[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Minios-devel] libc on Mini-OS
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:53:29AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 22:12 -0400, Carl Patenaude Poulin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We're still on a quest to get Rust programs to compile on Mini-OS. > > Right now, we need a libc to sandwich between the two. As far as we > > know, Mini-OS only works well with Newlib and Rust only works well > > with glibc. There's also the option of musl. > > > > We'd be the happiest if we could make glibc work on Mini-OS, but > > we've seen points to this being very hard to accomplish. Instead, > > I've been trying to get a "Hello world!" Newlib/Mini-OS app to > > compile, based on a tutorial from 2006 on the subject[1]. > > Unfortunately, that resource seems hopelessly antiquated, so I > > figured I'd ask the experts :) > > > > I have several questions: > > 1. Have there been any efforts around getting glibc to run on Mini > > OS? Is there documentation on the subject? > > 2. Similarly, what's the status of Newlib on Mini-OS? How do you > > suggest we tackle that? > > 3. Which libc do you think we should go with? > > My answer to all three of these would be to suggest that you investigate > rumpkernels (rumpkernels.org) which provides a BSD libc environment (which > is more POSIX than newlib by far and should therefore be easier to get Rust > working on). When targeting Xen rumpkernels uses mini-os for the lower > levels and achieves similar aims in a much more pleasant and accessible > way. > > Does rust run on native NetBSD? If so then that removes one big hurdle. > Googling seems to suggest there have been some efforts in this direction > but I'm not clear if they are "done". > > I would imagine that the rust maintainers would be more accepting of > patches which make rust usable on NetBSD than they might be of newlib or > some other even more niche libc, which means rust-on-rumpkernels would have > less to maintain themselves. > Someone make rust run on rump kernel (rumprun unikernel, to be precise). Announcement email was sent three days ago. https://www.freelists.org/post/rumpkernel-users/Rust-on-Rumprun Some links from the announcement email. [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/28593 [2] https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun-packages/tree/master/rust [3] https://www.freelists.org/post/rumpkernel-users/multibake-improvement-with-symbol-collisions [4] https://gandro.github.io/2015/09/27/rust-on-rumprun/ Wei. > (my actual answer to 1a and 1b would be "No" and to 2 would be "moribund") > > > 4. How does the Mini-OS build system create a Xen-appropriate ELF > > file without the use of a cross-compiler? Most resources I've found > > recommend the use of a cross-compiler, but nothing of the sort seems > > to be happening here. > > mini-os uses the native compiler with various options to stop it linking > against system libraries. > > AIUI Rump-kernels use wrappers which look just like cross compilers > (although under the hood I think they might do something similar to raw > mini-os) > > Ian. > > > _______________________________________________ > Minios-devel mailing list > Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel _______________________________________________ Minios-devel mailing list Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |