RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] Control panelchanges for IA64/VTI

["Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>]

Thanks.  Committed to xen-ia64-unstable.  Keir
hasn't pulled into xen-unstable yet so these
patches should get pulled in too.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:41 PM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> Cc: Xen-IA64-Devel
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] 
> Control panelchanges for IA64/VTI
> 
> Thanks for trying it out and failed hunks mainly came from 
> change from u32->uint32_t. Attached new version based on 
> latest xen-ia64-unstable.hg (Rev 7499).
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) 
> [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
> >Sent: 2005å10æ25æ 1:45
> >To: Tian, Kevin
> >Cc: Xen-IA64-Devel
> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] Control
> >panelchanges for IA64/VTI
> >
> >Could you regen the vti_cp and vti_cp_common patches?
> >After the merge with xen-unstable, many hunks fail
> >to apply and I am hesitant to apply them by hand
> >as I may break them and I am not able to test them.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Dan
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> >> Of Tian, Kevin
> >> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:55 AM
> >> To: Ewan Mellor
> >> Cc: Keir Fraser; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Xen-IA64-Devel
> >> Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND]
> >> Control panelchanges for IA64/VTI
> >>
> >> Ewan, thanks for pointing out following obvious error, and I
> >> need to make patch more carefully next time. ;-)
> >>
> >> Attached the updated version. To reduce the mail size, I
> >> skipped attaching the other untouched one.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kevin
> >>
> >> >From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >Sent: 2005å10æ24æ 18:07
> >> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:19:33AM +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >The patches look okay, although the Python bits aren't
> >> particularly
> >> >> >pretty.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  -- Keir
> >> >>
> >> >> Sorry for bad Python skill. ;-) So Dan, please help check in.
> >> >
> >> >Actually executing your code would be a good start.
> >> >
> >> >--- a/tools/python/xen/xend/image.py      Sat Oct 15 03:09:43 2005
> >> >+++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/image.py      Fri Oct 21 15:35:26 2005
> >> >@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> >> >     """
> >> >
> >> >     ostype = None
> >> >+    page_kb = 4
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >     def __init__(self, vm, imageConfig, deviceConfig):
> >> >@@ -366,11 +367,13 @@
> >> >
> >> >     def getDomainMemory(self, mem):
> >> >         """@see ImageHandler.getDomainMemory"""
> >> >+ if os.uname[4] == 'ia64':
> >> >+     page_kb = 16
> >> >         # for ioreq_t and xenstore
> >> >         static_pages = 2
> >> >
> >> >This is going to fail with a TypeError exception, because
> >> os.uname is a
> >> >function.  You want os.uname()[4].
> >> >
> >> >Ewan.
> >>
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel