RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]

["You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Fujita,

After do some investigation with Xiantao, the two failed cases are because we 
used out of date LTP. :(

The LTP which we used is okay for 2.6.12. But the latest kernel has some change 
in af_inet.c. And the error number is also changed.

I have checked the latest LTP. 20060306. Its source also has the update:
--- old/socket01.c  2006-03-13 15:44:43.000000000 +0800
+++ new/socket01.c    2006-03-13 15:44:08.000000000 +0800
@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@
}
if (TEST_RETURN != tdat[testno].retval ||
   (TEST_RETURN < 0 &&
-  TEST_ERRNO != tdat[testno].experrno)) {
-  tst_resm(TFAIL, "%s ; returned"
-  " %d (expected %d), errno %d (expected"
+ (TEST_ERRNO != tdat[testno].experrno && TEST_ERRNO != EPROTONOSUPPORT))) {    
 /* Change for defect 21065 for kernel change */
+ tst_resm(TFAIL, "%s ; returned"  /* of return code for this test but don't 
want */
+ " %d (expected %d), errno %d (expected"  /* to break on older kernels */
  " %d)", tdat[testno].desc,
  s, tdat[testno].retval,
  TEST_ERRNO, tdat[testno].experrno);


So I suggest we all upgrade the LTP to latest one 20060305 to fix for the 
2.6.16 kernel. :)

Best Regards,
Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of You,
>Yongkang
>Sent: 2006年3月13日 9:36
>To: yo.fujita; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>
>Hi Fujita,
>
>Thanks for your detail information. I also got the same result like yours. But 
>I
>made a mistake that I said it might relate to xenU unusable network. I forgot 
>it
>was running in Xen0. :) Xen0 network should be okay.
>
>There should be some problems, for my LTP result on Native (pure RHEL4u2
>with Tiger2) show these 2 cases are both pass.
>
>Best Regards,
>Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: yo.fujita [mailto:yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: 2006年3月13日 9:24
>>To: You, Yongkang; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>>
>>Hi YongKang,
>>
>>> EM～ From the log, there are only 4 failed cases. Two are known float
>>issue.
>>> The other 2 names are related to socket, it may related no network in
>>XenU.
>>I think so.
>>
>>This is detailed result of socket01.
>>socket01    1  PASS  :  invalid domain successful
>>socket01    2  PASS  :  invalid type successful
>>socket01    3  PASS  :  UNIX domain dgram successful
>>socket01    4  FAIL  :  raw open as non-root ; returned -1 (expected -1),
>>errno 93 (expected 94)
>>socket01    5  PASS  :  UDP socket successful
>>socket01    6  FAIL  :  UDP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
>>(expected 94)
>>socket01    7  FAIL  :  TCP dgram ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
>>(expected 94)
>>socket01    8  PASS  :  TCP socket successful
>>socket01    9  FAIL  :  ICMP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
>>(expected 94)
>>
>>Similarly, it's socketpair01.
>>socketpair01    1  PASS  :  invalid domain successful
>>socketpair01    2  PASS  :  invalid type successful
>>socketpair01    3  PASS  :  UNIX domain dgram successful
>>socketpair01    4  FAIL  :  raw open as non-root ; returned -1 (expected
>>-1), errno 93 (expected 94)
>>socketpair01    5  PASS  :  bad pointer successful
>>socketpair01    6  PASS  :  bad pointer successful
>>socketpair01    7  PASS  :  UDP socket successful
>>socketpair01    8  FAIL  :  TCP dgram ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
>>(expected 94)
>>socketpair01    9  PASS  :  TCP socket successful
>>socketpair01   10  FAIL  :  ICMP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno
>>93 (expected 94)
>>
>>Does your result match to this?
>>It might be due to the environment if differing.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Fujita
>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of nakato
>>> >Sent: 2006年3月10日 19:51
>>> >To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>>> >
>>> >Hi.
>>> >I'm Watanabe, co-worker of Fujita.
>>> >He's going out now for his unavoidable reason,
>>> >so I'll send the report instead today.
>>> >
>>> >TEST RESULT
>>> >      5/816 FAIL (Please see the attached files)
>>> >
>>> >Thanks.
>>> >Watanabe Takehiko
>>> >
>>> >> ----------------------------------------------------
>>> >> Hi YongKang,
>>> >>
>>> >> No, I doesn't try LTP on dom0 yet.
>>> >> I will execute it now.
>>> >> I will inform the result later.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Fujita
>>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>>> >> > From: You, Yongkang [mailto:yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx]
>>> >> > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:06 PM
>>> >> > To: yo.fujita; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi Fujita,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Did you try to run LTP and get the results in xen0 environment?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Best Regards,
>>> >> > Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>>> >> >
>>> >> > >-----Original Message-----
>>> >> > >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> > >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>> >> yo.fujita
>>> >> > >Sent: 2006年3月10日 14:32
>>> >> > >To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> > >Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >Hi, all
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >I will inform this week's benchmark result.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >The tool used now is as follows.
>>> >> > > - unixbench4.1.0
>>> >> > > - bonnie++-1.03
>>> >> > > - ltp-full-20051205
>>> >> > > - iozone3_191
>>> >> > > - lmbench-3.0-a5
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >TEST ENVIRONMENT
>>> >> > >    Machine          : Tiger4
>>> >> > >    KERN             : 2.6.16-rc5-xenU
>>> >> > >    changeset        : 9157:a693ccb4d581
>>> >> > >    Dom0 OS          : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP)
>>> >> > >    DomU OS          : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP)
>>> >> > >    No. of DomU's    : 1
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >SUMMARY:
>>> >> > >     - DomU came to do boot successfully!
>>> >> > >issues:
>>> >> > >     -
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >TEST RESULT
>>> >> > >    unixbench4.1.0    : PASS
>>> >> > >    bonnie++-1.03　   : PASS
>>> >> > >    ltp-full-20051205 : 51/816 FAIL (Please see the attached files)
>>> >> > >    iozone3_191       : PASS
>>> >> > >    lmbench-3.0-a5    : PASS
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >Thanks and best regards,
>>> >> > >Fujita and Fujitsu members
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>>> >> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel