| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 RE: Réf. : RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Focus on non-VTI?
 
 I responded with a clarification to Fred on this 
off-list...   I am fully supportive of VTI and agree that both VTI and 
non-VTI need to be supported in all development.  I was only referring 
to a focus for the next few weeks until Xen 3.0 is released.  For 
example, if there were some major merging required for VTI that might cause 
instability, I would recommend delaying that until post-3.0.  We 
would like to have real Xen/ia64 users (not just developers) and 
many/most will not have access to VTI until Montecito is broadly 
available in OEM servers.   P.S. Jean-Paul, for some reason all of your email is cc'ed 
to xen-ia64-devel-bounces, which gets bounced to the list administrator (me).  Is 
this address in your alias for xen-ia64-devel? 
 
  
  I am supporting what Fred is 
  saying.
 Xen-VTI is important as it 
  will allow to run unmodified operating systems.
 We need to have in mind both VTI and non-VTI modes in 
  every new development.
 Jean-Paul
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
      |  | "Yang, Fred" 
        <fred.yang@xxxxxxxxx> Envoyé par : xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 26/10/2005 07:33 
 | Pour :     
           "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" 
        <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, 
        <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 cc :
 Objet :        RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] 
        Focus on non-VTI?
 |  
 Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
 > Using history as 
  a guide (not HP internal information...
 > I don't have any), it usually 
  takes a few months from
 > chip release to volume production of systems 
  based on
 > the chip.  If this is true, it is likely to be at 
  least
 > 9-12 months until most Itanium users have access to
 > VTI 
  systems.  Thus, we should probably focus on getting
 > non-VTI 
  features stable for Xen/ia64 3.0.
 Dan,
 
 VTI is live and healthy. 
   Members in this community are eager to build
 product base on Xen/VTI, 
   members want to make sure they have Xen ready
 for their products. 
   This is how the community contribute into this
 effort.
 
 We 
  should revisit Xen/ia64 current implementation to make sure the
 community 
  members can benefit from it, example as VHPT for SMP support
 and PMT for 
  grant table described in the other 
  threads.
 
 -Fred
 
 _______________________________________________
 Xen-ia64-devel 
  mailing 
  list
 Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel 
 |