[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 4/4] mini-os: remove sanity_check()
On 25.07.24 00:44, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Jürgen Groß, le mar. 23 juil. 2024 08:36:13 +0200, a ecrit:On 22.07.24 23:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:Juergen Gross, le lun. 22 juil. 2024 17:01:41 +0200, a ecrit:Remove the sanity_check() function, as it is used nowhere. Since any application linked with Mini-OS can't call sanity_check() either (there is no EXPORT_SYMBOL for it), there is zero chance of breaking any use case.Don't we still want to keep it around, at least as formal documentation of the expected status of the list?Hmm, is it really worth the extra code?I have already seen such kind of piece of code getting very convenient when tracking odd bugs. What about putting it under CONFIG_TEST then? This would keep it in the source and it would even be compile tested by a simple "make testbuild", which is a simple test I'm always doing before submitting a patch. Juergen
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |