[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-ia64-devel] Réf. : RE: How is the basic tree coming? SMP support on Itanium
Dan, I want to let you know that Bull is interested by the SMP support for Itanium platforms. We have started to work on the support of "SMP host" on Itanium VT multiprocessor systems. We will of course communicate with you (the Xen IA64 man) through this mailing list for a good synchronization with other developments, and mainly with the SMP support in the paravirtualized Linux and the support of SMP guest. Regards Jean-Paul
Sorry... 99% of the changes I've committed have been maintenance, namely getting Xen/ia64 to compile with CONFIG_SMP (which can't even be turned off on Xen/x86) and catching the code up to the latest linux release. I wasn't intending to add new functionality or impact the multi-domain effort. I did get curious to see how far the SMP boot was getting and added some printk's and missing code (that was already in Xen/x86) but gave up on that rather quickly due to needing to do other maintenance activities (2.6.13). Rather than throw away useful debugging code, I checked it in. Last, I've been cleaning up some linux files that were changed (without ifdef's) and doing some minor restructuring following Arun's removal of the mkbuildtree patch process. I still have some more 2.6.13 work, but it should be done tomorrow. If any of this maintenance interfered with the multi-domain repair, I apologize. But it seemed like it was orthogonal so a good time to do it. (And if anyone else wants to volunteer to do my boring maintenance tasks, please let me know :-) Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 6:31 PM > To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) > Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: How is the basic tree coming? > > Hi, Dan, > Per your previous mail, you said: > >>>> I would like to solicit (or maybe beg!) for your help > >>>> in bug-hunting and bug-fixing to bring xen-ia64 back > >>>> to the previous functionality (e.g. multiple domains > >>>> working with grant tables, console and blk drivers). > >>>> Some of you may have participated in implementation > >>>> and debugging of the equivalent driver code on the x86 side > >>>> and your help especially would be greatly appreciated. > >>>> I see this as a community effort... > ################################ > >>>>I do not expect to > >>>> accept new functionality patches until this is all > >>>> working again. > ############################### > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Dan > > While xen-ia64-unstable > > 15 hours ago: Baby step toward host SMP support > changeset 6453: 44316ce83277 > parent 6452: f5c4042212b0 > tag: tip > author: djm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > date: Tue Aug 30 23:51:51 2005 > files: xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/mm_contig.c > xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/smp.c > xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/smpboot.c xen/arch/ia64/vcpu.c > xen/arch/ia64/xenmisc.c xen/arch/ia64/xensetup.c > 20 hours ago: Enable CONFIG_SMP compile and link > changeset 6452: f5c4042212b0 > parent 6451: 2b95125015a5 > author: djm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > date: Tue Aug 30 18:41:54 2005 > files: xen/arch/ia64/hyperprivop.S xen/arch/ia64/irq.c > xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/irq_ia64.c xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/mm_contig.c > xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/sal.c xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/smp.c > xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/smpboot.c xen/arch/ia64/process.c > xen/arch/ia64/xensetup.c xen/arch/ia64/xentime.c ... > > Self-contradictory? Why you are debugging MP and check in code > that is to make our basic tree effort harder? > > Thanks, > Kevin > _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |