Re: [Wg-test-framework] [Minutes] March Test WG meeting

["Slutz, Donald Christopher" <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, 200W per machine is an issue. The rack I have a quote for
has 3600W (30A @ 120) available and at 200W per box: That is
18 servers.

We are looking at 27 servers...

http://www.jump.net.uk/

Lists a Dell R210 @ 43.2W, HP Proliant DL360 @ 248W.

So it looks like with more of the lower power servers we can fit.

    -Don



On 06/17/14 12:40, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I spoke to John Dilley of the XenRT team here at Citrix and he looked
> at the consumption of a couple of racks for me to give some estimates
> of power usage.
>
> Both racks contained mostly idle machines.  The first rack contained
> quite new dual socket AMD servers, which were using 175W each.  The
> second contained somewhat older dual socket servers, using 200W each.
>
> On the one hand we're going to have a fair few single socket machines
> which will use less power, and most of them will be reasonably new.
> On the other hand they will perhaps be less idle.  And we'll have two
> bigger infrastructure boxes (VM hosts) which won't be idle.
>
> I think therefore, overall, we should budget for 200W per machine.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Wg-test-framework mailing list
Wg-test-framework@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wg-test-framework