[Xen-API] Re: Flood test with xen/openvswitch

[SÃbastien Riccio <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07.09.2011 17:15, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Why did you post separate copies of this message to xen-api and
> ovs-discuss, without even mentioning it in either copy?  What is
> the value of splintering discussion?
Hi Ben,

Sorry that was unintentional. I wasn't sure where was the best place to 
post this, so
I first sent it to the openvswitch list but then sent it the xen list 
too and forgot to
mention it.

For the details about the versions:

root@xen-blade13:~# ovs-vswitchd --version
ovs-vswitchd (Open vSwitch) 1.2.1+build0
Compiled Sep  6 2011 01:01:15
OpenFlow versions 0x1:0x1

It's the one from de debian unstable repository.

The kernel is Linux version 3.0.0-scxen-amd64 (root@xen-blade13) (gcc 
version 4.6.1 (Debian 4.6.1-4) ) #2 SMP Fri Aug 5 08:12:00 CEST 2011
It's the 3.0.0 stock kernel with debian .config recompiled with a vga 
fix patch for xen on running on debian unstable
root@xen-blade13:~# ovs-dpctl show
system@xapi0:
        lookups: frags:0, hit:542619, missed:83504, lost:10
        port 0: xapi0 (internal)
        port 1: eth1
        port 2: eth0
        port 3: bond0 (internal)
system@xapi1:
        lookups: frags:0, hit:1973235, missed:711045, lost:1416
        port 0: xapi1 (internal)
        port 1: xapi5 (internal)
        port 2: xapi2 (internal)
        port 3: xapi4 (internal)
        port 4: eth2
        port 5: eth3
        port 6: bond1 (internal)
        port 7: vif1.0
        port 26: vif6.0
        port 27: vif7.0

The conf.db looks quite huge, I don't know why. I've attached it to this 
reply zipped.

Attachment: conf.db.gz
Description: application/gzip

_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api