[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] First round of cleanup CONFIG_VTI patch


  • To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
  • From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:19:54 +0800
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:17:56 +0000
  • List-id: DIscussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcWlRk07hYcVCyTxSiGkFu4oUykiNAAACYlA
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] First round of cleanup CONFIG_VTI patch

You may go to
http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-ia64-unstable-Intel.hg?cmd=changese
t;node=1ec2225aa8c696ca4e96e0fc27b4eafe36a9633f to take a quick review.

Thanks,
Kevin

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tian,
>Kevin
>Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 1:16 PM
>To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] First round of cleanup CONFIG_VTI
patch
>
>Hi, Dan,
>       Following Fred's info about supporting xen0+xenU+xenVTI at
>runtime, we've checked in first round of cleanup patch into Intel
>staging tree with Rev. 5986. Could you take a look? No functional level
>change and most is code cleanup. We verified this patch not breaking
>anything and xen0+xenU still working. If close to your thought, can you
>please take a pull? ;-)
>
>Thanks,
>Kevin
>
>       Following is the description about the changeset:
>
>changeset:   5986:1ec2225aa8c696ca4e96e0fc27b4eafe36a9633f
>tag:         tip
>user:        fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>date:        Sat Aug 20 13:19:39 2005
>summary:     First step to remove CONFIG_VTI for final supporting
>xen0+xenU+xenVTI at runtime. This changeset mainly addresses common
>code
>like domain creation and rid allocation policy, including:
>
>- Boot time vti feature detection
>- Uniform arch_do_createdomain, new_thread, arch_set_infoguest, and
>construct_dom0. Now these function level CONFIG_VTIs have been removed
>with several specific lines still protected by CONFIG_VTIs. With more
>feature cleanup later, these lines will be free out grandually.
>- Use same rid allocation policy including physical emulation
>- Remove duplicated definition rr_t.
>
>Verified breaking nothing. ;-)
>
>Signed-off-by Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.