[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen master] VT-d: tidy error handling of RMRR parsing
commit 426dbf404e20c8c7bb8775fcb2190e01e9a52668 Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> AuthorDate: Mon May 6 14:51:29 2024 +0200 Commit: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> CommitDate: Mon May 6 14:51:29 2024 +0200 VT-d: tidy error handling of RMRR parsing It's acpi_parse_one_rmrr() where the allocation is coming from (by way of invoking acpi_parse_dev_scope()), or in add_one_user_rmrr()'s case allocation is even open-coded there, so freeing would better also happen there. Care needs to be taken to preserve acpi_parse_one_rmrr()'s ultimate return value. While fiddling with callers also move scope_devices_free() to .init and have it use XFREE() instead of open-coding it. To avoid making the situation worse for register_one_rmrr(), mark that __init right here as well. In register_one_rmrr() also have the "ignore" path take the main function return path. Suggested-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c index 76aade816c..882340b7ee 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c @@ -82,14 +82,13 @@ static int __init acpi_register_rmrr_unit(struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrr) return 0; } -static void scope_devices_free(struct dmar_scope *scope) +static void __init scope_devices_free(struct dmar_scope *scope) { if ( !scope ) return; scope->devices_cnt = 0; - xfree(scope->devices); - scope->devices = NULL; + XFREE(scope->devices); } static void __init disable_all_dmar_units(void) @@ -557,7 +556,7 @@ out: return ret; } -static int register_one_rmrr(struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru) +static int __init register_one_rmrr(struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru) { bool ignore = false; unsigned int i = 0; @@ -595,17 +594,13 @@ static int register_one_rmrr(struct acpi_rmrr_unit *rmrru) " Ignore RMRR [%"PRIx64",%"PRIx64"] as no device" " under its scope is PCI discoverable!\n", rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address); - scope_devices_free(&rmrru->scope); - xfree(rmrru); - return 1; + ret = 1; } else if ( rmrru->base_address > rmrru->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX, " RMRR [%"PRIx64",%"PRIx64"] is incorrect!\n", rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address); - scope_devices_free(&rmrru->scope); - xfree(rmrru); ret = -EFAULT; } else @@ -660,21 +655,20 @@ acpi_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header) &rmrru->scope, RMRR_TYPE, rmrr->segment); if ( !ret && (rmrru->scope.devices_cnt != 0) ) - { ret = register_one_rmrr(rmrru); - /* - * register_one_rmrr() returns greater than 0 when a specified - * PCIe device cannot be detected. To prevent VT-d from being - * disabled in such cases, reset the return value to 0 here. - */ - if ( ret > 0 ) - ret = 0; - } - else + if ( ret ) + { + scope_devices_free(&rmrru->scope); xfree(rmrru); + } - return ret; + /* + * register_one_rmrr() returns greater than 0 when a specified PCIe + * device cannot be detected. To prevent VT-d from being disabled in + * such cases, make the return value 0 here. + */ + return ret > 0 ? 0 : ret; } static int __init @@ -945,9 +939,13 @@ static int __init add_one_user_rmrr(unsigned long base_pfn, rmrr->scope.devices_cnt = dev_count; if ( register_one_rmrr(rmrr) ) + { printk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX "Could not register RMMR range "ERMRRU_FMT"\n", ERMRRU_ARG); + scope_devices_free(&rmrr->scope); + xfree(rmrr); + } return 1; } -- generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#master
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |