[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH v2] Limit the amount of work done for each Receiver DPC
- To: "paul@xxxxxxx" <paul@xxxxxxx>, Owen Smith <owen.smith@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Martin Harvey <martin.harvey@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:21:49 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=lOBPMZpxsVxEz93d/EnNpTYAXFvVomXNvOlMMRnPOXM=; b=DCNkwIGkeQCgDeEji/18OqYYQU4FXuHV+2GHY309GVDLag3e+e7CzSCkenGCgzNSJsouaJnWzAKk0Ow1oZg0EHmj+ULjyfjoe/Llm4PIrTlWKm9/qNWtbgfmsZYL97heZoShO9xR4TGgMpZIXh7z6vX20O56vcL2vKGChME10iUy4DcsfgKe/HBv6B+0WBR6+L4HTdyYG9OfZj/RLmtu4RTU7/9SpVJnvTJaRVDOvewnY8po6dxVURUeYKeV1ElFzQB44zUu3BVtQvWUFyfitNqcGI08WWhbatPDXOApjvgSKPdM2chqfb38H3cK4x94DORfQ/436obLqMLxpzLX9Q==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HpRtnIxD8owur2KTFLt0BKdDmKlQkrMXBlXYiSA7GZ8g30n0n4lQ+g3W9NKvKmdmIDYixRN2a7m7yMtFveI9x3Uh3g+lMBXOfU1yyfvHC5Ng0TL2TsvAKhMmWX3HW/7P7mqE9jGeaWYExQgolYZvRWJrw0o+vnDUnfVx01yyt805k4JCocX0/PQ/dDoVkiY8a99Cdo3rCt1Nemli9fB7gUjrmLP6jIp6eE9yr5rtKrRm/2vcZCghKT0QyMP3g9381qzhdMf+MoLasXUTPJKUCFL9O2ftqeSX5TdLMj4V48Nc2L/3GnBejrHHmVK0dTKaR/9KdvdH7tnV5jq4q9f9ug==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: "win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:21:56 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:zROIGKg59J6eFgJP2dSUaglOX161AhEKZh0ujC45NGQN5FlHY01je htvD2mBP/+DYzTwLYt1aNiyo04FuZKDnNJiTABvpSE1Higb9cadCdqndUqhZCn6wu8v7a5EA 2fyTvGacajYm1eF/k/F3oDJ9CU6jefSLlbFILas1hpZHGeIcw98z0M68wIFqtQw24LhXVvQ4 YmaT/D3YzdJ5RYlagr41IrbwP9flKyaVOQw5wFWiVhj5TcyplFNZH4tDfjZw0jQG+G4KtWSV efbpIxVy0uCl/sb5nFJpZ6gGqECaua60QFjERO6UYD66vRJjnRaPqrWqJPwwKqY4tmEt4kZ9 TlDiXC/YV8vGYTqlvkBaBZ7MDhVGIB62+faMEHq5KR/z2WeG5ft69NHKRhveKY/o6NwC2wI8 uEEIjcQaBzFn/ix3L+wVuhrgIIkMdXvO4Qc/HpnyFk1D95/GcyFH/qMuIEehWhq7ixNNa+2i 84xbDN1cBXGJR1GIEkaGbo1nfuyh2m5eDpdwL6QjfVtsjSKlFwouFTrGPjMK8WBbsZ8omfCu HqYuFzmWzE/NMPKnFJp9Vrp3IcjhxjTQIsPEJWo+/gsh0ecrkQMCRtTTUX+rfSnh0qWX9NEN 1dS6icotbI19kGgUp/6RRLQnZKflhsVWt4VGOpj7giIk/PQ+1zAWTJCSSNdYts7ssNwXSYty lKCg9LuA3poraGRTnWesLyTqFteJBQoEIPLXgdcJSNt3jUpiNpbYs7nJjq7LJOIsw==
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:HswCb6Fxn3EoL1dKpLqFQ5HXdLJyesId70hD6qkvc3Fom52j/f xGws5x6fatskdrZJkh8erwW5VoMkmsj6KdhrNhcItKPTOW8ldASbsP0WKM+UyGJ8STzI9gPO JbAtBD4b7LfBRHZKTBkW+F+r8bqbHpnpxAx92utkuFJjsaCZ2Imj0JbjpzZXcGITWua6BYKL Osou584xawc3Ueacq2QlMfWfLYmtHNnJX6JTYbGh8O8mC1/H2VwY+/NyLd8gYVUjtJz7tn23 PCiRbF6qKqtOz+4gPA1lXU849dlLLau5p+7Y23+4gowwfX+0SVjbdaKvi/VfcO0aWSAWMR4Z rxStEbToNOAj3qDyeISFDWqnTdOX4VmgPfIBmj8DTeSIXCNU0HItsEioRDfhTD7U08+Nl6za JQxmqc84FaFBXagU3GlpH1vjxR5z2JSEAZ4JguZr1kIPgjQa4UqZZa8FJeEZ8GEi6/4Ic7EP N2BMWZ4PpNa1uVY33Qo2EqmbWXLz8ONwbDRlJHtt2e0jBQknw8x0wExNYHlnNF8J4mUZFL6+ nNL6wtnrBTSc0da757GY46MIOKI32IRQiJPHOZIFzhGq1CM3XRq4Tv6LFw/+2ucIxg9upHpH 0AaiIsiYcfQTOeNSTV5uw0zvnkehTMYR39jsdD+pN+prrwALL2LCzrciFdr/ed
- List-id: Developer list for the Windows PV Drivers subproject <win-pv-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Thread-index: AQHYdnXhM853CaX5dkS4JamzRTB2U607/02AgAYxeUA=
- Thread-topic: [PATCH v2] Limit the amount of work done for each Receiver DPC
-----Original Message-----
From: Durrant, Paul <xadimgnik@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 02 June 2022 12:44
To: Owen Smith <owen.smith@xxxxxxxxxx>; Martin Harvey <martin.harvey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Limit the amount of work done for each Receiver DPC
On 02/06/2022 12:42, Paul Durrant wrote:
> How does this version look?
Second thoughts on my complaining.
OK, I guess that's fine. I thought "more" was a bit generic, but I then see
that you're re-checking Ring->PacketComplete after leaving the loop, and that
for subsequent patches, we can set "more" according to push-up ret-code.
OK, now Monday morning coffee has kicked in, it all makes sense, yes, I like it.
MH/
|