Re: [MirageOS-devel] Camlp4 Stack_overflow

[Andrà NÃss <andre.naess@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok: https://github.com/ocaml/camlp4/issues/29

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Daniel BÃnzli
<daniel.buenzli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le jeudi, 8 mai 2014 à 11:04, Andrà NÃss a Ãcrit :
>> The idea was to keep the application as simple as possible by moving
>> all processing to compile time. It would avoid the startup cost of
>> reading all the entries and thus make for simpler deployment, but I
>> realise I may be taking it a bit too far :)
>
> I also adopted that approach for quick demos in the past in another context 
> (with the same results [1]) and I don't think it's unreasonable. Please do 
> take the time of filing a bug report against the appropriate entity, these 
> things get fixed.
>
> Best,
>
> Daniel
>
> [1] https://github.com/ocsigen/js_of_ocaml/issues/4
>
>

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel