[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-changelog] [linux-2.6.18-xen] blktap2: fix synchronization in blktap_device_run_queue()
# HG changeset patch # User Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> # Date 1290172806 0 # Node ID 75a121aacca6cb8a66ffa8791388d1eb7809e9bf # Parent e73077b6d6bfe8f9073c2059671be7c9c391a194 blktap2: fix synchronization in blktap_device_run_queue() c/s 896 (use of blk_rq_map_sg()) made the problem worse, but from what I can tell there had been races (ring and stats updates) before. If that's not a correct observation, a perhaps better solution might be to move the struct scatterlist array out of struct blktap (and make it e.g. an on-stack variable, the problem being that blktap_device_process_request() has a pretty large stack frame already - shrinking this might be possible by moving e.g. the struct blktap_grant_table and struct blkif_request blkif_req instances the other way if the locking change here is the right thing to do). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/xen/blktap2/device.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -r e73077b6d6bf -r 75a121aacca6 drivers/xen/blktap2/device.c --- a/drivers/xen/blktap2/device.c Wed Nov 17 17:16:52 2010 +0000 +++ b/drivers/xen/blktap2/device.c Fri Nov 19 13:20:06 2010 +0000 @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ blktap_device_run_queue(struct blktap *t blkdev_dequeue_request(req); spin_unlock_irq(&dev->lock); - down_read(&tap->tap_sem); + down_write(&tap->tap_sem); err = blktap_device_process_request(tap, request, req); if (!err) @@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ blktap_device_run_queue(struct blktap *t blktap_request_free(tap, request); } - up_read(&tap->tap_sem); + up_write(&tap->tap_sem); spin_lock_irq(&dev->lock); } _______________________________________________ Xen-changelog mailing list Xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-changelog
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |