[Xen-changelog] [xen-4.1-testing] VT-d: fix off-by-one error in RMRR validation

[Xen patchbot-4.1-testing <patchbot@xxxxxxx>]

# HG changeset patch
# User Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
# Date 1317655872 -3600
# Node ID 8e6b081e80442ab2c868f47f5dcdb6beec3df601
# Parent  2a0cd93f7ed9666ac60baa19c69bd89cad63c79e
VT-d: fix off-by-one error in RMRR validation

(base_addr,end_addr) is an inclusive range, and hence there shouldn't
be a subtraction of 1 in the second invocation of page_is_ram_type().
For RMRRs covering a single page that actually resulted in the
immediately preceding page to get checked (which could have resulted
in a false warning).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
xen-unstable changeset:   23868:28147fd781af
xen-unstable date:        Thu Sep 22 18:32:34 2011 +0100
---


diff -r 2a0cd93f7ed9 -r 8e6b081e8044 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c        Mon Oct 03 16:29:52 2011 +0100
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c        Mon Oct 03 16:31:12 2011 +0100
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
      * inform the user
      */
     if ( (!page_is_ram_type(paddr_to_pfn(base_addr), RAM_TYPE_RESERVED)) ||
-         (!page_is_ram_type(paddr_to_pfn(end_addr) - 1, RAM_TYPE_RESERVED)) )
+         (!page_is_ram_type(paddr_to_pfn(end_addr), RAM_TYPE_RESERVED)) )
     {
         dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
                 "  RMRR address range not in reserved memory "

_______________________________________________
Xen-changelog mailing list
Xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-changelog