[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-changelog] [xen stable-4.3] sched_credit: filter node-affinity mask against online cpus
commit fb272e48312cf1ba377aa1415461a271a3e06986 Author: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> AuthorDate: Fri Sep 27 11:57:59 2013 +0200 Commit: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> CommitDate: Fri Sep 27 11:57:59 2013 +0200 sched_credit: filter node-affinity mask against online cpus in _csched_cpu_pick(), as not doing so may result in the domain's node-affinity mask (as retrieved by csched_balance_cpumask() ) and online mask (as retrieved by cpupool_scheduler_cpumask() ) having an empty intersection. Therefore, when attempting a node-affinity load balancing step and running this: ... /* Pick an online CPU from the proper affinity mask */ csched_balance_cpumask(vc, balance_step, &cpus); cpumask_and(&cpus, &cpus, online); ... we end up with an empty cpumask (in cpus). At this point, in the following code: .... /* If present, prefer vc's current processor */ cpu = cpumask_test_cpu(vc->processor, &cpus) ? vc->processor : cpumask_cycle(vc->processor, &cpus); .... an ASSERT (from inside cpumask_cycle() ) triggers like this: (XEN) Xen call trace: (XEN) [<ffff82d08011b124>] _csched_cpu_pick+0x1d2/0x652 (XEN) [<ffff82d08011b5b2>] csched_cpu_pick+0xe/0x10 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801232de>] vcpu_migrate+0x167/0x31e (XEN) [<ffff82d0801238cc>] cpu_disable_scheduler+0x1c8/0x287 (XEN) [<ffff82d080101b3f>] cpupool_unassign_cpu_helper+0x20/0xb4 (XEN) [<ffff82d08010544f>] continue_hypercall_tasklet_handler+0x4a/0xb1 (XEN) [<ffff82d080127793>] do_tasklet_work+0x78/0xab (XEN) [<ffff82d080127a70>] do_tasklet+0x5f/0x8b (XEN) [<ffff82d080158985>] idle_loop+0x57/0x5e (XEN) (XEN) (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) Panic on CPU 1: (XEN) Assertion 'cpu < nr_cpu_ids' failed at /home/dario/Sources/xen/xen/xen.git/xen/include/xe:16481 It is for example sufficient to have a domain with node-affinity to NUMA node 1 running, and issueing a `xl cpupool-numa-split' would make the above happen. That is because, by default, all the existing domains remain assigned to the first cpupool, and it now (after the cpupool-numa-split) only includes NUMA node 0. This change prevents that by generalizing the function used for figuring out whether a node-affinity load balancing step is legit or not. This way we can, in _csched_cpu_pick(), figure out early enough that the mask would end up empty, skip the step all together and avoid the splat. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> master commit: 5e5a44b6c942d6ea47f15d6f1ed02b03e0d69445 master date: 2013-09-20 11:37:28 +0200 --- xen/common/sched_credit.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit.c b/xen/common/sched_credit.c index 3188310..24f70c6 100644 --- a/xen/common/sched_credit.c +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit.c @@ -296,15 +296,28 @@ static void csched_set_node_affinity( * vcpu-affinity balancing is always necessary and must never be skipped. * OTOH, if a domain's node-affinity is said to be automatically computed * (or if it just spans all the nodes), we can safely avoid dealing with - * node-affinity entirely. Ah, node-affinity is also deemed meaningless - * in case it has empty intersection with the vcpu's vcpu-affinity, as it - * would mean trying to schedule it on _no_ pcpu! + * node-affinity entirely. + * + * Node-affinity is also deemed meaningless in case it has empty + * intersection with mask, to cover the cases where using the node-affinity + * mask seems legit, but would instead led to trying to schedule the vcpu + * on _no_ pcpu! Typical use cases are for mask to be equal to the vcpu's + * vcpu-affinity, or to the && of vcpu-affinity and the set of online cpus + * in the domain's cpupool. */ -#define __vcpu_has_node_affinity(vc) \ - ( !(cpumask_full(CSCHED_DOM(vc->domain)->node_affinity_cpumask) \ - || !cpumask_intersects(vc->cpu_affinity, \ - CSCHED_DOM(vc->domain)->node_affinity_cpumask) \ - || vc->domain->auto_node_affinity == 1) ) +static inline int __vcpu_has_node_affinity(const struct vcpu *vc, + const cpumask_t *mask) +{ + const struct domain *d = vc->domain; + const struct csched_dom *sdom = CSCHED_DOM(d); + + if ( d->auto_node_affinity + || cpumask_full(sdom->node_affinity_cpumask) + || !cpumask_intersects(sdom->node_affinity_cpumask, mask) ) + return 0; + + return 1; +} /* * Each csched-balance step uses its own cpumask. This function determines @@ -393,7 +406,8 @@ __runq_tickle(unsigned int cpu, struct csched_vcpu *new) int new_idlers_empty; if ( balance_step == CSCHED_BALANCE_NODE_AFFINITY - && !__vcpu_has_node_affinity(new->vcpu) ) + && !__vcpu_has_node_affinity(new->vcpu, + new->vcpu->cpu_affinity) ) continue; /* Are there idlers suitable for new (for this balance step)? */ @@ -626,11 +640,32 @@ _csched_cpu_pick(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *vc, bool_t commit) int cpu = vc->processor; int balance_step; + /* Store in cpus the mask of online cpus on which the domain can run */ online = cpupool_scheduler_cpumask(vc->domain->cpupool); + cpumask_and(&cpus, vc->cpu_affinity, online); + for_each_csched_balance_step( balance_step ) { + /* + * We want to pick up a pcpu among the ones that are online and + * can accommodate vc, which is basically what we computed above + * and stored in cpus. As far as vcpu-affinity is concerned, + * there always will be at least one of these pcpus, hence cpus + * is never empty and the calls to cpumask_cycle() and + * cpumask_test_cpu() below are ok. + * + * On the other hand, when considering node-affinity too, it + * is possible for the mask to become empty (for instance, if the + * domain has been put in a cpupool that does not contain any of the + * nodes in its node-affinity), which would result in the ASSERT()-s + * inside cpumask_*() operations triggering (in debug builds). + * + * Therefore, in this case, we filter the node-affinity mask against + * cpus and, if the result is empty, we just skip the node-affinity + * balancing step all together. + */ if ( balance_step == CSCHED_BALANCE_NODE_AFFINITY - && !__vcpu_has_node_affinity(vc) ) + && !__vcpu_has_node_affinity(vc, &cpus) ) continue; /* Pick an online CPU from the proper affinity mask */ @@ -1449,7 +1484,7 @@ csched_runq_steal(int peer_cpu, int cpu, int pri, int balance_step) * or counter. */ if ( balance_step == CSCHED_BALANCE_NODE_AFFINITY - && !__vcpu_has_node_affinity(vc) ) + && !__vcpu_has_node_affinity(vc, vc->cpu_affinity) ) continue; csched_balance_cpumask(vc, balance_step, csched_balance_mask); -- generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#stable-4.3 _______________________________________________ Xen-changelog mailing list Xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-changelog
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |