|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen-unstable-smoke bisection] complete build-arm64-xsm
branch xen-unstable-smoke xenbranch xen-unstable-smoke job build-arm64-xsm testid xen-build Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git *** Found and reproduced problem changeset *** Bug is in tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git Bug introduced: 03957f58db8942d61f4889b6924e39d3b27a9e43 Bug not present: 57d87ee3a5d10cdba972eec3a54cd971fec1b8d2 Last fail repro: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136714/ commit 03957f58db8942d61f4889b6924e39d3b27a9e43 Author: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue May 14 13:24:38 2019 +0100 xen/const: Extend the existing macro BIT to take a suffix in parameter Arm currently provides two macro BIT and BIT_ULL that are only usable in C and return respectively unsigned long and unsigned long long. Extending the macros to deal with assembly would be a nice benefits as it could replace the common pattern to define fields (AC(1, sfx) << X) easier to read. Rather than extending the two macros, it was decided to drop BIT_ULL() and extend the macro BIT() to take a suffix (e.g U, UL, ULL) in parameter. This would allow to use different suffix without having to define new macros. The new extend macro is now moved in include/xen/const.h so it can be used by anyone in Xen and also avoid to include bitops.h in assembly code. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> For bisection revision-tuple graph see: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-unstable-smoke/build-arm64-xsm.xen-build.html Revision IDs in each graph node refer, respectively, to the Trees above. ---------------------------------------- Running cs-bisection-step --graph-out=/home/logs/results/bisect/xen-unstable-smoke/build-arm64-xsm.xen-build --summary-out=tmp/136714.bisection-summary --basis-template=136665 --blessings=real,real-bisect xen-unstable-smoke build-arm64-xsm xen-build Searching for failure / basis pass: 136687 fail [host=laxton0] / 136665 ok. Failure / basis pass flights: 136687 / 136665 Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git Latest 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 b915f57a49bc12e9f5fb60ce604772b09777ff0d Basis pass 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 91f86f8634f99abd8f242943e62452211a09fa0a Generating revisions with ./adhoc-revtuple-generator git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git#9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11-9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git#91f86f8634f99abd8f242943e62452211a09fa0a-b915f57a49bc12e9f5fb60ce604772b09777ff0d Loaded 1001 nodes in revision graph Searching for test results: 136705 pass 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 57d87ee3a5d10cdba972eec3a54cd971fec1b8d2 136665 pass 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 91f86f8634f99abd8f242943e62452211a09fa0a 136700 fail 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 b915f57a49bc12e9f5fb60ce604772b09777ff0d 136687 fail 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 b915f57a49bc12e9f5fb60ce604772b09777ff0d 136710 fail 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 03957f58db8942d61f4889b6924e39d3b27a9e43 136702 fail 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 7ad0e780857728724e59859dcc422404d4ed0c46 136708 fail 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 03957f58db8942d61f4889b6924e39d3b27a9e43 136698 pass 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 91f86f8634f99abd8f242943e62452211a09fa0a 136704 fail 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 03957f58db8942d61f4889b6924e39d3b27a9e43 136709 pass 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 57d87ee3a5d10cdba972eec3a54cd971fec1b8d2 136714 fail 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 03957f58db8942d61f4889b6924e39d3b27a9e43 136711 pass 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 57d87ee3a5d10cdba972eec3a54cd971fec1b8d2 Searching for interesting versions Result found: flight 136665 (pass), for basis pass Result found: flight 136687 (fail), for basis failure Repro found: flight 136698 (pass), for basis pass Repro found: flight 136700 (fail), for basis failure 0 revisions at 9cca02d8ffc23e9688a971d858e4ffdff5389b11 57d87ee3a5d10cdba972eec3a54cd971fec1b8d2 No revisions left to test, checking graph state. Result found: flight 136705 (pass), for last pass Result found: flight 136708 (fail), for first failure Repro found: flight 136709 (pass), for last pass Repro found: flight 136710 (fail), for first failure Repro found: flight 136711 (pass), for last pass Repro found: flight 136714 (fail), for first failure *** Found and reproduced problem changeset *** Bug is in tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git Bug introduced: 03957f58db8942d61f4889b6924e39d3b27a9e43 Bug not present: 57d87ee3a5d10cdba972eec3a54cd971fec1b8d2 Last fail repro: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136714/ commit 03957f58db8942d61f4889b6924e39d3b27a9e43 Author: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue May 14 13:24:38 2019 +0100 xen/const: Extend the existing macro BIT to take a suffix in parameter Arm currently provides two macro BIT and BIT_ULL that are only usable in C and return respectively unsigned long and unsigned long long. Extending the macros to deal with assembly would be a nice benefits as it could replace the common pattern to define fields (AC(1, sfx) << X) easier to read. Rather than extending the two macros, it was decided to drop BIT_ULL() and extend the macro BIT() to take a suffix (e.g U, UL, ULL) in parameter. This would allow to use different suffix without having to define new macros. The new extend macro is now moved in include/xen/const.h so it can be used by anyone in Xen and also avoid to include bitops.h in assembly code. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Revision graph left in /home/logs/results/bisect/xen-unstable-smoke/build-arm64-xsm.xen-build.{dot,ps,png,html,svg}. ---------------------------------------- 136714: tolerable ALL FAIL flight 136714 xen-unstable-smoke real-bisect [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136714/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail baseline untested jobs: build-arm64-xsm fail ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org logs: /home/logs/logs images: /home/logs/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary _______________________________________________ osstest-output mailing list osstest-output@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/osstest-output
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |