Re: [MirageOS-devel] Unikernel debugging

[Richard Mortier <Richard.Mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 27 Oct 2014, at 20:40, Masoud Koleini <masoud.koleini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> On 27/10/14 19:30, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> 
>> On 27 Oct 2014, at 19:28, Masoud Koleini <masoud.koleini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 27/10/14 16:50, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 27 Oct 2014, at 15:37, Masoud Koleini <masoud.koleini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>> 2. Calling TCPV4 create_connection function produces no traffic on 
>>>>> virtual interfaces.
>>>> 
>>>> A small reproducible program demonstrating the problem would help here.
>>> 
>>> I found that this happens when NETWORK "listen" function is called on tap1 
>>> and tap2 devices. It looks to be a consequence of the first problem.
>> 
>> So it doesn't happen with one VIF, and only when you have multiple network 
>> interfaces attached to the VM?
> 
> Number of VIFs defined in xl file doesn't matter (if that is what you 
> are asking). Switch says MAC address of tap devices are the first MAC 
> defined (in my case, I can see tap1 and tap2 both have the MAC 
> 00:86:3E:51:27:4B.)

(might be easier if you could point us at the the github repo(s) for the 
original code and/or the minimal reproduction --cuts out a lot of wasted time 
where list members ask questions about the code you tried, and you have to 
write answers to varying degrees of detail :)

-- 
Cheers,

R.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel