[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH] [RFC] Interface compatibility example - for comment.
- To: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@xxxxxxxxx>, "win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Martin Harvey <martin.harvey@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:14:39 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=8XYuJQRz4vmsBPgsKcRd5biF+fPiIbVhIalV/ceG7KM=; b=gvr59upS+wyc1Oomdstp5UoyvSPm0r4CcS7yS2DrjNvOVMTU5NVqmiJwe3YVcQTYyKH9e3mWhYnXKZlbQcMeG3M8dMYolxpntOtsiJ/ahV/u7i/eFZDXozYJATGMdUzIocm/HsK1p2lYtz/YRuB6wxgchdh8ardEvjnMI16LWXnn6R27up8/xSXu74BTy7x7gfKLZaTzL+o5N8sFpzt7uEsUKYIdBazWYWPjMZgGhPx6HQG7Cm93o2AvRVQmx/GiWDms4IWp2GMMD4A3PSkPEyHyybc6ipPIl0KnZ1DaWH1dZ4eMSHtV2Y5Kvyb4thkp7nDB8F3QAH6sYO35W3HKfA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fO5FcVnMoS/REGBNHLV+wWVm28PfW41wmR8QhbQns+A8pWGPrfnzvd1uJGHmQtvZ+fLpkc/RXbn+DF1yWs/gJUNxfrE1LTvNhMdCCOaziF2DlCOZU36lGnT7uI+I0B20xCRjbifwvogqBU1e/XmE/w9LzA6NSX9mUJJdFEjsySSVx6oQpqJjKVZtHPIs697qTRfvkuePDzV1LjQYmc3/i5qWwDDR+zNJRM7zPowLot2U9DUqQOfQuz8ZjqGlTpqQL7fKXliOT0YXxQCBL6NhSGXccg+VMw38XsPgGu9l9K3+jrKRvvssnFaSQ/w5ezRcNfR1theeskTxlQHxY6EL8w==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:14:47 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:3UlJ06+BcLcWwRIGa9jUDrUDnn+TJUtcMsCJ2f8bNWPcYEJGY0x3x mAYDz3XaPqOY2D1L9B3b4+3oRhTsZHdnYJiGlFopHw8E34SpcT7XtnIdU2Y0wF+jCHgZBk+s 5hBMImowOQcFCK0SsKFa+C5xZVE/fjUAOC6UIYoAwgpLSd8UiAtlBl/rOAwh49skLCRDhiE/ Nj/uKUzAnf8s9JPGj9Suv/rRC9H5qyo4mpA5wZmP5ingXeF/5UrJMNHTU2OByOQrrl8RoaSW +vFxbelyWLVlz9F5gSNy+uTnuUiG9Y+DCDW4pZkc/HKbitq/0Te5p0TJvsEAXq7vh3S9zxHJ HehgrTrIeshFvWkdO3wyHC0GQkmVUFN0OevzXRSLaV/ZqAJGpfh66wGMa04AWEX0vYrP15I5 cxGFCkUbD6nrLy94aqdYcA506zPLOGzVG8ekldJ6GiASNoDH9XESaiM4sJE1jAtgMwIBezZe 8cSdTtoalLHfgFLPVAUTpk5mY9EhFGmK2Ee9A3T+PVxujeJpOBy+OGF3N79f9WQWcRT2EaRv HzL7kzyAw0ANczZwj2Amp6prr+VzHygCN9DfFG+3txKngWJ92YPNBgxaXGpkKiQoGi1VM0Kf iT4/QJr98De7neDXtDxXhi3pn+HlhEZUttUVeY97Wml1avSph6HQ2QJUDNFQNgnr9MtAywn0 EeTmNHkDiApt6eaIU9x7Z+RpDK2fCQQc2kLYHZdSRNfuoa55oYukhjIU9BvVravicH4Ei3xx DbMqzUig7IUjogA0KDTEU37vg9Ab6PhFmYdjjg7lEr+hu+lTOZJv7CV1GU=
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:L9pd46rFVpRf58PLAZ/9V4UaV5uVL9V00zEX/kB9WHVpm5Oj+v xGzc5w6farsl0ssSkb6Ki90dq7MAjhHPlOkMIs1NaZLUHbUQ6TQL2KgrGSpwEIdxeeygcZ79 YYT0EcMqy7MbEZt7ec3ODQKb9Jr7e6GeKT9IHjJhxWPGJXgtRbnmJE43GgYy9LrWd9ZaYRJd 653I5qtjCgcXMYYoCQHX8eRdXOoNXNidbPfQMGLwRP0njDsRqYrJrBVzSI1BYXVD1ChZ0493 LergD/7qK/99mm1x7n0XPJ5Zg+oqqv9jIDPr3DtiEmEESttu+aXvUjZ1REhkF2nAib0idqrD ALmWZkAy080QKUQoj/m2qW5+Cp6kdS15al8y7UvZKrm72EeBsqT8VGno5XaR3f9g4pu8x9yr tC2yaDu4NQFg6oplWL2zHkbWAeqqOPmwtXrccDy3hEFYcOYr5YqoISuEtTDZcbBSr/rIQqCv NnAs3Q7OtfNQryVQGRgkB/hNi3GngjFBaPRUYP/sSTzjhNhXh8i08V3tYWkHsM/I80D5NE++ PHOKJ1k6wmdL5hUYttQOMaBcenAG3ERhzBdGqUPFT8DakCf2nArpbmiY9Flt1CuKZ4v6fatK 6xIW+w71RCBH4GIff+oqFj41TKXHi3Wyjrx4VX+4V504eMNIbWDQ==
- List-id: Developer list for the Windows PV Drivers subproject <win-pv-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Thread-index: AQHYwrTFGWpT5Ma8KkGlnQe8yItGZa3iLyiAgCizhqA=
- Thread-topic: [PATCH] [RFC] Interface compatibility example - for comment.
-----Original Message-----
From: win-pv-devel <win-pv-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
Paul Durrant
Sent: 16 September 2022 15:41
To: win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Interface compatibility example - for comment.
> As you know, I'm still opposed to this idea and this patch, while I am sure
> it is functional, is just a small part of what is a fundamental shift.
> If we decide to go down this route then we'll want to do away with the whole
> PDO revision scheme as it stands.
I know, and agree. For the moment, I've shelved the code in some branch where
we can refer to it, should we later want some "get out of jail free" card.
MH.
|
