[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MirageOS on OpenStack problem
 
 
Hi, 
 
 $ qemu-system-x86_64 --version QEMU emulator version 2.11.1(Debian 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.32) Copyright (c) 2003-2017 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers 
 
 -- 
  Hans Ole
  (Re-sending with a current email for Ricardo) 
 
On Monday, 26.10.2020 at 11:37, Martin Lucina wrote: 
> Hi, 
>  
> On Sunday, 25.10.2020 at 13:37, Hans Ole Rafaelsen wrote: 
> > Hi, 
> >  
> > I have been investigating some more, and I seem to be a 'virtio-block 
> > device' problem. On the OpenStack cloud this device is reported when Solo5 
> > boots, but not on my local installation. 
> >  
> > I changed from IDE (default) to virtio as a drive on my local installation, 
> > and that gives the same behaviour as on the cloud. So the behaviour can be 
> > shown with these two different examples. 
> >  
> > Using a IDE drive for the image: 
> > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu Westmere -m 128 -nodefaults -no-acpi -display 
> > none -serial stdio -device virtio-net,netdev=n0 -netdev 
> > tap,id=n0,ifname=tap100,script=no,downscript=no -device isa-debug-exit 
> > -device lsi,id=scsi0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x9 \ 
> > -drive 
> > file=/home/hans/src/5g/mirage/repository.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=none,id=drive-ide0-0-0 
> > -device ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-0-0,id=ide0-0-0,bootindex=1 
> >  
> > SYSLINUX 6.03 20171017 Copyright (C) 1994-2014 H. Peter Anvin et al 
> > Loading unikernel.bin... ok 
> >             |      ___| 
> >   __|  _ \  |  _ \ __ \ 
> > \__ \ (   | | (   |  ) | 
> > ____/\___/ _|\___/____/ 
> > Solo5: Bindings version v0.6.7 
> > Solo5: Memory map: 128 MB addressable: 
> > Solo5:   reserved @ (0x0 - 0xfffff) 
> > Solo5:       text @ (0x100000 - 0x481fff) 
> > Solo5:     rodata @ (0x482000 - 0x51dfff) 
> > Solo5:       data @ (0x51e000 - 0x74efff) 
> > Solo5:       heap >= 0x74f000 < stack < 0x8000000 
> > Solo5: Clock source: TSC, frequency estimate is 2808856460 Hz 
> > Solo5: PCI:00:02: virtio-net device, base=0xc100, irq=10 
> > Solo5: PCI:00:02: configured, mac=52:54:00:12:34:56, features=0x79bfffe7 
> > Solo5: Application acquired 'service' as network device 
> > 2020-10-25 12:16:34 -00:00: INF [netif] Plugging into service with mac 
> > 52:54:00:12:34:56 mtu 1500 
> > 2020-10-25 12:16:34 -00:00: INF [ethernet] Connected Ethernet interface 
> > 52:54:00:12:34:56 
> >  
> > Using virtio drive for the image: 
> > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu Westmere -m 128 -nodefaults -no-acpi -display 
> > none -serial stdio -device virtio-net,netdev=n0 -netdev 
> > tap,id=n0,ifname=tap100,script=no,downscript=no -device isa-debug-exit \ 
> > -drive 
> > file=/home/hans/src/hermod-5g/mirage/repository.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0 
> > -device 
> > virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0xa,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0,bootindex=1 
> >  
> >  
> > SYSLINUX 6.03 20171017 Copyright (C) 1994-2014 H. Peter Anvin et al 
> > Loading unikernel.bin... ok 
> >             |      ___| 
> >   __|  _ \  |  _ \ __ \ 
> > \__ \ (   | | (   |  ) | 
> > ____/\___/ _|\___/____/ 
> > Solo5: Bindings version v0.6.7 
> > Solo5: Memory map: 127 MB addressable: 
> > Solo5:   reserved @ (0x0 - 0xfffff) 
> > Solo5:       text @ (0x100000 - 0x481fff) 
> > Solo5:     rodata @ (0x482000 - 0x51dfff) 
> > Solo5:       data @ (0x51e000 - 0x74efff) 
> > Solo5:       heap >= 0x74f000 < stack < 0x7ffe000 
> > Solo5: Clock source: TSC, frequency estimate is 2809165540 Hz 
> > Solo5: PCI:00:02: virtio-net device, base=0xc040, irq=10 
> > Solo5: PCI:00:02: configured, mac=52:54:00:12:34:56, features=0x79bfffe7 
> > Solo5: PCI:00:0a: virtio-block device, base=0xc000, irq=10 
> > Solo5: PCI:00:0a: configured, capacity=2097152 sectors, features=0x79000e54 
> > qemu-system-x86_64: virtio: zero sized buffers are not allowed 
>  
> Looks like some bug with recent QEMU and the Solo5 virtio-block 
> implementation. 
>  
> What QEMU version is that? 
>  
> As I wrote, the virtio target does not get much testing :-( 
>  
> > Is the problem that I need to set up handlers etc. to handle a virtio block 
> > device in the MirageOS application? I can't find anything about this in the 
> > documentation. Or might it be a bug in Solo5/MirageOS? 
>  
> No, it's a bug. 
>  
> Cc:ing Ricardo who may be able to look into it. 
>  
> Martin 
>  
 
  
 
    
     |