[xen staging-4.15] credit2: avoid picking a spurious idle unit when caps are used

[patchbot@xxxxxxx]

commit b11a694067a993f5fa57012922fd04f2a489e233
Author:     Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed Aug 25 14:50:00 2021 +0200
Commit:     Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed Aug 25 14:50:00 2021 +0200

    credit2: avoid picking a spurious idle unit when caps are used
    
    Commit 07b0eb5d0ef0 ("credit2: make sure we pick a runnable unit from the
    runq if there is one") did not fix completely the problem of potentially
    selecting a scheduling unit that will then not be able to run.
    
    In fact, in case caps are used and the unit we are currently looking
    at, during the runqueue scan, does not have enough budget for being run,
    we should continue looking instead than giving up and picking the idle
    unit.
    
    Suggested-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
    master commit: 0f742839ae57e10687e7a573070c37430f31068c
    master date: 2021-08-10 09:29:10 +0200
---
 xen/common/sched/credit2.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/common/sched/credit2.c b/xen/common/sched/credit2.c
index ebb09ea43a..6396b38e04 100644
--- a/xen/common/sched/credit2.c
+++ b/xen/common/sched/credit2.c
@@ -3463,6 +3463,15 @@ runq_candidate(struct csched2_runqueue_data *rqd,
                         (unsigned char *)&d);
         }
 
+        /*
+         * If the unit in the runqueue has more credits than current (or than
+         * idle, if current is not runnable) or if current is yielding, we may
+         * want to pick it up. Otherwise, there's no need to keep scanning the
+         * runqueue any further.
+         */
+        if ( !yield && svc->credit <= snext->credit )
+            break;
+
         /* Skip non runnable units that we (temporarily) have in the runq */
         if ( unlikely(!unit_runnable_state(svc->unit)) )
             continue;
@@ -3494,16 +3503,25 @@ runq_candidate(struct csched2_runqueue_data *rqd,
         }
 
         /*
-         * If the one in the runqueue has more credit than current (or idle,
-         * if current is not runnable), or if current is yielding, and also
-         * if the one in runqueue either is not capped, or is capped but has
-         * some budget, then choose it.
+         * If we are here, we are almost sure we want to pick the unit in
+         * the runqueue. Last thing we need to check is that it either is
+         * not capped or, if it is, it has some budget.
+         *
+         * Note that budget availability must be the very last check that
+         * we do in this loop, due to the side effects that unit_grab_budget()
+         * causes.
+         *
+         * In fact, if there is budget available in the unit's domain's
+         * budget pool, the function will pick some for running this unit.
+         * And we clearly want to do that only if we're otherwise sure that
+         * the unit will actually run, consume it, and return the leftover
+         * (if any) in the usual way.
          */
-        if ( (yield || svc->credit > snext->credit) &&
-             (!has_cap(svc) || unit_grab_budget(svc)) )
-            snext = svc;
+        if ( has_cap(svc) && !unit_grab_budget(svc) )
+            continue;
 
         /* In any case, if we got this far, break. */
+        snext = svc;
         break;
     }
 
--
generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#staging-4.15