[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen staging-4.15] x86/tsx: Cope with TSX deprecation on WHL-R/CFL-R
commit d5d7a8f7e6a6cc459fb3d0bad1d3fe1b05debe54 Author: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> AuthorDate: Wed Sep 16 16:15:52 2020 +0100 Commit: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> CommitDate: Tue Feb 8 18:04:52 2022 +0000 x86/tsx: Cope with TSX deprecation on WHL-R/CFL-R The February 2022 microcode is formally de-featuring TSX on the TAA-impacted client CPUs. The backup TAA mitigation (VERW regaining its flushing side effect) is being dropped, meaning that `smt=0 spec-ctrl=md-clear` no longer protects against TAA on these parts. The new functionality enumerates itself via the RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT CPUID bit (the same as June 2021), but has its control in MSR_MCU_OPT_CTRL as opposed to MSR_TSX_FORCE_ABORT. TSX now defaults to being disabled on ucode load. Furthermore, if SGX is enabled in the BIOS, TSX is locked and cannot be re-enabled. In this case, override opt_tsx to 0, so the RTM/HLE CPUID bits get hidden by default. While updating the command line documentation, take the opportunity to add a paragraph explaining what TSX being disabled actually means, and how migration compatibility works. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> (cherry picked from commit ad9f7c3b2e0df38ad6d54f4769d4dccf765fbcee) --- docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc | 25 ++++++++++--- xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c | 7 ++-- xen/arch/x86/tsx.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc index 3ece83a427..443802b3d2 100644 --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc @@ -2307,7 +2307,9 @@ Several microcode updates are relevant: Introduced MSR_TSX_CTRL on all TSX-enabled MDS_NO parts to date, CLX/WHL-R/CFL-R, with the controls becoming architectural moving forward and formally retiring HLE from the architecture. The user can disable TSX - to mitigate TAA, and elect to hide the HLE/RTM CPUID bits. + to mitigate TAA, and elect to hide the HLE/RTM CPUID bits. Also causes + VERW to once-again flush the microarchiectural buffers in case a TAA + mitigation is wanted along with TSX being enabled. * June 2021, removing the workaround for March 2019 on client CPUs and formally de-featured TSX on SKL/KBL/WHL/CFL (Note: SKX still retains the @@ -2315,19 +2317,32 @@ Several microcode updates are relevant: PCR3 works fine, and TSX is disabled by default, but the user can re-enable TSX at their own risk, accepting that the memory order erratum is unfixed. + * February 2022, removing the VERW flushing workaround from November 2019 on + client CPUs and formally de-featuring TSX on WHL-R/CFL-R (Note: CLX still + retains the VERW flushing workaround). TSX defaults to disabled, and is + locked off when SGX is enabled in the BIOS. When SGX is not enabled, TSX + can be re-enabled at the users own risk, as it reintroduces the TSX Async + Abort speculative vulnerability. + On systems with the ability to configure TSX, this boolean offers system wide control of whether TSX is enabled or disabled. +When TSX is disabled, transactions unconditionally abort. This is compatible +with the TSX spec, which requires software to have a non-transactional path as +a fallback. The RTM and HLE CPUID bits are hidden from VMs by default, but +can be re-enabled if required. This allows VMs which previously saw RTM/HLE +to be migrated in, although any TSX-enabled software will run with reduced +performance. + + * When TSX is locked off by firmware, `tsx=` is ignored and treated as + `false`. + * An explicit `tsx=` choice is honoured, even if it is `true` and would result in a vulnerable system. * When no explicit `tsx=` choice is given, parts vulnerable to TAA will be mitigated by disabling TSX, as this is the lowest overhead option. - If the use of TSX is important, the more expensive TAA mitigations can be - opted in to with `smt=0 spec-ctrl=md-clear`, at which point TSX will remain - active by default. - * When no explicit `tsx=` option is given, parts susceptible to the memory ordering errata default to `true` to enable working TSX. Alternatively, selecting `tsx=0` will disable TSX and restore PCR3 to a working state. diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c b/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c index e271f76386..3edf650f01 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c @@ -1185,11 +1185,14 @@ void __init init_speculation_mitigations(void) * the MDS mitigation of disabling HT and using VERW flushing. * * On CPUs which advertise MDS_NO, VERW has no flushing side effect until - * the TSX_CTRL microcode is loaded, despite the MD_CLEAR CPUID bit being + * the TSX_CTRL microcode (Nov 2019), despite the MD_CLEAR CPUID bit being * advertised, and there isn't a MD_CLEAR_2 flag to use... * + * Furthermore, the VERW flushing side effect is removed again on client + * parts with the Feb 2022 microcode. + * * If we're on affected hardware, able to do something about it (which - * implies that VERW now works), no explicit TSX choice and traditional + * implies that VERW might work), no explicit TSX choice and traditional * MDS mitigations (no-SMT, VERW) not obviosuly in use (someone might * plausibly value TSX higher than Hyperthreading...), disable TSX to * mitigate TAA. diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/tsx.c b/xen/arch/x86/tsx.c index c3b8a7ec00..be89741a2f 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/tsx.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/tsx.c @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ * This is arranged such that the bottom bit encodes whether TSX is actually * disabled, while identifying various explicit (>=0) and implicit (<0) * conditions. + * + * This option only has any effect on systems presenting a mechanism of + * controlling TSX behaviour, and where TSX isn't force-disabled by firmware. */ int8_t __read_mostly opt_tsx = -1; int8_t __read_mostly cpu_has_tsx_ctrl = -1; @@ -54,6 +57,66 @@ void tsx_init(void) cpu_has_tsx_ctrl = !!(caps & ARCH_CAPS_TSX_CTRL); has_rtm_always_abort = cpu_has_rtm_always_abort; + if ( cpu_has_tsx_ctrl && cpu_has_srbds_ctrl ) + { + /* + * On a TAA-vulnerable or later part with at least the May 2020 + * microcode mitigating SRBDS. + */ + uint64_t val; + + rdmsrl(MSR_MCU_OPT_CTRL, val); + + /* + * Probe for the February 2022 microcode which de-features TSX on + * TAA-vulnerable client parts - WHL-R/CFL-R. + * + * RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT (read above) enumerates the new functionality, + * but is read as zero if MCU_OPT_CTRL.RTM_ALLOW has been set + * before we run. Undo this. + */ + if ( val & MCU_OPT_CTRL_RTM_ALLOW ) + has_rtm_always_abort = true; + + if ( has_rtm_always_abort ) + { + if ( val & MCU_OPT_CTRL_RTM_LOCKED ) + { + /* + * If RTM_LOCKED is set, TSX is disabled because SGX is + * enabled, and there is nothing we can do. Override with + * tsx=0 so all other logic takes sensible actions. + */ + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "TSX locked by firmware - disabling\n"); + opt_tsx = 0; + } + else + { + /* + * Otherwise, set RTM_ALLOW. Not because we necessarily + * intend to enable RTM, but it prevents + * MSR_TSX_CTRL.RTM_DISABLE from being ignored, thus + * allowing the rest of the TSX selection logic to work as + * before. + */ + val |= MCU_OPT_CTRL_RTM_ALLOW; + } + + set_in_mcu_opt_ctrl( + MCU_OPT_CTRL_RTM_LOCKED | MCU_OPT_CTRL_RTM_ALLOW, val); + + /* + * If no explicit tsx= option is provided, pick a default. + * + * With RTM_ALWAYS_ABORT, the default ucode behaviour is to + * disable, so match that. This does not override explicit user + * choices, or implicit choices as a side effect of spec-ctrl=0. + */ + if ( opt_tsx == -1 ) + opt_tsx = 0; + } + } + if ( cpu_has_tsx_force_abort ) { /* @@ -142,6 +205,19 @@ void tsx_init(void) */ if ( cpu_has_tsx_ctrl ) { + /* + * On a TAA-vulnerable part with at least the November 2019 microcode, + * or newer part with TAA fixed. + * + * Notes: + * - With the February 2022 microcode, if SGX has caused TSX to be + * locked off, opt_tsx is overridden to 0. TSX_CTRL.RTM_DISABLE is + * an ignored bit, but we write it such that it matches the + * behaviour enforced by microcode. + * - Otherwise, if SGX isn't enabled and TSX is available to be + * controlled, we have or will set MSR_MCU_OPT_CTRL.RTM_ALLOW to + * let TSX_CTRL.RTM_DISABLE be usable. + */ uint32_t hi, lo; rdmsr(MSR_TSX_CTRL, lo, hi); diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h index e3d44813ff..e2d4ebead0 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ #define MSR_MCU_OPT_CTRL 0x00000123 #define MCU_OPT_CTRL_RNGDS_MITG_DIS (_AC(1, ULL) << 0) +#define MCU_OPT_CTRL_RTM_ALLOW (_AC(1, ULL) << 1) +#define MCU_OPT_CTRL_RTM_LOCKED (_AC(1, ULL) << 2) #define MSR_RTIT_OUTPUT_BASE 0x00000560 #define MSR_RTIT_OUTPUT_MASK 0x00000561 -- generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#staging-4.15
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |