591166igb.1 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=t9NpJ4Lvw29kDir6hlLstgHYZY2LdgHhE86OFZKVSXM=; b=fIXlM6vMfhs0Zy0lvXTu1pT4aOHRxkfgRYFqhPTSHlro8yn5Zx+c5y7489BAhMqgZc mUjlGd7K+8To5x1bzb1eEowmvEnjsCF7+iyYYh5UhnQKAn7fr9//HsiOi2VkwJ1orV1j +1qEV+r+GveMaLUvFqzW9F5sPtw5veVtp7KYg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=t9NpJ4Lvw29kDir6hlLstgHYZY2LdgHhE86OFZKVSXM=; b=MqBQd9A5jxmOECN6C73gtMKC1RMPK83uM+DQ2BXL+I/JDMn4+PLmfPm1YZKsUeYOyd nqdnYwiIaljd1bSizQoNVqz5C8apuAHtWCKzuDmXA4hKlVm5FJGBtMOfHgeDe5J3HZbv sFE+I3dr5oKwj271Kw13rMaLNLBOqTDsKt7lx6G6ar63ez/dIJyylBTRsOSIe1aRo9qx 0JiBLrK6YN5aHai8aUTw4NZfZOi1XTYMNOR35ZRJfA2mA+yH11JOXHpf3H9CB2GWtX/y GqBiceccgxumHDdg1e5E7xaL6mtZUjXN4KX8eGcets+Cubb1C7mjm/hMf0IBuKZD0RGA SpcA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaU6V5EVvALeguCdCh8k+s0R94gXUIE7ztYCC/oBAFdqYcsLd3YKnVGjH53ScusPAfRcPT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.43.201 with SMTP id y9mr4432034igl.67.1447171876283; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.220.193 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:11:16 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Wei Liu Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2585843860139505207==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============2585843860139505207== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011825c09da033052431f507 --089e011825c09da033052431f507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so please double-check that. A few comments: - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post. - Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release cycles shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that are following this trend. - I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot more strict on what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind it? - For those that are interested in joining, list the email, mailing list to use. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > Hi all > > I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 > release. Let me know if you have any comments. > > https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11139&preview=true > > Thanks > Wei. > > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > -- Sarah Conway Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --089e011825c09da033052431f507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I made a few small copy edits. I wa= s not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so please double-ch= eck that.=C2=A0

A = few comments:
- I would delete this se= ntence:=C2=A0=C2=A0Some might be wonder= ing what took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post= .=C2=A0
- Do you see any = negatives stemming from continue to make release cycles shorter and more pr= edictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or alternatively, expand mor= e on the benefits of shorter, more predictable=C2=A0release cycles, draw=C2= =A0comparisons=C2=A0to other OS projects that are following this trend.=C2= =A0
- I looked over the slides = and it seems like you are a lot more strict on what can be added during the= RC part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind i= t?
- For those that are interested in = joining, list the email, mailing list to use.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:2= 0 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
Hi all

I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7
release. Let me know if you have any comments.

https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&am= p;preview=3Dtrue

Thanks
Wei.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenprojec= t.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/ma= ilman/listinfo/publicity



--
Sarah Conw= ay
Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects=C2=A0
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-530= 0 =C2=A0Cell
Skype: =C2=A0sarah.k.conway
<= /div>
--089e011825c09da033052431f507-- --===============2585843860139505207== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============2585843860139505207==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Nov 10 17:56:45 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwD9w-0008Bh-E7; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:44 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwD9u-0008Bc-TO for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:43 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-12.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id FF/FE-18744-ADF22465; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:42 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447178200!2114731!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.47] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.1 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3511 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 17:56:40 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f47.google.com) (74.125.82.47) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2015 17:56:40 -0000 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so20593619wmv.1 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=Vz36V4yztdBy67474UgtjH/0Fi2JVf47LweJDqBWlCs=; b=xCc1vDO5yBCV6blUo3Wp9CkC7c2hTLXWy2Mk6dTLBuxL+yVXXjXaq4RRn3zDx2xQxl nVT69XqIrxAwwWgtiQL9jnptlicFCp83MS0BGFRzCxVuITTxydv+G0Yuj1Ln0Tj/v1vt /b5KOS0eU8M4qDo2ZcbFmnNNW1gSCYOo2YTx+G+TzVDQoBD5YxOCYrdgMPtPsOTP34yd ScWU12WzMnlGpqCNCCrJ1jgysfHUJzzDLfmsX20moC+xaA4Yo2qibgStMDQhpqoI8uql EubPPnIQ0z/pFGX+mXRiDW6ODOm3P99IxI4uKE0FKP8k+uQUnIX8zNWMOpjcAHCzP1ZS 4nOw== X-Received: by 10.28.52.17 with SMTP id b17mr6550056wma.41.1447178200638; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm20979814wmx.23.2015.11.10.09.56.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:38 +0000 Message-Id: <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> To: Sarah Conway X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9042846257962938879==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9042846257962938879== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BC7D8409-836D-4288-B43B-FA207A774811" --Apple-Mail=_BC7D8409-836D-4288-B43B-FA207A774811 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway = wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links = or view the slides, so please double-check that.=20 Odd, they all work for me >=20 > A few comments: > - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me = so long to write the announcement email and this blog post.=20 I will leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked = up, it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on.=20 > - Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release = cycles shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? = Or alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more = predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that = are following this trend.=20 No negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but = Ubuntu and OpenStack run 6 months cycles > - I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot more strict = on what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here = or was there a reasoning behind it? The reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over freeze = exceptions. In particular, because some vendors promised customers = features in 4.6 - not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for = shorter cycles is that the customer impact of a missing a release will = be less severe.=20 > - For those that are interested in joining, list the email, mailing = list to use. I added a link Lars >=20 > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu > wrote: > Hi all >=20 > I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 > release. Let me know if you have any comments. >=20 > https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&preview=3Dtrue = >=20 > Thanks > Wei. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity = >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Sarah Conway > Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects=20 > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --Apple-Mail=_BC7D8409-836D-4288-B43B-FA207A774811 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

Hi,

I = made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links or = view the slides, so please double-check = that. 
Odd, they all work for = me


A few comments:
- I would delete this sentence:  Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the = announcement email and this blog = post. 
I will leave this = up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked up, it's a nice = harmless trap quote they can focus on. 

- Do you see any negatives = stemming from continue to make release cycles shorter and more = predictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or alternatively, = expand more on the benefits of shorter, more predictable release = cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that are = following this = trend. 
No= negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but Ubuntu = and OpenStack run 6 months cycles

- I looked over the slides and it = seems like you are a lot more strict on what can be added during the RC = part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind = it?
The reasoning was, that = there was a lot of arguing over freeze exceptions. In particular, = because some vendors promised customers features in 4.6 - not all of = which made it. Part of the rationale for shorter cycles is that the = customer impact of a missing a release will be less = severe. 

