[xen stable-4.14] x86: Rename struct cpu_policy to struct old_cpuid_policy

[patchbot@xxxxxxx]

commit edc64afe1757410c0afe71683ff23d0e0e6aed14
Author:     Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 28 20:31:33 2023 +0100
Commit:     Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Thu Aug 3 19:14:19 2023 +0100

    x86: Rename struct cpu_policy to struct old_cpuid_policy
    
    We want to merge struct cpuid_policy and struct msr_policy together, and the
    result wants to be called struct cpu_policy.
    
    The current struct cpu_policy, being a pair of pointers, isn't terribly
    useful.  Rename the type to struct old_cpu_policy, but it will disappear
    entirely once the merge is complete.
    
    No functional change.
    
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
    (cherry picked from commit c2ec94c370f211d73f336ccfbdb32499f1b05f82)
---
 tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c | 4 ++--
 xen/arch/x86/domctl.c                    | 4 ++--
 xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c                    | 4 ++--
 xen/include/asm-x86/cpuid.h              | 2 +-
 xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h     | 6 +++---
 xen/lib/x86/policy.c                     | 4 ++--
 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c 
b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
index 0fa209f1ea..d8af5581ab 100644
--- a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
+++ b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static void test_is_compatible_success(void)
     for ( size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i )
     {
         struct test *t = &tests[i];
-        struct cpu_policy sys = {
+        struct old_cpu_policy sys = {
             &t->host_cpuid,
             &t->host_msr,
         }, new = {
@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static void test_is_compatible_failure(void)
     for ( size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i )
     {
         struct test *t = &tests[i];
-        struct cpu_policy sys = {
+        struct old_cpu_policy sys = {
             &t->host_cpuid,
             &t->host_msr,
         }, new = {
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
index 6f2c69788d..20855cb40d 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
@@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ void domain_cpu_policy_changed(struct domain *d)
 static int update_domain_cpu_policy(struct domain *d,
                                     xen_domctl_cpu_policy_t *xdpc)
 {
-    struct cpu_policy new = {};
-    const struct cpu_policy *sys = is_pv_domain(d)
+    struct old_cpu_policy new = {};
+    const struct old_cpu_policy *sys = is_pv_domain(d)
         ? &system_policies[XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_pv_max]
         : &system_policies[XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_hvm_max];
     struct cpu_policy_errors err = INIT_CPU_POLICY_ERRORS;
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c
index dc105cb463..444aa82cc0 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 #include <asm/psr.h>
 #include <asm/cpuid.h>
 
-const struct cpu_policy system_policies[6] = {
+const struct old_cpu_policy system_policies[6] = {
     [ XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_policy_raw ] = {
         &raw_cpuid_policy,
         &raw_msr_policy,
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ long arch_do_sysctl(
 
     case XEN_SYSCTL_get_cpu_policy:
     {
-        const struct cpu_policy *policy;
+        const struct old_cpu_policy *policy;
 
         /* Reserved field set, or bad policy index? */
         if ( sysctl->u.cpu_policy._rsvd ||
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/cpuid.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/cpuid.h
index 9c3637549a..49b3128f06 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/cpuid.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/cpuid.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ extern struct cpuid_policy raw_cpuid_policy, 
host_cpuid_policy,
     pv_max_cpuid_policy, pv_def_cpuid_policy,
     hvm_max_cpuid_policy, hvm_def_cpuid_policy;
 
-extern const struct cpu_policy system_policies[];
+extern const struct old_cpu_policy system_policies[];
 
 /* Check that all previously present features are still available. */
 bool recheck_cpu_features(unsigned int cpu);
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h 
b/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h
index 5a2c4c7b2d..3a5300d107 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 #include <xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h>
 #include <xen/lib/x86/msr.h>
 
-struct cpu_policy
+struct old_cpu_policy
 {
     struct cpuid_policy *cpuid;
     struct msr_policy *msr;
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ struct cpu_policy_errors
  * incompatibility is detected, the optional err pointer may identify the
  * problematic leaf/subleaf and/or MSR.
  */
-int x86_cpu_policies_are_compatible(const struct cpu_policy *host,
-                                    const struct cpu_policy *guest,
+int x86_cpu_policies_are_compatible(const struct old_cpu_policy *host,
+                                    const struct old_cpu_policy *guest,
                                     struct cpu_policy_errors *err);
 
 #endif /* !XEN_LIB_X86_POLICIES_H */
diff --git a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c b/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
index 4beca8767a..cb2d3b8dfa 100644
--- a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
+++ b/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 
 #include <xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h>
 
-int x86_cpu_policies_are_compatible(const struct cpu_policy *host,
-                                    const struct cpu_policy *guest,
+int x86_cpu_policies_are_compatible(const struct old_cpu_policy *host,
+                                    const struct old_cpu_policy *guest,
                                     struct cpu_policy_errors *err)
 {
     struct cpu_policy_errors e = INIT_CPU_POLICY_ERRORS;
--
generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#stable-4.14