[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Caml-list] VSTTE Competition 2013 Second Announcement



Interesting! That's an extraordinarily ambitious target for 2 days of coding (a 
verified DNS server), but I see from the FAQ that it can use other techniques 
too.  I'm looking forward to seeing the submissions too...

-anil

On 22 Apr 2013, at 09:24, Jeremy Yallop <yallop@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This year's competition (now finished) involved implementing a
> verified DNS server.  I'm looking forward to seeing the submissions.
> 
> http://vscomp.org/
> http://vscomp.org/a-complete-submission/
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sam Owre <owre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 17 April 2013 21:17
> Subject: [Caml-list] VSTTE Competition 2013 Second Announcement
> To:
> 
> Second Announcement
> 
> VSTTE Competition 2013
> 20-22 April 2013 (NOTE: The first announcement posted on 4 April had
> the wrong dates!)
> Organizers: Joseph Kiniry, Hannes Mehnert, Dan Zimmerman
> 
> This edition of the VSTTE programming contest is an experiment of a
> different kind, as it is more about software
> engineering than programming.  It is not a contest to see who can
> write and verify small problems as quickly as
> possible, but instead how can a team create a quality piece of code,
> using any tools and techniques (not just
> verification), in a short period of time.
> 
> Quality software is about more than just verified data types and
> algorithms at the source code level.  Unlike
> previous competitions, this year's VSComp will focus on a rigorously
> engineered software system.  Contestants will be evaluated for all of
> the software engineering artifacts that they
> produce, not just for verifying their implementations.
> 
> Consequently, teams that competed in previous competitions are
> encouraged to recruit new team members whose skills
> complement those of the existing team members.  For example, perhaps
> the current team is great at low-level design
> and verification, but is weak in writing
> requirements or in rigorous validation/testing.
> 
> The aims of the competition are:
> 
>  • to bring together those interested in rigorous software
> engineering and formal verification, and to provide an
>    engaging, hands-on, and fun opportunity for competition and 
> mutual-learning,
>  • to evaluate the usability of a variety of software engineering
> tools, not the least of which are logic-based
>    program verification tools, in a controlled experiment that could
> be easily repeated by others.
> 
> After the initial announcement of the contest we were asked the
> following question by more than one party.  You’ll
> find it in our FAQ.
> 
> Q. Why attach this style of contest to VSTTE, if we are not focusing
> exclusively on verification?
> 
> A. Not a single international programming contest rewards good
> software engineering behavior.  We have tried for
> years to influence the big contests and venues (e.g., ACM, ICFP, and
> TopCoder) to pay more attention to
> engineering and quality, but to little effect.  If we are going to see
> a contest like this survive and even thrive
> in the long run, it seems it has to be an outgrowth of the
> verification community, rather than the
> implementation-centric hack-fast community.
> 
> The contest takes place over a two-day period.  The system that
> contestants must develop is secret until the
> moment the contest starts.  The system will be decomposed for the
> contestants into an architecture, whose
> constituent pieces are the sub-problems of the contest.  Thus, by
> solving all sub-problems, one writes the entire
> application.  What's more, the architecture is specified in such a way
> that independent solutions to sub-problems
> submitted by competing teams should compose into the final system.
> 
> The kinds of software engineering concepts mentioned in the contest
> include: requirements, domain analysis,
> design, architecture, formal specifications, implementation,
> validation, verification, and traceability.  A
> well-prepared team will have a methodology prepared for each of these
> facets.  The submission of a solution for a
> sub-problem need not include any of these facets in particular---i.e.,
> running, verified code is neither necessary
> nor sufficient to win the
> contest.
> 
> There are no restrictions on concepts, tools, and technologies used.
> Teams whose focus in on "early" (i.e.,
> requirements or domain analysis) or "late" (validation/testing or
> evolution) phases of the software engineering
> process are very welcome.  There is no limit on team size, but the
> results will be normalized by team size.
> 
> We particularly encourage participation of:
> 
>  • student teams (this includes PhD students),
>  • non-developer teams using a tool someone else developed, and
>  • several teams using the same tool
> 
> A panel of judges will evaluate contest entries to independently score
> sub-problems and determine the winner.
> Solutions will be judged for correctness, completeness and elegance.
> The total score for a sub-problem is the
> sum of its scores in the following categories, where the total number
> of points in each category available is
> indicated in parentheses: domain analysis (3), requirements (3),
> architecture (3), design (6), implementation (6),
> validation (6), formal verification (12), traceability (3).  The
> maximum number of points available for each
> sub-problem is 42.  The verification researcher will note the weight
> given to formal verification.
> 
> All submitted artifacts will be made public immediately after the
> contest ends so that contestants can comment
> upon each other's submissions.  We expect that a paper will be
> co-authored by all interested contestants about the
> contest's results, as in several previous contests.
> 
> The contest begins at 9:00 GMT on Sat 20 April and ends at 9:00 GMT on
> Mon 22 April.
> 
> Prizes will be awarded in the following categories:
> 
>  • best team
>  • best student team
>  • tool used most effectively by the most teams
> 
> The contests website is http://www.vscomp.org/.  You will find there
> momentarily an outline of the contest, a some
> Frequently Asked Questions.  The contest problems will go live at this
> site at 9:00 GMT on Saturday the 20th of
> April.  (Take note of your daylight savings time GMT offset!) There is
> no need to pre-register for the contest,
> but you are welcome to warn us that you'll be competing.
> 
> Questions or comments about the contest should be sent to Joe Kiniry
> (kiniry@xxxxxxx).
> 
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
> 




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.