[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-API] Guest Utilities - HVM vs PV mode

  • To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Alexandre Kouznetsov <alk@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:19:44 -0600
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:20:00 +0000
  • List-id: User and development list for XCP and XAPI <xen-api.lists.xen.org>


El 11/02/13 22:02, George Shuklin escribiÃ:
On 12.02.2013 01:12, Alexandre Kouznetsov wrote:
El 11/02/13 14:52, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen escribiÃ:
Upstream Linux has had Xen domU support since 2.6.24.
So yes, Linux 2.6.32 default kernel has pvops Xen PV support.
I feel like need to go back to school... Have always been using *-xen
kernels, even in DomU's.

-xen kernels is still better.

All vanilla kernels < 3.0 can't raise memory over initial value (even
static max > dynamic max), and time is screwed after migration, and
MemTotal is not equal to mem_kb for domain... It can works, but we still
using suse's -xen forward-ported kernels, because they more polished,
than upstream.

I was about to establish as internal standard the kernel 3.2.0 from Debian's backports. Is Suse's any better?

Alexandre Kouznetsov

Xen-api mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.