[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-bugs] [Bug 900] New: xm vcpu-list informations broken
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=900 Summary: xm vcpu-list informations broken Product: Xen Version: unstable Platform: IA64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Tools AssignedTo: xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx I tested the xm vcpu-list command with xen-ia64-unstable CS:13904. I didn't set the cpu affinity to virtual CPUs, but the cpu affinity was already set to virtual CPUs. And I tried the xm vcpu-pin command next. The result is as follows. # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 3999 4 r----- 945.5 vm1 3 965 2 r----- 44.6 # xm vcpu-list Name ID VCPU CPU State Time(s) CPU Affinity Domain-0 0 0 0 -b- 431.0 0-7 Domain-0 0 1 9 r-- 205.5 0-7 Domain-0 0 2 8 -b- 157.3 0-7 Domain-0 0 3 3 -b- 152.0 0-7 vm1 3 0 15 -b- 4.4 0-7 vm1 3 1 2 r-- 46.4 0-7 # xm vcpu-pin vm1 0 8 # xm vcpu-list Name ID VCPU CPU State Time(s) CPU Affinity Domain-0 0 0 0 -b- 431.7 0-7 Domain-0 0 1 9 r-- 205.8 0-7 Domain-0 0 2 8 -b- 157.6 0-7 Domain-0 0 3 3 -b- 152.2 0-7 vm1 3 0 15 -b- 4.6 no cpus vm1 3 1 2 r-- 241.1 0-7 I didn't see such a result in x86. But the number of physical CPU is different. My ia64 machine has 16 physical CPUs. My x86 machine has 2 physical CPUs. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ Xen-bugs mailing list Xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-bugs
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |