|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [UNIKRAFT PATCH 0/5] Introduce Ring Buffer Implementation
Hi Costin,
For this version, I simply chose to introduce it into the ukmpi library since
it adopts a similar trait to mbox, which is the current inhabitant of the
microlibrary. Mbox is another "simple message passing" implementation and, for
me, along with the offline conversation I had with Simon (cc'd), it made sense
to include it here as an additional provision of the microlibrary itself.
I think your argument is fair in that it can exist as its own library: simply
as `ukring`. At this point, it is simple a decision w.r.t. whether the library
constitutes creating enough additional options that would degrade the quality
of ukmpi itself. Particulary, you refer to additional options which will be
brought out of the implementation in the future. For now, I do not see
additional options which would surface themselves at present in the KConfig
option menu. The decision is ultimately whether these options arise from
implementation-specific requirements, in the case of, for instance, mp_ring.{c,
h} from FreeBSD which is the ring buffer implementation for the networking
stack (that it is to say, "would this be part of `ukring` or it's own library?")
One thing to note is that the ring implementation, along with mbox, are not
POSIX, and so mbox and ring's "exportsyms" do not share similar method
standardization. This, along with the fact that they are
Unikraft-centric/-core
and namespaced functions mean as internal communication mechanism its placement
is somewhat arbitrary.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Alexander
On 20.07.20, 22:55, "Minios-devel on behalf of Costin Lupu"
<minios-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of costin.lupu@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I have a curiosity. Why don't you put this ring implementation in a
library of its own, e.g. ukring or smth? I thought that library
granularity was one of the strong points of Unikraft. Besides, this ring
implementation may be subject to more configuration options in the
future which would complicate the ukmpi configuration space.
Cheers,
Costin
On 7/20/20 7:40 PM, Alexander Jung wrote:
> From: Alexander Jung <alexander.jung@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This series introduces a port of FreeBSD's buf_ring.{h,c} implementation
for use
> within Unikraft. This simple ring buffer can be used for message passing
in
> queues, for example within a AF_UNIX socket implementation between two
> threads. The implementation is therefore thread safe and provides a
generic
> data field which is initialized to the desired ring buffer length.
>
> The implementation is provided within ukmpi as a new option,
LIBUKMPI_RING,
> which exposes the following new methods:
>
> - uk_ring_alloc
> - uk_ring_free
> - uk_ring_enqueue
> - uk_ring_dequeue
> - uk_ring_dequeue_single
> - uk_ring_advance_single
> - uk_ring_putback_single
> - uk_ring_peek
> - uk_ring_peek_clear_single
> - uk_ring_full
> - uk_ring_empty
> - uk_ring_count
>
> The port is currently limited, with no support for reading atomic values
from
> ARM{32,64} CPU registers (described in the comments inline). As a
result, use
> of the ring buffer implementation is untested on ARM.
>
> Alexander Jung (5):
> lib/ukmpi: Introduce simple ring interface KConfig option
> lib/ukmpi: Initial port of FreeBSD's buf_ring.h
> lib/ukmpi: Provide ring buffer allocation and free methods
> lib/ukmpi: Include ring buffer into Unikraft build process
> lib/ukmpi: Export the global ring buffer (de)init methods
>
> lib/ukmpi/Config.uk | 23 ++-
> lib/ukmpi/Makefile.uk | 1 +
> lib/ukmpi/exportsyms.uk | 3 +
> lib/ukmpi/include/uk/ring.h | 474
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/ukmpi/ring.c | 87 ++++++++
> 5 files changed, 587 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/ukmpi/include/uk/ring.h
> create mode 100644 lib/ukmpi/ring.c
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |