[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge


  • To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
  • From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:29:59 +0800
  • Cc: "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:27:58 +0000
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcWnjSOhSjX2nMKXQI2EGFjNgzyS+AAXrvdAAAAqXDAAAf54IAAFcXoAAATDFSAAADCbAAAOO83gAB29uYAAKFIVoAACuHFQACBS1PAAD2rcAACBlABQ
  • Thread-topic: Timer merge

Dan:
        Thanks, we will send out a patch soon for review with 1: guest
ITC (delta) /ITM keep in shared page, 2: fast hypercall for TPR,EOI,
IVR, 3: ac_timer own machine ITM, 4: short route for guest to set ITM.
        Eddie.


> 
> So Xen/x86 delivers every timer tick to every Linux domain?
> That seems like a potential performance problem!
Yes, the overhead spent on IA32 timer is much higher than IA64. 
Perhaps Linux tickless patch is a better solution.



_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.