[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen stable-4.14] gnttab: avoid triggering assertion in radix_tree_ulong_to_ptr()
commit 76c7755ed5ebc0ade1711ffd6f435233b97e8332 Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> AuthorDate: Wed Sep 8 14:50:39 2021 +0200 Commit: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> CommitDate: Wed Sep 8 14:50:39 2021 +0200 gnttab: avoid triggering assertion in radix_tree_ulong_to_ptr() Relevant quotes from the C11 standard: "Except where explicitly stated otherwise, for the purposes of this subclause unnamed members of objects of structure and union type do not participate in initialization. Unnamed members of structure objects have indeterminate value even after initialization." "If there are fewer initializers in a brace-enclosed list than there are elements or members of an aggregate, [...], the remainder of the aggregate shall be initialized implicitly the same as objects that have static storage duration." "If an object that has static or thread storage duration is not initialized explicitly, then: [...] â?? if it is an aggregate, every member is initialized (recursively) according to these rules, and any padding is initialized to zero bits; [...]" "A bit-field declaration with no declarator, but only a colon and a width, indicates an unnamed bit-field." Footnote: "An unnamed bit-field structure member is useful for padding to conform to externally imposed layouts." "There may be unnamed padding within a structure object, but not at its beginning." Which makes me conclude: - Whether an unnamed bit-field member is an unnamed member or padding is unclear, and hence also whether the last quote above would render the big endian case of the structure declaration invalid. - Whether the number of members of an aggregate includes unnamed ones is also not really clear. - The initializer in map_grant_ref() initializes all fields of the "cnt" sub-structure of the union, so assuming the second quote above applies here (indirectly), the compiler isn't required to implicitly initialize the rest (i.e. in particular any padding) like would happen for static storage duration objects. Gcc 7.4.1 can be observed (apparently in debug builds only) to translate aforementioned initializer to a read-modify-write operation of a stack variable, leaving unchanged the top two bits of whatever was previously in that stack slot. Clearly if either of the two bits were set, radix_tree_ulong_to_ptr()'s assertion would trigger. Therefore, to be on the safe side, add an explicit padding field for the non-big-endian-bitfields case and give a dummy name to both padding fields. Fixes: 9781b51efde2 ("gnttab: replace mapkind()") Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> master commit: b6da9d0414d69c2682214ee3ecf9816fcac500d0 master date: 2021-08-27 10:54:46 +0200 --- xen/common/grant_table.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xen/common/grant_table.c b/xen/common/grant_table.c index 192db15c34..86e298dfc0 100644 --- a/xen/common/grant_table.c +++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c @@ -930,10 +930,13 @@ union maptrack_node { struct { /* Radix tree slot pointers use two of the bits. */ #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD - unsigned long : 2; + unsigned long _0 : 2; #endif unsigned long rd : BITS_PER_LONG / 2 - 1; unsigned long wr : BITS_PER_LONG / 2 - 1; +#ifndef __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD + unsigned long _0 : 2; +#endif } cnt; unsigned long raw; }; -- generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#stable-4.14
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |