Re: [MirageOS-devel] Mirage on Xen/ARM status

[Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12 Jun 2014, at 15:46, Thomas Leonard <talex5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> The next step is to get networking working on ARM.
> 
> This seems to be working now (I can telnet to port 80 and send it a
> message), which it displays on the console.

Fantastic!!

> The main problem turned out to be ones_complement_checksum_bigarray,
> which was doing unaligned double-word (64-bit) memory access. This
> faults on ARM. For testing, I replaced it with the version in the unix
> directory.

Interesting -- they were meant to be exactly the same if I remember.
Is there an actual code difference between the two aside from include
headers?

-anil

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel