[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen master] x86/Intel: re-indent family 6 switch() in intel_log_freq()
commit 3e548a6379bc0b1b79a20d12aeb4faed2833a4a7 Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> AuthorDate: Fri Feb 18 09:00:10 2022 +0100 Commit: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> CommitDate: Fri Feb 18 09:00:10 2022 +0100 x86/Intel: re-indent family 6 switch() in intel_log_freq() This was left at its previous indentation by e6e3cf191d37 ("x86/Intel: also display CPU freq for family 0xf") to ease review. Remove the now unnecessary level of indentation. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c index 699add6a4a..d7c6e2bd7d 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c @@ -468,35 +468,33 @@ static void intel_log_freq(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) if ( !max_ratio ) return; + switch ( c->x86_model ) { - switch ( c->x86_model ) - { - case 0x0e: /* Core */ - case 0x0f: case 0x16: case 0x17: case 0x1d: /* Core2 */ - /* - * PLATFORM_INFO, while not documented for these, appears to - * exist in at least some cases, but what it holds doesn't - * match the scheme used by newer CPUs. At a guess, the min - * and max fields look to be reversed, while the scaling - * factor is encoded in FSB_FREQ. - */ - if ( min_ratio > max_ratio ) - SWAP(min_ratio, max_ratio); - if ( rdmsr_safe(MSR_FSB_FREQ, msrval) || - (msrval &= 7) >= ARRAY_SIZE(core_factors) ) - return; - factor = core_factors[msrval]; - break; - - case 0x1a: case 0x1e: case 0x1f: case 0x2e: /* Nehalem */ - case 0x25: case 0x2c: case 0x2f: /* Westmere */ - factor = 13333; - break; - - default: - factor = 10000; - break; - } + case 0x0e: /* Core */ + case 0x0f: case 0x16: case 0x17: case 0x1d: /* Core2 */ + /* + * PLATFORM_INFO, while not documented for these, appears to exist + * in at least some cases, but what it holds doesn't match the + * scheme used by newer CPUs. At a guess, the min and max fields + * look to be reversed, while the scaling factor is encoded in + * FSB_FREQ. + */ + if ( min_ratio > max_ratio ) + SWAP(min_ratio, max_ratio); + if ( rdmsr_safe(MSR_FSB_FREQ, msrval) || + (msrval &= 7) >= ARRAY_SIZE(core_factors) ) + return; + factor = core_factors[msrval]; + break; + + case 0x1a: case 0x1e: case 0x1f: case 0x2e: /* Nehalem */ + case 0x25: case 0x2c: case 0x2f: /* Westmere */ + factor = 13333; + break; + + default: + factor = 10000; + break; } break; -- generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#master
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |