[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [PATCH xenvbd] xencrsh: use ASSERT() in ASSERT3U/3S/3P() rather than BUG_ON()
Looks good, add my Reviewed-by Owen > -----Original Message----- > From: win-pv-devel [mailto:win-pv-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Paul Durrant > Sent: 17 June 2020 09:18 > To: win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH xenvbd] xencrsh: use ASSERT() in ASSERT3U/3S/3P() rather > than BUG_ON() > > [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments > unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. > > From: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > > ASSERT() then resolves to BUG_ON() followed by __analysis_assume(), which > avoids some spurious warnings during code analysis. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/xencrsh/assert.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/xencrsh/assert.h b/src/xencrsh/assert.h index > 546be5b..c746c89 100644 > --- a/src/xencrsh/assert.h > +++ b/src/xencrsh/assert.h > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ __BugCheck( > if (!(_Lval _OP _Rval)) { \ > LogError("%s = %llu\n", #_X, _Lval);\ > LogError("%s = %llu\n", #_Y, _Rval);\ > - BUG_ON(_X _OP _Y); \ > + ASSERT((_X) _OP (_Y)); \ > } \ > } while (FALSE) > > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ __BugCheck( > if (!(_Lval _OP _Rval)) { \ > LogError("%s = %lld\n", #_X, _Lval);\ > LogError("%s = %lld\n", #_Y, _Rval);\ > - BUG_ON(_X _OP _Y); \ > + ASSERT((_X) _OP (_Y)); \ > } \ > } while (FALSE) > > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ __BugCheck( > if (!(_Lval _OP _Rval)) { \ > LogError("%s = %p\n", #_X, _Lval); \ > LogError("%s = %p\n", #_Y, _Rval); \ > - BUG_ON(_X _OP _Y); \ > + ASSERT((_X) _OP (_Y)); \ > } \ > } while (FALSE) > > -- > 2.17.1 > >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |