[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fixed some bugs to make xen0 more stable


  • To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
  • From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:40:52 +0800
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:38:18 +0000
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcXP2HRI83rf2/ODRBuc5moDrgGuwgAGusrwAAqDThAABKMkoAAL0j3A
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fixed some bugs to make xen0 more stable

We shouldn't see any Nat faults. And I didn't see Nat faults on my test.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: 2005年10月14日 3:59
>To: Xu, Anthony
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fixed some bugs to make xen0 more stable
>
>> However, my testing is not going well so far.  I had just
>> completed compiling Linux 15 times on tip (with Tristan's
>> SMP patch) without any problems, but 2 of 5 runs so far with
>> this new patch failed with segment faults.
>
>Followed by six successful builds :-%
>
>I'm going to assume this is a random occurrence of a bug
>unrelated to your patch that happens to occur only every
>few hours or so and will commit your patch.
>
>By the way, I am now seeing two NaT faults per Linux build
>that are printing "attempting to handle as privop."
>I assume your fix exposed these but the messages are
>harmless?
>
>Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.