- For those that = are interested in joining, list the email, mailing list to = use.
I added a = link

Lars


On Tue, = Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
Hi all

I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7
release. Let me know if you have any comments.

https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&preview=3Dtrue
Thanks
Wei.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity<= /a>



--
Sarah Conway
Director of PR Services, Collaborative = Projects 
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) = 578-5300  Cell
Skype: =  sarah.k.conway
_______________________________________________
Publicity = mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity<= br class=3D"">

= --Apple-Mail=_BC7D8409-836D-4288-B43B-FA207A774811-- --===============9042846257962938879== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9042846257962938879==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Nov 10 17:56:45 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwD9w-0008Bh-E7; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:44 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwD9u-0008Bc-TO for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:43 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-12.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id FF/FE-18744-ADF22465; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:42 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447178200!2114731!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.47] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.1 required=7.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 3511 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 17:56:40 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f47.google.com) (74.125.82.47) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2015 17:56:40 -0000 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so20593619wmv.1 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=Vz36V4yztdBy67474UgtjH/0Fi2JVf47LweJDqBWlCs=; b=xCc1vDO5yBCV6blUo3Wp9CkC7c2hTLXWy2Mk6dTLBuxL+yVXXjXaq4RRn3zDx2xQxl nVT69XqIrxAwwWgtiQL9jnptlicFCp83MS0BGFRzCxVuITTxydv+G0Yuj1Ln0Tj/v1vt /b5KOS0eU8M4qDo2ZcbFmnNNW1gSCYOo2YTx+G+TzVDQoBD5YxOCYrdgMPtPsOTP34yd ScWU12WzMnlGpqCNCCrJ1jgysfHUJzzDLfmsX20moC+xaA4Yo2qibgStMDQhpqoI8uql EubPPnIQ0z/pFGX+mXRiDW6ODOm3P99IxI4uKE0FKP8k+uQUnIX8zNWMOpjcAHCzP1ZS 4nOw== X-Received: by 10.28.52.17 with SMTP id b17mr6550056wma.41.1447178200638; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm20979814wmx.23.2015.11.10.09.56.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:56:38 +0000 Message-Id: <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> To: Sarah Conway X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9042846257962938879==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============9042846257962938879== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BC7D8409-836D-4288-B43B-FA207A774811" --Apple-Mail=_BC7D8409-836D-4288-B43B-FA207A774811 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway = wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links = or view the slides, so please double-check that.=20 Odd, they all work for me >=20 > A few comments: > - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me = so long to write the announcement email and this blog post.=20 I will leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked = up, it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on.=20 > - Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release = cycles shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? = Or alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more = predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that = are following this trend.=20 No negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but = Ubuntu and OpenStack run 6 months cycles > - I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot more strict = on what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here = or was there a reasoning behind it? The reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over freeze = exceptions. In particular, because some vendors promised customers = features in 4.6 - not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for = shorter cycles is that the customer impact of a missing a release will = be less severe.=20 > - For those that are interested in joining, list the email, mailing = list to use. I added a link Lars >=20 > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu > wrote: > Hi all >=20 > I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 > release. Let me know if you have any comments. >=20 > https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&preview=3Dtrue = >=20 > Thanks > Wei. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity = >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Sarah Conway > Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects=20 > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --Apple-Mail=_BC7D8409-836D-4288-B43B-FA207A774811 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

Hi,

I = made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links or = view the slides, so please double-check = that. 
Odd, they all work for = me


A few comments:
- I would delete this sentence:  Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the = announcement email and this blog = post. 
I will leave this = up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked up, it's a nice = harmless trap quote they can focus on. 

- Do you see any negatives = stemming from continue to make release cycles shorter and more = predictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or alternatively, = expand more on the benefits of shorter, more predictable release = cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that are = following this = trend. 
No= negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but Ubuntu = and OpenStack run 6 months cycles

- I looked over the slides and it = seems like you are a lot more strict on what can be added during the RC = part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind = it?
The reasoning was, that = there was a lot of arguing over freeze exceptions. In particular, = because some vendors promised customers features in 4.6 - not all of = which made it. Part of the rationale for shorter cycles is that the = customer impact of a missing a release will be less = severe. 

- For those that = are interested in joining, list the email, mailing list to = use.
I added a = link

Lars


On Tue, = Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
Hi all

I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7
release. Let me know if you have any comments.

https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&preview=3Dtrue
Thanks
Wei.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity<= /a>



--
Sarah Conway
Director of PR Services, Collaborative = Projects 
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) = 578-5300  Cell
Skype: =  sarah.k.conway
_______________________________________________
Publicity = mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity<= br class=3D"">

= --Apple-Mail=_BC7D8409-836D-4288-B43B-FA207A774811-- --===============9042846257962938879== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============9042846257962938879==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Nov 10 18:11:42 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:11:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDOQ-0001eS-0W; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:11:42 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDOO-0001eB-II for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:11:40 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-4.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 20/20-09570-B5332465; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:11:39 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447179098!2563839!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.223.173] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 42502 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 18:11:38 -0000 Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2015 18:11:38 -0000 Received: by ioc74 with SMTP id 74so9482677ioc.2 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:11:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=b7KgYGErR8WlKKtllzWAQXamrU8DoIWm+vH9RUVwmWU=; b=JfEmORGyxLQpXbYbpw3EdaCP7k09YE/Rbd/L8NYocmsmL7Yd2STeVkjpcp+pU4nnbU G5DZ61mmhLtf3V8BHS7CAVsDPd6Dch/ykKAR7wExL2kYLgCLYdi7wvrO0Iwvz3kbOsPs oUa5PLlk80ssGIuFBeL4Kn6TDXKmS11QYiNa4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b7KgYGErR8WlKKtllzWAQXamrU8DoIWm+vH9RUVwmWU=; b=A6PKgGZlukja/xfUeBf1vdBYByljq/vfdYNhAjMCLLgYkeWLON9ZWr/qXYE47NkUSz M/pxpccDmAU9Pm8+YAG1z/rmX0kditVoXJ/u2okOmThrlBWM8PdDx/M7UHcrTihGVxbM D7hxswaYHXQC7LmJjALfkcXCChlnzfvavg04YNqLik4nNJQr/5Ya+q0PJDSAV+dJxuAo nnJYEkwXZRvKKKEWcLuTEwlIBSvk5v0KfTxTdv9Yp522tdUXNoKnQO5ocX44jPbPb3s1 xmbEesf5rcF59+TtjG0dlPSIEzl3KWCijyX3bCD2jzsfVS1JswHPqFzXqPMUUnMtu33p o+hA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnAkE0RttPf5MGRoLSiIRehqt34kCz7Vs5X1HcOFZZGDvO17ZwphDPqqn13ciNhLCCjqbkF MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.150.134 with SMTP id y128mr5156957iod.153.1447179097544; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.220.193 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:11:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:11:37 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Lars Kurth Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4565253539992565193==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4565253539992565193== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140f2ee092959052433a4f0 --001a1140f2ee092959052433a4f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I would still suggest adding positives knowing that some will find their own negatives. Sarah On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway > wrote: > > Hi, > > I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links or > view the slides, so please double-check that. > > Odd, they all work for me > > > A few comments: > - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me so > long to write the announcement email and this blog post. > > I will leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked > up, it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on. > > - Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release cycles > shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or > alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more > predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that are > following this trend. > > No negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but Ubuntu > and OpenStack run 6 months cycles > > - I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot more strict on > what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or > was there a reasoning behind it? > > The reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over freeze exceptions. > In particular, because some vendors promised customers features in 4.6 - > not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for shorter cycles is that > the customer impact of a missing a release will be less severe. > > - For those that are interested in joining, list the email, mailing list > to use. > > I added a link > > Lars > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 >> release. Let me know if you have any comments. >> >> https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11139&preview=true >> >> Thanks >> Wei. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > -- Sarah Conway Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --001a1140f2ee092959052433a4f0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I would still suggest adding positives knowing that some w= ill find their own negatives.=C2=A0

Sarah=C2=A0

On Tue, Nov 10= , 2015 at 12:56 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10 Nov 2= 015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

<= div>
Hi,

I made a few small copy edits. = I was not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so please doubl= e-check that.=C2=A0
Odd, they all work= for me


A few comme= nts:
- I would delete this sentence:= =C2=A0=C2=A0Some might be wondering wha= t took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post.=C2=A0=
I will leave this up to = Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked up, it's a nice ha= rmless trap quote they can focus on.=C2=A0

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
- Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make re= lease cycles shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head = on? Or alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more predicta= ble=C2=A0release cycles, draw=C2=A0comparisons=C2=A0to other OS projects th= at are following this trend.=C2=A0
No = negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but Ubuntu= and OpenStack run 6 months cycles

- I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot mor= e strict on what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I mistake= n here or was there a reasoning behind it?
The reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over fre= eze exceptions. In particular, because some vendors promised customers feat= ures in 4.6 - not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for shorter c= ycles is that the customer impact of a missing a release will be less sever= e.=C2=A0

- For those that are interest= ed in joining, list the email, mailing list to use.
=
I added a link

Lars


On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@= citrix.com> wrote:
Hi all
I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7
release. Let me know if you have any comments.

https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&am= p;preview=3Dtrue

Thanks
Wei.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici= ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/ma= ilman/listinfo/publicity



--
Sarah Conway
Director of= PR Services, Collaborative Projects=C2=A0
The Linux Foundationsconway@= linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =C2=A0Cell
Skype: =C2=A0sarah.k.conway
_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing listPubli= city@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.= org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




--
Sarah Conway
Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects= =C2=A0
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(9= 78) 578-5300 =C2=A0Cell
Skype: =C2=A0sarah.k.conway
--001a1140f2ee092959052433a4f0-- --===============4565253539992565193== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4565253539992565193==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Tue Nov 10 18:11:42 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:11:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDOQ-0001eS-0W; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:11:42 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDOO-0001eB-II for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:11:40 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-4.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 20/20-09570-B5332465; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:11:39 +0000 X-Env-Sender: sconway@linuxfoundation.org X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447179098!2563839!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.223.173] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 42502 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 18:11:38 -0000 Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173) by server-4.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2015 18:11:38 -0000 Received: by ioc74 with SMTP id 74so9482677ioc.2 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:11:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=b7KgYGErR8WlKKtllzWAQXamrU8DoIWm+vH9RUVwmWU=; b=JfEmORGyxLQpXbYbpw3EdaCP7k09YE/Rbd/L8NYocmsmL7Yd2STeVkjpcp+pU4nnbU G5DZ61mmhLtf3V8BHS7CAVsDPd6Dch/ykKAR7wExL2kYLgCLYdi7wvrO0Iwvz3kbOsPs oUa5PLlk80ssGIuFBeL4Kn6TDXKmS11QYiNa4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b7KgYGErR8WlKKtllzWAQXamrU8DoIWm+vH9RUVwmWU=; b=A6PKgGZlukja/xfUeBf1vdBYByljq/vfdYNhAjMCLLgYkeWLON9ZWr/qXYE47NkUSz M/pxpccDmAU9Pm8+YAG1z/rmX0kditVoXJ/u2okOmThrlBWM8PdDx/M7UHcrTihGVxbM D7hxswaYHXQC7LmJjALfkcXCChlnzfvavg04YNqLik4nNJQr/5Ya+q0PJDSAV+dJxuAo nnJYEkwXZRvKKKEWcLuTEwlIBSvk5v0KfTxTdv9Yp522tdUXNoKnQO5ocX44jPbPb3s1 xmbEesf5rcF59+TtjG0dlPSIEzl3KWCijyX3bCD2jzsfVS1JswHPqFzXqPMUUnMtu33p o+hA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnAkE0RttPf5MGRoLSiIRehqt34kCz7Vs5X1HcOFZZGDvO17ZwphDPqqn13ciNhLCCjqbkF MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.150.134 with SMTP id y128mr5156957iod.153.1447179097544; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.220.193 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:11:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:11:37 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sarah Conway To: Lars Kurth Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4565253539992565193==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4565253539992565193== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140f2ee092959052433a4f0 --001a1140f2ee092959052433a4f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I would still suggest adding positives knowing that some will find their own negatives. Sarah On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway > wrote: > > Hi, > > I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links or > view the slides, so please double-check that. > > Odd, they all work for me > > > A few comments: > - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me so > long to write the announcement email and this blog post. > > I will leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked > up, it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on. > > - Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release cycles > shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or > alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more > predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that are > following this trend. > > No negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but Ubuntu > and OpenStack run 6 months cycles > > - I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot more strict on > what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or > was there a reasoning behind it? > > The reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over freeze exceptions. > In particular, because some vendors promised customers features in 4.6 - > not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for shorter cycles is that > the customer impact of a missing a release will be less severe. > > - For those that are interested in joining, list the email, mailing list > to use. > > I added a link > > Lars > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 >> release. Let me know if you have any comments. >> >> https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11139&preview=true >> >> Thanks >> Wei. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity >> > > > > -- > Sarah Conway > Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway > _______________________________________________ > Publicity mailing list > Publicity@lists.xenproject.org > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > -- Sarah Conway Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects The Linux Foundation sconway@linuxfoundation.org (978) 578-5300 Cell Skype: sarah.k.conway --001a1140f2ee092959052433a4f0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I would still suggest adding positives knowing that some w= ill find their own negatives.=C2=A0

Sarah=C2=A0

On Tue, Nov 10= , 2015 at 12:56 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10 Nov 2= 015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

<= div>
Hi,

I made a few small copy edits. = I was not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so please doubl= e-check that.=C2=A0
Odd, they all work= for me


A few comme= nts:
- I would delete this sentence:= =C2=A0=C2=A0Some might be wondering wha= t took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post.=C2=A0=
I will leave this up to = Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked up, it's a nice ha= rmless trap quote they can focus on.=C2=A0

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
- Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make re= lease cycles shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head = on? Or alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more predicta= ble=C2=A0release cycles, draw=C2=A0comparisons=C2=A0to other OS projects th= at are following this trend.=C2=A0
No = negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but Ubuntu= and OpenStack run 6 months cycles

- I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot mor= e strict on what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I mistake= n here or was there a reasoning behind it?
The reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over fre= eze exceptions. In particular, because some vendors promised customers feat= ures in 4.6 - not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for shorter c= ycles is that the customer impact of a missing a release will be less sever= e.=C2=A0

- For those that are interest= ed in joining, list the email, mailing list to use.
=
I added a link

Lars


On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@= citrix.com> wrote:
Hi all
I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7
release. Let me know if you have any comments.

https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&am= p;preview=3Dtrue

Thanks
Wei.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publici= ty@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/ma= ilman/listinfo/publicity



--
Sarah Conway
Director of= PR Services, Collaborative Projects=C2=A0
The Linux Foundationsconway@= linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300 =C2=A0Cell
Skype: =C2=A0sarah.k.conway
_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing listPubli= city@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.= org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity




--
Sarah Conway
Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects= =C2=A0
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(9= 78) 578-5300 =C2=A0Cell
Skype: =C2=A0sarah.k.conway
--001a1140f2ee092959052433a4f0-- --===============4565253539992565193== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4565253539992565193==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:30:48 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSfv-0007Oj-9X; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSft-0007Oa-VF for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:46 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-6.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 0B/3A-29649-5D813465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:45 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447237842!2776348!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.41] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.6 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 44658 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:30:42 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:30:42 -0000 Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so38359275wmw.0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:30:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=ZAJb7bIC6z5jYNGkHb5M2qRO6pGfNui9+dDSD0P2RYs=; b=emfqi7nNiEz5Oc1q4WRh4PzRrqgXP4Y8TeurDYKumooagVH6IrJIR+CT3SPcDEWLWC HDmeUueA0mk8dfrtY+al3IzZCBkBhjOA27BlUhKGpOFG3XK2US9u96Pdx68YpYf5xPMt DfbvaGHN0eV+uVaz7ZbOIU5flAV2Z2kp8tGDytadGORwrsQKR35bG7+J4hGuE3wJBwgU qAY6fdo5mxbHck5sU38irGL1lhtXgyYoMI+YciC625IpSt1LwDlIKjV6nMsIrT8kex1G RM2ygmY5PsGuZa3U8sv0XW4e3qzq0bVtPFl4TV+Aro7hTmiZ6EDLjgyGW7ZOM8JuL9uq +DgA== X-Received: by 10.28.143.21 with SMTP id r21mr9750611wmd.39.1447237842490; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:30:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h67sm2129757wmf.17.2015.11.11.02.30.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:30:41 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:39 +0000 Message-Id: References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> To: Sarah Conway , Zibby Keaton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4786389763149503172==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4786389763149503172== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_70CA41B0-8D09-4F9E-8D1C-E08C415A848C" --Apple-Mail=_70CA41B0-8D09-4F9E-8D1C-E08C415A848C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii So how about: > With Xen 4.6 released in October, we are already one month into the = new cycle. Add... Which means it is time to start planning for the next release. > Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the announcement = email and this blog post. The reason is that Xen community underwent = thorough > discussion on how to manage releases from = xen-unstable and its impact on stable releases.=20 Note (we always have waited for a month to start a new cycle, so no need = to apologise). Instead, how about... You may remember that one of the goals of the ">= 4.6 release planning was to create smoother developer experience = and to release Xen 4.6 on time. Both goals were achieved, so it was = time to think where to go from here. Thus, the Xen community underwent = thorough > discussion on how to manage releases from = xen-unstable and its impact on stable releases.=20 Maybe replace: "manage releases" ... "manage future releases" > After the 4.7 release, we will start to release Xen every 6 = months: at the beginning of June and = December. Add ... A regular 6 monthly release schedule has worked well for Ubuntu, = OpenStack and many other projects. The idea behind it is a simple one: = set a hard date and modify your goals to match that timeline. Which is = also, why we dropped feature freeze exceptions, which create overheads = and introduce unnecessary risk and debate. In addition, the new fixed = release schedule will help open source projects and commercial vendors = who consume Xen Project releases to plan their own releases better. And = it allows us to set a schedule that ensures that every single release = cycle is only affected by a single holiday period and that we have a Xen = Project developer event (be at a Hackathon or Xen Project Developer = Summit) during each release cycle. >=20 Replace with: "The stable release scheme is unchanged:18 months full = support, plus 18 months security fixes afterwards." After that leave things as they are Regards Lars > On 10 Nov 2015, at 18:11, Sarah Conway = wrote: >=20 > I would still suggest adding positives knowing that some will find = their own negatives.=20 >=20 > Sarah=20 >=20 > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Lars Kurth > wrote: >=20 >> On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway > wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the = links or view the slides, so please double-check that.=20 > Odd, they all work for me >=20 >>=20 >> A few comments: >> - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me = so long to write the announcement email and this blog post.=20 > I will leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was = picked up, it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on.=20 >=20 >> - Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release = cycles shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? = Or alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more = predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that = are following this trend.=20 > No negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but = Ubuntu and OpenStack run 6 months cycles >=20 >> - I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot more = strict on what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I = mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind it? >=20 > The reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over freeze = exceptions. In particular, because some vendors promised customers = features in 4.6 - not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for = shorter cycles is that the customer impact of a missing a release will = be less severe.=20 >=20 >> - For those that are interested in joining, list the email, mailing = list to use. >=20 > I added a link >=20 > Lars >=20 >>=20 >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu > wrote: >> Hi all >>=20 >> I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 >> release. Let me know if you have any comments. >>=20 >> https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&preview=3Dtrue = >>=20 >> Thanks >> Wei. >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org = >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity = >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Sarah Conway >> Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects=20 >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> Skype: sarah.k.conway >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org = >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity = >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Sarah Conway > Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects=20 > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway --Apple-Mail=_70CA41B0-8D09-4F9E-8D1C-E08C415A848C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii So how about:

> With Xen 4.6 released in October, we are already = one month into the new cycle.
Add...
Which means it is time to start planning for the next = release.

> Some might be wondering what took me so long to = write the announcement email and this blog post. The reason is that Xen = community underwent thorough
> </a href=3D"..."= >discussion</a> on how to manage releases from xen-unstable = and its impact on <a href=3D"...">stable = releases</a>. 
Note (we always have = waited for a month to start a new cycle, so no need to = apologise).

Instead, how about...
You may remember = that one of the goals of the <a href=3D"https://blog.xenproject.org/2015/02/16/xen-project-4-6-planning= -opens/">4.6 release planning</a> was <em>to create = smoother developer experience and to release Xen 4.6 on time</em>. = Both goals were achieved, so it was time to think where to go from here. = Thus, the Xen community underwent thorough
> = </a href=3D"..." >discussion</a> on how to manage releases = from xen-unstable and its impact on <a href=3D"...">stable = releases</a>. 
Maybe replace: "manage = releases" ... "manage future releases"

> After the 4.7 release, we will = start to <strong>release Xen every 6 months</strong>: at the = beginning of <strong>June</strong> and = <strong>December</strong>.
Add = ...
A regular 6 monthly release schedule has worked = well for Ubuntu, OpenStack and many other projects. The idea behind = it is a simple one: set a hard date and modify your goals to match that = timeline. Which is also, why we dropped feature freeze exceptions, which = create overheads and introduce unnecessary risk and debate. In addition, = the new fixed release schedule will help open source projects and = commercial vendors who consume Xen Project releases to plan their own = releases better. And it allows us to set a schedule that ensures that = every single release cycle is only affected by a single holiday period = and that we have a Xen Project developer event (be at a Hackathon or Xen = Project Developer Summit) during each release cycle.

> 
Replace with: "The stable release scheme is unchanged:18 = months full support, plus 18 months security fixes = afterwards."
After that leave things as they = are

Regards
Lars

On 10 Nov 2015, at 18:11, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

I would still suggest adding positives knowing that some will = find their own negatives. 

Sarah 

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:56 PM, = Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

Hi,

I made a few small copy = edits. I was not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so = please double-check = that. 
Odd, they all work for = me


A few comments:
- I would delete this = sentence:  Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the = announcement email and this blog = post. 
I will = leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked up, = it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on. 

- = Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release cycles = shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or = alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more = predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS = projects that are following this = trend. 
No = negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but Ubuntu = and OpenStack run 6 months cycles

- I looked over the slides and it = seems like you are a lot more strict on what can be added during the RC = part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind = it?
The = reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over freeze exceptions. = In particular, because some vendors promised customers features in 4.6 - = not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for shorter cycles is = that the customer impact of a missing a release will be less = severe. 

- For those that = are interested in joining, list the email, mailing list to = use.
I added = a link

Lars


On Tue, = Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
Hi all

I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7
release. Let me know if you have any comments.

https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&preview=3Dtrue
Thanks
Wei.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity<= /a>



--
Sarah Conway
Director of = PR Services, Collaborative Projects 
The Linux = Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway
_______________________________________________
Publicity = mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity<= /a>




--
Sarah Conway
Director of PR Services, Collaborative = Projects 
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) = 578-5300  Cell
Skype: =  sarah.k.conway

= --Apple-Mail=_70CA41B0-8D09-4F9E-8D1C-E08C415A848C-- --===============4786389763149503172== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4786389763149503172==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:30:48 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSfv-0007Oj-9X; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSft-0007Oa-VF for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:46 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-6.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 0B/3A-29649-5D813465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:45 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447237842!2776348!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.41] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.6 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 44658 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:30:42 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:30:42 -0000 Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so38359275wmw.0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:30:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=ZAJb7bIC6z5jYNGkHb5M2qRO6pGfNui9+dDSD0P2RYs=; b=emfqi7nNiEz5Oc1q4WRh4PzRrqgXP4Y8TeurDYKumooagVH6IrJIR+CT3SPcDEWLWC HDmeUueA0mk8dfrtY+al3IzZCBkBhjOA27BlUhKGpOFG3XK2US9u96Pdx68YpYf5xPMt DfbvaGHN0eV+uVaz7ZbOIU5flAV2Z2kp8tGDytadGORwrsQKR35bG7+J4hGuE3wJBwgU qAY6fdo5mxbHck5sU38irGL1lhtXgyYoMI+YciC625IpSt1LwDlIKjV6nMsIrT8kex1G RM2ygmY5PsGuZa3U8sv0XW4e3qzq0bVtPFl4TV+Aro7hTmiZ6EDLjgyGW7ZOM8JuL9uq +DgA== X-Received: by 10.28.143.21 with SMTP id r21mr9750611wmd.39.1447237842490; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:30:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h67sm2129757wmf.17.2015.11.11.02.30.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:30:41 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:30:39 +0000 Message-Id: References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> To: Sarah Conway , Zibby Keaton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4786389763149503172==" Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org --===============4786389763149503172== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_70CA41B0-8D09-4F9E-8D1C-E08C415A848C" --Apple-Mail=_70CA41B0-8D09-4F9E-8D1C-E08C415A848C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii So how about: > With Xen 4.6 released in October, we are already one month into the = new cycle. Add... Which means it is time to start planning for the next release. > Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the announcement = email and this blog post. The reason is that Xen community underwent = thorough > discussion on how to manage releases from = xen-unstable and its impact on stable releases.=20 Note (we always have waited for a month to start a new cycle, so no need = to apologise). Instead, how about... You may remember that one of the goals of the ">= 4.6 release planning was to create smoother developer experience = and to release Xen 4.6 on time. Both goals were achieved, so it was = time to think where to go from here. Thus, the Xen community underwent = thorough > discussion on how to manage releases from = xen-unstable and its impact on stable releases.=20 Maybe replace: "manage releases" ... "manage future releases" > After the 4.7 release, we will start to release Xen every 6 = months: at the beginning of June and = December. Add ... A regular 6 monthly release schedule has worked well for Ubuntu, = OpenStack and many other projects. The idea behind it is a simple one: = set a hard date and modify your goals to match that timeline. Which is = also, why we dropped feature freeze exceptions, which create overheads = and introduce unnecessary risk and debate. In addition, the new fixed = release schedule will help open source projects and commercial vendors = who consume Xen Project releases to plan their own releases better. And = it allows us to set a schedule that ensures that every single release = cycle is only affected by a single holiday period and that we have a Xen = Project developer event (be at a Hackathon or Xen Project Developer = Summit) during each release cycle. >=20 Replace with: "The stable release scheme is unchanged:18 months full = support, plus 18 months security fixes afterwards." After that leave things as they are Regards Lars > On 10 Nov 2015, at 18:11, Sarah Conway = wrote: >=20 > I would still suggest adding positives knowing that some will find = their own negatives.=20 >=20 > Sarah=20 >=20 > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Lars Kurth > wrote: >=20 >> On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway > wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the = links or view the slides, so please double-check that.=20 > Odd, they all work for me >=20 >>=20 >> A few comments: >> - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me = so long to write the announcement email and this blog post.=20 > I will leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was = picked up, it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on.=20 >=20 >> - Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release = cycles shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? = Or alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more = predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS projects that = are following this trend.=20 > No negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but = Ubuntu and OpenStack run 6 months cycles >=20 >> - I looked over the slides and it seems like you are a lot more = strict on what can be added during the RC part of the cycle. Am I = mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind it? >=20 > The reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over freeze = exceptions. In particular, because some vendors promised customers = features in 4.6 - not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for = shorter cycles is that the customer impact of a missing a release will = be less severe.=20 >=20 >> - For those that are interested in joining, list the email, mailing = list to use. >=20 > I added a link >=20 > Lars >=20 >>=20 >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu > wrote: >> Hi all >>=20 >> I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7 >> release. Let me know if you have any comments. >>=20 >> https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&preview=3Dtrue = >>=20 >> Thanks >> Wei. >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org = >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity = >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Sarah Conway >> Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects=20 >> The Linux Foundation >> sconway@linuxfoundation.org >> (978) 578-5300 Cell >> Skype: sarah.k.conway >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicity mailing list >> Publicity@lists.xenproject.org = >> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity = >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Sarah Conway > Director of PR Services, Collaborative Projects=20 > The Linux Foundation > sconway@linuxfoundation.org > (978) 578-5300 Cell > Skype: sarah.k.conway --Apple-Mail=_70CA41B0-8D09-4F9E-8D1C-E08C415A848C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii So how about:

> With Xen 4.6 released in October, we are already = one month into the new cycle.
Add...
Which means it is time to start planning for the next = release.

> Some might be wondering what took me so long to = write the announcement email and this blog post. The reason is that Xen = community underwent thorough
> </a href=3D"..."= >discussion</a> on how to manage releases from xen-unstable = and its impact on <a href=3D"...">stable = releases</a>. 
Note (we always have = waited for a month to start a new cycle, so no need to = apologise).

Instead, how about...
You may remember = that one of the goals of the <a href=3D"https://blog.xenproject.org/2015/02/16/xen-project-4-6-planning= -opens/">4.6 release planning</a> was <em>to create = smoother developer experience and to release Xen 4.6 on time</em>. = Both goals were achieved, so it was time to think where to go from here. = Thus, the Xen community underwent thorough
> = </a href=3D"..." >discussion</a> on how to manage releases = from xen-unstable and its impact on <a href=3D"...">stable = releases</a>. 
Maybe replace: "manage = releases" ... "manage future releases"

> After the 4.7 release, we will = start to <strong>release Xen every 6 months</strong>: at the = beginning of <strong>June</strong> and = <strong>December</strong>.
Add = ...
A regular 6 monthly release schedule has worked = well for Ubuntu, OpenStack and many other projects. The idea behind = it is a simple one: set a hard date and modify your goals to match that = timeline. Which is also, why we dropped feature freeze exceptions, which = create overheads and introduce unnecessary risk and debate. In addition, = the new fixed release schedule will help open source projects and = commercial vendors who consume Xen Project releases to plan their own = releases better. And it allows us to set a schedule that ensures that = every single release cycle is only affected by a single holiday period = and that we have a Xen Project developer event (be at a Hackathon or Xen = Project Developer Summit) during each release cycle.

> 
Replace with: "The stable release scheme is unchanged:18 = months full support, plus 18 months security fixes = afterwards."
After that leave things as they = are

Regards
Lars

On 10 Nov 2015, at 18:11, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

I would still suggest adding positives knowing that some will = find their own negatives. 

Sarah 

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:56 PM, = Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway <sconway@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

Hi,

I made a few small copy = edits. I was not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so = please double-check = that. 
Odd, they all work for = me


A few comments:
- I would delete this = sentence:  Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the = announcement email and this blog = post. 
I will = leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked up, = it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on. 

- = Do you see any negatives stemming from continue to make release cycles = shorter and more predictable? If so, can we address them head on? Or = alternatively, expand more on the benefits of shorter, more = predictable release cycles, draw comparisons to other OS = projects that are following this = trend. 
No = negatives. I am not sure whether it's worthwhile doing this, but Ubuntu = and OpenStack run 6 months cycles

- I looked over the slides and it = seems like you are a lot more strict on what can be added during the RC = part of the cycle. Am I mistaken here or was there a reasoning behind = it?
The = reasoning was, that there was a lot of arguing over freeze exceptions. = In particular, because some vendors promised customers features in 4.6 - = not all of which made it. Part of the rationale for shorter cycles is = that the customer impact of a missing a release will be less = severe. 

- For those that = are interested in joining, list the email, mailing list to = use.
I added = a link

Lars


On Tue, = Nov 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
Hi all

I wrote a blog post with the help from Lars about the upcoming 4.7
release. Let me know if you have any comments.

https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=3D11139&preview=3Dtrue
Thanks
Wei.

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity<= /a>



--
Sarah Conway
Director of = PR Services, Collaborative Projects 
The Linux = Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) 578-5300  Cell
Skype:  sarah.k.conway
_______________________________________________
Publicity = mailing list
Publicity@lists.xenproject.org
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity<= /a>




--
Sarah Conway
Director of PR Services, Collaborative = Projects 
The Linux Foundation
sconway@linuxfoundation.org
(978) = 578-5300  Cell
Skype: =  sarah.k.conway

= --Apple-Mail=_70CA41B0-8D09-4F9E-8D1C-E08C415A848C-- --===============4786389763149503172== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity --===============4786389763149503172==-- From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:45:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSts-00083X-5i; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:12 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwStq-00083Q-SZ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:10 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-10.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 0A/C4-01143-63C13465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:10 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447238706!2310613!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 50069 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:45:07 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:45:07 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="311527381" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:04 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111104504.GG28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 05:56:38PM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so please double-check that. > Odd, they all work for me > > > > > A few comments: > > - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post. > I will leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked up, it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on. > I think it is harmless. I will leave it as it is. -- Wei. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:45:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSts-00083X-5i; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:12 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwStq-00083Q-SZ for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:10 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-10.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 0A/C4-01143-63C13465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:10 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447238706!2310613!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 50069 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:45:07 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-4.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:45:07 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="311527381" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:45:04 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111104504.GG28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 05:56:38PM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 10 Nov 2015, at 16:11, Sarah Conway wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I made a few small copy edits. I was not able to open any of the links or view the slides, so please double-check that. > Odd, they all work for me > > > > > A few comments: > > - I would delete this sentence: Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post. > I will leave this up to Wei. It's his personal style. If this was picked up, it's a nice harmless trap quote they can focus on. > I think it is harmless. I will leave it as it is. -- Wei. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:49:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSxq-00087I-K1; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:18 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSxp-00087D-0F for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:17 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-12.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 9E/24-14900-C2D13465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:16 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447238953!2122738!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 28590 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:49:14 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:49:14 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="317363095" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:10 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:30:39AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > So how about: > > > With Xen 4.6 released in October, we are already one month into the new cycle. > Add... > Which means it is time to start planning for the next release. > > > Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post. The reason is that Xen community underwent thorough > > discussion on how to manage releases from xen-unstable and its impact on stable releases. > Note (we always have waited for a month to start a new cycle, so no need to apologise). > > Instead, how about... > You may remember that one of the goals of the 4.6 release planning was to create smoother developer experience and to release Xen 4.6 on time. Both goals were achieved, so it was time to think where to go from here. Thus, the Xen community underwent thorough > > discussion on how to manage releases from xen-unstable and its impact on stable releases. > Maybe replace: "manage releases" ... "manage future releases" > > > After the 4.7 release, we will start to release Xen every 6 months: at the beginning of June and December. > Add ... > A regular 6 monthly release schedule has worked well for Ubuntu, OpenStack and many other projects. The idea behind it is a simple one: set a hard date and modify your goals to match that timeline. Which is also, why we dropped feature freeze exceptions, which create overheads and introduce unnecessary risk and debate. In addition, the new fixed release schedule will help open source projects and commercial vendors who consume Xen Project releases to plan their own releases better. And it allows us to set a schedule that ensures that every single release cycle is only affected by a single holiday period and that we have a Xen Project developer event (be at a Hackathon or Xen Project Developer Summit) during each release cycle. > Fine by me. > > > Replace with: "The stable release scheme is unchanged:18 months full support, plus 18 months security fixes afterwards." > After that leave things as they are One negative point other might pick is that they say more release means less resource for stable release maintenance. Not sure we need to emphasise more on the unchanged stable release scheme. -- Wei. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:49:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSxq-00087I-K1; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:18 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwSxp-00087D-0F for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:17 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-12.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 9E/24-14900-C2D13465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:16 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447238953!2122738!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 28590 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:49:14 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-11.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:49:14 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="317363095" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:49:10 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:30:39AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > So how about: > > > With Xen 4.6 released in October, we are already one month into the new cycle. > Add... > Which means it is time to start planning for the next release. > > > Some might be wondering what took me so long to write the announcement email and this blog post. The reason is that Xen community underwent thorough > > discussion on how to manage releases from xen-unstable and its impact on stable releases. > Note (we always have waited for a month to start a new cycle, so no need to apologise). > > Instead, how about... > You may remember that one of the goals of the 4.6 release planning was to create smoother developer experience and to release Xen 4.6 on time. Both goals were achieved, so it was time to think where to go from here. Thus, the Xen community underwent thorough > > discussion on how to manage releases from xen-unstable and its impact on stable releases. > Maybe replace: "manage releases" ... "manage future releases" > > > After the 4.7 release, we will start to release Xen every 6 months: at the beginning of June and December. > Add ... > A regular 6 monthly release schedule has worked well for Ubuntu, OpenStack and many other projects. The idea behind it is a simple one: set a hard date and modify your goals to match that timeline. Which is also, why we dropped feature freeze exceptions, which create overheads and introduce unnecessary risk and debate. In addition, the new fixed release schedule will help open source projects and commercial vendors who consume Xen Project releases to plan their own releases better. And it allows us to set a schedule that ensures that every single release cycle is only affected by a single holiday period and that we have a Xen Project developer event (be at a Hackathon or Xen Project Developer Summit) during each release cycle. > Fine by me. > > > Replace with: "The stable release scheme is unchanged:18 months full support, plus 18 months security fixes afterwards." > After that leave things as they are One negative point other might pick is that they say more release means less resource for stable release maintenance. Not sure we need to emphasise more on the unchanged stable release scheme. -- Wei. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:54:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:54:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwT2N-0008NQ-1g; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwT2K-0008NL-Pp for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:56 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 9F/78-18886-44E13465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:56 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447239232!2311877!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.46] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 56669 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:53:52 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f46.google.com) (74.125.82.46) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:53:52 -0000 Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so154295571wmw.1 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BPCesbMXHrB6EUJouHNHpzwjcPDRuOnyTwUPB6daIR8=; b=tJtIu4UsXgpynniN8uJRXSNkhHCtWGLgAAwnnTVQYLcdkn3EXCGfenNTAMwcKB8xbJ +zJMj1BIISAMjsxQzF82rbheMfOBM634/1Atf0SHuG7/g+RyUscTCp6qZw0aYo1JT/JM 5lO8CC8RskvmHpKtwpb4xZZ1tnMazV1i74UCdEPeJ9Ey/bihTBH3Ix8lM5Wr2U2ofr3n x+26d8y9l+kJZ5G1ISaqYO3nqMlin1gCb7tU3bFMXJZ0H8o9BXrBn9C718NDJr6kOaiq g/EZcAkAs/rbEbfZi+iHbguMjjdCQG/biiDkQVWY1T+imXOOaia3nWHS5HLBWUpYCPRg a6AA== X-Received: by 10.194.143.82 with SMTP id sc18mr7830032wjb.82.1447239232457; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm8366455wjz.29.2015.11.11.02.53.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:51 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:50 +0000 Message-Id: <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> To: Wei Liu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > One negative point other might pick is that they say more release means > less resource for stable release maintenance. Not sure we need to > emphasise more on the unchanged stable release scheme. Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. Will update the post and sync with Zibby later Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:54:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:54:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwT2N-0008NQ-1g; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwT2K-0008NL-Pp for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:56 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 9F/78-18886-44E13465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:56 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447239232!2311877!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.46] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 56669 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:53:52 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f46.google.com) (74.125.82.46) by server-16.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:53:52 -0000 Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so154295571wmw.1 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BPCesbMXHrB6EUJouHNHpzwjcPDRuOnyTwUPB6daIR8=; b=tJtIu4UsXgpynniN8uJRXSNkhHCtWGLgAAwnnTVQYLcdkn3EXCGfenNTAMwcKB8xbJ +zJMj1BIISAMjsxQzF82rbheMfOBM634/1Atf0SHuG7/g+RyUscTCp6qZw0aYo1JT/JM 5lO8CC8RskvmHpKtwpb4xZZ1tnMazV1i74UCdEPeJ9Ey/bihTBH3Ix8lM5Wr2U2ofr3n x+26d8y9l+kJZ5G1ISaqYO3nqMlin1gCb7tU3bFMXJZ0H8o9BXrBn9C718NDJr6kOaiq g/EZcAkAs/rbEbfZi+iHbguMjjdCQG/biiDkQVWY1T+imXOOaia3nWHS5HLBWUpYCPRg a6AA== X-Received: by 10.194.143.82 with SMTP id sc18mr7830032wjb.82.1447239232457; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm8366455wjz.29.2015.11.11.02.53.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:51 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:50 +0000 Message-Id: <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> To: Wei Liu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > One negative point other might pick is that they say more release means > less resource for stable release maintenance. Not sure we need to > emphasise more on the unchanged stable release scheme. Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. Will update the post and sync with Zibby later Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:56:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwT57-0008Q7-CY; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:49 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwT56-0008Q2-Pt for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:48 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id B1/AE-18886-0FE13465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:48 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447239406!2316532!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 33662 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:56:47 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-8.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:56:47 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="317363922" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:44 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:53:50AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > One negative point other might pick is that they say more release means > > less resource for stable release maintenance. Not sure we need to > > emphasise more on the unchanged stable release scheme. > > Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. > Makes sense. -- Wei. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 10:56:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwT57-0008Q7-CY; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:49 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwT56-0008Q2-Pt for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:48 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id B1/AE-18886-0FE13465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:48 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447239406!2316532!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 33662 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 10:56:47 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-8.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 10:56:47 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="317363922" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:56:44 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:53:50AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:49, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > One negative point other might pick is that they say more release means > > less resource for stable release maintenance. Not sure we need to > > emphasise more on the unchanged stable release scheme. > > Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. > Makes sense. -- Wei. _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 11:03:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTBJ-0000NM-KC; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTBI-0000NH-4w for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:12 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 29/4A-18886-F6023465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447239790!2316471!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.52] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 28194 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 11:03:10 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 11:03:10 -0000 Received: by wmdw130 with SMTP id w130so108074570wmd.0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:03:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lxiNx6bgIgivHNrKko+JjTD7xdBfOAo0N/E8SaWfGmk=; b=F9VQrDYXvxD9Q4p3RKn6UpJm0+INOj+k9zA4PchB2/FZiBvgNHEvqWGyF3/j4T5eub t5DZde7UjfeecravrzJfION8VajEOxrSgMj9aNeiuNEyo3oLQtAOtvJXBotikcZWcZew GTVvILAWavwVGAk6cq1/uNmIcV2vLI1J/srrDFaW4QVnR8PKZnSb8Z/zFRkKkDmDiBR2 M4Wcm8Yr+kVzlxlcIaMjJJBdqPnI1/iavfeJOFe/8NK0YVTt3r7QNzLHnQz3tafqWD2m 5XTfeC9CJclFTEaWmkRJNGMN1vFy+yvFrE7xyErIO+QTK7kMJAzPpYdyWSZMiVSbeOv5 jDDQ== X-Received: by 10.28.146.82 with SMTP id u79mr9895967wmd.96.1447239790056; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:03:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm24705641wmd.13.2015.11.11.03.03.09 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:03:09 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:07 +0000 Message-Id: <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> To: Wei Liu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:56, Wei Liu wrote: > >> Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. >> > > Makes sense. All is changed now in the blog post. Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 11:03:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTBJ-0000NM-KC; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTBI-0000NH-4w for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:12 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147] by server-15.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 29/4A-18886-F6023465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1447239790!2316471!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.52] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 28194 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 11:03:10 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by server-5.tower-27.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 11:03:10 -0000 Received: by wmdw130 with SMTP id w130so108074570wmd.0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:03:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lxiNx6bgIgivHNrKko+JjTD7xdBfOAo0N/E8SaWfGmk=; b=F9VQrDYXvxD9Q4p3RKn6UpJm0+INOj+k9zA4PchB2/FZiBvgNHEvqWGyF3/j4T5eub t5DZde7UjfeecravrzJfION8VajEOxrSgMj9aNeiuNEyo3oLQtAOtvJXBotikcZWcZew GTVvILAWavwVGAk6cq1/uNmIcV2vLI1J/srrDFaW4QVnR8PKZnSb8Z/zFRkKkDmDiBR2 M4Wcm8Yr+kVzlxlcIaMjJJBdqPnI1/iavfeJOFe/8NK0YVTt3r7QNzLHnQz3tafqWD2m 5XTfeC9CJclFTEaWmkRJNGMN1vFy+yvFrE7xyErIO+QTK7kMJAzPpYdyWSZMiVSbeOv5 jDDQ== X-Received: by 10.28.146.82 with SMTP id u79mr9895967wmd.96.1447239790056; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:03:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm24705641wmd.13.2015.11.11.03.03.09 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:03:09 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:03:07 +0000 Message-Id: <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> To: Wei Liu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:56, Wei Liu wrote: > >> Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. >> > > Makes sense. All is changed now in the blog post. Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 11:09:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTHp-0000Wd-43; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:57 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTHn-0000W1-La for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:55 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211] by server-12.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id B5/37-12831-30223465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:55 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1447240193!2707959!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 54737 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 11:09:54 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 11:09:54 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="311530676" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:51 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111110951.GA9967@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:03:07AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:56, Wei Liu wrote: > > > >> Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. > >> > > > > Makes sense. > > All is changed now in the blog post. LGTM. Thanks for doing this. Do you want to press the button or shall I? > Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 11:09:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTHp-0000Wd-43; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:57 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTHn-0000W1-La for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:55 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211] by server-12.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id B5/37-12831-30223465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:55 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1447240193!2707959!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 54737 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 11:09:54 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-9.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 11:09:54 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="311530676" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:09:51 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111110951.GA9967@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:03:07AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:56, Wei Liu wrote: > > > >> Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. > >> > > > > Makes sense. > > All is changed now in the blog post. LGTM. Thanks for doing this. Do you want to press the button or shall I? > Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 11:29:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTb1-0001Z0-9f; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTb0-0001Ys-EP for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:46 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-9.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id F0/4A-10678-9A623465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:45 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447241383!2804898!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.49] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 47998 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 11:29:44 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 11:29:44 -0000 Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so177000823wme.0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:29:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=R2gokaEJG46uexKSf30SD56A7BIX1rqIdvJy/sz6LLM=; b=n+y+4i8aJD7f1URFvzNq1W8fjcoReZutMO8NNfFnTTOR9l5RlsmcSOGs/LHDlCD2Vr OEKA+EQkRQD6IBGxkDcTPApcPX51iBFcCdf6djU1bh7kt4jnyCNEVqADaaUYdn1Jp8B0 c84HlUtIToGlFFI2b8ZwYPI3QAT6xQlSBphsYmDq65Vuk1eDP1LsCDfy4RjwAb6n2zu4 g18P1qdvA1JGUJGzS4QZePEcAD4aXg+90lD1yStKMPegwnpVie4FXvNK1aTErT+Gbm5j nPACXRrzqiTjXSFb6Js2gLWyKgZTRegfAZQ957vEuphr+JSFKUjX8+lB3HQZMIze+4Pa ynRw== X-Received: by 10.28.210.77 with SMTP id j74mr36850486wmg.60.1447241383173; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:29:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r65sm24814268wmb.20.2015.11.11.03.29.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: <20151111110951.GA9967@zion.uk.xensource.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:41 +0000 Message-Id: <6BD7C1EA-1941-4A66-955E-D7D5AEA3452C@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> <20151111110951.GA9967@zion.uk.xensource.com> To: Wei Liu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org > On 11 Nov 2015, at 11:09, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:03:07AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: >> >>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:56, Wei Liu wrote: >>> >>>> Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. >>>> >>> >>> Makes sense. >> >> All is changed now in the blog post. > > LGTM. Thanks for doing this. Do you want to press the button or shall I? I don't mind either way. Why don't you! Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 11:29:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTb1-0001Z0-9f; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:47 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTb0-0001Ys-EP for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:46 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-9.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id F0/4A-10678-9A623465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:45 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447241383!2804898!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.49] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 47998 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 11:29:44 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by server-7.tower-31.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 11:29:44 -0000 Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so177000823wme.0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:29:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=R2gokaEJG46uexKSf30SD56A7BIX1rqIdvJy/sz6LLM=; b=n+y+4i8aJD7f1URFvzNq1W8fjcoReZutMO8NNfFnTTOR9l5RlsmcSOGs/LHDlCD2Vr OEKA+EQkRQD6IBGxkDcTPApcPX51iBFcCdf6djU1bh7kt4jnyCNEVqADaaUYdn1Jp8B0 c84HlUtIToGlFFI2b8ZwYPI3QAT6xQlSBphsYmDq65Vuk1eDP1LsCDfy4RjwAb6n2zu4 g18P1qdvA1JGUJGzS4QZePEcAD4aXg+90lD1yStKMPegwnpVie4FXvNK1aTErT+Gbm5j nPACXRrzqiTjXSFb6Js2gLWyKgZTRegfAZQ957vEuphr+JSFKUjX8+lB3HQZMIze+4Pa ynRw== X-Received: by 10.28.210.77 with SMTP id j74mr36850486wmg.60.1447241383173; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:29:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (97e3cc8b.skybroadband.com. [151.227.204.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r65sm24814268wmb.20.2015.11.11.03.29.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Lars Kurth In-Reply-To: <20151111110951.GA9967@zion.uk.xensource.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:29:41 +0000 Message-Id: <6BD7C1EA-1941-4A66-955E-D7D5AEA3452C@gmail.com> References: <20151110122006.GA28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> <20151111110951.GA9967@zion.uk.xensource.com> To: Wei Liu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org > On 11 Nov 2015, at 11:09, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:03:07AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: >> >>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:56, Wei Liu wrote: >>> >>>> Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. >>>> >>> >>> Makes sense. >> >> All is changed now in the blog post. > > LGTM. Thanks for doing this. Do you want to press the button or shall I? I don't mind either way. Why don't you! Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 11:39:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTke-00029z-1z; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:44 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTkc-00029s-1e for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:42 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 4C/F8-23747-DF823465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:41 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447241979!2818114!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 57642 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 11:39:40 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 11:39:40 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="311533819" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:37 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111113937.GA10274@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> <20151111110951.GA9967@zion.uk.xensource.com> <6BD7C1EA-1941-4A66-955E-D7D5AEA3452C@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6BD7C1EA-1941-4A66-955E-D7D5AEA3452C@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:29:41AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 11:09, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:03:07AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> > >>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:56, Wei Liu wrote: > >>> > >>>> Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Makes sense. > >> > >> All is changed now in the blog post. > > > > LGTM. Thanks for doing this. Do you want to press the button or shall I? > > I don't mind either way. Why don't you! Scheduled for today 1200 GMT. > Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Wed Nov 11 11:39:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTke-00029z-1z; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:44 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwTkc-00029s-1e for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:42 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 4C/F8-23747-DF823465; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:41 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=7503460ff=wei.liu2@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1447241979!2818114!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.19.2; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 57642 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2015 11:39:40 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Nov 2015 11:39:40 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,275,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="311533819" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:37 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Lars Kurth Message-ID: <20151111113937.GA10274@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <52AAE207-F985-40A2-97B4-68B87EA0B00A@gmail.com> <20151111104910.GH28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <240DFD98-A228-4A69-80E8-06BAC96BCAB6@gmail.com> <20151111105644.GI28720@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1F1A616C-255E-461D-BEBC-06945F61874F@gmail.com> <20151111110951.GA9967@zion.uk.xensource.com> <6BD7C1EA-1941-4A66-955E-D7D5AEA3452C@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6BD7C1EA-1941-4A66-955E-D7D5AEA3452C@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Zibby Keaton , "publicity@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project 4.7 Planning Opens X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:29:41AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 11:09, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:03:07AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> > >>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:56, Wei Liu wrote: > >>> > >>>> Possible, but I don't want them to point them to it and it wasn't very conclusive in the discussion. If this turns out to be an issue, we could always change the point release cadence from 4 months to 6 to claw back some effort, or revisit the stable release maintenance. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Makes sense. > >> > >> All is changed now in the blog post. > > > > LGTM. Thanks for doing this. Do you want to press the button or shall I? > > I don't mind either way. Why don't you! Scheduled for today 1200 GMT. > Lars _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Nov 30 13:55:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a3OvB-0003RX-97; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a3OvA-0003RS-Is for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:12 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211] by server-6.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 5E/A9-22089-F355C565; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1448891710!7522843!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.43] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.35; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 60864 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2015 13:55:11 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by server-3.tower-206.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 30 Nov 2015 13:55:11 -0000 Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so156757357wme.0 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:55:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=RhwdstDmQxiiI10ifcqzRIfA2RKdsK11bLkw8oLHrcA=; b=I+yoOZNCcHiIXCD6NLQ7FwSJi6N0J1d7IPyj3aePI3lsNctjrQjVfyD4/h5MhuOCJ/ tTKH9fWrD6WbeqJlM0f3nhfZawq6SDuy4lRSifSEGPgrESdjeS+k+7pOReaBcGj2uzeC mixQjwjgQIrKhtRyKZ6slEibXQEClh2O4DbdLsdq4+PbMbQjBl0sQtIW9/MfzA9Lx1L2 rsx8Bje/KPlMtxtds9D7W+5Lc8r7P6DckRJvPTBgwttZhvTPrDVAVvVmLC9U9rmVJwe3 S1LdFa1xCU6u27haA0dn9oGMUTq7qhpX4/07n81BikvdCIguZG/xy7ATqEuv0ePAIPzc 8nLg== X-Received: by 10.194.114.34 with SMTP id jd2mr49954978wjb.12.1448891710558; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:55:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (97e5a080.skybroadband.com. [151.229.160.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i18sm21497071wmf.6.2015.11.30.05.55.08 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:55:09 -0800 (PST) From: Lars Kurth Message-Id: <61D923F2-2599-41E6-913B-EE2FC792F639@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:08 +0000 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project Contributor Training (Updated Versions) X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org See https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11165&preview=true _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity From publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Mon Nov 30 13:55:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xenproject.org Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a3OvB-0003RX-97; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:13 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a3OvA-0003RS-Is for publicity@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:12 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211] by server-6.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 5E/A9-22089-F355C565; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:11 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1448891710!7522843!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.82.43] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests= X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.35; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 60864 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2015 13:55:11 -0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by server-3.tower-206.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 30 Nov 2015 13:55:11 -0000 Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so156757357wme.0 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:55:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=RhwdstDmQxiiI10ifcqzRIfA2RKdsK11bLkw8oLHrcA=; b=I+yoOZNCcHiIXCD6NLQ7FwSJi6N0J1d7IPyj3aePI3lsNctjrQjVfyD4/h5MhuOCJ/ tTKH9fWrD6WbeqJlM0f3nhfZawq6SDuy4lRSifSEGPgrESdjeS+k+7pOReaBcGj2uzeC mixQjwjgQIrKhtRyKZ6slEibXQEClh2O4DbdLsdq4+PbMbQjBl0sQtIW9/MfzA9Lx1L2 rsx8Bje/KPlMtxtds9D7W+5Lc8r7P6DckRJvPTBgwttZhvTPrDVAVvVmLC9U9rmVJwe3 S1LdFa1xCU6u27haA0dn9oGMUTq7qhpX4/07n81BikvdCIguZG/xy7ATqEuv0ePAIPzc 8nLg== X-Received: by 10.194.114.34 with SMTP id jd2mr49954978wjb.12.1448891710558; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:55:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (97e5a080.skybroadband.com. [151.229.160.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i18sm21497071wmf.6.2015.11.30.05.55.08 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:55:09 -0800 (PST) From: Lars Kurth Message-Id: <61D923F2-2599-41E6-913B-EE2FC792F639@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:55:08 +0000 To: publicity@lists.xenproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: [Publicity] Blog post: Xen Project Contributor Training (Updated Versions) X-BeenThere: publicity@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: publicity-bounces@lists.xenproject.org See https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11165&preview=true _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@lists.xenproject.org http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity