|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen staging] VT-d: tidy error handling of RMRR parsing
commit 426dbf404e20c8c7bb8775fcb2190e01e9a52668
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon May 6 14:51:29 2024 +0200
Commit: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon May 6 14:51:29 2024 +0200
VT-d: tidy error handling of RMRR parsing
It's acpi_parse_one_rmrr() where the allocation is coming from (by way
of invoking acpi_parse_dev_scope()), or in add_one_user_rmrr()'s case
allocation is even open-coded there, so freeing would better also happen
there. Care needs to be taken to preserve acpi_parse_one_rmrr()'s
ultimate return value.
While fiddling with callers also move scope_devices_free() to .init and
have it use XFREE() instead of open-coding it. To avoid making the
situation worse for register_one_rmrr(), mark that __init right here as
well.
In register_one_rmrr() also have the "ignore" path take the main
function return path.
Suggested-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
index 76aade816c..882340b7ee 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
@@ -82,14 +82,13 @@ static int __init acpi_register_rmrr_unit(struct
acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrr)
return 0;
}
-static void scope_devices_free(struct dmar_scope *scope)
+static void __init scope_devices_free(struct dmar_scope *scope)
{
if ( !scope )
return;
scope->devices_cnt = 0;
- xfree(scope->devices);
- scope->devices = NULL;
+ XFREE(scope->devices);
}
static void __init disable_all_dmar_units(void)
@@ -557,7 +556,7 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-static int register_one_rmrr(struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru)
+static int __init register_one_rmrr(struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru)
{
bool ignore = false;
unsigned int i = 0;
@@ -595,17 +594,13 @@ static int register_one_rmrr(struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru)
" Ignore RMRR [%"PRIx64",%"PRIx64"] as no device"
" under its scope is PCI discoverable!\n",
rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
- scope_devices_free(&rmrru->scope);
- xfree(rmrru);
- return 1;
+ ret = 1;
}
else if ( rmrru->base_address > rmrru->end_address )
{
dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
" RMRR [%"PRIx64",%"PRIx64"] is incorrect!\n",
rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
- scope_devices_free(&rmrru->scope);
- xfree(rmrru);
ret = -EFAULT;
}
else
@@ -660,21 +655,20 @@ acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
&rmrru->scope, RMRR_TYPE, rmrr->segment);
if ( !ret && (rmrru->scope.devices_cnt != 0) )
- {
ret = register_one_rmrr(rmrru);
- /*
- * register_one_rmrr() returns greater than 0 when a specified
- * PCIe device cannot be detected. To prevent VT-d from being
- * disabled in such cases, reset the return value to 0 here.
- */
- if ( ret > 0 )
- ret = 0;
- }
- else
+ if ( ret )
+ {
+ scope_devices_free(&rmrru->scope);
xfree(rmrru);
+ }
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * register_one_rmrr() returns greater than 0 when a specified PCIe
+ * device cannot be detected. To prevent VT-d from being disabled in
+ * such cases, make the return value 0 here.
+ */
+ return ret > 0 ? 0 : ret;
}
static int __init
@@ -945,9 +939,13 @@ static int __init add_one_user_rmrr(unsigned long base_pfn,
rmrr->scope.devices_cnt = dev_count;
if ( register_one_rmrr(rmrr) )
+ {
printk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX
"Could not register RMMR range "ERMRRU_FMT"\n",
ERMRRU_ARG);
+ scope_devices_free(&rmrr->scope);
+ xfree(rmrr);
+ }
return 1;
}
--
generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#staging
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |