[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv5 26/46] plat/common: Add counter workaround for Cortex-A73 erratum 858921



Hi Wei,

On 10/08/18 08:08, Wei Chen wrote:
The errata #858921 describes that Cortex-A73 (r0p0 - r0p2)
counter read can return a wrong value when the counter crosses
a 32bit boundary, but newer Cortex-A73 are not affected.

The workaround involves performing the read twice, compare
bit[32] of the two read values. If bit[32] is different,
keep the first value, otherwise keep the second value.

Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@xxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm/arm64/Config.uk |  9 +++++++++
  plat/common/arm/time.c   | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/arm64/Config.uk b/arch/arm/arm64/Config.uk
index 7797516..07bc8ec 100644
--- a/arch/arm/arm64/Config.uk
+++ b/arch/arm/arm64/Config.uk
@@ -46,3 +46,12 @@ config MARCH_ARM64_CORTEXA75
                Compile for Armv8.2 Cortex-A75 (and compatible) CPUs
endchoice
+
+config ARM64_ERRATUM_858921
+       bool "Workaround for Cortex-A73 erratum 858921"
+       default n
+       depends on MARCH_ARM64_CORTEXA73

I don't think this is correct here. MARCH_ARM64_CORTEXA73 is about how the code was optimized for a given processor. It would still be possible to run a code compiled with generic option on Cortex-A73.

So you want to at least drop the depends on here and possibly default y for CORTEX_A73 and GENERIC.

Cheers,


+       help
+         This option enables a workaround for Cortex-A73 (r0p0 - r0p2),
+         whose counter may return a wrong value when the counter crosses
+         a 32-bit boundary. The newer Cortex-A73 are not affected.
diff --git a/plat/common/arm/time.c b/plat/common/arm/time.c
index 4d955f3..1829938 100644
--- a/plat/common/arm/time.c
+++ b/plat/common/arm/time.c
@@ -60,10 +60,30 @@ static inline uint64_t get_counter_frequency(void)
        return SYSREG_READ(cntfrq_el0);
  }
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_858921
+/*
+ * The errata #858921 describes that Cortex-A73 (r0p0 - r0p2) counter
+ * read can return a wrong value when the counter crosses a 32bit boundary.
+ * But newer Cortex-A73 are not affected.
+ *
+ * The workaround involves performing the read twice, compare bit[32] of
+ * the two read values. If bit[32] is different, keep the first value,
+ * otherwise keep the second value.
+ */
+static uint64_t read_virtual_count(void)
+{
+    uint64_t val_1st, val_2nd;
+
+    val_1st = SYSREG_READ(cntvct_el0);
+    val_2nd = SYSREG_READ(cntvct_el0);
+    return (((val_1st ^ val_2nd) >> 32) & 1) ? val_1st : val_2nd;
+}
+#else
  static inline uint64_t read_virtual_count(void)
  {
        return SYSREG_READ(cntvct_el0);
  }
+#endif
/*
   * monotonic_clock(): returns # of nanoseconds passed since


--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Minios-devel mailing list
Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.