[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [RFC] Design changes for bidirectional interface compatibility.
- To: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@xxxxxxxxx>, "win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Martin Harvey <martin.harvey@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:03:15 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=xVbJeps8HTLp5qHxSp/hN1jhQRenUgumhvpuGwq86XI=; b=AKT1WBnj/Lr+MS+lcuMaCT2MlQJYNXw9Dx9EcPYW9WvrCbp1VTdr9HhESvXErSRSW9M83RH73XgRSHKKA/OprvduUuHZwlOwT9w4Q1oq28mO8IGBZRC8ROx8LDLUia8DzoRQC9DjmVqmjN6ijw9gT0d+CyaXMlNQrNASNBnf1WezGuzvBKJ0rO0A2q+OBXXmvLfWjlEz2g7ilebIq6sufSv06R9A2VbGCoDHlHlSmdKhel/y6FjVfnMuwsr1tmtiKlJVDfIaJePYIURKDm1p9l3rc6Uxeq9o0i2/kfNoAteWw92NiuuMdsDVc0V5YSoR6yFvYucqSnVOfazu9QZusA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=f1AVVy3nTvruxY27XZaWU42RFB8G2QOj5mwYcQLJQb6TxboXBJnM5GLl6+dteFhbbWg/FmjY+KscQcpDht/a3wb7qyWDNrC885dfKU0ObXmQTi0fJrHpOX0/HV/m77hmSUcNGmuu9ZF5ybWPrnkMM13zDtC3moBx5TG97xGeOb7WvsheR+H2BFKtSIgkkSSv9M3pU58ibfJaqmYN6TK6jPePAIsRFtN+hRxWP6VVkC+H25Si8EwWO3yC0xyUoIjApE6O9VpjzvFPrtPxWEW8JTJiYh+l1tNHimL9KSzHdU2awUW1GjRLjXt38wO3bBEb6H5Xs5YglmjBcdyLBIaNwQ==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:03:34 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:cNPYhKDYaZ+VbRVW/zjiw5YqxClBgxIJ4kV8jS/XYbTApDlz1zZWm DAdDzzTO/yJamr8Lt9+PY7l9BsFuZLWxtcyQQY4rX1jcSlH+JHPbTi7wuYcHM8wwunrFh8PA xA2M4GYRCwMZiaA4E3ratANlFEkvYmQXL3wFeXYDS54QA5gWU8JhAlq3uU0meaEu/Dga++2k Y608pa31GONgWYuaDpEsPrb8XuDgdyp0N8mlg1mDRx0lAe2e0k9VPo3Oay3Jn3kdYhYdsbSq zHrlezREsvxpn/BO/v9+lrJWhRiro36ZGBivkF+Sam66iWukwRpukoN2FjwXm8M49mBt4gZJ NygLvVcQy9xVkHHsLx1vxW1j0iSlECJkVPKCSHXjCCd86HJW1LOzudrNUUbBrY7ot5XG35p8 vsWcxlYO3hvh8ruqF66Ys9Fo5x/aezUZsYYsHwmyizFB/E7R5yFW7/N+dJTwDY3gIZJAOraY M0aLzFoaXwsYTUWYgtRVM14w7zu3yakG9FbgAv9Sa4f5mHJ0A13lrjkKsTYa/SBRNlPn1ber WXDl4j8Kk5LbIzOkWHemp6qrt3PzXrYV9sgL72xyq5XuUCNyW4ONAJDADNXptH80CZSQel3O 0UY+y8hq6kx3EOuR9j5GRa/pRasoR8aHsJOVuE39gyJ4q7V+BqCQHgJSCZbb94rv9NwQiYlv mJlhPvsDD1r9biKE3SU8+/IqSvoYHdOa2gfeSUDUA0JpcH5p50+hQ7OSdAlF7OpitryGnf7x DXiQDUCuoj/RPUjj82TlW0rSRr1znQVZmbZPjnqY18=
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:USRop6N7DQjJ68BcT3/155DYdb4zR+YMi2TDiHoddfUFSKalfp 6V98jzjSWE8Ar5K0tQ4uxoX5PwCk80lKQFqbX5WI3PYOCIghrNEGgP1+rfKnjbalTDH41mpO 1dmspFebrN5DFB5K6UjjVQUexQpuVvm5rY5ts2uk0dKD2CHJsQjTuRZDz6LmRGAC19QbYpHp uV4cRK4xC6f24MU8i9Dn4ZG8DeutzijvvdEFI7Li9izDPLoSKj6bb8HRTd9AwZSSlzzbAr9n WAuxDl55+kr+qwxnbnpiDuBtVt6ZXcI+l4dYyxY/suW3bRY8GTFcZcsoi5zXEISSeUmRMXeZ f30lMd1o9ImgnslymO0GbQMk/boXsTAjbZuCOlqGqmrsrjSD0gDc1dwYpfbxvC8kIl+Mpxya RRwguixu1q5D777VHADuLzJmVXv1vxpWBnnf8YjnRZX4dbYLhNrZYH9EcQFJsbBir15I0uDe ErVajnlb9rWELfa2qcsnhkwdSqUHh2FhCaQlIassjQ1zRNhnh2w0YR2cRalHYd85A2TYVC+o 3/Q9JVvaALStVTYbN2Be8HT8fyAmvRQQjUOGbXOljjHLFvAQO+l3c22sRH2AiHQu138HJpou W/bLpxjx9CR2v+TcuTwZZM7hfBBG2gQDWF8LAv26RE
- List-id: Developer list for the Windows PV Drivers subproject <win-pv-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Thread-index: Adi3zfZIeioY1WCfTXGZlPfbnnICHQBickCAAABL/4AAvn1/cAAFMAmAAAAsQrA=
- Thread-topic: [RFC] Design changes for bidirectional interface compatibility.
-----Original Message-----
From: win-pv-devel <win-pv-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
Paul Durrant
> Right, so there is no need for more compatibility code and I'd really like to
> keep it that way unless
> there is a fundamental reason why the current scheme will not work. To my
> mind compatibility
> in both directions will just complicate the code for no *good* reason.
OK, you reckon it will be more pain than gain.
> The network settings issue is therefore what we need to understand first, I
> think.
Agreed. There is something FUBAR there.
MH.
|
