Re: [Publicity] Xen4CentOS6 blog post

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:39:44PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 11:16 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> >A quick glance.
> >
> >Second paragraph:
> >
> >We have tried to ensure that existing tooling that users have in
> >production written **again** xm/xend will continue to work, while also
> >adding support for the newer **xenlite** (xl) layers.
> >
> >Should be "against" and "xenlight".
> 
> Although, I'm not sure "xenlight" is really an appropriate name
> anymore.  It's not particularly "light"; it's just the new
> toolstack.
> 

Isn't xenlight canonical name for that library? It's about the attribute
of that library?

> Maybe we could say something like this: "We have tried to ensure
> that existing tooling that users have in production written again
> xm/xend will continue to work, while also adding support for the
> newer library-based toolstack (xl)".
> 

Or just "newer toolstack xl". I don't think user cares particularly about
this. :-)


Wei.

>  -George
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Publicity mailing list
> Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity