[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Continuation bug?


  • To: "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:26:03 -0700
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:23:12 +0000
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcXNbYQwgCMO+epWSYC/2cMyvuRKqgAMEfaw
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] Continuation bug?

> Le Vendredi 07 Octobre 2005 17:45, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs 
> Fort Collins) a 
> écrit :
> > > In non-VTI domains, is the hypercall_continuation field cleared ?
> > >
> > > It doesn't appear to be.  So, I need this patch.
> > >
> > > Tristan.
> >
> > This flag was used in VTI domains and I never saw the need for
> > it in non-VTI.  However, since it may be needed when running
> > multiple domains or SMP, I added in the patch.
>
> This is used in guest_console_write!

OK.  I haven't looked much at the new console code.

How's it going on the update of your SMP patch to tip?
Or if you want to submit a series of smaller patches
(that don't break uni-processor) I would be happy to
start applying them.

Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.