Hi,

Even I am interested with the same.

As far as I know, P= V on Xen-ARM for Cortex-A8 is available for testing on ARM Fast Model Emula= tors.

But It has been months since we = heard any news about it.

PV on Xen-= ARM for Cortex-A9 is already available for Tegra 2 Harmony.

Even I would like to learn and get some answers= from you guys, to the questions posted by Simon Sturm.

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Simon Sturm <Simon.Sturm@neclab.eu> wrote:

Hello PV Xen-ARM dev= elopers,

=C2=A0=

I have a few questio= ns about the PV Xen on ARM project, its development state, and future plans= .

=C2=A0=

I know that there is= active development on the upstream version of Xen but to my understanding,= this covers primarily PVH support and thus requires an ARM processor with = hardware virtualization extensions. However, I am interested in experimenting with Xen on ARM with= recent devices without these extensions =E2=80=93 which leads me to PV Xen= on ARM.

=C2=A0=

On your wiki pages y= ou refer to two different GIT repositories where the last commits are more = than a year ago. This let me assume that the PV Xen on ARM work is frozen.<= u>

As I saw that the ne= wer repository is based on a Xen 4.2 development version (according to the = READMEs) and the other on Xen 3.0. I guess that there was effort ongoing in= porting PV Xen on ARM work to a newer Xen base at last. It also seems to be that MiniOS o= n ARM is not ported yet to the newer code base.

=C2=A0=

Now my questions:=

* What is the curren= t and future development plan of PV Xen on ARM? I guess that this work will= not go upstream Xen soon and maybe never.

* Are there also pat= ches available (or included in the repositories) to build a Linux kernel fo= r PV Xen on ARM (as Dom0 and DomU)?

=C2=A0=

=C2=A0=

Thanks,
=
=C2=A0=

Simon<= /span>

_______________________________________________
Xen-arm mailing list
Xen-arm@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm

=E2=9C=89 Regards :: Krishna Pavan =E2=9C=8D

--20cf302ef94a2a825804d6b61d65-- --===============4519050035616276696== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-arm mailing list Xen-arm@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm --===============4519050035616276696==-- From xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Wed Feb 27 15:08:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xen.org Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:08:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAic0-0003tg-7I; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:08:04 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAiby-0003tK-W8 for xen-arm@lists.xen.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:08:03 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:11309] by server-10.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 3D/13-12679-2512E215; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:08:02 +0000 X-Env-Sender: post4pavan@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1361977569!9099068!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.216.48] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.9 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_50_60, HTML_MESSAGE, ML_RADAR_SPEW_LINKS_14, RCVD_BY_IP, spamassassin: X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.8.6; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 26372 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2013 15:06:10 -0000 Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-qa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by server-13.tower-27.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2013 15:06:10 -0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id j8so539765qah.14 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:06:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+1T0+7D6NckduCRSRAZ3OMDo4fC+3zRC7V6Qc3U1NPg=; b=xuYU7Z/Ocj/gJ7FRWCfVSqL91Z1yjKPEqiEeN9OmBo82WVrrkhf2E9ex4FdUxKNEN+ JCkGlP0RB2l/60darLhEEQ+gif+lQDi8/qseXdfA2x3/kOY2qfA6FvEfKVMriK/ZjLMe VY/ZTBjn3oyxqzVPLewEMDb/h0av9VaUS7IQd5QAPSjRAci1OREIQq9tWYWIN3BDiKap Z0jFCKyx2ZphWX+DEb3O3+FpYWA4QmgdpSG57Og2caoWAZSf2YyMbsEg0eRhDC78q9Gk QPMOb1loIBDN2mokqw5WuzIupeL0w7ZX+HwpDxI2pHKRv2H+KIrR8/hC1w35NaV6Fkrt Da2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.178.4 with SMTP id bk4mr8175807qab.70.1361977568552; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:06:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.78.214 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:06:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:36:08 +0530 Message-ID: From: Krishna Pavan To: Simon Sturm Cc: "xen-arm@lists.xen.org" Subject: Re: [XenARM] State of PV Xen on ARM X-BeenThere: xen-arm@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List for Xen ARM developers and users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4519050035616276696==" Sender: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org --===============4519050035616276696== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf302ef94a2a825804d6b61d65 --20cf302ef94a2a825804d6b61d65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Even I am interested with the same. As far as I know, PV on Xen-ARM for Cortex-A8 is available for testing on ARM Fast Model Emulators. But It has been months since we heard any news about it. PV on Xen-ARM for Cortex-A9 is already available for Tegra 2 Harmony. Even I would like to learn and get some answers from you guys, to the questions posted by Simon Sturm. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Simon Sturm wrote: > Hello PV Xen-ARM developers,**** > > ** ** > > I have a few questions about the PV Xen on ARM project, its development > state, and future plans.**** > > ** ** > > I know that there is active development on the upstream version of Xen bu= t > to my understanding, this covers primarily PVH support and thus requires = an > ARM processor with hardware virtualization extensions. However, I am > interested in experimenting with Xen on ARM with recent devices without > these extensions =E2=80=93 which leads me to PV Xen on ARM.**** > > ** ** > > On your wiki pages you refer to two different GIT repositories where the > last commits are more than a year ago. This let me assume that the PV Xen > on ARM work is frozen.**** > > As I saw that the newer repository is based on a Xen 4.2 development > version (according to the READMEs) and the other on Xen 3.0. I guess that > there was effort ongoing in porting PV Xen on ARM work to a newer Xen bas= e > at last. It also seems to be that MiniOS on ARM is not ported yet to the > newer code base.**** > > ** ** > > Now my questions:**** > > * What is the current and future development plan of PV Xen on ARM? I > guess that this work will not go upstream Xen soon and maybe never.**** > > * Are there also patches available (or included in the repositories) to > build a Linux kernel for PV Xen on ARM (as Dom0 and DomU)?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > Simon**** > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-arm mailing list > Xen-arm@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm > > --=20 =E2=9C=89 Regards :: Krishna Pavan =E2=9C=8D --20cf302ef94a2a825804d6b61d65 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Even I am interested with the same.

As far as I know, P= V on Xen-ARM for Cortex-A8 is available for testing on ARM Fast Model Emula= tors.

But It has been months since we = heard any news about it.

PV on Xen-= ARM for Cortex-A9 is already available for Tegra 2 Harmony.

Even I would like to learn and get some answers= from you guys, to the questions posted by Simon Sturm.

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Simon Sturm <Simon.Sturm@neclab.eu> wrote:

Hello PV Xen-ARM dev= elopers,

=C2=A0=

I have a few questio= ns about the PV Xen on ARM project, its development state, and future plans= .

=C2=A0=

I know that there is= active development on the upstream version of Xen but to my understanding,= this covers primarily PVH support and thus requires an ARM processor with = hardware virtualization extensions. However, I am interested in experimenting with Xen on ARM with= recent devices without these extensions =E2=80=93 which leads me to PV Xen= on ARM.

=C2=A0=

On your wiki pages y= ou refer to two different GIT repositories where the last commits are more = than a year ago. This let me assume that the PV Xen on ARM work is frozen.<= u>

As I saw that the ne= wer repository is based on a Xen 4.2 development version (according to the = READMEs) and the other on Xen 3.0. I guess that there was effort ongoing in= porting PV Xen on ARM work to a newer Xen base at last. It also seems to be that MiniOS o= n ARM is not ported yet to the newer code base.

=C2=A0=

Now my questions:=

* What is the curren= t and future development plan of PV Xen on ARM? I guess that this work will= not go upstream Xen soon and maybe never.

* Are there also pat= ches available (or included in the repositories) to build a Linux kernel fo= r PV Xen on ARM (as Dom0 and DomU)?

