Re: [win-pv-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] Added Resolving Disagreement

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/01/2020, 07:25, "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

    >+## Issue: Small functional issues
    >+
    >+The most common area of disagreements which happen in code reviews, are
    >+differing opinions on whether small functional issues in a patch series 
have to
    >+be resolved or not before the code is ready to be submitted. Such 
disagreements
    >+are typically caused by different expectations related to the level of
    >+perfection a patch series needs to fulfil before it can be considered 
ready to
    
    s/fulfil/fulfill/
    
    >+be committed.
    >+
    >+To explain this better, I am going to use the analogy of some building 
work that
    >+has been performed at your house. Let's say that you have a new bathroom
    >+installed. Before paying your builder the last instalment, you perform an
    
    s/instalment/installment/

Hi Juergen: thank you for pointing out the remaining typos. 

I fixed these in my local tree, with the exception of the two instances above.

The two issues above come down to US vs non-US English

https://grammarist.com/spelling/fulfil-fulfill/
https://grammarist.com/spelling/installment-instalment/ 

I didn't really review the document for consistency with respect to a 
particular style of English spelling.
It does seem though that normally I use US spelling (e.g. minimize) mostly and 
of course the Contributor
Covenant has been written US spelling. 

I don't have a strong view either way and can have a go at making it consistent 
(e.g. in US stylespelling)

Lars


_______________________________________________
win-pv-devel mailing list
win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/win-pv-devel