RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Changes to virq/irq interface in xen-unstable

["Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>]

> I'm still stuck on the environmental issue related 
> possibly to udev or hotplug, which preventing "xm create"

Not sure if you saw this, which looks like a similar problem. 

http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-11/msg00326.html 

If it is udev-related, maybe try installing a recent version
of udev and rebooting?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:35 PM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); 
> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Changes to virq/irq interface 
> in xen-unstable
> 
> Yes, not many changes required for ia64 and some simple stubs 
> are enough. Actually that's a good way to go. However 
> currently I'm still stuck on the environmental issue related 
> possibly to udev or hotplug, which preventing "xm create" 
> executed correctly. Hope other guys interested in this issue 
> can also make a try to see how quick we can solve it easily. 
> ;-) Once it's solved, we can adapt to Keir's changes and then test.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Magenheimer,
> >Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> >Sent: 2005å11æ9æ 1:33
> >To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Changes to virq/irq interface in 
> xen-unstable
> >
> >Kevin, would you take a look at this?  The changes are
> >probably not hard, but until multiple domains is up on
> >tip, I can't test and don't want to break your work.
> >
> >Keir's changes are in xen-unstable cset 7699.
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:08 AM
> >> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: Please pull xen-ia64-unstable
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7 Nov 2005, at 18:45, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
> >> Collins) wrote:
> >>
> >> > Please pull
> >> >
> >> > http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-ia64-unstable.hg
> >> >
> >> > Merged up thru xen-unstable cset 7642.
> >>
> >> Okay, pulled through. I noticed that the event-channel
> >> interfaces still
> >> cause problems (bind_virq_to_irq in particular). I've had
> >> another go at
> >> rationalising the binding interface in light of this, so 
> you now need
> >> to implement:
> >>   bind_evtchn_to_irq --- same as it ever was
> >>   bind_virq_to_irqhandler --- replaces bind_virq_to_irq
> >>   bind_ipi_to_irqhandler --- replaces bind_ipi_to_irq
> >>   unbind_from_irqhandler --- common unbind function that replaces
> >> unbind_evtchn_from_irqhandler, unbind_virq_from_irq and
> >> unbind_ipi_from_irq
> >>
> >> This interface eliminates all evtchn-related ia64 ifdefs in
> >> common code.
> >>
> >>   -- Keir
> >>
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:48 AM
> >> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: Please pull xen-ia64-unstable
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8 Nov 2005, at 15:41, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
> >> Collins) wrote:
> >>
> >> > Great, thanks!  Are these new interfaces checked into
> >> > xen-unstable yet?  I can't find the changeset.
> >>
> >> They have to get through our automatic regression tests. 
> Assuming all
> >> goes well the changes should be pushed in less than an hour,
> >>
> >>   -- Keir
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel