[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 138342: regressions - FAIL
flight 138342 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138342/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 138228 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass version targeted for testing: xen 11911563610786615c2b3a01cdcaaf09a6f9e38d baseline version: xen f3d8eef9091747e70c505094f63514b43329a922 Last test of basis 138228 2019-06-21 20:00:39 Z 1 days Testing same since 138242 2019-06-21 23:01:48 Z 1 days 7 attempts ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> julien.grall@xxxxxxx Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx> jobs: build-arm64-xsm pass build-amd64 pass build-armhf pass build-amd64-libvirt pass test-armhf-armhf-xl pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org logs: /home/logs/logs images: /home/logs/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Not pushing. ------------------------------------------------------------ commit 11911563610786615c2b3a01cdcaaf09a6f9e38d Author: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Jun 21 13:20:25 2019 -0700 xen/arm: fix mask calculation in pdx_init_mask The mask calculation in pdx_init_mask is wrong when the first bank starts at address 0x0. The reason is that pdx_init_mask will do '0 - 1' causing an underflow. As a result, the mask becomes 0xffffffffffffffff which is the biggest possible mask and ends up causing a significant memory waste in the frametable size computation. For instance, on platforms that have a low memory bank starting at 0x0 and a high memory bank, the frametable will end up covering all the holes in between. The purpose of the mask is to be passed as a parameter to pfn_pdx_hole_setup, which based on the mask parameter calculates pfn_pdx_hole_shift, pfn_pdx_bottom_mask, etc. which are actually the important masks for frametable initialization later on. pfn_pdx_hole_setup never compresses addresses below MAX_ORDER bits (1GB on ARM). Thus, it is safe to initialize mask passing 1ULL << (MAX_ORDER + PAGE_SHIFT) as start address to pdx_init_mask. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> commit eb63e1225aba04c959eeb68eda99e422939c37de Author: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Jun 21 13:19:31 2019 -0700 xen: Replace u64 with uint64_t in pdx_init_mask() and callers Xen is phasing out the use of u64 in favor of uint64_t. Therefore, the instance of u64 in the pdx_init_mask() (and the callers) are now replaced with uint64_t. Take the opportunity to also modify srat_region_mask as this is used to store the result of pdx_init_mask(). Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: julien.grall@xxxxxxx (qemu changes not included) _______________________________________________ osstest-output mailing list osstest-output@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/osstest-output
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |