x86emul: re-order checks in test harness On older systems printing the "n/a" messages (resulting from the compiler not being new enough to deal with some of the test code) isn't very useful: If both CPU and compiler are too old for a certain test, we can as well omit those messages, as those tests wouldn't be run even if the compiler did produce code. (This has become obvious with the 3DNow! tests, which I had to run on an older system still supporting those insns, and that system naturally also had an older compiler.) Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c @@ -3267,15 +3267,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) for ( j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(blobs); j++ ) { + if ( blobs[j].check_cpu && !blobs[j].check_cpu() ) + continue; + if ( !blobs[j].size ) { printf("%-39s n/a\n", blobs[j].name); continue; } - if ( blobs[j].check_cpu && !blobs[j].check_cpu() ) - continue; - memcpy(res, blobs[j].code, blobs[j].size); ctxt.lma = blobs[j].bitness == 64; ctxt.addr_size = ctxt.sp_size = blobs[j].bitness;