=C2=A0=

=C2=A0=

Thanks,
=
=C2=A0=

Simon<= /span>

_______________________________________________
Xen-arm mailing list
Xen-arm@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm

=E2=9C=89 Regards :: Krishna Pavan =E2=9C=8D

--20cf302ef94a2a825804d6b61d65-- --===============4519050035616276696== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-arm mailing list Xen-arm@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm --===============4519050035616276696==-- From xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Wed Feb 27 16:35:50 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xen.org Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAjys-0006yB-CJ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAjyr-0006xs-1s; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.99:43991] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id C4/E4-25744-FD53E215; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:43 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-217.messagelabs.com!1361982942!18420677!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.83.51] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.6 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.8.6; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1320 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2013 16:35:43 -0000 Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ee0-f51.google.com) (74.125.83.51) by server-4.tower-217.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2013 16:35:43 -0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id d17so661498eek.38 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:35:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=t4cH5aMHeGDQhqW9KCopbnz6oQ68MKdnO9EDPIqkqEE=; b=heMwVYuXG6cDud0pIapZe/jhF71TYmN1qEWWzQlQAmYxmCIwx787xCmVNfKfYVuYdy 8WvsnKMlOV0UVrEH5tlseZw6VbKXTOSettmLha3ykde0iBfXL4XcYdlHM9+zGxgtOw79 pb4BC+Nic+63R6c4r59XtY2yxqtxm3r436gEmrVZAX1hgDQ0lU85v9jiCC33VJOKunFG ziQfxWn+1N70E4A/81IPJ71ab/ffEKNygu/kTfhpCSTT8osJbhIrXl1TUZ2Rq5H2LlGF GLJtQCd2Kbx5qEUgsX8u/8G1jCuwJC6sNCNuTXd/bJCBmCSZw4Ntz9SE/hHhzyk8cVMP biKQ== X-Received: by 10.15.101.204 with SMTP id bp52mr7261169eeb.31.1361982942595; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.26.11] ([151.225.0.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q42sm7280638eem.14.2013.02.27.08.35.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:35:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512E35DA.4030507@xen.org> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:38 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lars.kurth@xen.org References: <512984AE.2060400@xen.org> In-Reply-To: <512984AE.2060400@xen.org> Cc: "xen-api@lists.xen.org" , xen-arm@lists.xen.org, Amir M Chaudhry , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Anil Madhavapeddy Subject: Re: [XenARM] [Vote] Results of formal vote for Mirage to be accepted as Xen.org Incubation Project - Correction X-BeenThere: xen-arm@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: List for Xen ARM developers and users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5800890625558681927==" Sender: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============5800890625558681927== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030006050307060205060201" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030006050307060205060201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I need to correct the results and apologize for a mistake I made : I should have double checked the process before sending out the request for voting. http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html says*"Voting:* The community manager arranges a timed private vote as outlined above (voting should be open for a minimum of a week). Any maintainer of a mature project and the Xen.org community manager is allowed to vote. Voting follows the conventions as laid out in 'Principle: Consensus Decision Making'." This means that: a) I miscommunicated who is elgible to vote : which are project leads, committers and maintainers of mature projects, as well as the community manager. b) I tallied wrongly I am summarizing the results again: the following people who fit the criteria in a) can vote. Note that XCP does not have a defined list of maintainers and committers, thus only the vote of the XCP's project lead - Mike McClurg - counts. Eligible votes came from: Ian Campbell Mike McClurg Jan Beulich Lars Kurth Tim Deegan Ian Jackson 5 in favour, 1 abstained. If no committer challenges by Friday, the vote will carry. Regards Lars On 24/02/2013 03:10, Lars Kurth wrote: > Hi everybody, > > sorry for the delay in posting the vote results for > http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal. > > The vote breakdown: > - 6 out of 7 Xen committers voted (including project leads) > - 5 were in favour > - 1 abstained due to the "choice of the ISC licence rather than a > copyleft licence such as LGPLv2+" > > So overall the vote carries. > > We also several other community members voting in support of the > proposal. We also discussed the proposal at the last Xen Maintainer, > Committer and Developer Meeting, which expressed support for the > proposal. > > What happens next? > I will work with the Mirage project lead on a detailed plan for the > Incubation phase. > > Best Regards > Lars --------------030006050307060205060201 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I need to correct the results and apologize for a mistake I made : I should have double checked the process before sending out the request for voting.

http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html says "Voting: The community manager arranges a timed private vote as outlined above (voting should be open for a minimum of a week). Any maintainer of a mature project and the Xen.org community manager is allowed to vote. Voting follows the conventions as laid out in 'Principle: Consensus Decision Making'."

This means that:
a) I miscommunicated who is elgible to vote : which are project leads, committers and maintainers of mature projects, as well as the community manager.
b) I tallied wrongly

I am summarizing the results again: the following people who fit the criteria in a) can vote. Note that XCP does not have a defined list of maintainers and committers, thus only the vote of the XCP's project lead - Mike McClurg - counts. Eligible votes came from:

Ian Campbell
Mike McClurg
Jan Beulich
Lars Kurth
Tim Deegan
Ian Jackson

5 in favour, 1 abstained.

If no committer challenges by Friday, the vote will carry.

Regards
Lars

On 24/02/2013 03:10, Lars Kurth wrote:

Hi everybody,

sorry for the delay in posting the vote results for http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal.

The vote breakdown:
- 6 out of 7 Xen committers voted (including project leads)
- 5 were in favour
- 1 abstained due to the "choice of the ISC licence rather than a copyleft licence such as LGPLv2+"

So overall the vote carries.

We also several other community members voting in support of the proposal. We also discussed the proposal at the last Xen Maintainer, Committer and Developer Meeting, which expressed support for the proposal.

What happens next?
I will work with the Mirage project lead on a detailed plan for the Incubation phase.

Best Regards
Lars

--------------030006050307060205060201-- --===============5800890625558681927== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-arm mailing list Xen-arm@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm --===============5800890625558681927==-- From xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Wed Feb 27 16:35:50 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xen.org Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAjys-0006yB-CJ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:46 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAjyr-0006xs-1s; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:45 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.99:43991] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id C4/E4-25744-FD53E215; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:43 +0000 X-Env-Sender: lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-217.messagelabs.com!1361982942!18420677!1 X-Originating-IP: [74.125.83.51] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.6 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.8.6; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1320 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2013 16:35:43 -0000 Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ee0-f51.google.com) (74.125.83.51) by server-4.tower-217.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2013 16:35:43 -0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id d17so661498eek.38 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:35:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=t4cH5aMHeGDQhqW9KCopbnz6oQ68MKdnO9EDPIqkqEE=; b=heMwVYuXG6cDud0pIapZe/jhF71TYmN1qEWWzQlQAmYxmCIwx787xCmVNfKfYVuYdy 8WvsnKMlOV0UVrEH5tlseZw6VbKXTOSettmLha3ykde0iBfXL4XcYdlHM9+zGxgtOw79 pb4BC+Nic+63R6c4r59XtY2yxqtxm3r436gEmrVZAX1hgDQ0lU85v9jiCC33VJOKunFG ziQfxWn+1N70E4A/81IPJ71ab/ffEKNygu/kTfhpCSTT8osJbhIrXl1TUZ2Rq5H2LlGF GLJtQCd2Kbx5qEUgsX8u/8G1jCuwJC6sNCNuTXd/bJCBmCSZw4Ntz9SE/hHhzyk8cVMP biKQ== X-Received: by 10.15.101.204 with SMTP id bp52mr7261169eeb.31.1361982942595; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.26.11] ([151.225.0.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q42sm7280638eem.14.2013.02.27.08.35.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:35:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512E35DA.4030507@xen.org> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:35:38 +0000 From: Lars Kurth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lars.kurth@xen.org References: <512984AE.2060400@xen.org> In-Reply-To: <512984AE.2060400@xen.org> Cc: "xen-api@lists.xen.org" , xen-arm@lists.xen.org, Amir M Chaudhry , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Anil Madhavapeddy Subject: Re: [XenARM] [Vote] Results of formal vote for Mirage to be accepted as Xen.org Incubation Project - Correction X-BeenThere: xen-arm@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org List-Id: List for Xen ARM developers and users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5800890625558681927==" Sender: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============5800890625558681927== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030006050307060205060201" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030006050307060205060201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I need to correct the results and apologize for a mistake I made : I should have double checked the process before sending out the request for voting. http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html says*"Voting:* The community manager arranges a timed private vote as outlined above (voting should be open for a minimum of a week). Any maintainer of a mature project and the Xen.org community manager is allowed to vote. Voting follows the conventions as laid out in 'Principle: Consensus Decision Making'." This means that: a) I miscommunicated who is elgible to vote : which are project leads, committers and maintainers of mature projects, as well as the community manager. b) I tallied wrongly I am summarizing the results again: the following people who fit the criteria in a) can vote. Note that XCP does not have a defined list of maintainers and committers, thus only the vote of the XCP's project lead - Mike McClurg - counts. Eligible votes came from: Ian Campbell Mike McClurg Jan Beulich Lars Kurth Tim Deegan Ian Jackson 5 in favour, 1 abstained. If no committer challenges by Friday, the vote will carry. Regards Lars On 24/02/2013 03:10, Lars Kurth wrote: > Hi everybody, > > sorry for the delay in posting the vote results for > http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal. > > The vote breakdown: > - 6 out of 7 Xen committers voted (including project leads) > - 5 were in favour > - 1 abstained due to the "choice of the ISC licence rather than a > copyleft licence such as LGPLv2+" > > So overall the vote carries. > > We also several other community members voting in support of the > proposal. We also discussed the proposal at the last Xen Maintainer, > Committer and Developer Meeting, which expressed support for the > proposal. > > What happens next? > I will work with the Mirage project lead on a detailed plan for the > Incubation phase. > > Best Regards > Lars --------------030006050307060205060201 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi everybody,

sorry for the delay in posting the vote results for http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal.

The vote breakdown:
- 6 out of 7 Xen committers voted (including project leads)
- 5 were in favour
- 1 abstained due to the "choice of the ISC licence rather than a copyleft licence such as LGPLv2+"

So overall the vote carries.

We also several other community members voting in support of the proposal. We also discussed the proposal at the last Xen Maintainer, Committer and Developer Meeting, which expressed support for the proposal.

What happens next?
I will work with the Mirage project lead on a detailed plan for the Incubation phase.

Best Regards
Lars

--------------030006050307060205060201-- --===============5800890625558681927== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-arm mailing list Xen-arm@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm --===============5800890625558681927==-- From xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Thu Feb 28 08:56:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xen.org Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:56:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAzHx-0007wz-QA; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:56:29 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAzHw-0007wV-Nd for xen-arm@lists.xen.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:56:28 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:4384] by server-10.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 39/4F-12679-BBB1F215; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:56:27 +0000 X-Env-Sender: goswin-v-b@web.de X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1362041783!9311217!1 X-Originating-IP: [212.227.17.11] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMjEyLjIyNy4xNy4xMSA9PiAyMDk2OA==\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.8.6; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1602 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2013 08:56:24 -0000 Received: from mout.web.de (HELO mout.web.de) (212.227.17.11) by server-2.tower-27.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2013 08:56:24 -0000 Received: from frosties.localnet ([95.208.119.3]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUnUe-1UKy792Bci-00YgiY for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:56:23 +0100 Received: from mrvn by frosties.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UAzHr-0000kx-2Q for xen-arm@lists.xen.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:56:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:56:23 +0100 From: Goswin von Brederlow To: xen-arm@lists.xen.org Message-ID: <20130228085622.GB2652@frosties> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:uzEdPx7on/e/DJAViOpjw95P6LN4+waUWYeUj+4MOPe viSfWwzeExKy/HdJHgUf2oEZs7ZUAZCL/KbUFo/OTd+cygbh0k yHYfpVAp3wm2Cq2j4HTn1K2Ti/afSXgKJEfNxaQwCsk8/LlgPE Vw28v4B4AgToNgGPERJZ+1jpnMuBVcuVKVdVLi05cemLNZnfLU rAYf9P7NuF/AIhaQ6Ho1g== Subject: Re: [XenARM] State of PV Xen on ARM X-BeenThere: xen-arm@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List for Xen ARM developers and users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:36:08PM +0530, Krishna Pavan wrote: > Hi, > > Even I am interested with the same. > > As far as I know, PV on Xen-ARM for Cortex-A8 is available for testing on > ARM Fast Model Emulators. > > But It has been months since we heard any news about it. > > PV on Xen-ARM for Cortex-A9 is already available for Tegra 2 Harmony. > > Even I would like to learn and get some answers from you guys, to the > questions posted by Simon Sturm. How about an ARMv6 like the arm1176jzf-s in the Raspberry Pi? Or ARMv7 like an Pengpod or Cubbieboard (Allwinner A10 - sunxi)? And what git repository would be the best to try? MfG Goswin _______________________________________________ Xen-arm mailing list Xen-arm@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm From xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Thu Feb 28 08:56:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: archives@lists.xen.org Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:56:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAzHx-0007wz-QA; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:56:29 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAzHw-0007wV-Nd for xen-arm@lists.xen.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:56:28 +0000 Received: from [193.109.254.147:4384] by server-10.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id 39/4F-12679-BBB1F215; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:56:27 +0000 X-Env-Sender: goswin-v-b@web.de X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1362041783!9311217!1 X-Originating-IP: [212.227.17.11] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMjEyLjIyNy4xNy4xMSA9PiAyMDk2OA==\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.8.6; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1602 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2013 08:56:24 -0000 Received: from mout.web.de (HELO mout.web.de) (212.227.17.11) by server-2.tower-27.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2013 08:56:24 -0000 Received: from frosties.localnet ([95.208.119.3]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUnUe-1UKy792Bci-00YgiY for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:56:23 +0100 Received: from mrvn by frosties.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UAzHr-0000kx-2Q for xen-arm@lists.xen.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:56:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:56:23 +0100 From: Goswin von Brederlow To: xen-arm@lists.xen.org Message-ID: <20130228085622.GB2652@frosties> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:uzEdPx7on/e/DJAViOpjw95P6LN4+waUWYeUj+4MOPe viSfWwzeExKy/HdJHgUf2oEZs7ZUAZCL/KbUFo/OTd+cygbh0k yHYfpVAp3wm2Cq2j4HTn1K2Ti/afSXgKJEfNxaQwCsk8/LlgPE Vw28v4B4AgToNgGPERJZ+1jpnMuBVcuVKVdVLi05cemLNZnfLU rAYf9P7NuF/AIhaQ6Ho1g== Subject: Re: [XenARM] State of PV Xen on ARM X-BeenThere: xen-arm@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List for Xen ARM developers and users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-arm-bounces@lists.xen.org On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:36:08PM +0530, Krishna Pavan wrote: > Hi, > > Even I am interested with the same. > > As far as I know, PV on Xen-ARM for Cortex-A8 is available for testing on > ARM Fast Model Emulators. > > But It has been months since we heard any news about it. > > PV on Xen-ARM for Cortex-A9 is already available for Tegra 2 Harmony. > > Even I would like to learn and get some answers from you guys, to the > questions posted by Simon Sturm. How about an ARMv6 like the arm1176jzf-s in the Raspberry Pi? Or ARMv7 like an Pengpod or Cubbieboard (Allwinner A10 - sunxi)? And what git repository would be the best to try? MfG Goswin _______________________________________________ Xen-arm mailing list Xen-arm@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm