[xen master] x86/boot: Expose MSR_ARCH_CAPS data in guest max policies

[patchbot@xxxxxxx]

commit bbb289f3d5bdd3358af748d7c567343532ac45b5
Author:     Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Fri May 12 15:53:35 2023 +0100
Commit:     Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed May 24 19:04:41 2023 +0100

    x86/boot: Expose MSR_ARCH_CAPS data in guest max policies
    
    We already have common and default feature adjustment helpers.  Introduce 
one
    for max featuresets too.
    
    Offer MSR_ARCH_CAPS unconditionally in the max policy, and stop clobbering 
the
    data inherited from the Host policy.  This will be necessary to level a VM
    safely for migration.  Annotate the ARCH_CAPS CPUID bit as special.  Note:
    ARCH_CAPS is still max-only for now, so will not be inhereted by the default
    policies.
    
    With this done, the special case for dom0 can be shrunk to just resampling 
the
    Host policy (as ARCH_CAPS isn't visible by default yet).
    
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c                   | 42 ++++++++++++++++-------------
 xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c
index dfd9abd856..74266d30b5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c
@@ -408,6 +408,25 @@ static void __init calculate_host_policy(void)
     p->platform_info.cpuid_faulting = cpu_has_cpuid_faulting;
 }
 
+static void __init guest_common_max_feature_adjustments(uint32_t *fs)
+{
+    if ( boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL )
+    {
+        /*
+         * MSR_ARCH_CAPS is just feature data, and we can offer it to guests
+         * unconditionally, although limit it to Intel systems as it is highly
+         * uarch-specific.
+         *
+         * In particular, the RSBA and RRSBA bits mean "you might migrate to a
+         * system where RSB underflow uses alternative predictors (a.k.a
+         * Retpoline not safe)", so these need to be visible to a guest in all
+         * cases, even when it's only some other server in the pool which
+         * suffers the identified behaviour.
+         */
+        __set_bit(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPS, fs);
+    }
+}
+
 static void __init guest_common_default_feature_adjustments(uint32_t *fs)
 {
     /*
@@ -483,6 +502,7 @@ static void __init calculate_pv_max_policy(void)
         __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_IBRS, fs);
     }
 
+    guest_common_max_feature_adjustments(fs);
     guest_common_feature_adjustments(fs);
 
     sanitise_featureset(fs);
@@ -490,8 +510,6 @@ static void __init calculate_pv_max_policy(void)
     recalculate_xstate(p);
 
     p->extd.raw[0xa] = EMPTY_LEAF; /* No SVM for PV guests. */
-
-    p->arch_caps.raw = 0; /* Not supported yet. */
 }
 
 static void __init calculate_pv_def_policy(void)
@@ -598,6 +616,7 @@ static void __init calculate_hvm_max_policy(void)
     if ( !cpu_has_vmx )
         __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_PKS, fs);
 
+    guest_common_max_feature_adjustments(fs);
     guest_common_feature_adjustments(fs);
 
     sanitise_featureset(fs);
@@ -606,8 +625,6 @@ static void __init calculate_hvm_max_policy(void)
 
     /* It's always possible to emulate CPUID faulting for HVM guests */
     p->platform_info.cpuid_faulting = true;
-
-    p->arch_caps.raw = 0; /* Not supported yet. */
 }
 
 static void __init calculate_hvm_def_policy(void)
@@ -828,7 +845,10 @@ void __init init_dom0_cpuid_policy(struct domain *d)
      * domain policy logic gains a better understanding of MSRs.
      */
     if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && cpu_has_arch_caps )
+    {
         p->feat.arch_caps = true;
+        p->arch_caps.raw = host_cpu_policy.arch_caps.raw;
+    }
 
     /* Apply dom0-cpuid= command line settings, if provided. */
     if ( dom0_cpuid_cmdline )
@@ -858,20 +878,6 @@ void __init init_dom0_cpuid_policy(struct domain *d)
         p->platform_info.cpuid_faulting = false;
 
     recalculate_cpuid_policy(d);
-
-    if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && cpu_has_arch_caps )
-    {
-        uint64_t val;
-
-        rdmsrl(MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, val);
-
-        p->arch_caps.raw = val &
-            (ARCH_CAPS_RDCL_NO | ARCH_CAPS_IBRS_ALL | ARCH_CAPS_RSBA |
-             ARCH_CAPS_SSB_NO | ARCH_CAPS_MDS_NO | ARCH_CAPS_IF_PSCHANGE_MC_NO 
|
-             ARCH_CAPS_TAA_NO | ARCH_CAPS_SBDR_SSDP_NO | ARCH_CAPS_FBSDP_NO |
-             ARCH_CAPS_PSDP_NO | ARCH_CAPS_FB_CLEAR | ARCH_CAPS_RRSBA |
-             ARCH_CAPS_BHI_NO | ARCH_CAPS_PBRSB_NO);
-    }
 }
 
 static void __init __maybe_unused build_assertions(void)
diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h 
b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h
index 033b1a72fe..777041425e 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ XEN_CPUFEATURE(AVX512_FP16,   9*32+23) /*   AVX512 FP16 
instructions */
 XEN_CPUFEATURE(IBRSB,         9*32+26) /*A  IBRS and IBPB support (used by 
Intel) */
 XEN_CPUFEATURE(STIBP,         9*32+27) /*A  STIBP */
 XEN_CPUFEATURE(L1D_FLUSH,     9*32+28) /*S  MSR_FLUSH_CMD and L1D flush. */
-XEN_CPUFEATURE(ARCH_CAPS,     9*32+29) /*a  IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR */
+XEN_CPUFEATURE(ARCH_CAPS,     9*32+29) /*!a IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR */
 XEN_CPUFEATURE(CORE_CAPS,     9*32+30) /*   IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR */
 XEN_CPUFEATURE(SSBD,          9*32+31) /*A  MSR_SPEC_CTRL.SSBD available */
 
--
generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#master