[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-API] Alternative to Vastsky?


  • To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Tim Titley <tim@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 23:10:39 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:13:05 -0700
  • List-id: Discussion of API issues surrounding Xen <xen-api.lists.xensource.com>

Has anyone considered a replacement for the vastsky storage backend now that the project is officially dead (at least for now)?

I have been looking at Ceph ( http://ceph.newdream.net/ ). A suggestion to someone so inclined to do something about it, may be to use the Rados block device (RBD) and put an LVM storage group on it, which would require modification of the current LVM storage manager code - I assume similar to LVMOISCSI.

This would provide scalable, redundant storage at what I assume would be reasonable performance since the data can be striped across many storage nodes.

Development seems reasonably active and although the project is not officially production quality yet, it is part of the Linux kernel which looks promising, as does the news that they will be providing commercial support.

The only downside is that RBD requires a 2.6.37 kernel. For those "in the know" - how long will it be before this kernel makes it to XCP - considering that this vanilla kernel supposedly works in dom0 (I have yet to get it working)?

Any thoughts?

Regards,

Tim

_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.