Re: opam and myocamlbuild.ml files

[Richard Mortier <Richard.Mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 17 Jul 2012, at 18:27, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:

> On 17 Jul 2012, at 17:52, Richard Mortier <Richard.Mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 17 Jul 2012, at 10:35, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> 
>>> Good question.  We could move to only generating the setup.ml for stable 
>>> releases, and
>>> not for the working copy.  The diff spam is really irritating when bug 
>>> bisecting...
>> 
>> agree; at risk of repeating in other mail- could we even just move to oasis 
>> being a dependency and let opam handle it?
> 
> Could do; but that would require different OPAM files for dev and releases. 
> Just needs someone to make sure that works...

hm- don't follow. why does that require different opam files?

(perhaps a more general question here is- what's the difference in concept 
between dev and release versions of an opam package?)

-- 
Cheers,

R.




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may 
contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, 
please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy 
or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  
Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily 
reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.